Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Man Shot Dead By Gardai During Attempted Robbery

135

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,333 ✭✭✭Zambia


    Good work by the Garda, a criminal gang carrying out armed raids has been removed from the streets. Plus these yahoos also put a garda in the position of shooting them not an easy thing to live with you shoot someone you take away everything they ever where and ever will be. Just because the members accept this fact does not make the act any easier.

    In the end its better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 329 ✭✭budda15c


    jetski wrote: »
    I assume the raiders were carring guns and fired first? if not the guard who shot him should be suspened and charged.

    Seriously?? Thats B0ll0x. A criminal made a concious decision to take a firearm into a RESIDENTIAL area to threaten and endanger life for financial gain. He made his decision and he suffered the consequences.

    A member of AGS was FORCED to make a split second decision and to take another life in order to preserve their own life, the life of their coleagues and that of the public. They have to live with the fact that they took another life, something which I don't envy.

    Hopefully there won't be too much time and money wasted on enquiries and hopefully it won't have any severe effect on the member who was forced to discharge their weapon.

    Criminals in this country need to know that if they go out into public with a firearm, they will be met with the same and they will suffer the consequences.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,096 ✭✭✭bunny shooter


    Well done to Gardai for a well executed operation

    If the criminals want to carry firearms then this can be the only outcome

    However, remember that one or more Gardai had to open fire on these scumbags and one of them is now dead. That is something that one or more Gardai has to live with for the rest of their lives. Taking a life at probably close range has got to be a hard thing to do.

    The only comfort he/she/they will have is that the majority of the public are 100% behind him/her/them.

    To the Gardai involved, I pesonally thank you for doing your duty and I am 100% behind you


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,572 ✭✭✭msg11


    The only comfort he/she/they will have is that the majority of the public are 100% behind him/her/them.

    To the Gardai involved, I pesonally thank you for doing your duty and I am 100% behind you

    Or it was not them on the 6 1 news. Seriously, this needs to happen more often. And as I said pitty it was not the 5 of them killed.

    We live in fear, fair play to the Garda for standing up this time, and hope the rest serve a good 20 years in jail..

    And don't forget its our money they were trying to take, good owl tax payers bailing the banks out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,922 ✭✭✭ronivek


    From breakingnews.ie;

    Molloy, of Lower Sheriff Street, north inner city Dublin, was a known gangster and in 2003 was sentenced to six years for firearms offences but had four-and-a-half years suspended on condition he attended drug rehab.

    In 2004, he was given a five-year suspended sentence for traffic offences and had a long list of convictions for minor offences.

    If our justice system wasn't such a shambles it's likely this wonderful example of humanity wouldn't have had the opportunity to get involved in the first place.

    Be that as it may however; he was involved and it cost him his life. Without knowing the full circumstances of the shooting it's hard to be completely objective here; but in the main I think if you're clearly involved in an act of aggression against the Gardai or members of the public and you're armed with a weapon then the chance is there that you'll pay with your life.

    At the same time I sympathise with the victims family and friends; along with the Gardai who fired the fatal shots. They're all going to suffer because of the actions of one man.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 417 ✭✭the locust


    Great work by AGS! I'm sure there were a few different units involved.

    If the crim is a big enough man to pull a gun, then the big boys rules applies... Its the law of the jungle with guns, kill or be killed.
    Gangs have been pullin lots of robberies, heists recently and hopefully it sends out a clear message to other would-be gangs.
    You can never fault police for protecting or preserving life or property


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,968 ✭✭✭✭mikemac


    Good work by AGS.
    Doing the work that most citizens would never attempt to do, facing dangerous scum most days and all for an average wage and little thanks.
    (keyboard warriors posting here excepted ;))

    While a review of the operation will be done, I just hope this doesn't turn into a tribunal with barristers getting rich and serving gardai getting suspended.

    I don't remember exactly what happened with the Lusk enquiry but for sure the families of the failed robbers had some strong comments for the State and the operation.
    Don't want to see that in the press again


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,333 ✭✭✭Zambia


    mikemac wrote: »
    the families of the failed robbers had some strong comments for the State and the operation.

    They should have used their strong words on their kin while they had the chance.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,608 ✭✭✭✭arybvtcw0eolkf


    jetski wrote: »
    I dont expect them to do nothing, a shot in the leg will be more than enough to stop someone, you dont need to kill them.


    I don't think Bruce Willis was on the set that day!.

    I'm not sure how the police are trained in fire arms, but in the army we're trained to shoot for the centre of the mass (the chest) ensuring a kill.

    Shooting gun's from people's hands, taking a leg out & other such crap is better left to Hollywood.

    Again speaking as a soldier, the threat to life yesterday would have been enough for a soldier guarding a cash in transit escort to lawfully shot and kill the robber.

    In fact the robber's yesterday covered all the bases under which we're allowed shot someone.

    I'm delighted with this result & I wish god speed to any member of AGS in carrying out their work & returning home to their families safe & well.

    .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,002 ✭✭✭✭AlekSmart


    Group 4 or any of the other cash-in-transit companies are ordinary men and women, and are NOT armed or provided with any effective form of self protection against a shotgun blast.

    Cash-In-Transit staff HAVE been shot and seriously injured in the past,with devestating results.

    I would suggest that a Group 4 employee carrying a cash box is in mortal danger from the likes of Mr Molloy and his accomplices who MUST be taken as being prepared to USE their weapons.

    I would not consider myself to be a slavish supporter of AGS policies but in this case I would stand firm in my opinion of the members involved having performed a dangerous and thankless task with bravery and determination.
    From breakingnews.ie;

    Molloy, of Lower Sheriff Street, north inner city Dublin, was a known gangster and in 2003 was sentenced to six years for firearms offences but had four-and-a-half years suspended on condition he attended drug rehab.

    In 2004, he was given a five-year suspended sentence for traffic offences and had a long list of convictions for minor offences.

    What is somewhat more depressing is the realization that yet again it`s a case of the "Usual Suspects".
    From the accounts now being published we see the sadly typical reality of hardened criminals,emboldened by years of tolerant finger wagging by a State thus seen as wimpy and powerless.

    Every day we read court reports of similar new blood being given similar sentences for their first ventures into criminality.
    It`s all so predictable.....Probation Act-Juvenile Liason Scheme-Young Offenders-Detox and Rehab programmes......anything as long as it does`nt smack of Punishment.

    Net result...a growing clique of young self-confident persons who have been built up to incredible proportions and who will eventually decide to put-it-up to the State as happened in Lucan.

    Even today,as accounts of arrests and other associated Garda activity are being made public,we see the same predictable addresses,same tight geographical locations and the same references to dependencies or other such avenuies to excuse criminal terrorist behaviour.

    We are such a tolerant society and that tolerance is costing us dearly !


    Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.

    Charles Mackay (1812-1889)



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,333 ✭✭✭Zambia


    I spent 3 years in G4. I agree with the above comments


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,777 ✭✭✭meathstevie


    jetski wrote: »
    Hes contradicting himself.

    I dont expect them to do nothing, a shot in the leg will be more than enough to stop someone, you dont need to kill them.

    Here we go again : since when do you think a shot in the leg can't be lethal ? And on top of that if you think a Garda marksman has the time to afford the luxury taking the risk of taking a doubtful aimed shot at a leg of someone who might shoot a member of the public or another Garda at any time when he can aim a shot or shots depending how the threat reacts at center mass which has a higher probability of hitting the target and a higher probability of success in neutralising the threat ?

    In simple words : the particular Gardai on the trigger did not fire to kill. They fired to neutralise an immediate very serious threat that can't be countered by less lethal means whether they had a chance to challenge them is rather irrelevant. It all depends how serious the threat was and in this case without knowing the details I'd say it was very very serious and very imminent.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Help & Feedback Category Moderators Posts: 9,893 CMod ✭✭✭✭Shield


    The Indo are reporting this morning that the dead raider was both armed and discharged his weapon seconds before being shot.

    "They shouted at the security guards to hand over the money and fired a blast from a sawn-off shotgun into the air.

    The gardai immediately confronted the two raiders and shouted: "Armed gardai, throw down your weapons".

    The man, armed with the shotgun, immediately lowered the weapon and pointed it in the direction of the gardai as he turned to confront them."

    It is beginning to look like the raider had every intention to shoot the Garda, and he got shot in self defence.

    In a situation like this, you only have a fraction of a second to decide what you are going to do. Picture yourself in that Garda's situation... you've just seen an armed raider discharge a shotgun into the air... he lowers his weapon, turns it in your direction, and faces you...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 627 ✭✭✭mcguiver


    Meanwhile, back on topic...

    Gardai work for the community...protecting them and their property.
    No Garda wants to shoot or harm anyone, and those members involved are going to learn all about tribunals, paperwork and scrutiny the hard way.
    It's very easy to make decisions after the event from a comfy seat... not with a loaded gun pointing at you or a member of the public.

    Your average person has no idea what it's like to see someone killed, speaking from experience.. forget Hollywood, no one cluthces their chest and falls over while giving a speech.... they will remember every sound, smell, and thing that happened that day for the rest of their lives.

    In most juristictions this would be minor news, armed criminal gets shot, they knew the risks and they've paid the price. No ones jumping for joy that a family have lost someone... but they chose this line of work.

    My sympathies lie with the decent bank workers, security personnell and members of the public who want to go about their lives without being put at risk by people who are too lazy and dumb to earn a living.

    The people who want to criticise a Garda for putting their life on the line should go back to watching tv, playing their playstation and living in a dreamworld, I hope it's a safer world for them.


  • Posts: 6,321 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Thanks to the police for the brave actions yesterday.
    Im disgusted that people are questioning this.
    wERE THEY ARMED?? what rot. they werent robbing with a feather duster, for christs sakes.
    Even if they had fake guns, who gives a ****. Ive seen those fake guns, they look very real to me, and Id die of fright should nyone point one at me.
    There is/was a shop in Stephens Green Center selling the replicas, I was shocked. Couldnt believe it.Fake ak47s and glocks.I dont know if the shop is still selling them. I did actualy call the police when I saw these in the shop window. So Im hoping they are not.

    They risked peoples lives yesterday and the scum got exactly what they deserve.



    The man they shot is a known scumbag, no loss to anyone.
    Well done again. Shoot to kill every time .
    Its either them or you going home to your familys at the end of the day.

    take care.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,626 ✭✭✭timmywex


    Personally i think it was a good move to send out a message if nothing else, serious crime like this will not be tolerated!

    Alot of the papers and other sources this morning reporting that 5 shots were fired, which would mean that more than one garda believed it was the last resort and no other option available


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,194 ✭✭✭Trojan911


    Chief--- wrote: »
    The criminal does not have to fire first.

    Simply having a gun and pointing it near members of the public or gardai will get you shot dead.

    This is what we all pay our taxes for (including gardai). To be protected from these type of people.


    Well said.

    Live by the Gun, die by the Gun. These perps knew the rules, it's their proffession. I hope the Garda involved can return to duties asap.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,195 ✭✭✭goldie fish


    jetski wrote: »
    I assume the raiders were carring guns and fired first? if not the guard who shot him should be suspened and charged.

    No, They were carrying kittens to an animal shelter...:cool:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,097 ✭✭✭IRISH RAIL


    Jesus FUC*ING CRIST
    some of the comments here are shocking
    If those two cops didnt shoot those pricks then wed be having a thread about a cop who got killed yesterday.
    there were dozens of people nearby women with kids etc that muppet with the shotgun didnt think about those when he started shooting.
    i think a scot medal is in order for those two cops.
    he turned to the cops with a shotgun and got shot no fu3kin wound to the leg would have stoped him he looked like a mad man when he got out of the car.
    also to the other poster Ive no intention of mentioning what kind of veichles the cops were using. Interesting I know but my lips are sealed


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,497 ✭✭✭Poccington


    The armed members of AGS should also be applauded for their shooting. Given the situation, the obvious pressure the lads would've been under and the fact the incident was in a busy public area, they were very much on the ball.

    1 out of 2 ain't bad :p


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,700 ✭✭✭brayblue24


    From today's Indo:-

    Molloy was described last night as a former small-time criminal, who had been recruited by the gang leader to take part in some of his planned heists because regular associates were not available.

    What exactly were they busy doing? Or do they just work on a roster system and like the rest of us there's no more overtime!!


  • Posts: 2,263 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Poccington wrote: »
    The armed members of AGS should also be applauded for their shooting. Given the situation, the obvious pressure the lads would've been under and the fact the incident was in a busy public area, they were very much on the ball.

    1 out of 2 ain't bad :p

    Your post is in very poor taste. I'm a member of the Gardai myself and while the dead man and injured man were criminals engaged in a violent robbery they both have families who are still around. The families may even visit this forum and could find it upsetting about what is being said about their sons, brothers, cousins, etc. Only recently we had the cousin of Garda McCallion posting updates of his unsuccusful battle for life in hospital.

    And the Gardai involved didn't wake up yesterday and say, "I'm gonna kill some robbers today." I can't imagine what they are feeling today but it's probably not elation.

    People, think about what you are going to post before you hit the submit button.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 3,933 Mod ✭✭✭✭Turner


    Yes these families will believe that their sons didnt deserve to die.

    "Sure they were only doing an armed robbery".

    For criminals like this it is their way of life. They dont see the gardai as protecting the people, they see them as scumbags intefering with the criminals legitimate business.


  • Posts: 2,263 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Chief--- wrote: »
    Yes these families will believe that their sons didnt deserve to die.

    "Sure they were only doing an armed robbery".

    For criminals like this it is their way of life. They dont see the gardai as protecting the people, they see them as scumbags intefering with the criminals legitimate business.

    I agree with you 100% but I just think comments glorifying the death are in bad taste.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,194 ✭✭✭Trojan911


    foreign wrote: »
    The families may even visit this forum and could find it upsetting about what is being said about their sons, brothers, cousins, etc.

    I hope they do visit this forum and read this thread. They might see that decent law abiding citizens are sick and tired of their loved ones scummy, intimidating, violent & thieving ways and they will not be tolerated in our society.

    However, I doubt they will see this way of thinking.... :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,002 ✭✭✭✭AlekSmart


    mcguiver wrote: »
    Meanwhile, back on topic.

    My sympathies lie with the decent bank workers, security personnell and members of the public who want to go about their lives without being put at risk by people who are too lazy and dumb to earn a living.

    This point is quite important IMO.

    One of the predominant characteristics of our criminal underclass is their fondness for being described as "Unemployed",usually put forward in the context of an application for Free Legal Aid.

    Possession of a young baby and a girlfriend is another desireable option when going through the legal hoops as is having been on a "Programme" of some description,usually one involving Drugs or Alcohol or a combination of same.

    The underlying reality is that before these folks embark upon their criminal adventures they are already making full use of the panopoly of State Benefits which,naturally enough,are being paid for by the very people they will be visiting their pent up anger and aggression upon.

    So....us "ordinaries",including the Gardai who must attempt to prevent the crime,the Ambulance Personnell,Doctors and Nurses who WILL make the GREATEST of attempts to keep these Criminal types alive AFTER they get themselves shot, are simply to ber laughed at and treated with contempt for daring to disagree with a system which mollycoddles criminals at every stage ?

    The Criminals typified by Friday`s escapade are far from being Lazy and Dumb.....Energetic and Cunning would be a more accurate description I feel.


    Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.

    Charles Mackay (1812-1889)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 744 ✭✭✭garbanzo


    I guess, if you play with matches you get burned !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,466 ✭✭✭FGR


    Excellent work by OCU and all other members involved.

    Armed criminals go out there to commit crime under the pretense that the majority of Gardai they may encounter would simply back off due to being unarmed..so the presence these units has displayed how AGS will not tolerate the effective 'abuse' of that privaledge in Irish society.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,629 ✭✭✭ART6


    If someone goes out with the intention of committing a serious crime, and carries a lethal weapon, then it is reasonable to assume that he carries it with at least the intention to intimidate. Equally, given how the deliberate use of guns has evolved in recent times, it is also reasonable (to me at least) to assume that he is prepared to kill if pressed. Therefore, if the garda on the spot feels that the only way to prevent him doing so is to put a bullet into him, then he has my total support. I don't feel for the man's family at all. The ones I feel for are the garda who was forced to take a life to protect others, and those innocent people who in the past have lost their lives to violent criminals.

    And to those people who suggest that the garda should not shoot until the criminal has fired first, all I can say is "would you? Would you risk your life and the future of your family by giving him that chance?"


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,907 ✭✭✭LostinBlanch


    Well going by the Sindo article he was threatening to kill the security guard.
    The 28-year-old armed robber shot dead by an undercover garda on Friday was holding a sawn-off shotgun to the throat of a security van driver and threatening to kill him before being called on to drop his weapon, it has been learned.

    So it definitely looks the guard shot to save a life.

    Isn't that what the yanks would call a righteous kill?

    EDIT: That sounds more gung ho than I meant, but you know what I mean.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement