Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Third-level fees have to come back

13567

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 19 gerardo1982


    Why would little Johnny want to pay €40,000 for his education and then join the dole queues. The government needs to make sure that highly paid jobs are available for graduates, then they can bring the fees back.


  • Registered Users Posts: 74 ✭✭ndubz


    I know :p But I'm 30 and I'm also on back to education, and I went back to college because I was unemployed for a year and half and decided to change industry (as was the case when I went back to college the second time. That time I paid for myself though). I have no guilt about taking up a space in my college. 1/3 of the people on the course aren't cut out for it. They clearly thought "oh lets just do a security course". But the course includes legal studies and business admin, amongst other subjects.

    A security course ? You must be talking about fas. I've never heard of a degree in security, but again I would have no interest as such. Well the only thing I can say to you is fair play to you. At least you are of the minority at your age who are there to learn, however, when graduated, a company will hire a 24 year old over a 50 year old on the same course. That was my point. Some people are passed the age of employability.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,639 ✭✭✭PeakOutput


    ndubz wrote: »
    Everyone may not want the same things. But everyone is equal. You really do belong in the US, where they don't treat everyone as equal. The european union has done wonders for this country and if were not for them, we would still be a backward catholic island were people were not treated as equals.

    Equality is the way forward.

    sorry i should have been clearer.as far as age, race, sex, religon, etc goes everyone is and should be equal

    however

    academically everyone is not equal and academically everyone does not belong in university

    everyone should have the opportunity to go to university if they are good enough and if they want to this is were grants / scholarships / loans comes in

    with the better off paying fees it opens more opportunity for the less advantaged to earn grants and scholarships so they can attend the current grant system is a joke(im a perfect example worked and supported myself for 3 years before going to university but because i hadnt turned 22 yet i wasnt entitled to any assistance as they still took my parents income into account)


    everyone should have the chance

    absolutely and in the system i suggest they still would :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,854 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    Sulmac wrote: »
    For those wondering about the actual cost of a year in third level in Ireland (taken from that FG document I posted earlier):

    Estimated Undergraduate Unit Costs Per Annum for Universities 2008/2009 (Source: HEA)
    Arts €9,446
    Business €8,688
    Science €13,615
    Engineering €14,247
    Medicine €12,675
    Dentistry €38,621
    Veterinary €28,844
    Part-time Arts €5,717
    Part-time Science €7,344
    Nursing €7,451

    It also says the student registration fee raises around €173 million per year.

    The vets look like they get a better education then the doctors, Rex and Flopsy must be thrilled :pac:

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,848 ✭✭✭?Cee?view


    taconnol wrote: »
    Ok, where are they?

    A lot of the services you mention also serve post-graduate and research services. I'm talking about undergraduate.

    Estimated Undergraduate Unit Costs Per Annum for Universities 2008/2009

    (Source: HEA)

    Arts €9,446
    Business €8,688
    Science €13,615
    Engineering €14,247
    Medicine €12,675
    Dentistry €38,621
    Veterinary €28,844
    Part-time Arts €5,717
    Part-time Science €7,344
    Nursing €7,451


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,366 ✭✭✭ninty9er


    plus the €6,000 the government pays per student

    I've just recovered from a fit of hysterical laughing. Do you honestly believe the State pays the prescribed fee?? There would be absolutely no funding problems if that were the case.

    In UL that would mean an almost doubling of the current core grant.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,639 ✭✭✭PeakOutput


    ndubz wrote: »
    Free education is the only way forward for an equal fair society

    no its not simply stating something does not make it true

    there are other ways to provide better quality education to everyone


  • Registered Users Posts: 74 ✭✭ndubz


    PeakOutput wrote: »
    sorry i should have been clearer.as far as age, race, sex, religon, etc goes everyone is and should be equal

    however

    academically everyone is not equal and academically everyone does not belong in university

    everyone should have the opportunity to go to university if they are good enough and if they want to this is were grants / scholarships / loans comes in

    with the better off paying fees it opens more opportunity for the less advantaged to earn grants and scholarships so they can attend the current grant system is a joke(im a perfect example worked and supported myself for 3 years before going to university but because i hadnt turned 22 yet i wasnt entitled to any assistance as they still took my parents income into account)





    absolutely and in the system i suggest they still would :p

    Yeah that is a joke man. I can understand where your coming from. That annoys me that someone in my college is getting a 6000 a year grant plus back to education - Total piss take. Just because s/he is over 23. Joke.!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,848 ✭✭✭?Cee?view


    taconnol wrote: »
    Ok, where are they?

    A lot of the services you mention also serve post-graduate and research services. I'm talking about undergraduate.

    One of the central problems in Irish 3rd level is that it is in no way self financing whereas 4th level can tend in many disciplines to benefit from external funding which can be funded by industry through fellowships etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 479 ✭✭Furious-Dave


    ndubz wrote: »
    A security course ? You must be talking about fas. I've never heard of a degree in security, but again I would have no interest as such. Well the only thing I can say to you is fair play to you. At least you are of the minority at your age who are there to learn, however, when graduated, a company will hire a 24 year old over a 50 year old on the same course. That was my point. Some people are passed the age of employability.

    Nope not Fás. It's actually a level 6 course (basic degree being level 7) in security business management. Not a Uni nor an IT though.
    Lol, I'm aware of the point you were making, I was just taking the piss :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 74 ✭✭ndubz


    Nope not Fás. It's actually a level 6 course (basic degree being level 7) in security business management. Not a Uni nor an IT though.
    Lol, I'm aware of the point you were making, I was just taking the piss :D

    Oh well level 6 isnt a walk in the park. So i understand where you are coming home - Well fair play for taking the piss, lightin up the humour in here with all the FG supporter's. ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 479 ✭✭Furious-Dave


    ndubz wrote: »
    lightin up the humour in here with all the FG supporter's. ;)

    What's that supposed to mean :mad: :p


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,892 ✭✭✭ChocolateSauce


    Sulmac wrote: »
    For those wondering about the actual cost of a year in third level in Ireland (taken from that FG document I posted earlier):

    Estimated Undergraduate Unit Costs Per Annum for Universities 2008/2009 (Source: HEA)
    Arts €9,446
    Business €8,688
    Science €13,615
    Engineering €14,247
    Medicine €12,675
    Dentistry €38,621
    Veterinary €28,844
    Part-time Arts €5,717
    Part-time Science €7,344
    Nursing €7,451

    It also says the student registration fee raises around €173 million per year.


    Huh. UCD seems to insist that my fees amount to 23,000 a year, all of which is paid for by the state except for 1500.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,263 ✭✭✭MavisDavis


    They can work for a few years, save up quite a bit of money and then go to college say when they are 21 or 23, mature students tend to have more appreciation for the courses they are doing than a lot of 17 or 18 year old kids.

    Personally, I think a graduates' payment scheme would work better. People will work harder knowing that they'll have to pay for their education, rather than making mammy and daddy do it.

    And I say this as a prospective student.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,366 ✭✭✭ninty9er


    ndubz wrote: »
    I understand where your coming from, definitely a Fine Gael supporter I take it. - The party which will definitely bring Ireland to it's knees. Free education is the only way forward for an equal fair society where people are not burdened with debts to pay for their educating which is a basic human right.

    No on count one.

    On free education, not necessarily. An education system that EVERYONE has to pay the same for is fair.

    If you have to take a loan up front and pay back once you have a job, there is no reason why you can't go to college, even if you come from a single parent, welfare dependent family, as there is no associated cost while in college.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,745 ✭✭✭Eliot Rosewater


    ninty9er wrote: »
    I've just recovered from a fit of hysterical laughing. Do you honestly believe the State pays the prescribed fee??

    I suppose; trusting a Fianna Fail administration was a bit naive of me, eh ninty9er? :p

    But seriously, I genuinely wasn't aware that was the case. It really just adds another item of support towards abolishing free fees.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 7,439 Mod ✭✭✭✭XxMCRxBabyxX


    ninty9er wrote: »
    If you have to take a loan up front and pay back once you have a job, there is no reason why you can't go to college, even if you come from a single parent, welfare dependent family, as there is no associated cost while in college.

    +1

    I don't understand the those from lower paid families shouldn't have to pay fees. Fine give them the grant for college expenses but if a PRSI scheme is brought in (which is the most likely option as has been proposed I believe) why should those not as wealthy be exempt considering they will be as qualified as the rest of us and therefore able to get the jobs to pay the same amounts as the rest of us?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,263 ✭✭✭MavisDavis


    +1

    I don't understand the those from lower paid families shouldn't have to pay fees. Fine give them the grant for college expenses but if a PRSI scheme is brought in (which is the most likely option as has been proposed I believe) why should those not as wealthy be exempt considering they will be as qualified as the rest of us and therefore able to get the jobs to pay the same amounts as the rest of us?

    +1

    I absolutely agree. I have no problem with people getting grants to afford accommodation/transport costs that may be necessary for them to get their course, but if it's a post-college repayment scheme (which it should be), we will all be qualified and tax-payers, so we should all pay. After college, we should all definitely be adults, so it can't possibly be fair to base repayment on family circumstances and parents' income.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,316 ✭✭✭✭amacachi


    1% extra tax on earnings for those with degrees? Would near enough cover the costs.

    At the same time I wouldn't really care if fees were brought back, as long as there's a proper loans system.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,639 ✭✭✭PeakOutput


    amacachi wrote: »
    1% extra tax on earnings for those with degrees? Would near enough cover the costs.

    At the same time I wouldn't really care if fees were brought back, as long as there's a proper loans system.

    i dont think it should be a tax as then there is no guarantee of the colleges getting the money

    it should be a state loan of some sort that is repaid with automatic deductions from your wage


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,981 ✭✭✭monosharp


    Just a comment about the university rankings.

    Several people here have claimed Irelands universities are not 'top-class' because they are not in the top 100/200 etc of some list. Well bollox.

    Heres an example list. http://www.arwu.org/ARWU2009.jsp

    From numbers 1 to 19 you have nothing but American and British Universities.

    Straight away you should notice how there's a complete lack of non-English speaking institutions until #20. Does anyone honestly believe that Germany, France, Japan, China, Sweden, Italy etc don't have a University that would come into the top 10 if these criteria were anything but completely biased ?

    Are all the really intelligent people in the world native English speakers ? Its complete bollox.

    On quality of education these lists mean almost nothing. The top ranks are based on nothing more than fame, wealth, and exclusivity. The quality of their education or graduates have almost nothing to do with it.

    You have Universities in the US teaching creationism :eek: that are ranked higher then excellent educational institutions in other parts of the world. Its nonsense.

    G.W graduated from Yale ffs. You really think he got to go to a 'great' school because of his superior intelligence ?

    edit: Oh yeah, bring in fees for people who can afford them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,609 ✭✭✭Flamed Diving


    monosharp wrote: »
    Just a comment about the university rankings.

    Several people here have claimed Irelands universities are not 'top-class' because they are not in the top 100/200 etc of some list. Well bollox.

    Heres an example list. http://www.arwu.org/ARWU2009.jsp

    From numbers 1 to 19 you have nothing but American and British Universities.

    Straight away you should notice how there's a complete lack of non-English speaking institutions until #20. Does anyone honestly believe that Germany, France, Japan, China, Sweden, Italy etc don't have a University that would come into the top 10 if these criteria were anything but completely biased ?

    Are all the really intelligent people in the world native English speakers ? Its complete bollox.

    On quality of education these lists mean almost nothing. The top ranks are based on nothing more than fame, wealth, and exclusivity. The quality of their education or graduates have almost nothing to do with it.

    You have Universities in the US teaching creationism :eek: that are ranked higher then excellent educational institutions in other parts of the world. Its nonsense.

    G.W graduated from Yale ffs. You really think he got to go to a 'great' school because of his superior intelligence ?

    edit: Oh yeah, bring in fees for people who can afford them.

    This wouldn't be the first time that I have made this kind of statement on this forum, but...

    You can learn a lot about a study by reading the 'methodology':

    http://www.arwu.org/ARWUMethodology2009.jsp


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 39,022 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,672 ✭✭✭anymore


    Seconded, with grants provided to those from low-income families.

    Lets pretend we line in a democratic republic for a minute, if we are going to charge, them charge everyone. Many in the less well off category have better cash flow than many indebted self-supporting middle class people.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,672 ✭✭✭anymore


    This post has been deleted.

    You are aware of how many hundred million people live in the US, dont you <
    P.S did you you have to pay fees for your education ?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,609 ✭✭✭Flamed Diving


    anymore wrote: »
    Lets pretend we line in a democratic republic for a minute, if we are going to charge, them charge everyone. Many in the less well off category have better cash flow than many indebted self-supporting middle class people.

    Hi anymore, my name is Flamed Diving. You may not have encountered me before, but, for me, simply making statements is never sufficient evidence for such a claim. Unless you are willing to back it up with data, then I will never take such positions seriously.

    Thanks, and good luck!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,639 ✭✭✭PeakOutput


    anymore wrote: »
    You are aware of how many hundred million people live in the US, dont you <
    P.S did you you have to pay fees for your education ?

    if the number was just related to size of population then it would be more evenly spread out between the universities

    if you really think that the only reason these universities constantly reach the top of independant lists is elitism then i guess there is not much we can say accept, with respect, you dont know what your talking about


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,672 ✭✭✭anymore


    Hi anymore, my name is Flamed Diving. You may not have encountered me before, but, for me, simply making statements is never sufficient evidence for such a claim. Unless you are willing to back it up with data, then I will never take such positions seriously.

    Thanks, and good luck!

    Flamed Diving, why are you assuming i am especially concerned whether you take my posts seriousuly or not ? :confused:

    I am sure if you make the effort on Goggle, you will be able to dig up the story of the unemployed married man who is getting in the region of € 38,000 from all his different benefits. However instead of being grateful, the story came to light, because he was complaining !
    No doubt he is one of the ' Vulnerable' who would qualify for grants.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,672 ✭✭✭anymore


    PeakOutput wrote: »
    if the number was just related to size of population then it would be more evenly spread out between the universities

    if you really think that the only reason these universities constantly reach the top of independant lists is elitism then i guess there is not much we can say accept, with respect, you dont know what your talking about

    I didnt say it was totally related to population size as you would realise if you thought about my post.
    I was merely commenting on one factor. I am sure we all realise that is a complex area and not al the simplistic one. It would be nice if the thread reflects this.
    Could you tell me where I mentioned elitism ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,609 ✭✭✭Flamed Diving


    anymore wrote: »
    Flamed Diving, why are you assuming i am especially concerned whether you take my posts seriousuly or not ? :confused:

    I am sure if you make the effort on Goggle, you will be able to dig up the story of the unemployed married man who is getting in the region of € 38,000 from all his different benefits. However instead of being grateful, the story came to light, because he was complaining !
    No doubt he is one of the ' Vulnerable' who would qualify for grants.

    1) This is another post of vacuous claims

    2) Anecdotal evidence, while not useless, is nothing compared to actual data

    You are not saying anything, no matter how strongly you believe you are. You should not be concerned with whether I take you seriously, but whether anything you say should be taken seriously by... anyone.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,673 ✭✭✭mahamageehad


    I have seen these threads a few times on Irish forums, and I always see this type of post.
    ...
    As far as I see it, the only people who lose out are students from middle-class families, who won't be able to afford their own car and a J1 holiday every summer.
    Oh my god, this is possibly the most ridiculous statement I have ever heard.
    Terrible idea.

    And why are people so for the idea of providing free education to students from only low income family's? again after again these students have proven to be the under performers in college, and that is FACT, the basic reality is they come from low income family's for a reason and the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.


    ...
    No, I was wrong, this is worse.
    amacachi wrote: »
    1% extra tax on earnings for those with degrees? Would near enough cover the costs.

    At the same time I wouldn't really care if fees were brought back, as long as there's a proper loans system.

    One point that hasn't been mentioned yet- current taxes! Graduates tend to earn more than non-graduates- €10,000 according to a previous post. This means they pay more taxes. We are already paying our own way! The universities are in debt and need some cash? Guess what. So does everyone these days.

    I think the whole mentality of this country, particularly FF supporters is ridiculous. Lets pick on the people who can't do anything about it and let the wealthy away unhindered. For example until recently millionaire horse owners paid no tax, but nurses always have. Superstars like Bono that are reeling in the money pay their taxes in another country, but workers on minimum wage contribute? We can find money to bail out the banks, but not to help students? Why is it always the less well off in society, or the elderly who have to take the burden?

    If fees had been around a few years ago, I wouldn't be in college now. I couldn't afford it. I love how people throw around the word loan like there's nothing to it. I already have a loan. And a part time job. But it's not enough. Not all of us are paid for out of daddys pocket. The full grant is €3,420. At the most a student can work 20 hours a week and even at that some can't manage it. Roughly €150 of wages. Now, these days that isn't even definite due to the lack of jobs. Most students that are trying to support themselves. How is it fair to saddle them with debt for the rest of their lives?

    Increase the taxes for the ridiculous "administrative" positions, both public and private. Slash Cowen's salary- he's not worth more than Obama. Get rid of the Oireachtas.

    The only students I think need to be looked at are the aforementioned "dossers" there for the college experience. I think that anyone who drops out during or after first year without a valid reason should have to pay back their maintenance grant.

    Oh and that much money for building work is just silly- i'm sure NAMA have plently of vacant buildings lying around they'd only love to get rid of! ;):p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,289 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    I believe a states primary duty to it's citizens (outside of the provision of a equitable legal system) involves providing three essential services: health, security and education.

    While having third-level education free for all is desirable, it seems to be unaffordable.

    I'm wondering if a merit based, tiered approach is the best course of action?

    Focus our resources on making one or two of our universities (say UL and Trinity) world class in the most vital areas of education. Eliminate their humanities courses and adopt a targeted focus on science, technology, engineering, pure maths etc. Fund these universities better than the others and set the entry level high based on Leaving Cert results, application essays etc. in order to attract the best and brightest to these universities. Set the fees high for these universities (say 20k per year).

    Use another university (say NUI, Galway) to provide the high end business and legal courses at a similar funding and fee level, again using high entry requirements to ensure that only those with the ability and determination to graduate will gain entry.

    Leave many of our current universities as they are, providing average degrees in Science, Arts, Business, Law etc. for average students at an average cost (say 10k per year).

    Use other universities (perhaps the current IT's?) to provide free or low cost diploma level courses for those not prepared to pay upwards of 30k for their education or accademically incapable of attaining the higher levels.

    The keys to success of a model like this are imho a more rigourous testing of entrants ability, ensuring that loans/grants/scholorships are available to provide access for any student to the level of education for which they're capable.

    I may be wrong in some of my assumptions on a model like this but it would be my belief that focusing universities on specific areas should help reduce their operating costs and improve their quality when compared to 'jack of all trades' institutions. Add this to the increased funding for the institutions selected to be "our MIT" or "our Stanford Law" and the result should be a supply of top class graduates to current industry and "hot-house" industry developing from these institutions.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 7,439 Mod ✭✭✭✭XxMCRxBabyxX


    But it's not enough. Not all of us are paid for out of daddys pocket.

    Not all of us are eligible for grants despite the fact that daddy has barely any money! And there aren't that many jobs around for those not eligible for a grant to make money so what are we meant to do?! We have no choice but to take daddy's money.

    I'm sick of people implying that the only people with money issues in college are those low income families on grants. there are plenty of us not eligible for various reasons that find it hard to survive and we don't have the benefit of the government's pockets. Not that i have an issue with people getting grants! i'm just sick of the insinuation that if you're not getting a grant you're getting daddys money and lots of it!
    How is it fair to saddle them with debt for the rest of their lives?

    This is why the PRSI/tax system is being introduced. if we pay out of our wages, it's not a debt that is placed on us but a system in which we pay back for our education out of our salaries. It's less pressure for a start and has been successful in other countries


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,672 ✭✭✭anymore


    Oh my god, this is possibly the most ridiculous statement I have ever heard.


    No, I was wrong, this is worse.



    One point that hasn't been mentioned yet- current taxes! Graduates tend to earn more than non-graduates- €10,000 according to a previous post. This means they pay more taxes. We are already paying our own way! The universities are in debt and need some cash? Guess what. So does everyone these days.

    I think the whole mentality of this country, particularly FF supporters is ridiculous. Lets pick on the people who can't do anything about it and let the wealthy away unhindered. For example until recently millionaire horse owners paid no tax, but nurses always have. Superstars like Bono that are reeling in the money pay their taxes in another country, but workers on minimum wage contribute? We can find money to bail out the banks, but not to help students? Why is it always the less well off in society, or the elderly who have to take the burden?

    If fees had been around a few years ago, I wouldn't be in college now. I couldn't afford it. I love how people throw around the word loan like there's nothing to it. I already have a loan. And a part time job. But it's not enough. Not all of us are paid for out of daddys pocket. The full grant is €3,420. At the most a student can work 20 hours a week and even at that some can't manage it. Roughly €150 of wages. Now, these days that isn't even definite due to the lack of jobs. Most students that are trying to support themselves. How is it fair to saddle them with debt for the rest of their lives?

    Increase the taxes for the ridiculous "administrative" positions, both public and private. Slash Cowen's salary- he's not worth more than Obama. Get rid of the Oireachtas.

    The only students I think need to be looked at are the aforementioned "dossers" there for the college experience. I think that anyone who drops out during or after first year without a valid reason should have to pay back their maintenance grant.

    Oh and that much money for building work is just silly- i'm sure NAMA have plently of vacant buildings lying around they'd only love to get rid of! ;):p


    Excellent contribution.
    Why is it that billions upon billions have been paid out to the Agricultural sector and few if any question this, but free education , well partly free, which can benefit anyone who chooses to access it and which which yields an economic benefit, as the above poster points out, is regularlily questioned ?
    Why don't we end all subsidies toi the betting and racing industry, abolish the tax exemption for the arts and farts brigade to help finance education ?
    Why don't we pay our professors and lecturers similiar rates of pay as our neighbouring and much larger neighbour the UK ? The savings could be ploughed back to education. There is plenty of scope for making savings for re-investment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,639 ✭✭✭PeakOutput


    One point that hasn't been mentioned yet- current taxes! Graduates tend to earn more than non-graduates- €10,000 according to a previous post. This means they pay more taxes. We are already paying our own way! The universities are in debt and need some cash? Guess what. So does everyone these days.

    the universities dont see that money the point is the universities need more money, much more, increasing taxes or talking about taxes at all dosnt address this.
    I think the whole mentality of this country, particularly FF supporters is ridiculous. Lets pick on the people who can't do anything about it and let the wealthy away unhindered. For example until recently millionaire horse owners paid no tax, but nurses always have. Superstars like Bono that are reeling in the money pay their taxes in another country, but workers on minimum wage contribute? We can find money to bail out the banks, but not to help students? Why is it always the less well off in society, or the elderly who have to take the burden?

    most people in this thread, including myself, have specifically
    explained ways that fees can be introduced without affecting the 'vulnerable' in anyway. there are very good reasons for providing tax breaks to the industries you have mentioned but thats an argument for another thread

    If fees had been around a few years ago, I wouldn't be in college now. I couldn't afford it. I love how people throw around the word loan like there's nothing to it. I already have a loan. And a part time job. But it's not enough. Not all of us are paid for out of daddys pocket. The full grant is €3,420. At the most a student can work 20 hours a week and even at that some can't manage it. Roughly €150 of wages. Now, these days that isn't even definite due to the lack of jobs. Most students that are trying to support themselves. How is it fair to saddle them with debt for the rest of their lives?

    if you get the grant there is no excuse for not being able to survive on your own. i work between 22 and 24 hours a week on minimum and that takes care of everything accept rent, if i was entitled to a grant i would probably not have to work at all and i could pay my rent. and by the way even while working i average a's and b's, i also have plenty of time for going out getting drunk and having the craic in the words of a 30 year old self made millionare 'make the time STOP WATCHING ****ING LOST'

    The only students I think need to be looked at are the aforementioned "dossers" there for the college experience. I think that anyone who drops out during or after first year without a valid reason should have to pay back their maintenance grant.

    thats a good idea to start with, it dosnt go nearly far enough though


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,609 ✭✭✭Flamed Diving


    Oh my god, this is possibly the most ridiculous statement I have ever heard.

    And yet...

    No, I was wrong, this is worse:



    One point that hasn't been mentioned yet- current taxes! Graduates tend to earn more than non-graduates- €10,000 according to a previous post. This means they pay more taxes. We are already paying our own way! The universities are in debt and need some cash? Guess what. So does everyone these days.

    I think the whole mentality of this country, particularly FF supporters is ridiculous. Lets pick on the people who can't do anything about it and let the wealthy away unhindered. For example until recently millionaire horse owners paid no tax, but nurses always have. Superstars like Bono that are reeling in the money pay their taxes in another country, but workers on minimum wage contribute? We can find money to bail out the banks, but not to help students? Why is it always the less well off in society, or the elderly who have to take the burden?

    If fees had been around a few years ago, I wouldn't be in college now. I couldn't afford it. I love how people throw around the word loan like there's nothing to it. I already have a loan. And a part time job. But it's not enough. Not all of us are paid for out of daddys pocket. The full grant is €3,420. At the most a student can work 20 hours a week and even at that some can't manage it. Roughly €150 of wages. Now, these days that isn't even definite due to the lack of jobs. Most students that are trying to support themselves. How is it fair to saddle them with debt for the rest of their lives?

    Increase the taxes for the ridiculous "administrative" positions, both public and private. Slash Cowen's salary- he's not worth more than Obama. Get rid of the Oireachtas.

    The only students I think need to be looked at are the aforementioned "dossers" there for the college experience. I think that anyone who drops out during or after first year without a valid reason should have to pay back their maintenance grant.

    Oh and that much money for building work is just silly- i'm sure NAMA have plently of vacant buildings lying around they'd only love to get rid of! ;):p

    Couldn't have put it better myself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,639 ✭✭✭PeakOutput


    anymore wrote: »
    Why don't we end all subsidies toi the betting and racing industry, abolish the tax exemption for the arts and farts brigade to help finance education ?

    because they will leave and take the jobs they create with them is that so hard to understand? the arts and farts brigade provides breaks to actual creators of art ONLY and has been capped already so anyone earning over a certain amount pays tax. most artists have NOTHING to do with the 'arts and farts' brigade you really do just soak up everything you are told dont you? learn to research it will improve your university grades considerably

    Why don't we pay our professors and lecturers similiar rates of pay as our neighbouring and much larger neighbour the UK ? The savings could be ploughed back to education. There is plenty of scope for making savings for re-investment.

    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/sciencetoday/2009/1126/1224259471866.html


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,672 ✭✭✭anymore


    PeakOutput wrote: »
    because they will leave and take the jobs they create with them is that so hard to understand? the arts and farts brigade provides breaks to actual creators of art ONLY and has been capped already so anyone earning over a certain amount pays tax. most artists have NOTHING to do with the 'arts and farts' brigade you really do just soak up everything you are told dont you? learn to research it will improve your university grades considerably




    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/sciencetoday/2009/1126/1224259471866.html

    If an industry needs to be permanently subsidised, then it is questionable how much value it is to the country, particularily one that has so much involvement by wealthy tax exiles. The reality is that these racing/gambling subsidies exist because quite a few of our political representatives are invloved in one way or another with the racing / gambling fraternity - it is not co-incidence that the notorious FF tent was at a racing venue.

    The justification for a tax exemption for artists and writers is totally nonsensical and I daresay even immoral. This is a sector that is foremost in climbing up on its carefully constructed moral high ground to lecture the rest of society and to sneer at us.
    Now there may a case in the initial years of an artists/writers career to allow them to average income over say 3/ 4 years to avoid high tax being paid in respect of thier first financially successful year, but there is no moral justification for a € 100,000 annual tax exemption. Any struggling writer/ artist on low income will not be in the tax net anyway and so will not be paying.
    remember the Arts and Farts sector already benefits from multi million subsidies so to give a tax exemption as well is bizzare and unacceptable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,639 ✭✭✭PeakOutput


    anymore wrote: »
    If an industry needs to be permanently subsidised

    its not a subsidy we dont pay them anything we simply dont tax certain parts of their business, that is not subsidising them. in return they set up large business's here, bring in foreign investment and hire hundreds of workers who pay millions in taxes. as far as i know there is no tax break for the gambling industry so i dont know what your talking about there. paddy power pays the same taxes on his profits as any other company afaik
    The justification for a tax exemption for artists and writers is totally nonsensical and I daresay even immoral. This is a sector that is foremost in climbing up on its carefully constructed moral high ground to lecture the rest of society and to sneer at us.

    well you clearly have something against artists so i dont know if there is much point debating the point with you, but for every bono and u2 there are thousands of artists on the poverty line and people who make art for the love of it rather than monetary reward. again is it only the artist who dosnt pay tax dealers / galleries /auction houses all pay the same taxes as everyone and they wouldnt be there without the artists and there wouldnt be anywere near as many artists if they were taxed the same way as other employees. and thats just talking about strict monetary benefit of the break the social and cultural benefits are far greater


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,798 ✭✭✭karma_


    This post has been deleted.


    There are 3 or 4 Universities in the US that basically cherry pick the students it allows in, that gives them a hell of an advantage. It is your post that is utterly foolish.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,609 ✭✭✭Flamed Diving


    karma_ wrote: »
    There are 3 or 4 Universities in the US that basically cherry pick the students it allows in.

    Why do you think that is?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,639 ✭✭✭PeakOutput


    karma_ wrote: »
    There are 3 or 4 Universities in the US that basically cherry pick the students it allows in, that gives them a hell of an advantage. It is your post that is utterly foolish.

    wrong, they dont cherry pick individuals in general.

    they set standards and if you meet those standards you can get in this benefits everyone int he college by keeping the standard of your fellow students high

    they then cherry pick the best to give scholarships and grants to so no matter were you are from if you are smart enough you can get in

    i dont see any problem with this

    you are being judged completely on academic ability do you think there should be any other criteria examined for entry?

    edit; i will say that there are times when people get in cause of who they know and being related to an alumni is a huge advantage. i dont believe that a brilliant student would lose their place because of this though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 39,022 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,798 ✭✭✭karma_


    PeakOutput wrote: »
    wrong, they dont cherry pick individuals in general.

    they set standards and if you meet those standards you can get in this benefits everyone int he college by keeping the standard of your fellow students high

    they then cherry pick the best to give scholarships and grants to so no matter were you are from if you are smart enough you can get in

    i dont see any problem with this

    you are being judged completely on academic ability do you think there should be any other criteria examined for entry?

    I'm not saying this is a problem. I'm responding to the poster who ridicules the claim that there is a reason why these institutions have produced a higher number of Nobel prize winners as opposed to our own universities.

    It is in no way 'asinine' to say they have more Nobel prize winners because they have a larger pool of students to choose from.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 39,022 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,798 ✭✭✭karma_


    This post has been deleted.

    Maybe you should read my last post if you need it spelled out any clearer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,443 ✭✭✭Byron85


    This post has been deleted.


    I know a girl who just finished her Masters in.....*drum roll* Swedish Film.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,021 ✭✭✭Sulmac


    Another thing I would do to reduce costs would be merge all universities/instituties of technology/colleges of further education/etc. in Dublin into a new "University of Dublin" and all those outside Dublin into a "University of Ireland" (or maybe a provincial basis - "University of Munster", etc.). Something similar to the current NUI set-up (even though NUI has been/is being abolished?), but with each campus specialising in a different field.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,941 ✭✭✭granturismo


    This post has been deleted.

    I probably disagree with the majority of your posts on boards but agree with means testing and not funding courses which are of little to no use to the economy or from which graduates will just keep entering a cycle of one post grad course after another until they get a series of irrelevant contract jobs usually funded by the Irish or EU taxpayer.

    Heres one good example of relevant research in our unis
    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/frontpage/2010/0429/1224269288308.html?via=mr

    except John Collins had to ruin the article with this quote;

    The sale is a significant boost for the Government policy of funding basic research at third-level institutes which can subsequently be sold commercially.

    So much of basic research funded in this country is completely irrelevant. It is argued that all basic research contributes to the overall knowledge of science, medicine, engineering, social sciences etc but when has one research project from Ireland benefitted a single cancer patient or saved a region's crops from infestation using natural predators instead of pesticides.

    Back to the OP, yes third level fees do have to return. If they dont, colleges will just keep increasing the 'admission fee' in lieu of fees.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,781 ✭✭✭amen


    Another thing I would do to reduce costs would be merge all universities/instituties of technology/colleges of further education/etc. in Dublin into a new "University of Dublin" and all those outside Dublin into a "University of Ireland" (or maybe a provincial basis - "University of Munster", etc.). Something similar to the current NUI set-up (even though NUI has been/is being abolished?), but with each campus specialising in a different field.

    a dreadful idea. There is a big difference between a University and an IT offering certs/diplomas.

    As for each campus specialising a lot of research is cross discipline and it can be an advantage to have everyone on the same campus.

    Even at undergrad level you may be taught the basics about other courses with lecturers from those courses.


Advertisement