Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

DTT Commercial Multiplexes (was OneVision, Boxer etc...)

1313234363759

Comments

  • Posts: 22,785 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Infractions people if theres any more brash posts on politicians.
    Keep it respectable,you can be heavily critical without being brash.
    Thank you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,372 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    I don't want to sound pedantic, but there is already a NATIONAL TELEVISION MULTIPLEX in place serving 90% of the population. It just happens to be analogue. Maybe in the document he should have stated that it was the DTT NATIONAL TELEVISION MULTIPLEX. Its just that on October 31st 2010 Ryan might use this as his get out clause.
    He has already proved to be a slimeball in the way he reneged on the MOU.

    System I analogue is, by definition, not a multiplex...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,809 ✭✭✭10000maniacs


    MYOB wrote: »
    System I analogue is, by definition, not a multiplex...
    Sorry mate. Multiplexers can be and are applied to both analog and digital systems, so by definition you are wrong.
    Ok, the common meaning is a group of digital TV channels that are mixed using discrete multi-tone modulation for broadcast over an analogue carrier channel is a multiplex. But NATIONAL TELEVISION MULTIPLEX can be interpratated to mean anything.
    If he said NATIONAL DTT MULTIPLEX instead of NATIONAL TELEVISION MULTIPLEX maybe their would be less room for ambiguity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 291 ✭✭Biffo The Bare


    If he said NATIONAL DTT MULTIPLEX instead of NATIONAL TELEVISION MULTIPLEX maybe their would be less room for ambiguity.

    Let it be said he used a slight ambiguity in the text of the Memorandum Of Understanding to justify depriving us of a couple of BBC channels on the free mux.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,357 ✭✭✭✭The Cush


    But NATIONAL TELEVISION MULTIPLEX can be interpratated to mean anything.

    Not in this case. The Statutory Instrument gives effect to a section of the Broadcasting Act 2009 [Sec. 130(1)(b)(i)(I)].

    In the context of the Act, Part 8 - Digital Broadcasting and Analogue Switch-Off, it defines a multiplex as follows
    “multiplex” means an electronic system which combines programme
    material and related and other data in a digital form
    and the transmission
    of that material and data so combined by means of wireless
    telegraphy directly or indirectly for reception by the general public;

    In the three Broadcasting Acts to date relating to digital broadcasting the definition of multiplex is the same and never refers to analogue broadcasting.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,809 ✭✭✭10000maniacs


    delete


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,809 ✭✭✭10000maniacs


    Thanks The Cush
    Thats great, it means he can't do a u-turn on that particular part of the legislation.:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 64 ✭✭BoredNaMoaner


    TBH, cynicism seems to be a healthy perspective when it comes to the DTT rollout, so it is not surprising to wonder is the Minister's order all that it seems. Even the title of this thread is pessimistic of the commercial possibility. So can we expect both analogue AND digital TV services from the Autumn? And is the scheduled ASO date realistic given the recession? When the meagre contents of Saorview service is publicized it will have many consumers scratching their heads wondering what the advantage to them is. I Expect Joe Duffy to be busy unless the ASO schedule slips a few years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    TBH, cynicism seems to be a healthy perspective when it comes to the DTT rollout, so it is not surprising to wonder is the Minister's order all that it seems. Even the title of this thread is pessimistic of the commercial possibility. So can we expect both analogue AND digital TV services from the Autumn? And is the scheduled ASO date realistic given the recession? When the meagre contents of Saorview service is publicized it will have many consumers scratching their heads wondering what the advantage to them is. I Expect Joe Duffy to be busy unless the ASO schedule slips a few years.

    Well the next minister has until 2015. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,372 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Sorry mate. Multiplexers can be and are applied to both analog and digital systems, so by definition you are wrong.
    Ok, the common meaning is a group of digital TV channels that are mixed using discrete multi-tone modulation for broadcast over an analogue carrier channel is a multiplex. But NATIONAL TELEVISION MULTIPLEX can be interpratated to mean anything.
    If he said NATIONAL DTT MULTIPLEX instead of NATIONAL TELEVISION MULTIPLEX maybe their would be less room for ambiguity.

    Except I'm not wrong because, as I said, System I is not multiplexed. And I'm not your mate.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,011 ✭✭✭carrolls


    MYOB wrote: »
    Except I'm not wrong because, as I said, System I is not multiplexed. And I'm not your mate.
    He has had a lucky break then Mr Smuggins.:rolleyes:


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,723 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Lads Black Briar has already warned you, enough with the bickering and off topic discussions.

    Keep it civil and on topic or I'll start handing out bans.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 374 ✭✭tlaavtech


    For all the slagging that Eamonn Ryan gets, he has actually put a date on FTA DTT. It surprises me how little reaction there has been here to this.

    If it doesn't happen, then by all means attack whomsoever deserves your wrath, but at least now we have something fairly concrete. He has also told One Vision to pee or get off the pot!

    Granted, the turn-around on the MoU was bloody annoying, but as I said at the time, it really would have screwed over any commercial interests in DTT (and I think i said it before the U-turn, but I am open to correction on this :D).

    Bottom line, after all the years of nothing happening, it is finally happening. Let's celebrate and enjoy.

    (And no, I have no vested interests, political or otherwise - I am just trying to bring a little bit of balance to the discussion.)

    As for ASO and Joe Duffy, that's SEP (Someone Elses Problem)!! Those of us that are here are forward-looking technology savvy persons, who very likely will have done our own ASO long before the official one. In my case, the first time i put up an aerial was last year for DTT :).

    ASO - What ASO!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,011 ✭✭✭carrolls


    tlaavtech wrote: »
    Granted, the turn-around on the MoU was bloody annoying, but as I said at the time, it really would have screwed over any commercial interests in DTT !
    I think you hit the nail on the head tlaavtech. Commercial interests. The project was doomed the minute some bright spark decided this would be the ideal opportunity to make a buck. When commercial interests are put before national interests the only way is down.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23 rabbitsears


    My ASO was in October 1998. I've haven't used any kind of Analogue since. :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8 rpm1966


    If I buy an LCD TV with MPEG2 and with the UK's Freesat built-in to use in Dublin, will I be able to pick up the Freesat and other FTA satellite channels?

    Is there any issue with the satellite transmission coverage/footprint - ie does the signal quality degrade as you go southwards on the Island of Ireland? And if so where is it unreliable or unfeasible to use?

    When RTE eventually deploy Digital Terrestrial TV, will I just need an MPEG4-MPEG2 Set top Box to convert RTE's MPEG4 to MPEG2? Are there any other drawbacks? Would I lose any picture or sound quality by having an MPEG4-MPEG2 converter?

    Is it true that RTE should have deployed Digital Terr. to all of the the 26 counties by October 2010 on foot of Eamon Ryan's recent order to do so?


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,558 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    rpm1966 wrote: »
    If I buy an LCD TV with MPEG2 and with the UK's Freesat built-in to use in Dublin, will I be able to pick up the Freesat and other FTA satellite channels?
    If you have a STB, you will input to the TV by SCART or HDMI cable. Anything that the STB decodes will work on the TV. So a sat box will work. UK Freeview will work directly on the TV if you are in an overspill area and have the correct aerial pointing to the UK transmitter.
    rpm1966 wrote: »
    Is there any issue with the satellite transmission coverage/footprint - ie does the signal quality degrade as you go southwards on the Island of Ireland? And if so where is it unreliable or unfeasible to use?
    No.
    rpm1966 wrote: »
    When RTE eventually deploy Digital Terrestrial TV, will I just need an MPEG4-MPEG2 Set top Box to convert RTE's MPEG4 to MPEG2? Are there any other drawbacks? Would I lose any picture or sound quality by having an MPEG4-MPEG2 converter?
    See above, a STB will work for you, or you could plug in a CAM like the Neotion NP4 if the TV can take it. You would only have one remote then.
    rpm1966 wrote: »
    Is it true that RTE should have deployed Digital Terr. to all of the the 26 counties by October 2010 on foot of Eamon Ryan's recent order to do so?

    No only 90% of the population. They already reach that, I think.

    I would wait and buy the MPEG4 TV if it were me.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27 jammygit


    If I buy an LCD TV with MPEG2 and with the UK's Freesat built-in to use in Dublin, will I be able to pick up the Freesat and other FTA satellite channels?

    UK Freesat will work within Ireland to allow pickup of FTA channels. Note that you will not get RTE on Freesat.

    Is there any issue with the satellite transmission coverage/footprint - ie does the signal quality degrade as you go southwards on the Island of Ireland? And if so where is it unreliable or unfeasible to use?

    As long as you use a 60cm or greater dish there should be no problem. When installing make sure to use good quality cable and connectors to reduce the risk of signal loss. If in doubt get a professional installer to set up your dish.


    When RTE eventually deploy Digital Terrestrial TV, will I just need an MPEG4-MPEG2 Set top Box to convert RTE's MPEG4 to MPEG2? Are there any other drawbacks? Would I lose any picture or sound quality by having an MPEG4-MPEG2 converter?

    If your TV is MPEG-2 then you will need a set-top box (STB) to receive RTEs Digital transmissions. Alternatively there is a company called Neotion who manufacture a card to go into the CI slot on your digital TV. However its performance is not guaranteed with every TV so you'll need to do a bit more research if you go down this route. You should not lose out on sound or picture quality if you buy a good STB. Search on Boards - there are plenty of postings regarding available options.

    Is it true that RTE should have deployed Digital Terr. to all of the the 26 counties by October 2010 on foot of Eamon Ryan's recent order to do so?

    Yes, RTE have been given a clear instruction by the minister in this regard. They must stard FTA transmissions by end of October. This does not mean that they will be obliged to carry anything other than RTE1 and RTE2 by the way


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,357 ✭✭✭✭The Cush


    rpm1966 wrote: »
    If I buy an LCD TV with MPEG2 and with the UK's Freesat built-in to use in Dublin, will I be able to pick up the Freesat and other FTA satellite channels?

    Is there any issue with the satellite transmission coverage/footprint - ie does the signal quality degrade as you go southwards on the Island of Ireland? And if so where is it unreliable or unfeasible to use?

    When RTE eventually deploy Digital Terrestrial TV, will I just need an MPEG4-MPEG2 Set top Box to convert RTE's MPEG4 to MPEG2? Are there any other drawbacks? Would I lose any picture or sound quality by having an MPEG4-MPEG2 converter?

    Is it true that RTE should have deployed Digital Terr. to all of the the 26 counties by October 2010 on foot of Eamon Ryan's recent order to do so?

    All freesat TVs are MPEG-4 (the freesat Panasonics may have issues with Irish DTT - you should do a search of other posts) so no worries about converting from MPEG-4 to MPEG-2.

    Three manufacturers currently produce freesat TVs Panasonic, Sony and LG. As I said above the Panasonic may have issues, the LG LF7700 models appear to the be most hassle-free: freesat, Irish DTT, MHEG-5 (freesat epg/Irish digital text), many posts here about this model - do a search. Not sure about other FTA sat channels.

    The Sony freesat's act differently in UK mode and non-UK mode. In the UK setting you get freesat with MHEG-5 7/8 day EPG. In a non UK setting you get FTA Sat with DiSEqC 1.0, no freesat epg as MHEG-5 appears to be enabled only in the UK setting. The lack of MHEG-5 also means no digital text on the Irish DTT channels. If you use the UK setting with freesat enabled the Irish DTT channels are automatically placed in the 800's as they are seen as non UK/out of region channels, according to others here they can be manually placed from 001 upwards also in the UK setting no VHF analogue tuning if you receive RTÉ 1/2 via a VHF aerial (not required in Dublin).

    So to answer your first question if you want both the freesat and FTA satellite channels the Sony will do this with now and next info only and DiSEqC 1.0 control for multi-LNB setups and also the Irish DTT channels with epg and VHF analogue tuning. All in the Ireland setting.

    Regarding the Oct 2010 date, this is the date RTÉNL's DTT network must be available to approx. 90% of the population (national coverage Dec 2011). The official launch date is another matter.
    There is no definitive launch date for a DTT service in Ireland as yet. This is a matter for RTÉ (www.rte.ie) and the Broadcasting Commission of Ireland (www.bci.ie) to determine.

    http://www.rtenl.ie/dtt.htm



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27 jammygit


    The Cush wrote: »

    Three manufacturers currently produce freesat TVs Panasonic, Sony and LG. As I said above the Panasonic may have issues, the LG LF7700 models appear to the be most hassle-free: freesat, Irish DTT, MHEG-5 (freesat epg/Irish digital text), many posts here about this model - do a search. Not sure about other FTA sat channels.

    The Sony freesat's act differently in UK mode and non-UK mode. In the UK setting you get freesat with MHEG-5 7/8 day EPG. In a non UK setting you get FTA Sat with DiSEqC 1.0, no freesat epg as MHEG-5 appears to be enabled only in the UK setting. The lack of MHEG-5 also means no digital text on the Irish DTT channels. If you use the UK setting with freesat enabled the Irish DTT channels are automatically placed in the 800's as they are seen as non UK/out of region channels, according to others here they can be manually placed from 001 upwards also in the UK setting no VHF analogue tuning if you receive RTÉ 1/2 via a VHF aerial (not required in Dublin).

    So to answer your first question if you want both the freesat and FTA satellite channels the Sony will do this with now and next info only and DiSEqC 1.0 control for multi-LNB setups and also the Irish DTT channels with epg and VHF analogue tuning. All in the Ireland setting.

    Regarding the Oct 2010 date, this is the date RTÉNL's DTT network must be available to approx. 90% of the population (national coverage Dec 2011). The official launch date is another matter.

    Do you happen to know the model number of the Sony set you refer to? It sounds interesting. .


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,357 ✭✭✭✭The Cush


    jammygit wrote: »
    Do you happen to know the model number of the Sony set you refer to? It sounds interesting. .

    The UK Sony 5800 & 5810 models.

    Recent posts here and here on the Sony freesats, search for others.

    Power City stock some of these Sony TVs.

    A caveat, try before you buy. My information is based on posts here and information from elsewhere as I don't own one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,357 ✭✭✭✭The Cush


    BAI Board meeting Monday
    Clarity expected on DTT contract

    Broadcasting

    THE future of the high stakes commercial Digital Terrestrial Television (DTT) project is expected to become clear on Monday after a crunch meeting of the Broadcasting Authority.

    The Eircom-led One Vision consortium has been mulling over a contract for commercial DTT since last May, after the Boxer/DTT consortium abandoned plans to spend €165m on the venue.

    http://www.independent.ie/business/irish/clarity-expected-on-dtt-contract-2114077.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,357 ✭✭✭✭The Cush


    Article from today's Sunday Business Post, two inaccuracies in the article - the RTÉ multiplex order was signed last month, not last week and OneVision were awarded the contract last May.
    RTE must have DTT operational by October

    28 March 2010 By Samantha McCaughren

    The government has ordered RTE to have digital terrestrial television (DTT) available to more than 90 per cent of the population by the end of October, despite ongoing delays with the commercial side of the project.

    RTE is understood to be fairly confident that it can have the public service side of DTT operational in time for this deadline.

    However, it is likely to put further pressure on the Eircom-led commercial consortium OneVision to sign contracts with RTE and the Broadcasting Authority of Ireland (BAI).

    A statutory instrument, signed by communications minister Eamon Ryan last week, requires RTE to ensure that its free-to-air digital television service is operational and available to the majority of homes by October 31.

    DTT will replace signals received free by hundreds of thousands of homes and will compete with Sky Digital and UPC. It was planned that RTE’s free stations would be launched along with commercial bundles of stations to make it attractive to consumers.

    However, the commercial side has still not been agreed, and an initial launch date of September 2009 was missed.

    Sources said that, as RTE proceeds with the public service multiplex, or bundle of stations, it will become more difficult to accommodate the commercial operator.

    RTE’s transmission business RTENL will have to spend in excess of €100 million building the network, but it is understood that it could save up to €40 million if it facilitates only the public service side of the project.

    OneVision has yet to agree a transmission deal with RTE, amid claims that the broadcaster is seeking too many financial guarantees.

    However, RTE insiders said it had moved its position as far as possible. OneVision will also have to enter into agreements with the BAI, providers of television content, and a set-top box company.

    The BAI meets tomorrow, and the issue of DTT will be high on the agenda. BAI chairman Bob Collins recently said that the authority was running out of patience on the issue.

    OneVision was awarded the contract last June after the Communicorp-led consortium Boxer pulled out of negotiations.

    Although speedy negotiations with OneVision were hoped for, the talks have dragged on with RTE, which is legally obliged only to get the public service DTT up and running.

    http://www.sbpost.ie/news/ireland/rte-must-have-dtt-operational-by-october-48251.html

    Right now things are not looking good for pay DTT, in Portugal the 5 commercial multiplexes have been handed back.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 316 ✭✭d8player


    The Cush wrote: »
    :
    As I said above the Panasonic may have issues,
    :

    I was able to pick up the Irish DTT signal on my Panasonic G20 last night using its in-built DVB tuner. The quality was excellent.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,011 ✭✭✭carrolls


    Sources said that, as RTE proceeds with the public service multiplex, or bundle of stations, it will become more difficult to accommodate the commercial operator.
    The only successful DTT launches in the last 10 years were the ones where they offered as many free channels on a couple of muxes and then later on a top-up TV scenario would be introduced that offered something different to what people normally get free. Channels like Sky 1, Sky Sports, Arts, Movies, UK TV channels etc.
    Any other model has a tendency to fail, because its not viable.
    The British government were very quick to step in with a Freeview Service when OnDigital failed in 2001. By the way OnDigital is a very similar model to what we are attempting at the moment. The only differences are
    1: The 2010 market is now saturated with Digital options.
    2: The gap in the market is for only 150,000 households and the vast majority of these won't want pay-tv at any price.

    My advice to Ryan and the BAI is to
    1: Put as many high quality channels on the free mux as possible.
    2: Launch as soon as possible. Even before October.
    3: Dump OneVision to the recycle bin.
    4: Try and get BBC back on board with the Memorandum Of Understanding.
    5: Allow UTV and Channel 4 to use the free mux if they want to. Don't charge them exorbitant fees for doing so.
    6: Source a cheap STB with HD functionality and subsitise it to the people who want it.
    7: Meticulously do a business plan for a top-up TV scenario and get it right this time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,067 ✭✭✭slegs


    carrolls wrote: »
    Sources said that, as RTE proceeds with the public service multiplex, or bundle of stations, it will become more difficult to accommodate the commercial operator.
    The only successful DTT launches in the last 10 years were the ones where they offered as many free channels on a couple of muxes and then later on a top-up TV scenario would be introduced that offered something different to what people normally get free. Channels like Sky 1, Sky Sports, Arts, Movies, UK TV channels etc.
    Any other model has a tendency to fail, because its not viable.
    The British government were very quick to step in with a Freeview Service when OnDigital failed in 2001. By the way OnDigital is a very similar model to what we are attempting at the moment. The only differences are
    1: The 2010 market is now saturated with Digital options.
    2: The gap in the market is for only 150,000 households and the vast majority of these won't want pay-tv at any price.

    My advice to Ryan and the BAI is to
    1: Put as many high quality channels on the free mux as possible.
    2: Launch as soon as possible. Even before October.
    3: Dump OneVision to the recycle bin.
    4: Try and get BBC back on board with the Memorandum Of Understanding.
    5: Allow UTV and Channel 4 to use the free mux if they want to. Don't charge them exorbitant fees for doing so.
    6: Source a cheap STB with HD functionality and subsitise it to the people who want it.
    7: Meticulously do a business plan for a top-up TV scenario and get it right this time.


    This all sounds great carrolls but its not realistic. There is no money to support subsidisation of STBs or for subsidising costs for free UK channels.

    All of this has to be self funding which makes it more challenging to support a UK Freeview type model here. Now if they had planned for it from day one instead of wasting time and money on Pay DTT it might be a different story.

    At this point the most we can expect or hope for in the short term is RTE1, RTE2, TV3, TG4 plus whatever RTE variants RTE can come up with. At a stretch we might get BBC1+2 if Ryan does another u turn.

    Anything launching at this point would be a leap forward from where we are


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    1: Put as many high quality channels on the free mux as possible.

    I.E. Create no really jobs in the sector and import more Multinational TV services.
    5: Allow UTV and Channel 4 to use the free mux if they want to. Don't charge them exorbitant fees for doing so.

    Sure let TV3 not pay for the services as well. I am sure TV3 would be delighted to see UTV getting free access to DTT while they pay for the privileged. The MOU could have covered C4 as a PSB especially if it takes over Local TV from Channel 3 in the Future.

    Right now I would launch the 4 Irish Channels on DTT plus BBC 1 and 2 NI. Make RTÉ News Now a feature, a good schedule is just required with a few broadcasts from our European Neighbours such as PBS's news from other EBU members. And also Community TV, City Channel and 3e. City Channel would have to change in the future.

    In May 2010 begin to look for new commercial competitors that will source material from Ireland rather than giving DTT free to Multinational organisations, to be operational by October 2010. Licences issued by June only on the condition that the services are launched in October. If services aren't launched then just broadcast the Viacom set of channels, sure they need the help.

    Let Setanta and Sky provide Pay Per View. And organise RTÉ HD for an October launch. And yes forget One Vision and Easy TV.

    But the DTT's commercial services cannot be paid for by the public purse either through giving free access to Multinational organisations or through Pay TV.
    At this point the most we can expect or hope for in the short term is RTE1, RTE2, TV3, TG4 plus whatever RTE variants RTE can come up with.

    And variants from both TG4 and TV3. Let TnaG (The overseeing body of TG4) oversee the IFB channel and OTV. TV3 would happily allow 3e FTA.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,011 ✭✭✭carrolls


    Elmo wrote: »
    I am sure TV3 would be delighted to see UTV getting free access to DTT while they pay for the privileged.
    Where did I say free access? I said Allow them on to the free mux, and don't charge them exorbitant fees for doing so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,641 ✭✭✭✭Elmo


    carrolls wrote: »
    Where did I say free access? I said Allow them on to the free mux, and don't charge them exorbitant fees for doing so.

    Sorry. Indeed charge what it costs. But I still think TV3 would have some issues unless UTV decided that they wanted a UTV ROI service that would replace some of the ITV Network shows with different imports. UTV may want to have an ROI TV service, looking at their expansion into ROI Radio and their phenomenal slide in viewers from ROI since 2000.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,011 ✭✭✭carrolls


    slegs wrote: »
    This all sounds great carrolls but its not realistic. There is no money to support subsidisation of STBs or for subsidising costs for free UK channels.

    All of this has to be self funding which makes it more challenging to support a UK Freeview type model here. Now if they had planned for it from day one instead of wasting time and money on Pay DTT it might be a different story.

    At this point the most we can expect or hope for in the short term is RTE1, RTE2, TV3, TG4 plus whatever RTE variants RTE can come up with. At a stretch we might get BBC1+2 if Ryan does another u turn.

    Anything launching at this point would be a leap forward from where we are

    As it is the only model that has any chance of working long term based on past history in different countries, DTT is doomed. Unless of course they listen to me instead of you. ;)


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement