Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ha ha lol. Sure it's only a joke... Mod Warning Post 69

  • 08-01-2010 04:21PM
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 18,239 ✭✭✭✭WindSock


    I noticed this facebook group there yesterday. It was set up as a joke initially, for fun I suppose. Now it looks to me as going over the top, especially with the domestic abuse jokes, and the pictures too. Sad thing is, there are loads of guys (and some chicks) thanking the same jokes that are poured out over and over again.
    Do you think I am a bit sensitive by being a bit disgusted by it? Or am I right on sister? Heaven knows, I have laughed at some kitchen jokes before too myself, about 15 years ago though. Some of the 'bitch do this' posts don't sit right though.

    http://www.facebook.com/group.php?v=info&ref=search&gid=242731297745#/group.php?v=wall&ref=search&gid=242731297745

    It seems to have become a sexist free for all at the moment. I did report it but there is no category for sexism, only racism as usual :rolleyes:


«13456

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,130 ✭✭✭✭Karl Hungus


    WindSock wrote: »
    Do you think I am a bit sensitive by being a bit disgusted by it?

    There's nothing more disgusting than stale jokes tbh.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,239 ✭✭✭✭WindSock


    There's nothing more disgusting than stale jokes tbh.


    True.




    / awaits Harry Enfields 'Women know your limits' to be posted...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,488 ✭✭✭pikachucheeks


    I'm taking it in jest, for the most part.

    A few guys I know have joined the group (luckily, none of the guys who post here :P) and I assume they're only doing it for the laugh, rather than to take a serious stab at women.

    They think it's funny, to bring back these silly out-dated stereotypes of women to try and annoy us.

    I don't think there's any serious malice involved though, or at least, I should hope not.

    Although, some of those "jokes" and comments are ridiculous.

    "You wanna hear a funny joke? womens rights"

    :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,647 ✭✭✭✭Fago!


    I reckon even though these people are posting these jokes, they don't actually feel that way.

    Some of them are funny, some of them are stupid, and the rest are just beyond mean.

    Some of the girls seem to be joining in.

    I clicked on the "Photos" part of it and some of the pics are a bit disgusting TBH!

    However, I don't take it seriously. They're the "Adrian Kennedy's" of the facebook group world. Just tryin to be controversial. (At least I hope)


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,698 Mod ✭✭✭✭Silverfish


    WindSock wrote: »
    True.




    / awaits Harry Enfields 'Women know your limits' to be posted...

    That won't be happening in this thread.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,640 ✭✭✭Pushtrak


    There are lots of idiots on both sides of the gender fence. Obviously, that group is going to attract more of the intellectually challenged from one side than the other.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,819 ✭✭✭✭g'em


    WindSock wrote: »
    Do you think I am a bit sensitive by being a bit disgusted by it?

    Nope, not at all. Laughing at these jokes over and over establishes a tolerance for them. A tolerance for them can, over time, establish a sense of normality in them. They're in ridiculously bad taste.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,560 ✭✭✭southsiderosie


    Ugh.

    I hate facebook "cause" status updates, so I'm generally sympathetic to the idea of an anti-cause update group. But this goes beyond the limits of bad taste. It's one thing to use a silly 50's style photo - it's quite another to use real anti-domestic violence ads, or repeatedly use the word bitch. Although, to be honest, reading through some of the comments, it could have been a thread in AH...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,239 ✭✭✭✭WindSock


    g'em wrote: »
    Nope, not at all. Laughing at these jokes over and over establishes a tolerance for them. A tolerance for them can, over time, establish a sense of normality in them. They're in ridiculously bad taste.

    Yeah, when reading the page, I was reminded by this article, posted in another thread a few days ago;

    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/opinion/2010/0104/1224261594914.html

    Unmerited jokes are a travesty of the feminine character

    JANUARY 4TH, 1923




    FROM THE ARCHIVES: This column, on what was effectively the women’s page of The Irish Times in 1923 was written by someone using the pen-name Lumex and could be seen, perhaps, as an early plea for political correctness as well as illustrating some of the constant features of all progress in women’s rights.

    EVERYONE ENJOYS a joke, and no one more than woman – even at her own expense. When one comes to think of it, has not woman herself been an unfailing subject for funny stories in every pantomime, every comic paper, and most after-dinner speeches? The fund of jokes has not by any means reached the point of exhaustion yet.

    Many of them are well-merited, many true to life, and others again are redeemed by their inherent wit; but a host are still going the rounds about which something should be said in a quiet way, for they are both unjust and unmerited, so far-fetched in their exaggerations that they are a travesty of the feminine character.

    And women themselves are, perhaps, too ready to pass these latters over with a generous smile.
    You know what has been said about giving a dog a bad name. Is it wise, think you, dear womenfolk, to allow this type of unworthy joke against yourselves to always pass unheeded? It hurts sometimes, and not because it is turned against yourselves, but because of something in it that is really an injustice.
    Even in wit there should be a margin left for an element of fair play and a certain kindliness of spirit. For ridicule can be as deadly in effect as a serpent’s sting; it can spread wrong ideas in a more potent and telling way than any precept couched in direct and forceful terms could convey.
    If a simple case in point is needed – the first woman to ride a bicycle in the public street was stoned; she was ostracised by society, denounced from the pulpit, the theme of ribald song, the butt of the ignorant.

    And yet, what more harmless than the poor bicycle; what more essential to every-day needs, and what has contributed more largely to her present-day freedom? For it was the happy thought of the bicycle that released her once and for all from the thralldom of the trailing skirt, the tight waist, the embroidery frame, and their natural concomitant – the never-ending doctor’s bill!

    Each stretching of the wings has brought with it the same list of persecutions in a greater or less degree; university education, political freedom, the entrée to the professions – all alike had to be won in the teeth of the bitterest opposition from the unthinking masses.
    So public opinion is a force to be reckoned with – and of very much greater concern to women than to men. Every little counts, and no opportunity should be lost for educating the popular mind to a healthier idea, a truer conception of the feminine.

    A cheap jibe at her sex no woman should allow to pass without a protest, in some form or other, to the perpetrator. In recent years, the low-water level has undoubtedly been raised, but all would benefit by the raising of it a little higher still.
    But there are jokes and jokes, and some of the best are those centering around woman.

    Human failings can quite well be made the subject of merriment without hurting if presented in the right way. For example, the old pantomime rhyme –
    “Put two old women to two cups of tea,
    And they will talk of more scandal than ever could be.
    Put two old men to two glasses of beer,
    And they will talk of more work than they could do in a year.”
    Another instance in which the sharpness of a thrust was robbed of its hurt by a sheath of wit was provided by the following story:- A man called upon to propose a toast to the first and newly-admitted lady members of his club expressed his pent-up feelings in the words –
    “To the ladies! Once our superiors, now our equals.”

    Fun, frolic, laughter – this work-a-day world needs as much as it can get; but the milk of human kindness should be dispensed at the same time with a generous hand

    Thinking of this reminded to challenge this sort of crap everytime it arises. There is trying to be funny, then there is a bad taste feeding frenzy. I think if you want to make bad taste jokes, do it where it is accepted, out of the public eye for instance.

    Replace the word 'bitch' with 'n1gger' and we'll see how long it lasts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,503 ✭✭✭✭jellie


    Looking at the group I thought it was a bit stupid but didnt find it particularly offensive, just took it as a joke. To be honest, women all posting their bra colours on facebook seems a bit odd to me, i got the mail and didnt do it cause i doubt anyone cares what colour my bra is.

    But i looked at the pictures and some of them are REALLY offensive & worth reporting.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,130 ✭✭✭✭Karl Hungus


    g'em wrote: »
    Laughing at these jokes over and over establishes a tolerance for them. A tolerance for them can, over time, establish a sense of normality in them.

    Nonsense. Laughing at something in the context of a joke doesn't do any such thing, any more than people who tell sick jokes establish a sense of normality with dead babies. It's the same as the whole 'desensitization' malarkey you hear aimed violence in films and TV, but no matter how many times you see Bruce Will shoot someone onscreen, it doesn't establish a sense of normality with seeing someone shot in real life.

    Believe me, I've laughed at my fair share of hideously offensive, racist, sexist and otherwise in bad taste jokes, and I certainly don't feel any sense of normality in any of it though. More often than not, a joke is just a joke.

    I'll leave you with this, enjoy:

    1262960693172.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,819 ✭✭✭✭g'em


    Nonsense. Laughing at something in the context of a joke doesn't do any such thing, any more than people who tell sick jokes establish a sense of normality with dead babies.
    Dead baby jokes are accepted as bad taste, it's a verbatim topic for most people. Anti-women jokes on the other hand are much more widely tolerated and there *is* certainly a sense of normality about them. They don't get challenged as often, they don't get frowned upon, and just as Windsock asked in her OP, when they are challenged we run the risk of being seen as overly sensitive.
    More often than not, a joke is just a joke.
    That doesn't make it funny and it doesn't mean it's right. I find the 'jokes' about domestic abuse in particular extremely offensive - it's an issue that's still struggling to be taken seriously by a lot of people, and these kinds of things just don't help.

    A joke is definitely not a joke when it seeks to undermine and belittle, which is, imho, what those pictures do.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,239 ✭✭✭✭WindSock


    Nonsense. Laughing at something in the context of a joke doesn't do any such thing, any more than people who tell sick jokes establish a sense of normality with dead babies. It's the same as the whole 'desensitization' malarkey you hear aimed violence in films and TV, but no matter how many times you see Bruce Will shoot someone onscreen, it doesn't establish a sense of normality with seeing someone shot in real life.

    Well, there is laughing at something, hell I have laughed at and told some hideously offensive jokes in my time, what makes them funny is that it is sort of 'forbidden' or taboo. I think that is why people laugh at these jokes mostly. It is not an intention to offend personally the group at the butt of the joke.

    Then there is sticking the boot in, this is something that is intent to offend and rides in the shadow of the joke.

    Example:

    Joke: a horse walks into a bar and the barman asks 'why the long face?'

    Idiot: haha lol. Stupid horse with it's ugly long face, I hope it get's pwnd next time it walks into a bar and is sent off to the glue factory.

    Horse: Hay, that's not very nice :(

    Idiot: Lighten up, it's just a joke. Jeez.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,462 ✭✭✭Orla K


    I hate things like that. It's still being sexist even if it is hiding behind a 'joke'.

    That kind of 'humour' is the main reason I don't go into AH, I just end up getting píssed off at the stupidity of others.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,130 ✭✭✭✭Karl Hungus


    WindSock wrote: »
    Then there is sticking the boot in, this is something that is intent to offend and rides in the shadow of the joke.

    Example:

    Joke: a horse walks into a bar and the barman asks 'why the long face?'

    Idiot: haha lol. Stupid horse with it's ugly long face, I hope it get's pwnd next time it walks into a bar and is sent off to the glue factory.

    Horse: Hay, that's not very nice :(

    Idiot: Lighten up, it's just a joke. Jeez.

    Is that what's actually happening here though?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,819 ✭✭✭✭g'em


    I'd say so, yeah. Heaps of boot sticking.

    11542_194011964703_568289703_2845627_6713717_n.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,007 ✭✭✭Moriarty


    g'em wrote: »
    Dead baby jokes are accepted as bad taste, it's a verbatim topic for most people. Anti-women jokes on the other hand are much more widely tolerated and there *is* certainly a sense of normality about them. They don't get challenged as often, they don't get frowned upon, and just as Windsock asked in her OP, when they are challenged we run the risk of being seen as overly sensitive.

    Why do you feel the need to challenge them, exactly? Do you feel the need to challenge any risque humour? Most people who tell these jokes tell them because they're funny - and a lot of them are funny, just like a load of other risque subjects. Anyone who tells them for the primary reason of having a dig at women is just having a dig at women through the form of a joke. If it wasn't a joke, they'd just find another way to comment. The idiot is at fault, not the joke. Intent is everything.

    g'em wrote: »
    That doesn't make it funny and it doesn't mean it's right. I find the 'jokes' about domestic abuse in particular extremely offensive - it's an issue that's still struggling to be taken seriously by a lot of people, and these kinds of things just don't help.

    A joke is definitely not a joke when it seeks to undermine and belittle, which is, imho, what those pictures do.

    Who are you to say what I can and can't find humerous, exactly? They're all jokes, some of which are very bloody funny.

    I still don't find the harsh reality of a dead baby or domestic violence funny, though. Strange, eh?

    If you don't like it, feel free to ignore it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,239 ✭✭✭✭WindSock


    Is that what's actually happening here though?

    Here are just a few examples from the Wall posts today...

    -Dont make me raise my hand!!! Now go cook me a steak. And dont burn it either bitch!! Oh, and some onion rings too...

    -ya bitches back to the kitchen

    -What do the 34% of women in the U.K. that suffer from domestic abuse each year have in common? They dont ****ing listen

    Reply: 34% of women shouldn't have talked unless spoken to

    -Wat do ya call a woman with two black eyes. . . . . . a slow learner!

    -I geniunely hope any woman who posts a colour as their status gets breast cancer! That is all!... oh and make me a sandwich, I think I might be getting thinner! lol NAH!!!!

    And these are the comments re: pictures. This is what I disliked the most. Both pics & comments:

    http://www.facebook.com/group.php?v=wall&ref=search&gid=242731297745#/photo_comments.php?subj=242731297745


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,320 ✭✭✭✭Chucky the tree


    g'em wrote: »
    A joke is definitely not a joke when it seeks to undermine and belittle, which is, imho, what those pictures do.


    Nearly all jokes undermine or belittle something or someone.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,239 ✭✭✭✭WindSock


    Moriarty wrote: »
    If you don't like it, feel free to ignore it.


    Would you say the same regarding the furore over the RSA ad a few months ago? Granted that wasn't a joke, but it was sexist none the less, and it obviously irked people.

    As I said, I don't mind people making controversial jokes, it's the fact that others see it as a green light to spit as much venom as they can.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 123 ✭✭elleburp


    WindSock wrote: »
    -I geniunely hope any woman who posts a colour as their status gets breast cancer! That is all!...

    How is that funny?

    I don't see the joke :mad:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 120 ✭✭Massive Muscles


    WindSock wrote: »
    Here are just a few examples from the Wall posts today...

    -Dont make me raise my hand!!! Now go cook me a steak. And dont burn it either bitch!! Oh, and some onion rings too...

    -ya bitches back to the kitchen

    -What do the 34% of women in the U.K. that suffer from domestic abuse each year have in common? They dont ****ing listen

    Reply: 34% of women shouldn't have talked unless spoken to

    -Wat do ya call a woman with two black eyes. . . . . . a slow learner!

    -I geniunely hope any woman who posts a colour as their status gets breast cancer! That is all!... oh and make me a sandwich, I think I might be getting thinner! lol NAH!!!!

    And these are the comments re: pictures. This is what I disliked the most. Both pics & comments:

    http://www.facebook.com/group.php?v=wall&ref=search&gid=242731297745#/photo_comments.php?subj=242731297745
    Lol. You have some issues if you are offended by this as it is just a certain style of humour.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,007 ✭✭✭Moriarty


    WindSock wrote: »
    Would you say the same regarding the furore over the RSA ad a few months ago? Granted that wasn't a joke, but it was sexist none the less, and it obviously irked people.

    As I said, I don't mind people making controversial jokes, it's the fact that others see it as a green light to spit as much venom as they can.

    There was furore over an RSA ad? That must have been exciting.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,819 ✭✭✭✭g'em


    Moriarty wrote: »
    Why do you feel the need to challenge them, exactly? Do you feel the need to challenge any risque humour?
    If I hear a joke directed at me that I find personally offensive, I would challenge it. I don't find the jokes on that page funny so I'm challenging them.
    Moriarty wrote:
    Most people who tell these jokes tell them because they're funny
    funny to whom? I'm simply saying I don't find these funny at all, and said why.
    Moriarty wrote:
    Who are you to say what I can and can't find humerous, exactly?
    Where did I say anything of the sort?
    Moriarty wrote:
    They're all jokes, some of which are very bloody funny.
    In your opinion. I don't agree with your opinion. I'm allowed to do that.
    Moriarty wrote:
    I still don't find the harsh reality of a dead baby or domestic violence funny, though. Strange, eh?
    So you find some anti-women jokes funny and others not? Fair enough. Have you a sliding scale of funniness? I'm genuinely not trying to be smart, just wondering. Personally I stopped finding the majority of anti-women jokes funny a long time ago (if I ever did) becuase I hear them quite unsubtly sent in my direction over and over and over again.
    Moriarty wrote:
    If you don't like it, feel free to ignore it.
    I could do, or I could challenge it, which I choose to do, because (and I'll say it again) in my opinion it does harm.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 123 ✭✭elleburp


    Lol. You have some issues if you are offended by this as it is just a certain style of humour.

    Saying that you "genuinely" hope someone gets breast cancer is not a joke, it's sick


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,239 ✭✭✭✭WindSock


    Moriarty wrote: »
    There was furore over an RSA ad? That must have been exciting.

    Yarp


    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055617730

    Note the irony at the end of the OP too. Actually,it was in the WHOLE thread.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 120 ✭✭Massive Muscles


    elleburp wrote: »
    Saying that you "genuinely" hope someone gets breast cancer is not a joke, it's sick
    That is part of the humour. The faux sincerity of the statement makes it funny.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,819 ✭✭✭✭g'em


    Nearly all jokes undermine or belittle something or someone.
    There's a difference between poking fun at and undermining.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,239 ✭✭✭✭WindSock


    elleburp wrote: »
    Saying that you "genuinely" hope someone gets breast cancer is not a joke, it's sick


    Well, that is what irked me about a lot of the comments. Some people don't know the difference between a joke, and being a tool.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,315 ✭✭✭✭amacachi


    WindSock wrote: »
    Well, that is what irked me about a lot of the comments. Some people don't know the difference between a joke, and being a tool.

    Yes, some, out of about 10,000 members. And that's not a gender thing, just because a type of cancer was mentioned doesn't make it so.


Advertisement
Advertisement