Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

ML or GP

  • 03-03-2009 08:15PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Which is the best, the Magners League or the Sky Sports hyped Guinness Premiership?

    Is Top14 any good also??


«134

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,249 ✭✭✭Stev_o


    How can you compare 3 completely different leagues that bare very little resemblance to each other?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 243 ✭✭NU8


    Make a poll?

    It has to be between the ML and Top 14. The Premiership is only good occasionally, usually when London Irish or Bath are playing.

    I'm going to go with the Magners League mainly because of some amazing interprovincial matches in the last few seasons.


  • Posts: 4,333 ✭✭✭ Addilynn Gifted Conductor


    Which is the best, the Magners League or the Sky Sports hyped Guinness Premiership?

    Is Top14 any good also??

    Il give you a football analogy,not in terms of the playing style but the strength of the leagues.

    Top 14-English premiership(there teams are so strong they should be allowed 2 extra h-cup teams)

    Magners league-la liga ( their are some good teams that are always in with a shout but the league lacks the strength of the top 14.

    Guiness prem-Serie A(Top few teams can be good,but their style is not suited for europe and they are overhyped.)

    As far as im concerned the Guiness premiership is a poor standard league.

    The top 6 from france should be entered,the top 4 from magners league and the top 2 from England.Says it all really when Munster dispatch one of the stronggest English teams Sale with so much ease.
    Maybe Leinster,Ospreys,Cardiff etc would have beaten them so convincingly but I think they would have beaten them and it says alot imo.
    Stev_o wrote: »
    How can you compare 3 completely different leagues that bare very little resemblance to each other?
    Of course you can compare different leagues,why cant you?
    If you mean playing style then yes they are all different,but in terms of strength,wealth and fan base of course they can be compared.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Stev_o wrote: »
    How can you compare 3 completely different leagues that bare very little resemblance to each other?

    Fair enough so. :rolleyes::rolleyes:


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,958 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    As far as im concerned the Guiness premiership is a poor standard league.

    The top 6 from france should be entered,the top 4 from magners league and the top 2 from England.Says it all really when Munster dispatch one of the stronggest English teams Sale with so much ease.
    Maybe Leinster,Ospreys,Cardiff etc would have beaten them so convincingly but I think they would have beaten them and it says alot imo.

    The GP teams have still been far more successful in Europe then the ML teams. Leinster managed to lose quite convincingly to Leicester and Wasps in the last two seasons of HEC. You're massively under-rating the GP, its as strong as the ML.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,205 ✭✭✭✭Crash


    The GP can be an incredibly poor league from a spectators point of view, many matches becoming pure war of attrition stuff, but you really can't knock it as much people do.

    The ML turns out some absolute drudgery on a regular basis as well, but its a lot harder to judge objectively because of the Irish interest in it. To be honest, I stay out of arguments as to which is the better etc., because I agree with Stev_o here - the style of rugby played makes it very difficult to compare.


  • Posts: 4,333 ✭✭✭ Addilynn Gifted Conductor


    Podge_irl wrote: »
    The GP teams have still been far more successful in Europe then the ML teams. Leinster managed to lose quite convincingly to Leicester and Wasps in the last two seasons of HEC. You're massively under-rating the GP, its as strong as the ML.

    yeah,
    I thought someone might bring up Wasps or Leicester.
    The fact is from what ive seen this season,the GP is going down the toilet.There are way too many foreignors that are rubbish journeymen and their brand of rugby is so unnatractive and boring,imo a side who dares run the ball SH style will beat them.

    Wasps are a spent force and Leicester play ****e rugby although they do win.Leicester imo will have most of their players go next year,Murphy is already being looked at by a number of top french clubs and its only a matter of time before they leave and others will follow.

    I wouldnt agree that its as strong as the ML,if you look now only Leicester can realistically win.Quinns just arent good enough and from the magners Cardiff,Munster,Leinster,Ospreys etc are all in with a good shout.

    Thats 4 ML and 1 Prem.
    In years gone by I would agree with you,but its a league on the way down,its ****e to watch and im glad tbh.The English have destroyed football,lets hope they dont do the same with rugby.

    At least if the French turn the top 14 into the Barclays Premiership in rugby ,they play attractive stuff.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,836 ✭✭✭corny


    Guiness prem-Serie A(Top few teams can be good,but their style is not suited for europe and they are overhyped.)

    Thats a flawed analogy if you meant that in an historical sense. Italy has been the most successful nation in the European Cup! (11 winners, 14 Runners up). In the present, the tide will turn on the Premiership and La Liga very soon. The Italians with their 4 World Cups have always had a strong domestic league and very soon they will again.

    Apologies for the rant off topic:)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,326 ✭✭✭Serenity Now!


    Guinness Premiership for me.
    I think Magners League rugby is terrible and even a couple of 'derby' games between Irish provinces won't change that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,048 ✭✭✭Amazotheamazing


    yeah,
    I thought someone might bring up Wasps or Leicester.
    The fact is from what ive seen this season,the GP is going down the toilet.There are way too many foreignors that are rubbish journeymen and their brand of rugby is so unnatractive and boring,imo a side who dares run the ball SH style will beat them.

    Wasps are a spent force and Leicester play ****e rugby although they do win.Leicester imo will have most of their players go next year,Murphy is already being looked at by a number of top french clubs and its only a matter of time before they leave and others will follow.

    I wouldnt agree that its as strong as the ML,if you look now only Leicester can realistically win.Quinns just arent good enough and from the magners Cardiff,Munster,Leinster,Ospreys etc are all in with a good shout.

    Thats 4 ML and 1 Prem.
    In years gone by I would agree with you,but its a league on the way down,its ****e to watch and im glad tbh.The English have destroyed football,lets hope they dont do the same with rugby.

    At least if the French turn the top 14 into the Barclays Premiership in rugby ,they play attractive stuff.

    Not so sure I agree with that, all leagues have good periods and bad periods. In the 1980's no-one would have believed the Premiership in football would be far better than the Italian league, eventually it will swing back and we'll have people asking what happened, it's just a natural thing.

    In addition, every team declines at some point. Munster will decline and maybe another ML will become a dominant team in Europe. Just the way of the world, if you'd told an Ulster fan in the 1980's that Munster would be more successful than them in the pro era they'd have laughed, up until then they'd been the dominant Irish province for the most part.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 4,333 ✭✭✭ Addilynn Gifted Conductor


    Guinness Premiership for me.
    I think Magners League rugby is terrible and even a couple of 'derby' games between Irish provinces won't change that.


    I can see where your coming from,but I think the tv coverage given has affected your liking of the magners.The magners is just not pleasing to watch on setanat,very bland coverage,with piss poor analysis.

    Sky make it seem like a final every game.

    We really need it to get better coverage.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 283 ✭✭escobar


    Stev_o wrote: »
    How can you compare 3 completely different leagues that bare very little resemblance to each other?

    Good Point...The only way to compare the quality of the leagues is through international competition.

    In the Heineken Cup half of the teams to make it to the knockout stages are Celtic League teams. That statistic speaks for itself......The Celtic League also has europe's best team.


    The competition in the Magners league has done great things for the national sides as well with Wales and Ireland contesting the six nations this year and wales having won the six nations 2 of the last three years.
    Ireland has the record try scorer of the six nations in Brian O Driscoll.

    The Guiness Premiership along with the English national team seems to be falling apart at the moment with the best english players playing abroad. Not a good time for them..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,969 ✭✭✭buck65


    I like the ML but there have been some bad games and interest does dwindle in it around this time when the 6 nations and the H Cup come into their own. Maybe next year with the playoffs there will be a bit of late season excitement in the ML. This years ML could be a close affair and may yet keep us all glued to Setanta.
    I do enjoy watching the French league , especially Stade and Toulouse but like the ML there are some dodgy teams there too.
    The GP is a good solid league , very unspectacular at times but a good game there beats most.
    The ML has a good level of rugby generally with possibly a 2 tier developing.
    1 - Munster, Leinster, Ospreys and Cardiff (when they feel like it)
    2- Ulster, Glasgow, Scarlets, Edinburgh, Dragons, Connacht.
    Still though any of these teams are well capable of beating each other. Certainly the top four would be well capable of holding their own in Enland or France as they have proved by qualifying for the HCup quarter finals.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,326 ✭✭✭Serenity Now!


    I can see where your coming from,but I think the tv coverage given has affected your liking of the magners.The magners is just not pleasing to watch on setanat,very bland coverage,with piss poor analysis.

    Sky make it seem like a final every game.

    We really need it to get better coverage.
    I was actually referring to the rugby itself. Never mind the presentation. I don't see or hear any TV coverage when I go to a game.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 184 ✭✭ibuprofen


    yeah,
    I thought someone might bring up Wasps or Leicester.
    The fact is from what ive seen this season,the GP is going down the toilet.There are way too many foreignors that are rubbish journeymen and their brand of rugby is so unnatractive and boring,imo a side who dares run the ball SH style will beat them.

    Wasps are a spent force and Leicester play ****e rugby although they do win.Leicester imo will have most of their players go next year,Murphy is already being looked at by a number of top french clubs and its only a matter of time before they leave and others will follow.

    I wouldnt agree that its as strong as the ML,if you look now only Leicester can realistically win.Quinns just arent good enough and from the magners Cardiff,Munster,Leinster,Ospreys etc are all in with a good shout.

    Thats 4 ML and 1 Prem.
    In years gone by I would agree with you,but its a league on the way down,its ****e to watch and im glad tbh.The English have destroyed football,lets hope they dont do the same with rugby.

    At least if the French turn the top 14 into the Barclays Premiership in rugby ,they play attractive stuff.


    Completley agree.

    The GP is boring plodding rugby, terrible to watch.
    It's falling apart at the seams. Most of their good players will be gone by the end of the season

    I don't rate it compared to the ML. Only one GP team will make it into the next round of the heineken cup . Can't see any of them winning it.

    I'd say that's between the Blues and Munster. Most probably a munnster leinster semi too!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,828 ✭✭✭gosplan


    escobar wrote: »
    Good Point...The only way to compare the quality of the leagues is through international competition.

    In the Heineken Cup half of the teams to make it to the knockout stages are Celtic League teams. That statistic speaks for itself......The Celtic League also has europe's best team.

    I don't think the French are currently as enthusiastic about the Heineken cup as we are, apart from the nearly withdrawing thing last year. Obviously they'd like to win it but I don't think they see it as their priority - probably because of the money available through the Top 14.

    Think the GP is going through a slump at the moment. it might well bounce back in the next couple of years though.

    Munster are by all accounts, either a freak or a force of nature. I don't think you can judge the Magners league by their exploits. I mean they're up there with the All Blacks! :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 182 ✭✭ScholesyIsGod


    escobar wrote: »
    Good Point...The only way to compare the quality of the leagues is through international competition.

    In the Heineken Cup half of the teams to make it to the knockout stages are Celtic League teams. That statistic speaks for itself......The Celtic League also has europe's best team.


    The competition in the Magners league has done great things for the national sides as well with Wales and Ireland contesting the six nations this year and wales having won the six nations 2 of the last three years.
    Ireland has the record try scorer of the six nations in Brian O Driscoll.

    The Guiness Premiership along with the English national team seems to be falling apart at the moment with the best english players playing abroad. Not a good time for them..

    Im not a big fan of the Guinness Premiership by any means dont get me wrong but in fairness they do have 3 teams in the quarter finals this season, last season they had 2 in the semis and the season before last they had 2 teams in the final.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 283 ✭✭escobar


    Im not a big fan of the Guinness Premiership by any means dont get me wrong but in fairness they do have 3 teams in the quarter finals this season, last season they had 2 in the semis and the season before last they had 2 teams in the final.

    I don't really like watching GP either, boring...zzz.

    The GP this year is in freefall and it'll be worse next year with all of the players leaving .
    I don't see them doing much in the HC knockouts so presently I would see the CL as being the pre eminent league in europe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,772 ✭✭✭toomevara


    ibuprofen wrote: »

    The GP is boring plodding rugby, terrible to watch.
    It's falling apart at the seams. Most of their good players will be gone by the end of the season

    Aeghhhh! what utter nonsense and piffle...The GP has a competitive edge and following among fans that the ML can only dream of...It goes from strength to strength with record gates even in the bleeding credit crunch....Teams from the GP are very well represented in the Heineken cup quarter stage and have completely dominated the challenge cup this year

    All this tosh about high profile names jumping ship is a massive over- statement,,,3 big name players have left for France...just 3...and the RFU are moving to put an end to that...It's the best rugby union national club competition in the world..no question and bar a few marquee clashes knocks the weak kneed ML into the ditch....

    Go watch Bath, leicester, London Irish , Northampton play rugby and you'll see skillful genuinely competitive rugby straight out of the top drawer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,772 ✭✭✭toomevara


    escobar wrote: »

    The GP this year is in freefall and it'll be worse next year with all of the players leaving .

    Who are 'all' these players?? It is not in 'freefall'...record gates and receipts virtually across the board...this is crazy talk....


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 283 ✭✭escobar


    gosplan wrote: »
    I don't think the French are currently as enthusiastic about the Heineken cup as we are, apart from the nearly withdrawing thing last year. Obviously they'd like to win it but I don't think they see it as their priority - probably because of the money available through the Top 14.

    Think the GP is going through a slump at the moment. it might well bounce back in the next couple of years though.

    Munster are by all accounts, either a freak or a force of nature. I don't think you can judge the Magners league by their exploits. I mean they're up there with the All Blacks! :D

    The only way to judge the leagues against each other though is in competition and we have half the teams in the knockout stages of the HC this year.

    The GP won't bounce back until sterling does. Don't see that happening for awhile...that is unless england joins the euro. TBH the GP will most probably hemmorage players for the next year or two.

    Munster are the all blacks of club competition and they win trophies but they're not the only good team . There's the scarlets and leinster who have a great history in the HC, The blues are looking almost unstopable this year. In fact almost every year the cl has at least matched the next best european league with getting 3 teams into the knockout stages.

    I don't think any european league has gotten 4 teams through to the knockout stages before!!!!


  • Posts: 4,333 ✭✭✭ Addilynn Gifted Conductor


    toomevara wrote: »
    Aeghhhh! what utter nonsense and piffle...The GP has a competitive edge and following among fans that the ML can only dream of...It goes from strength to strength with record gates even in the bleeding credit crunch....Teams from the GP are very well represented in the Heineken cup quarter stage and have completely dominated the challenge cup this year

    All this tosh about high profile names jumping ship is a massive over- statement,,,3 big name players have left for France...just 3...and the RFU are moving to put an end to that...It's the best rugby union national club competition in the world..no question and bar a few marquee clashes knocks the weak kneed ML into the ditch....

    Go watch Bath, leicester, London Irish , Northampton play rugby and you'll see skillful genuinely competitive rugby straight out of the top drawer.

    Come on,you have to be joking.

    the super 14 is the best league followed by the top 14.

    How are the rfu gona keep star players who are all foreignors?
    They have a salary cap unlike every other league.

    Also im looking for the attendance stats now but only Leicester and one or 2 other could match Leinster or Munster for attendances.

    Why is it the best?
    Most team are filled with journeymen.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,341 ✭✭✭✭Chucky the tree


    I think using the HEC as an example is a bit short sighted. The french couldnt give a stuff about the HEC, one French team makes it through and Goose wants to allow the top 6 enter it next year? Extremelty strange thinking.


    The only reason the ML teams do so well in the HEC is because they arent hugely pushed about the winning the magners league. Alot of english/French teams would prefer to win their own domestic league, the french teams for definite. Cardiff are a perfect example, best team in the ML sitting 2nd bottom in the ML, you'd never see the same in the Top 14 or GP.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,341 ✭✭✭✭Chucky the tree


    Come on,you have to be joking.

    the super 14 is the best league followed by the top 14.

    How are the rfu gona keep star players who are all foreignors?
    They have a salary cap unlike every other league.

    Also im looking for the attendance stats now but only Leicester and one or 2 other could match Leinster or Munster for attendances.

    Why is it the best?
    Most team are filled with journeymen.


    That's complete bull****. The same "journeymen" who leinster & Munster manage to sign because they can offer more money? I suppose Van der linde isnt a journeyman but a player at the peak of his career? Same goes for Tipoki & howlett.


    P.S - excactly how many Top 14 matches have you watched this season? :confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,193 ✭✭✭[Jackass]


    toomevara wrote: »
    Aeghhhh! what utter nonsense and piffle...The GP has a competitive edge and following among fans that the ML can only dream of...

    Look up the GP website. Exluding games in Twickenham, the highest attended game in GP this season wouldn't even fill the RDS. Never mind the gates of 20,500 and 25,000 brought in by Ospreys and Munster this season.
    toomevara wrote: »
    It goes from strength to strength with record gates even in the bleeding credit crunch....Teams from the GP are very well represented in the Heineken cup quarter stage and have completely dominated the challenge cup this year

    The GP is decades old. Infact, in it's format, English club rugby is no doubt over a century old.

    The Magners League is 8 years old. Over the last couple of seasons, Thomond Park, Liberty Stadium, Parc y Scarlets, RDS have all been developed to better than anything you will find in the GP and with the exception of Parc y Scarlets, bigger than any stadium you will find in the GP. Parc y Scarlets would just be one of the biggest, not the biggest like all the rest.

    Over the next couple of seasons, Cardiff will be added to that list, and the Dragons and Ulster will have developed grounds as good as anything you will find in the GP.

    Facility wise, ML is, without question, already well ahead of GP even at this early stage of development, and these are hard cold facts without prejiduce. If you don't believe me I'll post capacity and pictures of state of the art ML grounds vs the old, creaking sheds used in GP which are smaller and far less fan friendly.

    Now to the teams, in the EDF cup, Ospreys, the ML side who are defending champions against all of the GP teams, won their group knocking out GP league leaders for a good chunk of the season London Irish and high flying Harlequins who are 3rd (?) at the moment.

    Cardiff dominated their group, winning all 3 games & knocking out GP heavy weights Leicester, Bath and the team Munster fans talked up as a tough draw in HEC this season Sale, who sat bottom of the group, winless.

    Scarlets were unlucky on the final day to miss out on a 3rd from 4 ML teams in the GP / Welsh ML semi-finals.

    Of the 4 ML teams in this competition and 12 GP teams, you can expect at least 1 ML in the final, but if I was a betting man, when the 2 finalists are decided I would have my money on GP 0 from 12 and ML 2 from 4.

    In Europe, Munster, ML, are the defending champions & top ranked team in Europe and at the moment you would have to say hands down the best team in Europe.

    The HEC quarter finals are made up of 4 ML, 3 GP & 1 T14.

    As for the challange cup, English teams dominate it when ML send in the heavyweights of Connacht to defend our honour (with all due respect), who by the way, make the Quarter finals of the competition despite being the basement boys of ML year after year, and also T14 teams fighting relegation battles and who historically don't give a toss about Europe at the best of times and a couple of Italian and Spanish part timers. I don't think that portion of your argument is relevant.

    The quality of team in the ML is, without question, better than that of the GP. Absolutely no question about it. Don't mind the hype, don't mind the flashing lights, shiny bits, sky enduced broadway show, on the coal face, ML is better.

    As for the supporter argument, as said, ML is still in its infancey. Year on year, crowds are growing accross the board, with record crowds coming through the gates for most teams each season. But I'll admit there were teathing problems with the ML which people who try to talk down the league refuse to forget. First of all, when a league is set up, it's a bit much to expect it to be an instant hit which fans hoping and praying to land a trophy that's just been invented.

    It's even harsher to expect that these fans will even exist in the first place when...for the most part...the team has just been invented!! (as with Wales and Scotland regionlised teams after a couple of years in ML).

    ML is growing at an incredible pace, ok it has the poor Setanta coverage and hasn't been marketed as well as Sky market their multi-million investment - again, more established competition, bigger TV audiences also, but even this year compared to, say 4 years ago, the competetiveness and quality of players on the pitch is world class!! Of all the leagues in the world, Magners league games on average have the highest amount of international capped players starting for each team per game with an average of (and i will hunt out a source for this if required) iirc 12 internationals on average starting for every single team in every single game, higher than any other league in the world. Magners league, the most represented league in the last 2 world cups.

    The old notion of "teams don't take it seriously" is an old argument that is getting weaker and weaker each year. Munster for example talked up the competition this season, O'Callaghan quoted as saying it's a competition they are taking very seriously (and also admited which is something they may not have done in the past) and that they very much want to win it! (no doubt after seeing arch rivals Leinster lift the crown). Look at the table this year, with all the top teams, both ML and Europe, also being the top teams in the league putting out best teams available in all games and all out to win it.

    With the exception of Cardiff who are having a disastor of a domestic season, but not for a lack of trying as they have fielded their best teams all the way through, and I think their reaction after losing to Leinster in the RDS tells you that it's not as if they don't give a sh*t, they were furios.

    The crowds are growing and on average attendence ML would be there or there abouts on a par with GP at the moment, but with out top teams such as Leinster, Munster, Ospreys & Cardiff being either at the very top of GP listing for average attendance, or as will be in Munsters case, the top ranked average attendence team as no GP team has a ground big enough to fit in that amount of fans.

    ML has bigger grounds and as they get fuller and fuller each season, will pass out GP to a level at the moment they can't match due to the lack of facilitys.
    toomevara wrote: »
    Go watch Bath, leicester, London Irish , Northampton play rugby and you'll see skillful genuinely competitive rugby straight out of the top drawer.

    Go watch Munster, Leinster, Cardiff Ospreys and you'll see even better rugby.


  • Posts: 4,333 ✭✭✭ Addilynn Gifted Conductor


    That's complete bull****. The same "journeymen" who leinster & Munster manage to sign because they can offer more money? I suppose Van der linde isnt a journeyman but a player at the peak of his career? Same goes for Tipoki & howlett.


    P.S - excactly how many Top 14 matches have you watched this season? :confused:


    Em,Van Der Linde is a 28 year old prop,just won the world cup last year and started in the final alongside big OS.

    He is most definitely not a journeyman and one of the best props in the world currently at his peak,as all props are from 27-32 and most other athletes from 28-30.
    Are you actually serious?
    Do you know anything about Van Der Linde?

    Munster
    Leinster
    Ospreys
    Cardiff
    Ulster
    Edinburgh?

    are all littered with internationals.
    The same cant be said to the top 6 teams in the guiness prem.

    The sky sports teams hail mapisua like he is the best centre in the world.
    Tipoki has alot more honours than mapasua i.e captaining the maoris.

    I still cant get over the fact that you think Van Der Linde is a journeyman lol.



    I have watched most of the big top 14 games online this year,you only have to look at the top 8 teams squads to see the quality.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 184 ✭✭ibuprofen


    toomevara wrote: »
    Aeghhhh! what utter nonsense and piffle...The GP has a competitive edge and following among fans that the ML can only dream of...It goes from strength to strength with record gates even in the bleeding credit crunch....Teams from the GP are very well represented in the Heineken cup quarter stage and have completely dominated the challenge cup this year

    All this tosh about high profile names jumping ship is a massive over- statement,,,3 big name players have left for France...just 3...and the RFU are moving to put an end to that...It's the best rugby union national club competition in the world..no question and bar a few marquee clashes knocks the weak kneed ML into the ditch....

    Go watch Bath, leicester, London Irish , Northampton play rugby and you'll see skillful genuinely competitive rugby straight out of the top drawer.

    zzzzzzz ....jumper... rugby... ball... zzzzzzzzzzzz sorry you nearly put me asleep talking about the GP

    This weak kneed ML as you call it has just gotten 4 teams in to the knockout stages of the HC.

    Cmon even you toomevara would have to admit the strenght of the ML.

    After all they've achieved a record no. of teams making it into the HC knockouts and have the two stand out favourites for the cup.

    The GP though has only opened it's flood gates, alot more player will go as their contracts end.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,772 ✭✭✭toomevara


    Come on,you have to be joking.

    the super 14 is the best league followed by the top 14.

    The super 14 is an international club competition not a national one, so no comparison....from what I've seen (Eurosport mostly) the top 14 isn't a patch on the GP...it's bloated, inflated and overvalued...and exhibits all the same problems many identify as being issues with the GP. And again comparisons are unfair as they've no salary cap unlike the GP, thus allowing rich municipalities and generous sugar daddies to completely skew the competition.


  • Posts: 4,333 ✭✭✭ Addilynn Gifted Conductor


    toomevara wrote: »
    The super 14 is an international club competition not a national one, so no comparison....from what I've seen (Eurosport mostly) the top 14 isn't a patch on the GP...it's bloated, inflated and overvalued...and exhibits all the same problems many identify as being issues with the GP. And again comparisons are unfair as they've no salary cap unlike the GP, thus allowing rich municipalities and generous sugar daddies to completely skew the competition.


    Il let Jackass's post above speak for its brilliant self.

    Also the rugby in the Top 14 from what ive seen is far more aesthetically pleasing,although I am biased as I prefer players not to run into contact on purpose.

    If you dont want to count the super 14 then dont,but its structured in a league style with knockouts like the premiership so I included it.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,341 ✭✭✭✭Chucky the tree


    Em,Van Der Linde is a 28 year old prop,just won the world cup last year and started in the final alongside big OS.

    He is most definitely not a journeyman and one of the best props in the world currently at his peak,as all props are from 27-32 and most other athletes from 28-30.
    Are you actually serious?
    Do you know anything about Van Der Linde?

    Munster
    Leinster
    Ospreys
    Cardiff
    Ulster
    Edinburgh?

    are all littered with internationals.
    The same cant be said to the top 6 teams in the guiness prem.

    The sky sports teams hail mapisua like he is the best centre in the world.
    Tipoki has alot more honours than mapasua i.e captaining the maoris.

    I still cant get over the fact that you think Van Der Linde is a journeyman lol.



    I have watched most of the big top 14 games online this year,you only have to look at the top 8 teams squads to see the quality.


    Van der linde came here for the money and he's showing it, the fact he's 28 or just won a WC doesnt make a difference. Maybe with an extended run he'll up his game, but he's not playing at the level he should be and certainly not at the level for the pay he's on.


    Top 6 might have more internationals, but in the entire league I think GP would easily have more internationals then the ML. The ML is a 3 horse race, and it's usually the same every year the GP is wide open and it always is every year. I'd much rather match between a top 6 side in the GP like Bath vs Lecister then Osphreys vs Edinburgh. It's the Leinster/Munster interest that makes the ML interesting, outside of that it's muck.


Advertisement