Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

What Is This Lisbon Treaty All About?

24

Comments

  • #52
    mickdw
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,572 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    Without claiming to know much about the treaty, it appears to me from media reports that the huge majority of people in the EU would vote against this given the chance. Its just unlucky that most countries governments can push this through without asking the people.
    Even it all these people are against it because they cannot quite understand it still means it shouldnt go through until a revised plan can be clearly put to the people. Unfortunately, that is not going to happen as constitutionally most governments can just sign off on these things.
    For these reasons, I think we should do our best to stop this thing in its tracks as we have the power to do it. Forget about the threats of being left behind etc. That was said after the first vote and it didnt happen. They are back begging for a yes vote now. If this thing is stopped, we might get something more transparent.
    Far from being left behind, we have obtained guarantees from Europe (although most likely worthless) re what is/is not contained in treaty.
    Vote no I say.


  • #53
    dlofnep
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    Purple Gorilla wrote: »
    That's my point. People voting no to spite the government seem to ignore the fact that the only real alternatives, Labour & Fine Gael also support it.

    I voted no the last time; and my estimates have come true - I am voting no again. The same parties supported the yes vote last time as this time - It has no bearing on my vote. I'm not handing our power over to Europe, which clearly already has a hold on Irish politics by forcing a re-run of the referendum. And on what premise? The fact that people were misinformed or undereducated last time around? The average Joe still doesn't have a clue what the treaty is about and they will still be uninformed this time around.

    My vote was no - but apparently, it was the wrong answer, and will continue to be the wrong answer until I vote yes. This treaty has been rejected time and time again, under different forms and guises.. but it still manages to crawl back into politics. People are pissed off with this, and don't want to keep voting on the same issue. If it fails again (which it probably won't due to the Government using scaremongering), then it still will be passed.


  • #54
    The_Minister
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭The_Minister


    Darlughda wrote: »
    No male baby I cuddle in my arms today is ever going to be forced to fight in organised murder if I can help it. That is why I am voting NO to Lisbon.
    So you believe that the Lisbon Treaty will lead to conscription.

    Despite the fact that it won't, and that there is nothing in the treaty that could lead to conscription.

    Despite the fact that this exact same allegation was levelled against the Maastricht Treaty and the Nice treaty.

    Both of which passed without conscription being introduced.

    Tell me, do you have any rational reason for believing this?


  • #55
    The_Minister
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭The_Minister


    dlofnep wrote: »
    My vote was no - but apparently, it was the wrong answer, and will continue to be the wrong answer until I vote yes.

    Then you will be absolutely thrilled to hear that this is the last time we get to vote on this.
    If we vote No, the Lisbon Treaty is dead and gone.

    There will still be future treaties, containing many of the same clauses as the Lisbon Treaty, because some changes have to be made, but most likely any future treaty will be substantially different.


  • #56
    dlofnep
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,759 ✭✭✭✭dlofnep


    The_Minister wrote: »
    Then you will be absolutely thrilled to hear that this is the last time we get to vote on this.

    I was told that the last time.
    The_Minister wrote: »
    If we vote No, the Lisbon Treaty is dead and gone.

    Do you not think that they will ratify it anyway, and give Ireland clauses if it fails again?
    The_Minister wrote: »
    There will still be future treaties, containing many of the same clauses as the Lisbon Treaty, because some changes have to be made, but most likely any future treaty will be substantially different.

    Same shít, different shade of brown, tbh.


  • #57
    The_Minister
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭The_Minister


    mickdw wrote: »
    Without claiming to know much about the treaty, it appears to me from media reports that the huge majority of people in the EU would vote against this given the chance.
    Actually overall more people voted for it than against it. :P
    mickdw wrote: »
    Its just unlucky that most countries governments can push this through without asking the people.
    If you read the Crotty judgement you'll see that our government probably can too. There is nothing forcing the government to have a referendum on more than a small part of the treaty - it's just become a tradition in Ireland, started by Haughey, that we vote on the whole treaty.
    mickdw wrote: »
    Even it all these people are against it because they cannot quite understand it still means it shouldnt go through until a revised plan can be clearly put to the people.
    It is a treaty negotiated by 25 members covering all the countries of Europe, 500 million people with various languages and cultures.
    It can't be simple.
    There are 5 pages on the Polish steel industry alone for example.
    But, even now, a man with average intelligence can understand the Lisbon Treaty. He just needs to make some coffee and stick with it for several hours. He will also need to look up several pieces of background information so he can put it in context.
    The treaty isn't as complicated and unreadable as the No side have made out, it merely requires perseverance.


  • #58
    IRockUrSocks
    Closed Accounts Posts: 80 ✭✭IRockUrSocks


    The_Minister wrote: »
    But, even now, a man with average intelligence can understand the Lisbon Treaty. He just needs to make some coffee and stick with it for several hours. He will also need to look up several pieces of background information so he can put it in context.
    The treaty isn't as complicated and unreadable as the No side have made out, it merely requires perseverance.

    Wasn't Biffo asked if he had even read it? The grin on his face suggested he was getting around to it. Too busy spending his salary which exceeds both Barack Obama's and Mr. Browns.


  • #59
    The_Minister
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭The_Minister


    Rebelheart wrote: »
    There is only one answer to this vote: yes. It's just silly to vote anything else considering what has happened to this state in the past 12 months.
    Don't call all No voters silly.
    Many of them are, and many of them are just confused, but some of them have decent reasons for voting No.
    Calling people silly for voting No is the kind of complacency and arrogance that killed the first Lisbon Treaty.

    Also, while the EU is the only reason Ireland is still here after the last year or so, the rejection of the Lisbon Treaty did not cause the economic crash.
    Rebelheart wrote: »
    This one is going to pass - easily. Most Irish people don't have their heads in the sand now.

    Actually, I think it might fail again.


  • #60
    thomond2006
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    TheZohan wrote: »
    Yes, plus only Sinn Fein suporters and people who are ignorant of the facts vote No.

    +1

    Since when did anyone give two ****s about what those a-holes say?


  • Advertisement
  • #61
    The_Minister
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭The_Minister


    IRockUrSocks wrote: »
    Wasn't Biffo asked if he had even read it? The grin on his face suggested he was getting around to it. Too busy spending his salary which exceeds both Barack Obama's and Mr. Browns.

    He helped negotiate it.
    He may not have read it cover to cover but he would certainly have been aware of its contents and the remifications of what it contained.


  • #62
    The_Minister
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭The_Minister


    thomond2006 wrote: »
    +1

    Since when did anyone give two ****s about what those a-holes say?
    He was being sarcastic I think:)

    Although, if Sinn Fein start getting moral and talking about of the country with regards to Lisbon so soon (say the next two weeks) after Ferris met the McCabe killers as they left jail I will go ballistic.


  • #63
    Euro_Kraut
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,957 ✭✭✭Euro_Kraut


    dlofnep wrote: »
    Do you not think that they will ratify it anyway, and give Ireland clauses if it fails again?


    I guess its possible that will happen. Not sure if that would be positive for Ireland though.

    I'll be voting yes. I am in favour of greater European integration. Some (not all) decisions are better made at a european level. Ireland could benefit a lot over the coming years from closers links to the European mainland - particulary in terms of social policy. We need to look to Finland more and Britian less.

    This is a good treaty, not a great treaty. But we should never let the perfect be the enemy of the good.


  • #64
    IRockUrSocks
    Closed Accounts Posts: 80 ✭✭IRockUrSocks


    The_Minister wrote: »
    He was being sarcastic I think:)

    Although, if Sinn Fein start getting moral and talking about of the country with regards to Lisbon so soon (say the next two weeks) after Ferris met the McCabe killers as they left jail I will go ballistic.

    What are Sinn Feins gripes with the treaty as a whole?

    And since when have the Irish Republic listened to them during the last so and so decades?


  • #65
    The_Minister
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭The_Minister


    dlofnep wrote: »
    I was told that the last time.
    Except we all knew it wasn't true last time.
    This time various European Officials have said that Europe will have to move on if it is rejected, and a French minister visiting Ireland recently said that it doesn't matter what Ireland does, so long as they do it quickly.
    There will not be another vote on the Lisbon treaty.
    dlofnep wrote: »
    Do you not think that they will ratify it anyway, and give Ireland clauses if it fails again?
    I don't actually (although technically the Dail could ratify most of the treaty). The Treaty requires the agreement of all countries according to their constitutional rules. Ireland has to say yes. The only other option would be to kick Ireland out of the Union (an unpalatable and extreme move).

    The clauses we got this time are there to fix non-existant problems.
    Abortions, conscription etc, are all in people's heads.
    If Ireland was to require substantive changes to the treaty, then other countries would demand similar concessions, and the whole thing would have to be renegotiated.
    dlofnep wrote: »
    Same shít, different shade of brown, tbh.
    To follow on with your language, tough shít.
    Changes need to be made in the structure of Europe, these changes will be made even if they have to be ratified by the Dail.
    On the issues of how those changes are made and what specifically they are is open to debate though. The majority of the Lisbon treaty does not necasserily fall into this catagory.


  • #66
    An Fear Aniar
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,377 ✭✭✭An Fear Aniar


    This referendum means that the votes cast in the last referendum were worthless.

    It would be easier to vote NO now than have to get into armed insurrection (again) 20 years down the road.

    Serious business. Vote NO.

    .


  • Advertisement
  • #67
    weeder
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,469 ✭✭✭weeder


    cherryghost wrote: »
    Vote No?

    1 internet for you sir


  • #68
    K-9
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,311 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    Gerry Adams correctly quoted “The people said no. Exactly the same treaty is being presented once again.” he also stated that it was a "bad treaty" and put it to the people not to be swayed by propaganda

    LOLZ

    Darlughda wrote: »

    No male baby I cuddle in my arms today is ever going to be forced to fight in organised murder if I can help it. That is why I am voting NO to Lisbon.

    Its ok, female babies will be included too, if we haven't forced abortions by then.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • #69
    annabellee77
    Closed Accounts Posts: 158 ✭✭annabellee77


    Darlughda wrote: »

    No male baby I cuddle in my arms today is ever going to be forced to fight in organised murder if I can help it. That is why I am voting NO to Lisbon.

    Well, I'm still quite undecided......but if any statement was gonna push me to the YES side.......this is it!!!! :rolleyes::rolleyes::D


  • #70
    TheZohanS
    Closed Accounts Posts: 11,582 ✭✭✭✭TheZohanS


    K-9 wrote: »
    Its ok, female babies will be included too, if we haven't forced abortions by then.


    Stop scaremongering.

    We'll only have forced abortions if people vote No...and our economy will be in the sh!t.


  • #71
    Pygmalion
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,082 ✭✭✭Pygmalion


    Darlughda wrote: »
    No male baby I cuddle in my arms today is ever going to be forced to fight in organised murder if I can help it. That is why I am voting NO to Lisbon.

    You would be against conscription.
    That's great.

    Now why are you using that as your reasoning for voting no to the Lisbon treaty? The Lisbon treaty says nothing about conscription and won't change a single law related to it.


  • Advertisement
  • #72
    IRockUrSocks
    Closed Accounts Posts: 80 ✭✭IRockUrSocks


    Wow, the poll is the closest it's ever been. I'm going to go all out and vote accordingly to this polls outcome. :D


  • #73
    squod
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,704 ✭✭✭squod


    I've another way of looking at this treaty.

    Let's say a yes vote happens and Qualified Majority Voting is introduced.

    Go along with me.

    So, Im a state and I want X thing to get passed via this process.
    Wouldn't it make sense for me then to wait until the balance of favour is on my side with regard getting X passed. As in a number of like minded states wanting to change, let's say, the common agricultural policy for example.

    Also it'd make easier states to informally approach each other, with a view to internal bargaining among members for votes in favour of X, or whatever.

    Remember no state so far has passed lisbon via a public vote.

    Last poll done in the UK showed a massive majority would reject the Lisbon treaty if they were asked to vote.

    Why do you think the recent polls here are so close to a 50/50 split?

    To me voting again on lisbon doesn't make sense.


  • #74
    phasers
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,159 ✭✭✭✭phasers


    Please everybody vote no, every time there's any kind of national votey thing my mam bakes a cake.

    I'm not sure why.


  • #75
    Feathers
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,082 ✭✭✭Feathers


    People give out about voters with a "don't know, vote no" attitude. "Why don't you let the people who do know decide for you & stay at home on polling day?" I heard this advice given to people last time. What rubbish.

    We're being given a broad overview of changes under the Lisbon Treaty in a patronising booklet & then being asked, on the whole, to trust the politicians when they tell us it will be good for us. Hmm, I wonder why people have a hard time trusting our politicians?

    Added to this - opinion around everyday people in Europe (& the defeat of the EU Constitution in France/Denmark) points to the fact that most people in European don't want this to pass. We're being asked to pass a treaty that the bureaucrats aren't willing to put to their own people for a vote, because they know it would fail. Not a cause to be skeptical?

    Everyone also keeps telling us that X, Y and Z will/won't be brought in if Lisbon is passed.

    The trouble with the Lisbon Treaty, is that it isn't easily boiled down to its core ideas: we have a referendum on divorce - vote Yes if you want it, No if you don't. Simple. The Lisbon Treaty seems to propose fairly wide policies in certain areas, rather than the laws themselves - these aren't formulated yet.

    Justice Iarlaith O'Neill, head of the Referendum Commission last time out, was asked on RTÉ Radio if abortion could be brought in under Lisbon - he spend two minutes shuffling papers & ended up dodging the question.

    If the person who is in charge of informing the general public about the document can't give a clear, concise answer, it's a bit stupid telling people that it's simple & that they should understand it. & of course there will be scaremongering going on.

    All that said, of course Lisbon will pass - as the government are scaremongering themselves with regard to the economy.


  • #76
    cooperguy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,650 ✭✭✭cooperguy


    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    Not surprising at all that Sinn Fein has stuck to its policy of last year on a NO vote.

    Gerry Adams correctly quoted “The people said no. Exactly the same treaty is being presented once again.” he also stated that it was a "bad treaty" and put it to the people not to be swayed by propaganda and the current economic climate.

    With Libertas gone Sinn Féin now looks set to be the only remaining well financed voice in the anti-Lisbon camp.

    Last year, the party’s key arguments against the treaty were claims it would end Ireland’s automatic right to a commissioner, it would erode neutrality and undermine workers’ rights

    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2009/0810/breaking1.htm

    Of coarse the fact that we were loosing the "Irish" commisioner under the Nice Treaty and not the Lisbon treaty, that it doesnt in any way effect our neutrality and if anything strengthens the rights of workers due to the Charter of Fundamental Rights included in the treaty didnt for a second stop them making those claims!!


  • #77
    K-9
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,311 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    squod wrote: »
    I've another way of looking at this treaty.

    Let's say a yes vote happens and Qualified Majority Voting is introduced.

    Go along with me.

    So, Im a state and I want X thing to get passed via this process.
    Wouldn't it make sense for me then to wait until the balance of favour is on my side with regard getting X passed. As in a number of like minded states wanting to change, let's say, the common agricultural policy for example.

    Also it'd make easier states to informally approach each other, with a view to internal bargaining among members for votes in favour of X, or whatever.

    Remember no state so far has passed lisbon via a public vote.

    Last poll done in the UK showed a massive majority would reject the Lisbon treaty if they were asked to vote.

    Why do you think the recent polls here are so close to a 50/50 split?

    To me voting again on lisbon doesn't make sense.

    The above isn't a bad summary of how the EU works anyway and always has. Vetoes are rarely used and it is about cooperation. Losing vetoes sounds scarey if you don't realise that.

    No other state has passed it by a public vote because their constitution doesn't require it. The UK and Germany had legal challenges to that. We are indeed the odd one out on Referenda.

    On the UK, tbh, I think the problem there isn't so much Lisbon, it's more the EU. They've opted out of the Euro and many other things and still they are eurosceptic.
    Feathers wrote: »
    People give out about voters with a "don't know, vote no" attitude. "Why don't you let the people who do know decide for you & stay at home on polling day?" I heard this advice given to people last time. What rubbish.

    We're being given a broad overview of changes under the Lisbon Treaty in a patronising booklet & then being asked, on the whole, to trust the politicians when they tell us it will be good for us. Hmm, I wonder why people have a hard time trusting our politicians?

    Added to this - opinion around everyday people in Europe (& the defeat of the EU Constitution in France/Denmark) points to the fact that most people in European don't want this to pass. We're being asked to pass a treaty that the bureaucrats aren't willing to put to their own people for a vote, because they know it would fail. Not a cause to be skeptical?

    Everyone also keeps telling us that X, Y and Z will/won't be brought in if Lisbon is passed.

    The trouble with the Lisbon Treaty, is that it isn't easily boiled down to its core ideas: we have a referendum on divorce - vote Yes if you want it, No if you don't. Simple. The Lisbon Treaty seems to propose fairly wide policies in certain areas, rather than the laws themselves - these aren't formulated yet.

    Justice Iarlaith O'Neill, head of the Referendum Commission last time out, was asked on RTÉ Radio if abortion could be brought in under Lisbon - he spend two minutes shuffling papers & ended up dodging the question.

    If the person who is in charge of informing the general public about the document can't give a clear, concise answer, it's a bit stupid telling people that it's simple & that they should understand it. & of course there will be scaremongering going on.

    All that said, of course Lisbon will pass - as the government are scaremongering themselves with regard to the economy.

    The booklet isn't patronising! Many people want a booklet like that as they don't have the time or inclination to read more on it. The Treaty is available to read if that is your inclination.

    As for abortion, it is clear our position will not be affected.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • #78
    colly10
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,009 ✭✭✭colly10


    One question on the treaty, if it gets passed will the people get to vote on future treatys?


  • #79
    WeeBushy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,572 ✭✭✭WeeBushy


    colly10 wrote: »
    One question on the treaty, if it gets passed will the people get to vote on future treatys?

    Yes, and don't let any no-voter tell you otherwise. Our constitution requires referendums on any further treaty or modification of part there of.


  • #80
    K-9
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,311 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    colly10 wrote: »
    One question on the treaty, if it gets passed will the people get to vote on future treatys?

    Yes, Croatia will be next.

    There is a thing called a self amending clause which the No side uses to argue otherwise. It ignores that any amending has to be done within each countries Constitutional requirements.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • #81
    The_Minister
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭The_Minister


    colly10 wrote: »
    One question on the treaty, if it gets passed will the people get to vote on future treatys?
    WeeBushy wrote: »
    Yes, and don't let any no-voter tell you otherwise. Our constitution requires referendums on any further treaty or modification of part there of.

    If you read the judgement of Crotty v. An Taoiseach you will see that actually, with the exception of foreign policy decisions, we don't have to have a referendum at all at the moment.

    Why doesn't anyone listen?

    /cries


  • Advertisement
  • #82
    K-9
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,311 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    The_Minister wrote: »

    If you read the judgement of Crotty v. An Taoiseach you will see that actually, with the exception of foreign policy decisions, we don't have to have a referendum at all at the moment.

    Why doesn't anyone listen?

    /cries

    Fair point.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • #83
    procure11
    Closed Accounts Posts: 421 ✭✭procure11


    thomond2006 wrote: »
    +1

    Since when did anyone give two ****s about what those a-holes say?


    Honestly I would not be surprised if the Irish people vote NO once again.

    I have tried my best to read the Lisbon treaty and it just seems to me as a slightly revised version of the EU constitution rejected by the French and the Dutch...hence it is unsurprising that the aforementioned nations decided to ratify the treaty the treaty without another referenda.

    I have listened to the Govt and the Yes voters and all they seem to be doing is consistently patronising the the public and educating them on how on stupid and unintelligent it would be for them to reject this treaty.We are constantly bombarded about the how Ireland would be economically destroyed and politically villified if we say NO again!!!...

    The Yes side come across as very pompous ,elitist and condecending...Ordinary folks dont listen to such !!!!


  • #84
    The_Minister
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭The_Minister


    procure11 wrote: »
    I have listened to the Govt and the Yes voters and all they seem to be doing is consistently patronising the the public and educating them on how on stupid and unintelligent it would be for them to reject this treaty.We are constantly bombarded about the how Ireland would be economically destroyed and politically villified if we say NO again!!!...

    The Yes side come across as very pompous ,elitist and condecending...Ordinary folks dont listen to such !!!!
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=61556595&postcount=59
    Not the entire Yes side.


  • #85
    K-9
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,311 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    procure11 wrote: »
    Honestly I would not be surprised if the Irish people vote NO once again.

    I have tried my best to read the Lisbon treaty and it just seems to me as a slightly revised version of the EU constitution rejected by the French and the Dutch...hence it is unsurprising that the aforementioned nations decided to ratify the treaty the treaty without another referenda.

    I have listened to the Govt and the Yes voters and all they seem to be doing is consistently patronising the the public and educating them on how on stupid and unintelligent it would be for them to reject this treaty.We are constantly bombarded about the how Ireland would be economically destroyed and politically villified if we say NO again!!!...

    The Yes side come across as very pompous ,elitist and condecending...Ordinary folks dont listen to such !!!!

    In fairness there are some on the No side who just seek offense, even if none is intended. I don't know why that is, as their points should stand for themselves and they shouldn't need stuff like this to prove a point or whatever.

    I do believe rational people do not believe abortion, conscription or taxation are under threat, but still some believe this. Probably is better to ignore but I hate thinking somebody would read the points and believe them.

    PS. The referendum point being a case in point. I like people asking is it an issue, but I hate people quoting the Treaty to say this is so. If they quoted the Treaty properly, it isn't an issue!

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • #86
    procure11
    Closed Accounts Posts: 421 ✭✭procure11


    The_Minister wrote: »
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=61556595&postcount=59
    Not the entire Yes side.

    Excellent .The truth however is that you would be in the minority,I would like you to visit the EU forum on boards....very one sided to say the least.Incidentally all polls on this site suggests a No victory...and this in my opinion could be alluded to the superior complex on the Yes side.


  • #87
    IRockUrSocks
    Closed Accounts Posts: 80 ✭✭IRockUrSocks


    These are the main features of the Lisbon Treaty:

    The Lisbon Treaty:
    • sets out the Union’s values – including respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights including the rights of minorities;
    • defines the EU’s competences more clearly than in previous Treaties and makes it clear that competences not explicitly conferred on the Union remain with the Member States;
    • gives legal effect to the Charter of Fundamental Rights and recognises the rights, freedoms and principles set out in the Charter;
    • will allow the EU to accede to the European Convention on Human Rights;
    • allows for a citizens’ initiative under which 1 million citizens from a number of Member States can petition the European Commission on issues falling within the EU’s competence;
    • expands the right of individuals to bring proceedings before the European Court of Justice in relation to acts of the Union;
    • gives a new role in EU affairs to national parliaments including the Oireachtas.
    • increases the powers of the European Parliament, which under Lisbon will have 751 members including 12 from Ireland. Under Lisbon, the European Parliament will legislate jointly on most EU issues with the Council of Ministers, where the Irish Government is represented alongside the governments of the other 26 EU Member States;
    • provides for the appointment of a President of the European Council who will hold office for a maximum period of 5 years and will chair four meetings of EU leaders each year;
    • allows for more decisions to be taken by the Council of Ministers on a new double majority basis, i.e. by at least 15 EU countries representing at least 65% of the Union’s population;
    • makes changes in the conduct of the Union’s external relations including by the appointment of a High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy;
    • gives citizens the right to deal with the EU institutions in any EU language including Irish;
    • makes a number of changes to the EU Treaties in respect of border checks, asylum and immigration, judicial cooperation in civil and criminal matters and police cooperation. Ireland is not bound by measures adopted in these areas, but can opt to be involved on a case-by-case basis;
    • gives the European Union some new competences in such areas as energy, humanitarian aid, tourism, sport, administrative cooperation and the participation by young people in the democratic life of Europe. Climate change is also a new political objective, given expression in the Treaty on foot of a proposal by Ireland."
    • Under an arrangement known as ‘enhanced cooperation’, the Treaty lays down the procedures for allowing a group of Member States to cooperate more deeply in certain areas of EU policy. This arrangement does not apply in the field of common foreign and security policy.

    These are for people who may not fully understand each individual proposal of the Treaty.


  • #88
    K-9
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,311 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    procure11 wrote: »
    Excellent .The truth however is that you would be in the minority,I would like you to visit the EU forum on boards....very one sided to say the least.Incidentally all polls on this site suggests a No victory...and this in my opinion could be alluded to the superior complex on the Yes side.

    Suppose it depends on what perspective you are coming from. If somebody asks a genuine question on there they are usually treated with respect. If somebody just posts verbatem from another site, they usually will be scoffed at.

    Unfortunately there seems to be very few middle ground posters over there.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • #89
    The_Minister
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭The_Minister


    procure11 wrote: »
    Excellent .The truth however is that you would be in the minority,I would like you to visit the EU forum on boards....very one sided to say the least.Incidentally all polls on this site suggests a No victory...and this in my opinion could be alluded to the superior complex on the Yes side.

    Firstly that not what alluded means - you mean attributed to.:)

    Secondly, most Yes side voters would be like me.
    It's just hard not to get frustrated when certain No siders come out with rather bizarre claims such as conscription.


  • #90
    IRockUrSocks
    Closed Accounts Posts: 80 ✭✭IRockUrSocks


    The_Minister wrote: »
    Firstly that not what alluded means - you mean attributed to.:)

    Secondly, most Yes side voters would be like me.
    It's just hard not to get frustrated when certain No siders come out with rather bizarre claims such as conscription.

    Yes. One of the legal guarantees secured by Ireland confirms that the Lisbon Treaty does not affect or prejudice Ireland’s traditional policy of military neutrality. This legal guarantee confirms that there will be no conscription and no European army. It also makes clear that nothing in the Lisbon Treaty will take away from Ireland’s entitlement to determine the nature or volume of our defence expenditure.

    Primarily, the No Side should have a good nose at the Treaty itself before speaking on something which they haven't read. I'm in the process of doing just that.


  • Advertisement
  • #91
    procure11
    Closed Accounts Posts: 421 ✭✭procure11


    K-9 wrote: »
    Suppose it depends on what perspective you are coming from. If somebody asks a genuine question on there they are usually treated with respect. If somebody just posts verbatem from another site, they usually will be scoffed at.

    Unfortunately there seems to be very few middle ground posters over there.

    You have a valid point but the fact is the Irish people have a very legitimate right to be upset because they have to vote again on an almost a similar treaty .I can reason with you that a lot of people would say things that are off topic and sometimes senseless but IMHO I think they are entitled to do so because they casted their vote not too long ago.

    Most of the Yes side are focused on what would be good for Ireland vis a vis Europe .We want to know what the future holds...is it going to be same old politics of ...you didnt get right first off sh..ite or are they going to listen to the populace?


    P.S...I dont mean the usual how Europe built/saved /rescued Ireland 10/20 years ago...stale news!!!...we could equally boast about the Polish/Lituanians in a few years time.


  • #92
    K-9
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,311 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    procure11 wrote: »
    You have a valid point but the fact is the Irish people have a very legitimate right to be upset because they have to vote again on an almost a similar treaty .I can reason with you that a lot of people would say things that are off topic and sometimes senseless but IMHO I think they are entitled to do so because they casted their vote not too long ago.

    Can't argue with that. They are entitled to be pissed off, but again the Govt. can run this referendum. Just as they are entitled to be pissed off, people are entitled to argue the Govt. can run this. Why people would get offended with that, I don't know!
    procure11 wrote:
    Most of the Yes side are focused on what would be good for Ireland vis a vis Europe .We want to know what the future holds...is it going to be same old politics of ...you didnt get right first off sh..ite or are they going to listen to the populace?


    P.S...I dont mean the usual how Europe built/saved /rescued Ireland 10/20 years ago...stale news!!!...we could equally boast about the Polish/Lituanians in a few years time.

    To me they have addressed some concerns No voters had. I don't believe they can address every No voters concern or indeed even the majority, given the reasons in polls.

    The rage at a second vote isn't a new phenomenon.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • #93
    The_Minister
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭The_Minister


    IRockUrSocks wrote: »
    Yes. One of the legal guarantees secured by Ireland confirms that the Lisbon Treaty does not affect or prejudice Ireland’s traditional policy of military neutrality. This legal guarantee confirms that there will be no conscription and no European army.
    There was never any chance of conscription being brought in, in the first place.


  • #94
    procure11
    Closed Accounts Posts: 421 ✭✭procure11


    The_Minister wrote: »
    Firstly that not what alluded means - you mean attributed to.:)

    Secondly, most Yes side voters would be like me.
    It's just hard not to get frustrated when certain No siders come out with rather bizarre claims such as conscription.

    I wont bother to find out if I wrongly used that word...thank God it's not my thesis presentation...but I could always use you as a form of dictionary...bless you:D

    I dont think there would be any form of frustration if there was a water -tight case from the Yes side.Most of the arguements on the EU forum recently have absolutely nothing to do with conscription btw.


  • #95
    K-9
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,311 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    procure11 wrote: »
    I dont think there would be any form of frustration if there was a water -tight case from the Yes side.

    Ah, what do you mean by water tight?

    Referenda aren't water tight, look at divorce and Abortion.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • #96
    PrivateEye
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,283 ✭✭✭PrivateEye


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IPSVxyETO6A


    I think Higgins is likely to become the public face of the No campaign, given the fact Mary Lou is gone from the picture (and Deco of corse). He essentially dedicated the majority of his first Parl. speech to the issue recently too.

    Skip to 1:13, where they dub over the Cupla Focal :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • #97
    m5ex9oqjawdg2i
    Closed Accounts Posts: 11,221 ✭✭✭✭m5ex9oqjawdg2i


    I think a lot of people are voting no, based on fears of what may happen... you know?


  • #98
    K-9
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,311 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    Leilani Happy Moon wrote: »
    I think a lot of people are voting no, based on fears of what may happen... you know?

    And that is the problem with referenda. It equally applies to Abortion referenda.

    Conscription may happen!

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • #99
    The Volt
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,957 ✭✭✭The Volt


    Where's the Atari jaguar voting option when you need it? :(


  • #100
    Seaneh
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 18,300 ✭✭✭✭Seaneh


    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4291770489472554607&hl=en

    Watch this.
    Skip the first minute or so.


  • #101
    m5ex9oqjawdg2i
    Closed Accounts Posts: 11,221 ✭✭✭✭m5ex9oqjawdg2i


    K-9 wrote: »
    And that is the problem with referenda. It equally applies to Abortion referenda.

    Conscription may happen!

    And pigs may fly... :rolleyes:

    After looking at the above video, it's pretty scary to have people from other countries coming to Ireland with said countries salaries... That will seriously effect us...


  • Advertisement
Advertisement