Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The religious come a' knockin

  • 13-02-2009 1:34am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,745 ✭✭✭


    After just over two years living in Dublin, I've finally had the faithful call to my door to try to get me round to their way of thinking. Two Chinese girls popped up, presumably ready for a polite brush off (maybe I'm being unkind to my fellow neighbours).

    I don't know what specific flavour of Christianity they were peddling, but it seemed to center on the idea of God having a female as well as a male character. They had this questionnaire that asked me a few basic belief questions, as well as a few Bible passages with a question asking me what it means.

    I have to say I found the conversation interesting, they seemed surprised when I told them that I didn't believe in the bible in any sort of religious sense. When they told me the bible was true I simply replied that it was a circular logic. The Bible is true because it was written by God because it says so in... the Bible.

    They then asked me if I believed I had a spirit, to which I of course replied that I didn't, and that when we die we rot in the ground. Hardly an uplifting thought, but at least I'm not kidding myself, or so I believe. Oddly enough, they mentioned that it was "proved" that the soul existed because it had a weight as scientists measured peoples weight as they died. My retort was that I would like to see the paper in which these results were published. I further explained that my world view was informed by evidence, and that my non belief was due to the lack of evidence for a supernatural deity. The conversation revolved around this theme for a while.

    Finally they thanked me for my time and left.

    I find myself wondering if I was being rude by engaging them in such frank debate, would they expect that I nod politely or accept their argument? Or perhaps that they would get the brush off? How do people here generally deal with religious proselytising?


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,045 ✭✭✭Húrin


    Sounds like a good way to respond. I'd be alarmed if somebody found that the soul had a measurable weight... it should not do as it is not physical. The film 21 grams was made about this claim.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,612 ✭✭✭uncleoswald


    I wonder if it was the same two I met on the street recently. They stopped me wanting to ask me some questions. (usually I'd walk on but the guy they asked before me had aggressively told them to f*ck off so I felt embarrassed to be Irish and they were kind of cute :o) It was only once they had me that I realised it was just about Jesus. I really didn't want to get into a debate in the middle of the street and they seemed fairly harmless so I quickly apologised and made my retreat.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,905 ✭✭✭✭Handsome Bob


    swiss wrote: »
    After just over two years living in Dublin, I've finally had the faithful call to my door to try to get me round to their way of thinking. Two Chinese girls popped up, presumably ready for a polite brush off (maybe I'm being unkind to my fellow neighbours).

    I don't know what specific flavour of Christianity they were peddling, but it seemed to center on the idea of God having a female as well as a male character. They had this questionnaire that asked me a few basic belief questions, as well as a few Bible passages with a question asking me what it means.

    I have to say I found the conversation interesting, they seemed surprised when I told them that I didn't believe in the bible in any sort of religious sense. When they told me the bible was true I simply replied that it was a circular logic. The Bible is true because it was written by God because it says so in... the Bible.

    They then asked me if I believed I had a spirit, to which I of course replied that I didn't, and that when we die we rot in the ground. Hardly an uplifting thought, but at least I'm not kidding myself, or so I believe. Oddly enough, they mentioned that it was "proved" that the soul existed because it had a weight as scientists measured peoples weight as they died. My retort was that I would like to see the paper in which these results were published. I further explained that my world view was informed by evidence, and that my non belief was due to the lack of evidence for a supernatural deity. The conversation revolved around this theme for a while.

    Finally they thanked me for my time and left.

    I find myself wondering if I was being rude by engaging them in such frank debate, would they expect that I nod politely or accept their argument? Or perhaps that they would get the brush off? How do people here generally deal with religious proselytising?

    Hardly the most hostile of exchanges, I've seen far worse. You were by no means rude, that is of course if the exchange went as you say it did.:pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,737 ✭✭✭Asiaprod


    swiss wrote: »
    Two Chinese girls popped up, presumably ready for a polite brush off (maybe I'm being unkind to my fellow neighbours).

    I don't know what specific flavour of Christianity they were peddling, but it seemed to center on the idea of God having a female as well as a male character.

    Wow, thats a new one on me. I know we have a branch of Christianity in Japan that worships at Jesus' grave...yes he is buried in Japan. I have never heard of any branch in Asia that centers on a female side to the Christian God.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,848 ✭✭✭✭Zombrex


    er, everyone back up there for a minute ... let me get this straight, there are two cute Asian chicks wandering around Dublin who would actually want to stop and chat to me ... where and when please :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,825 ✭✭✭Gambler


    Asiaprod wrote: »
    I know we have a branch of Christianity in Japan that worships at Jesus' grave...yes he is buried in Japan.

    Poor guy must have been cut up into pieces and sent to different part of the worlds, seems a few people have his burial site..

    http://www.jesus.com.au/html/page/jesus_in_india
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmadiyya_views_of_Jesus
    http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull&cid=1171894508893

    And apparently he also ascended to heaven leaving no earthly remains, it all depends on who you talk to...


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,612 ✭✭✭uncleoswald


    Gambler wrote: »
    Poor guy must have been cut up into pieces and sent to different part of the worlds, seems a few people have his burial site..

    And apparently he also ascended to heaven leaving no earthly remains, it all depends on who you talk to...

    Sure I have some in a jar at home. Who doesn't?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,718 ✭✭✭The Mad Hatter


    Gambler wrote: »
    Poor guy must have been cut up into pieces and sent to different part of the worlds, seems a few people have his burial site..

    http://www.jesus.com.au/html/page/jesus_in_india
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmadiyya_views_of_Jesus
    http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull&cid=1171894508893

    And apparently he also ascended to heaven leaving no earthly remains, it all depends on who you talk to...

    That's nothing. According to QI, his grandmother had seven heads. They were all approved as relics by the RCC back in way-back-when.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,892 ✭✭✭ChocolateSauce


    Sounds like a fine way to respond. By approaching you, they signed away any right they may have had to not have their beliefs attacked, and by merely asking questions you were very moderate.

    In fact, it might even be argued that it's rude to just nod politely, because in your head you'd be going "yeah right", and being slightly dishonest by not telling them so.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,346 ✭✭✭Rev Hellfire


    A simple thanks but not interested is all that's required.
    Manners people, its a case of manners.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,558 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dades


    Manners people, its a case of manners.
    Shouldn't 'manners' preclude someone from asking a stranger about their religion in the first place? :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,346 ✭✭✭Rev Hellfire


    Dades wrote: »
    Shouldn't 'manners' preclude someone from asking a stranger about their religion in the first place? :)
    Two wrongs don't make a right :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    Two wrongs don't make a right :)

    An eye for an eye. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,745 ✭✭✭swiss


    Ah but you see I didn't mind being bothered, I sometimes fear that I live in a little world where my beliefs are re-inforced by my peers and by what I read on the Internet, so in a way I found it an interesting exercise to explain and defend what I feel about the world and a supernatural existence (or lack thereof) to others.

    I don't feel I was being rude either. I think that people can believe what they like, but in order to bring me on board, I do think that it is important to demonstrate to my satisfaction a rigorous logic and argument to support their case. In this case, it was bases on Bible verses which I perhaps unkindly dismissed more or less out of hand. It was almost as if I had torpedoed their whole argument by arguing the bible was a work of fiction. Which it is (where is the right smiley when you need it).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,371 ✭✭✭✭Zillah


    Aren´t most of these people told to not bother with atheists at all? It´s way easier to convince someone of weak faith to transfer it than to cause it´s spontaneous generation in a cold rational heart.

    Anyway, I think you were quite gentle with them. I´d have been much the same but I´d have thrown in a little bit of argument by ridicule.

    Really depends on how cute they were.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,835 ✭✭✭Schuhart


    Húrin wrote: »
    Sounds like a good way to respond. I'd be alarmed if somebody found that the soul had a measurable weight... it should not do as it is not physical. The film 21 grams was made about this claim.
    Just to save people a Google, an article explaining why the claim is baloney is here.

    Yeah, I know that it probably means something if we sort of knew it was baloney to begin with about implicit assumptions in our outlook. But I'll take refuge in the statement that extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,057 ✭✭✭Wacker


    swiss wrote: »
    Oddly enough, they mentioned that it was "proved" that the soul existed because it had a weight as scientists measured peoples weight as they died.

    Doesn't your sphincter muscle relax as you die?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,905 ✭✭✭✭Handsome Bob


    A simple thanks but not interested is all that's required.
    Manners people, its a case of manners.

    I really don't think his manners were that bad in comparison to what I have seen before. It's not as if he directly insulted them.
    Zillah wrote: »
    I´d have been much the same but I´d have thrown in a little bit of argument by ridicule.

    Really depends on how cute they were.

    That honestly shocks me.:pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 223 ✭✭davef1000


    I lived in Terenure until a few months ago and used to regularly get visits from the evangelisers from the church near the corner of Leinster Road. I'd usually just tell them that I'm not interested in talking about Jesus, and leave it at that. The odd time I'd engage in a conversation, if I fancied a bit of a debate. The majority of times they were alright, if very patronising. ("Ah, sure when you grow up you'll come to your senses" sort of thing. I'm 29...) The last time I spoke to any of them it went something like this:

    Person at my door: "Hello, we're from a church in Harold's Cross. Are you a Catholic?"

    Me: "No."

    P: "Well, when you look for Jesus you'll find he can do some great things."

    M: "I have looked, actually, and I didn't find anything."

    P: "Oh, well when you look a bit harder, you'll see that he can do things like cure the sick."

    M: "He hasn't been doing much of that lately, has he?"

    P: "Oh, he HAS! In my prayer group people are cured all the time. He cures things like a sore leg, or a pain in the back, or homosexuality-"

    M: "Wait, you're saying that homosexuality is something that needs to be CURED?"

    P: "It can be, yes."

    M: *slams door*

    And this from a woman my age who looked like butter wouldn't melt.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,745 ✭✭✭swiss


    davef1000 wrote: »
    P: "Oh, he HAS! In my prayer group people are cured all the time. He cures things like a sore leg, or a pain in the back, or homosexuality-"

    M: "Wait, you're saying that homosexuality is something that needs to be CURED?"

    P: "It can be, yes."
    At least they didn't try this line of logic with me.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,045 ✭✭✭Húrin


    davef1000 wrote: »
    Person at my door: "Hello, we're from a church in Harold's Cross. Are you a Catholic?"

    Me: "No."

    P: "Well, when you look for Jesus you'll find he can do some great things."

    M: "I have looked, actually, and I didn't find anything."

    P: "Oh, well when you look a bit harder, you'll see that he can do things like cure the sick."

    M: "He hasn't been doing much of that lately, has he?"

    P: "Oh, he HAS! In my prayer group people are cured all the time. He cures things like a sore leg, or a pain in the back, or homosexuality-"

    M: "Wait, you're saying that homosexuality is something that needs to be CURED?"

    P: "It can be, yes."

    M: *slams door*

    And this from a woman my age who looked like butter wouldn't melt.

    It's funny how the homosexuality issue is such a deal-breaker for people these days.


  • Administrators, Computer Games Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 32,459 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Mickeroo


    Húrin wrote: »
    It's funny how the homosexuality issue is such a deal-breaker for people these days.

    I think it's funny people still think it's wrong.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,558 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dades


    It's funnier how "worship" is such a deal breaker for an all-loving creator.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27,857 ✭✭✭✭Dave!


    Húrin wrote: »
    It's funny how the homosexuality issue is such a deal-breaker for people these days.
    ffs....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    I think its funny how homosexuality is likened to having a sore leg.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,180 ✭✭✭Mena


    Galvasean wrote: »
    I think its funny how homosexuality is likened to having a sore leg.

    Sex + Kama Sutra = Sore Leg?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    I wonder will the cure for homosexuality come in cream or tablet form?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,718 ✭✭✭The Mad Hatter


    Galvasean wrote: »
    I wonder will the cure for homosexuality come in cream or tablet form?

    Suppository?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean




  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,905 ✭✭✭✭Handsome Bob


    Húrin wrote: »
    It's funny how the homosexuality issue is such a deal-breaker for people these days.

    Yup, how dare people be pissed off when they are told they are sinners for living a life that doesn't harm anyone else.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    My gf came upon these a few years back outside of trinity college. The Asian girl stopped her and asked if she'd give her a hand with her assignment because she couldn't read it properly. She then had her basically reading bible passages, and it was only when the Asian girl started asking her odd questions and things like, "Who is the mother?" that she realised that this girl was just an odd bible-thumper with a focus on this "God is female too" thing.

    I've only ever encountered real life religion spam once in my adult life. Just told the JW's that "I have no interest in having this discussion" and they promptly left without fuss.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,045 ✭✭✭Húrin


    LZ5by5 wrote: »
    Yup, how dare people be pissed off when they are told they are sinners for living a life that doesn't harm anyone else.
    If we dismissed everything that pissed us off then we would be quite ignorant. For instance, the fact that global warming is happening is something that pisses a lot of people off for various reasons. But that doesn't mean that it's legitimate to use that annoyance to close their mind to that message.
    Dades wrote: »
    It's funnier how "worship" is such a deal breaker for an all-loving creator.

    Aren't mods supposed to be broadly in favour of keeping threads on-topic?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,346 ✭✭✭Rev Hellfire


    Húrin wrote: »
    Aren't mods supposed to be broadly in favour of keeping threads on-topic?
    Y'arr they be more guidelines than rules. pirate_wink.gif


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,905 ✭✭✭✭Handsome Bob


    Húrin wrote: »
    If we dismissed everything that pissed us off then we would be quite ignorant. For instance, the fact that global warming is happening is something that pisses a lot of people off for various reasons. But that doesn't mean that it's legitimate to use that annoyance to close their mind to that message.

    On the one hand we have Global Warming, something that could be potentially disastrous for our planet and its' inhabitants. On the other hand we have Homosexuality, which is not a threat to human life.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,045 ✭✭✭Húrin


    LZ5by5 wrote: »
    On the one hand we have Global Warming, something that could be potentially disastrous for our planet and its' inhabitants. On the other hand we have Homosexuality, which is not a threat to human life.

    Does this mean that only facts which have life-or-death dimensions are true? I don't see how your post refutes my point. It's quite obvious that I wasn't saying the two issues are similar. However, the reaction to dismiss them is pychologically similar if not idential.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,758 ✭✭✭Stercus Accidit


    Húrin wrote: »
    Does this mean that only facts which have life-or-death dimensions are true? I don't see how your post refutes my point. It's quite obvious that I wasn't saying the two issues are similar. However, the reaction to dismiss them is pychologically similar if not idential.

    Can you tell us then for a "fact" if homosexuality is wrong and needs to be cured then?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    seamus wrote: »
    religion spam

    I like that term. Expect to see me using it a lot in future.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,045 ✭✭✭Húrin


    Can you tell us then for a "fact" if homosexuality is wrong and needs to be cured then?

    For the purpose of this discussion it doesn't matter. My point is that it's stupid to dismiss an idea merely because it pisses you off. It is fine to dismiss it if the idea is false.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,558 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dades


    Hurin, we all enjoy a little off topicness once threads have served their purpose. You seem to be involved in plenty of it yourself.

    And let's forget it was your post that prompted the shift.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    Húrin wrote: »
    For the purpose of this discussion it doesn't matter. My point is that it's stupid to dismiss an idea merely because it pisses you off. It is fine to dismiss it if the idea is false.

    Perhaps it pisses them off because it is false?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,045 ✭✭✭Húrin


    Galvasean wrote: »
    Perhaps it pisses them off because it is false?
    That's fair enough if you have the confidence to be sure that claims are false.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    Húrin wrote: »
    That's fair enough if you have the confidence to be sure that claims are false.

    Considering the claim in discussion is that homosexuality can and needs to be cured by prayer, yes I (and others here) am extremely confident that said claims are false.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    It also stands to reason that if homosexuality can be "cured" through any means, then it can also be "given" to a person. As a bonafide ridiculously heterosexual male, I am more than willing to submit myself as a guinea pig so that religious people can "give" me gay and prove their claims.

    That is, because I'm 101% confident that they will fail.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,848 ✭✭✭✭Zombrex


    Húrin wrote: »
    If we dismissed everything that pissed us off then we would be quite ignorant. For instance, the fact that global warming is happening is something that pisses a lot of people off for various reasons. But that doesn't mean that it's legitimate to use that annoyance to close their mind to that message.

    Yes because those two things (global warming and homosexuality) are the same thing :rolleyes:

    You are ignoring why people "close their mind" to your religion's message. I think if the reason to believe global warming was happening was "God says so" a lot of people would close their mind to that as well


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,558 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dades


    seamus wrote: »
    I am more than willing to submit myself as a guinea pig so that religious people can "give" me gay and prove their claims.
    You might not be so enthusiastic when they send Ted Haggard over to your house to "give you gay". :eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,353 ✭✭✭Goduznt Xzst


    I'd personally like for Hurin to come a'knocking. What fun that would be :rolleyes:

    Me: *opens door* Good Morning!
    Hurin: Is it though? Your have clearly been brainwashed by your social constructivism to wish me a good morning when in fact you can't know whether or not this morning will be good. Further, your wish for my morning to be good shows your moral universalism, a proof for the meta-ethical divine command theory.
    Me: *closes door*


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,745 ✭✭✭swiss


    seamus wrote:
    My gf came upon these a few years back outside of trinity college. The Asian girl stopped her and asked if she'd give her a hand with her assignment because she couldn't read it properly. She then had her basically reading bible passages, and it was only when the Asian girl started asking her odd questions and things like, "Who is the mother?" that she realised that this girl was just an odd bible-thumper with a focus on this "God is female too" thing.
    That sounds like the same group alright, and possibly the same person as I encountered.

    This has gotten me thinking about the wider context of people calling around to the door in order to push a particular agenda, whether it be to get you to vote a particular way, to buy a product or service, to get you to donate to charity, or as in this case to proselytise for a religion.

    In theory, I don't have a problem with it at all, with the proviso that you can simply say "sorry, not interested" and they walk away without quibble. In reality, it is usually an interruption that you can do without as you're sitting down to watch telly, have dinner, or play left 4 dead with your mates.

    Is this then something you just live with? Or would there be some merit in putting yourself on some kind of 'do not disturb' list where if you are part of an organisation that calls to peoples doors you should consult this list and respect the wishes of those who decide to opt out?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,718 ✭✭✭The Mad Hatter


    swiss wrote: »
    In reality, it is usually an interruption that you can do without as you're sitting down to watch telly, have dinner, or play left 4 dead with your mates.

    Invite them in to play. You could run a pool on how long they'll last before they run.

    (Am I stereotyping? Very sorry.)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,745 ✭✭✭swiss


    Invite them in to play. You could run a pool on how long they'll last before they run.

    (Am I stereotyping? Very sorry.)
    At least they could use their turn undead ability.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,180 ✭✭✭Mena


    swiss wrote: »
    Is this then something you just live with? Or would there be some merit in putting yourself on some kind of 'do not disturb' list where if you are part of an organisation that calls to peoples doors you should consult this list and respect the wishes of those who decide to opt out?

    We used to have a good few people coming to our door, be they J.Witness or S.Sellingsomething. Was a right pain as they would always arrive at a time when we'd gone to bath, sat down to eat or whatever.

    I used to have a sign up on my house on the dark continent... I put it up here for a laugh... you've all see it... "Trespassers will be shot... survivors will be shot again".

    It's either worked very well and we only get a very few people at the door now (with a great conversation piece) or they just generally slowed down coming to our area.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement