Jesus Christ

Zemuppet wrote: »

i have my own theory on his so called crucifixion.

Jesus died den came back as a zombie...the 1st zombie. den to explain how the cave he was placed was opened, its very simple. Grave robbers moved the stone in front of the cave, only to find a very dead and very hungry Jesus. He ate dem, leaving nothing behind.

There the crucifixion story told in a more believable way

Dudess wrote: »

The original hippie, whom, ironically, far-right christian zealots would ****ing detest.

Flecktarn wrote: »

Very true, he would have looked something like this:
http://www.awitness.org/eden2004/jesus.jpg

Beruthiel wrote: »

He probably did exist and was one of the best politicians ever to hit the streets back in the year 0AD.
The best damn democrat to run against the Roman conservatives if you will.
Obviously, his PR company did one hell of a job when selling their product.
Not surprisingly though, like all advertising agencies, they exaggerated a 'little' when promoting what Jebus could deliver.

owenc wrote: »

How do you know what colour his friggen skin is.

Biggins wrote: »

We don't know what he was but we do know what he wasn't by process of elimination, time-line and geographical locational birthplace.
As such we can surmise more accurately what colour he was given his regional caucasian.
The vast majority of historians and scientists stick to the basic tenement that he was a Galilean Jew (historical background on this alone is found in the bible in many books) and thus would have features which resemble modern-day persons of Semitic descent. This would have meant that his skin colour alone portrayed by western and most modern civilisations would be totally inaccurate via their idolised pictures, statues, glass stained windows and even mass cards, etc.

The Middle East was crossing point of cultures and races which leads to further attenuation that Jesus more so should have been African or Arabian, even partly mixed, if not more so. The Near East was the primary means of access for traders and travelers seeking to access Africa via the adjoining Levant. Hence, the bordering Roman provinces of Judea and Galilee (Jesus' home region) multiple waves of immigrants passing through those primarily Semitic lands. As such, it is conceivable that Jesus' lineage could have borne traces of Arab, Aramean, Berber, Roman, Greek, Black African, Persian or Indian ancestry.

Had he been any one of these or a mixture, yet again there is no way he could have been the current image that is propagandised by current white only thinkers. His facial bone structure alone would have been indicative of the Levant era, Judea and Galilee region alone. Further taking into account the geographic region, the religious persuasion of his family and their faith's tendency to stay within their own kind, and their ability or lack there of to travel great distances due to known family job description and monetary concerns, that also absolutely limits the rare likelihood of further western caucasian DNA and pale/white/skin tones being introduced.

Again, we don't know exactly what he was but we can be nearly sure given the above reasons and many more, what he wasn't - and thats the image you probably see all around you in western civilisation.