Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

If Mohammed had sex with his 9 year old wife does that make him a pedophile?

2456713

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,620 ✭✭✭sligopark


    Hank_Jones wrote: »
    +1. I've read a few books on the subject and the guy was quite real.

    In the same sort of vain as Jesus really, except not as many magic tricks.

    nor are there records of Jesus shagging children, forcing women into subserviance or giving the ok for male rape

    muslims what a f_cking bunch

    mohammed the paedophile - sort of puts Islam into a different perspective for me


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 87 ✭✭Strange Loop


    Wibbs wrote: »
    Bukhari would get short shrift today in the west(and among most Muslims)

    As would his evidence that Mohammad was a paedophile in a modern-day Western court of law.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 113 ✭✭gu10


    Its paedophile, not pedophile. with a distinct letter 'a' after the initial p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,620 ✭✭✭sligopark


    gu10 wrote: »
    Its paedophile, not pedophile. with a distinct letter 'a' after the initial p

    whoever it is you are giving out to might be canadian ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,227 ✭✭✭The Highwayman


    The claim that she was 9 when the marriage was consumated came from a book written some 250 years after the fact, and all subsequent claims came from this.

    Modern historians using a method of aging people according to other events that occured around the same time have determined she was 10 years older, aged 19, when she and Mohammed had sex.

    So, the fact is there are no facts. Do you believe the guy 250 years after the marriage or do you believe the modern-day historians? (or will you take the agnostic position)

    I suspect peoples personal feelings towards Muslims (or child brides) will help determine which 'fact' they choose to believe.

    He must have been a magic man because he died when she was 18


    Volume 7, Book 62, Number 88:
    Narrated 'Ursa:

    The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with 'Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death).


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16 jibblybitsy


    what a bunch or fetards you cant have sex with a 9 year old!!! am i the only one who has spotted this super duper facto mackto detracto. like a track cosmo retro intro outro i listened to there. ok. thankwank


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,086 ✭✭✭Nijmegen


    The issue is not what Mohammad did, it's what the religion believes he did.

    As we see in Yemen, they think marrying and having sex with 9 year olds is grand.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,887 ✭✭✭JuliusCaesar


    Richard II of England was joined in marriage to young Isabel of France, who had been 7 years old when their engagement was announced the previous year in Paris. Not only was there no uproar; there was considerable happiness expressed over the assumed probability that this marriage would end the Hundred Years War then in one of its periodic states of truce between the two kingdoms. Peace was to be ensured by joining together this man and this little girl in marriage.
    Source


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,086 ✭✭✭Nijmegen



    And nowadays we have Brits marrying 7 year olds?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 87 ✭✭Strange Loop


    He must have been a magic man because he died when she was 18


    Volume 7, Book 62, Number 88:
    Narrated 'Ursa:

    The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with 'Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death).
    Evidence that Aisha was older than nine

    Muqtedar Khan argues that there are different reports within the Islamic sources about the age of Aisha at the time of marriage,[7] Maulana Muhammad Ali makes a detailed historical argument that Aisha was betrothed at nine or ten, but was fifteen at marriage,[6] while Moiz Amjad agrees with Hafiz Niaz Ahmad and Habib ur Rahman Kandhalwi and argues on the authenticity of hadith regarding Aisha's age and shows that it contradicts with other Islamic literature and puts her age at marriage as late as twenty.[3][4][5] Following arguments are given to support this conclusion.

    URL="http://www.aimislam.com/w/index.php?title=Aisha%27s_age_at_marriage&action=edit§ion=8"][COLOR=#000000]edit[/COLOR][/URL Authenticity of hadith regarding Aisha's age
    • Reports regarding Aisha's age were recorded during the Abbasid caliphate when Aisha's youth might be deliberately emphasized by scholars to reject Shi'a claims for the descendants of Ali ibn Abi Talib.[20]
    • Most of the narratives regarding Aisha's age are reported only by Hisham ibn Urwa reporting on the authority of his father. All the narratives of this event have been reported through narrators from Iraq, where Hisham ibn Urwa is reported to have shifted after living in Madinah for seventy-one years. It is reported in one of the most well known books on the life and reliability of the narrators of the traditions ascribed to Muhammad that Yaqub ibn Shaibah said, "narratives reported by Hisham are reliable except those that are reported through the people of Iraq". It further states that Malik ibn Anas objected on those narratives of Hisham, which were reported through people of Iraq.[21] Another book on the narrators of the traditions of Muhammad reports that when he was old, Hisham's memory suffered quite badly.[22]
    • Muhammad is attributed to say, "A woman must be consulted and get her permission to make the marriage valid".[23] According to another report, Aisha at the age of nine was rather more interested to play with toy-horses than to take up the responsible task of a wife.[24] The permission of an immature girl cannot be a valid authorization for marriage.
    • Comparison of hadith of Aisha's age with hadith of Laylat al-Qadr, in which 1 was used for 21, 3 for 23, 5 for 25 and so on, suggest that maybe Aisha's reports were transmitted literally and 16 became 6 and 19 became 9, as it is a way of talking in Arabic language when base is already known.[4]
    URL="http://www.aimislam.com/w/index.php?title=Aisha%27s_age_at_marriage&action=edit§ion=9"][COLOR=#000000]edit[/COLOR][/URL Evidences from Islamic literature
    • According to hadith in Bukhari and Muslim, Aisha is said to have joined Muhammad on the raid that culminated in the Battle of Badr, in 624 CE[25] and then in 625 CE in the Battle of Uhud.[26] As no one below the age of fifteen was allowed to accompany raiding parties,[27][28] Aisha should have been at least fifteen in 624 CE and thus at least thirteen when she was married following the Hijra in 622 CE.
    • Ibn Hisham's recension of Ibn Ishaq's Sirat Rashul Allah, the earliest surviving biography of Muhammad, records Aisha as having converted to Islam before Umar ibn al-Khattab, during the first few years of Islam around 610 CE. In order to accept Islam she must have been walking and talking, hence at least three years of age, which would make her at least fifteen in 622 CE.[29]
    • Tabari reports that Abu Bakr wished to spare Aisha the discomforts of a journey to Ethiopia soon after 615 CE, and tried to bring forward her marriage to Mut`im ibn `Uday's son. Mut`am refused because Abu Bakr had converted to Islam, but if Aisha was already of marriageable age in 615 CE, she must have been older than nine in 622 CE.[30][5](p.91)
    • Tabari also reports that Abu Bakr's four children were all born during the Jahiliyyah,[31] the pre Islamic period, which is said to have ended in 610 CE, making Aisha at least twelve in 622 CE when Aisha started living with Muhammad.
    • Aisha is reported to have said that at the time Surah Al-Qamar, the 54th chapter of the Qur'an , was revealed, "I was a young girl".[32] The 54th Surah of the Qur'an was revealed nine years before Hijrah.[33] According to this tradition, Aisha had not only been born before the revelation of the referred Surah, but was actually a young girl, not even only an infant at that time. So if this age is assumed to be 7 to 14 years then her age at the time of marriage would be 16 to 23.
    • According to almost all the historians, Asma bint Abu Bakr, the elder sister of Aisha, was ten years older than Aisha.[34][35] Asma is reported to die in the 73 AH, when she was 100 years old.[36][37] Now, obviously if Asma was 100 years old in the 73 AH, she should have been 27 or 28 years old at the time of Migration to Medina (1 AH). If Asma was 27 or 28 years old at that time, Aisha should have been 17 or 18 years old at the same time. Thus, Aisha - if she got married in 1 AH or 2 AH - was between 18 to 20 years old at the time of her marriage.


    ...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,217 ✭✭✭✭biko


    If Mohammed had sex with his 9 year old wife does that make him a pedophile?
    It would if it happened under current legislation. Also Socrates, Plato and Aristotle would face some jail time because in those days older men often had young boy lovers. That's how they rolled like.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,227 ✭✭✭The Highwayman


    ...

    2. Sahih Muslim 817-875 A.D. 261 A.H.

    This is generally considered the second most reliable collection of hadiths.

    2a. "(3309) ‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) married me when I was six years old, and I was admitted to his house at the age of nine. She further said: We went to Medina and I had an attack of fever for a month, and my hair had come down to the earlobes. Umm Ruman (my mother) came to me and I was at that time on a swing along with my playmates. She called me loudly and I went to her and I did not know what she had wanted of me. She took hold of my hand and took me to the door, and I was saying: Ha, ha (as if I was gasping), until the agitation of my heart was over. She took me to a house, where had gathered the women of the Ansar. They all blessed me and wished me good luck and said: May you have shared in good. She (my mother) entrusted me to them. They washed my head and embellished me and nothing frightened me. Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) came there in the morning, and I was entrusted to him." Sahih Muslim vol.2 book 8 ch.548 no.3309 p.715-716

    2b. "(3310) ‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) married me when I was six years old, and I was admitted to his house when I was nine years old."

    (3311) ‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) married here when she was seven years old, and she was taken to his house as a bride when she was nine, and her dolls were with her: and when he (the Holy Prophet) died she was eighteen years old." Sahih Muslim vol.2 book 8 ch.548 no.3310,3311 p.716.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 87 ✭✭Strange Loop


    2. Sahih Muslim 817-875 A.D. 261 A.H.

    This is generally considered the second most reliable collection of hadiths.

    2a. "(3309) ‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) married me when I was six years old, and I was admitted to his house at the age of nine. She further said: We went to Medina and I had an attack of fever for a month, and my hair had come down to the earlobes. Umm Ruman (my mother) came to me and I was at that time on a swing along with my playmates. She called me loudly and I went to her and I did not know what she had wanted of me. She took hold of my hand and took me to the door, and I was saying: Ha, ha (as if I was gasping), until the agitation of my heart was over. She took me to a house, where had gathered the women of the Ansar. They all blessed me and wished me good luck and said: May you have shared in good. She (my mother) entrusted me to them. They washed my head and embellished me and nothing frightened me. Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) came there in the morning, and I was entrusted to him." Sahih Muslim vol.2 book 8 ch.548 no.3309 p.715-716

    2b. "(3310) ‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported: Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) married me when I was six years old, and I was admitted to his house when I was nine years old."

    (3311) ‘A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reported that Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) married here when she was seven years old, and she was taken to his house as a bride when she was nine, and her dolls were with her: and when he (the Holy Prophet) died she was eighteen years old." Sahih Muslim vol.2 book 8 ch.548 no.3310,3311 p.716.

    None of the Hadith's were written until well over 200 years after Mohamads death.

    The other hadiths took their evidence from Bukhari's Hadith whose sole source for that claim was from a single source, one guy, who had the story passed down by mouth through his family.

    That's all the evidence there is. The other hadith got it from there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,013 ✭✭✭✭Cuddlesworth


    Nijmegen wrote: »
    The issue is not what Mohammad did, it's what the religion believes he did.

    As we see in Yemen, they think marrying and having sex with 9 year olds is grand.

    I would love to see evidence of another culture of that time who spoke out against the trafficking of young women/girls. We accept its wrong as a western society now, doesn't mean it was wrong then for the people living in those times.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,485 ✭✭✭Denerick


    picture.php?albumid=1349&pictureid=12492

    I can't find Mohammad anywhere in this picture...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,227 ✭✭✭The Highwayman


    None of the Hadith's were written until well over 200 years after Mohamads death.

    The other hadiths took their evidence from Bukhari's Hadith whose sole source for that claim was from a single source, one guy, who had the story passed down by mouth through his family.

    That's all the evidence there is. The other hadith got it from there.

    The overwhelming majority of Muslims consider hadith to be essential supplements to and clarifications of the Qur'an

    June 27, 2008
    Age, or lack thereof, is no hindrance to marriage under Islam, according to Ahmad Al-Mu'bi, an officiant for marriages from Saudi Arabia who says sex at 9 is fine.

    He confirmed, "The Prophet Muhammad is the model we follow. He took 'Aisha to be his wife when she was 6, but he had sex with her only when she was 9."

    I think this man would be a better scholar of Islam than me and maybe you?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 87 ✭✭Strange Loop


    The overwhelming majority of Muslims consider hadith to be essential supplements to and clarifications of the Qur'an

    June 27, 2008
    Age, or lack thereof, is no hindrance to marriage under Islam, according to Ahmad Al-Mu'bi, an officiant for marriages from Saudi Arabia who says sex at 9 is fine.

    He confirmed, "The Prophet Muhammad is the model we follow. He took 'Aisha to be his wife when she was 6, but he had sex with her only when she was 9."
    I think this man would be a better scholar of Islam than me and maybe you?

    You asked if he was a paedophile.

    You've presented evidence for the prosecution. I've presented evidence for the defence.

    I don't think evidence compiled 200 years after the fact, from a non-written source, would be admissible in a Western court, less so the word of a single imam/scholar from June 27, 2008.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,322 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Hank_Jones wrote: »
    +1. I've read a few books on the subject and the guy was quite real.

    In the same sort of vain as Jesus really, except not as many magic tricks.
    I dunno how you read a few books on the subject and came to that conclusion. Actually TBH I do as too often his historicity is taken as read. Objectively it's anything but. There are no Non Muslim sources for him or his life. None at all. Even those sources are not until 130 years after the date given as his death. Around the time some external sources come to light. They're not that helpful in pinning down the reality of him as they either make no mention of a religious mission and refer to him as a general in a localised Arab war or get his message wrong.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Muhammad#Sources_for_the_historical_Muhammad

    The historical record of Jesus, while still weak in todays terms is far better. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus It was written earlier and by people who knew him in life or knew people who did. External sources are thin enough in number but again far higher than with Muhammad.


    Nijmegen wrote: »
    The issue is not what Mohammad did, it's what the religion believes he did.

    As we see in Yemen, they think marrying and having sex with 9 year olds is grand.
    Exactly. The original hadith texts would not have survived if they considered it wrong for him to act like this. Clearly the guy who came up with this and more importantly his audience and the scribes felt that this was perfectly fine an act to associate with the Prophet. Its only in subsequent years where the scholars have started to look of an "out" to bring it into more enlightened times.
    Yep like I said we were at this in Europe(and elsewhere). The main difference being that none of the religious faith founders did the same. Thus it's a lot easier to call it a morally dodgy practice and change it. If Jesus had married a 9 year old we might have very different laws and attitudes still.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,322 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    I don't think evidence compiled 200 years after the fact, from a non-written source, would be admissible in a Western court, less so the word of a single imam/scholar from June 27, 2008.
    I would agree, though that also means that much of what Muslims(and other faiths) believe is equally inadmissable. It's all up for grabs. Like I said the historical Muhammad would also go by the wayside.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,887 ✭✭✭JuliusCaesar


    Wibbs wrote: »
    Yep like I said we were at this in Europe(and elsewhere). The main difference being that none of the religious faith founders did the same. Thus it's a lot easier to call it a morally dodgy practice and change it. If Jesus had married a 9 year old we might have very different laws and attitudes still.
    Mary was about 14 or 15 and Joseph was about 30 years olders than her.
    This age difference should not be taken as a norm for the faithful, but as a special situation. Joseph needed to be much older in order to have a man with much wisdom and experience to care for and protect the Christ-child and His Mother.

    From Catholic Answers All religions will justify themselves, even against common sense, or modern sensibilities. (Yes, yes, I know the self-justifying delusions start with the existance of a god.)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 87 ✭✭Strange Loop


    Wibbs wrote: »
    I would agree, though that also means that much of what Muslims(and other faiths) believe is equally inadmissable. It's all up for grabs. Like I said the historical Muhammad would also go by the wayside.

    No argument there, especially given the contradictory evidence in other faiths, like the existence of 80 or so Gospels containing varying stories relating to the life of Jesus, for example.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,070 ✭✭✭Placebo


    back in the day if the priest touched a 9 year old boy,..... oh wait.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,061 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    You asked if he was a paedophile.

    You've presented evidence for the prosecution. I've presented evidence for the defence.

    I don't think evidence compiled 200 years after the fact, from a non-written source, would be admissible in a Western court, less so the word of a single imam/scholar from June 27, 2008.
    Yet it's still permissable for men to have sex with 9 year olds in some Muslim countries.
    Perhaps your time would be better spent tying to convince those people, rather than us.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,941 ✭✭✭caseyann


    Yes he would have been,But there was no real rules for women then.No it cant but men did what they wanted then.And some still do.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 87 ✭✭Strange Loop


    Terry wrote: »
    Yet it's still permissable for men to have sex with 9 year olds in some Muslim countries.
    Perhaps your time would be better spent tying to convince those people, rather than us.

    Convince those people of what?

    Are you really suggesting I travel to Yemen to convince the men there to change their customs or is it just your way of asking the lone detractor to fuck off out of the thread?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,227 ✭✭✭The Highwayman


    You asked if he was a paedophile.

    You've presented evidence for the prosecution. I've presented evidence for the defence.

    I don't think evidence compiled 200 years after the fact, from a non-written source, would be admissible in a Western court, less so the word of a single imam/scholar from June 27, 2008.

    I was not aware we were in a court!

    Are you suggesting ANYTHING from a book a thousand years or more old should be taken with anything but a pinch of salt? Because people of the Islamic faith put a whole lot of credence in the old Quran.

    But if we were in court I'd be more happy to be in a western court than a court that came under Sharia law. A court that can sentence a teenage rape victim to death by stoning for getting pregnant and then pardon the rapist. FFS

    Your 'defence' is the usual line trotted out by supporters of Islam over this point, when it suits you you will reference all the hadiths you can but when its used to show what Islam really is then 'oh its vague blah blah blah'

    Islams attitude to girls and women is backward. It starts with your prophet and runs down hill from there.

    The Quran in Sura 4:24 says:

    And forbidden to you are wedded wives of other people except those who have fallen in your hands (as prisoners of war).
    Thus, women captives are sometimes forced to marry their Muslim masters, regardless of the marital status of the women. That is, the masters are allowed to have sex with the enslaved human property(rape)

    You can try and defend your prophet muhammad all you want in this fourm but hey when you get to install sharia law then all us non believers will convert or die. That is how it works is it not?

    ""O believers, do not take the Jews and the Christians as your friends and protectors, they are friends of each other. And whoever makes them a friend then he is from amongst them. Verily God does not guide the unjust people. And you will see that those (Muslims) in whose hearts is a disease run towards them saying 'We fear that a calamity may befall us.' So God will soon bring victory or a decision from Him, causing them regret on account of the thoughts they harbored in their hearts." (Quran 5:51-52)"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,219 ✭✭✭PK2008


    I was considering converting to Islam before I read this thread


    Phew, thank god for atheists


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 87 ✭✭Strange Loop


    I was not aware we were in a court!
    Correct, we're not.
    Are you suggesting ANYTHING from a book a thousand years or more old should be taken with anything but a pinch of salt? Because people of the Islamic faith put a whole lot of credence in the old Quran.
    Yes, anything written in books of any age should be taken with a pinch of salt.
    But if we were in court I'd be more happy to be in a western court than a court that came under Sharia law. A court that can sentence a teenage rape victim to death by stoning for getting pregnant and then pardon the rapist. FFS
    Good for you. How does it relate to your original question?
    Your 'defence' is the usual line trotted out by supporters of Islam over this point, when it suits you you will reference all the hadiths you can but when its used to show what Islam really is then 'oh its vague blah blah blah'
    Naturally it will be 'trotted out' if that is the available evidence.
    Islams attitude to girls and women is backward. It starts with your prophet and runs down hill from there.
    My prophet?
    The Quran in Sura 4:24 says:

    And forbidden to you are wedded wives of other people except those who have fallen in your hands (as prisoners of war).
    Thus, women captives are sometimes forced to marry their Muslim masters, regardless of the marital status of the women. That is, the masters are allowed to have sex with the enslaved human property(rape)

    You can try and defend your prophet muhammad all you want in this fourm but hey when you get to install sharia law then all us non believers will convert or die. That is how it works is it not?

    ""O believers, do not take the Jews and the Christians as your friends and protectors, they are friends of each other. And whoever makes them a friend then he is from amongst them. Verily God does not guide the unjust people. And you will see that those (Muslims) in whose hearts is a disease run towards them saying 'We fear that a calamity may befall us.' So God will soon bring victory or a decision from Him, causing them regret on account of the thoughts they harbored in their hearts." (Quran 5:51-52)"
    Again what has this to do with your original question?


    You asked a simple question in the OP, was Mohammed a paedophile?

    I presented evidence to the contrary. I said the evidence was contradictory but didn't draw any conclusions myself. I remain agnostic as to Mohammads supposed paedophilia.

    I did say people will probably consider the evidence according to their individual agendas and prejudices.
    You seem happy to accept the word of a single source, from 200 years after the fact, but not the evidence of modern historians, evidence which seems, to me, to be on a par with your own (quality-wise). Why not?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,410 ✭✭✭old_aussie


    A timeline of the life of mohammad and the beginning of islam

    mohammad says "do as I say, not as I do"

    The truth seems to be in the article....

    http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages/History.htm


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 87 ✭✭Strange Loop


    old_aussie wrote: »
    A timeline of the life of mohammad and the beginning of islam

    mohammad says "do as I say, not as I do"

    The truth seems to be in the article....

    http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages/History.htm

    Mmm. All the usual anti-muslim points included.

    Read Christian scholar Karen Armstrong's history of Mohammad, 'Prophet of our time', for a different history (including the assertion that Aisha was around 18 at the time of her marriage).

    Again, choose which history you choose to believe according to your prejudices.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement