Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Misogynistic lines/attitudes from porn does it bother you ?

191012141517

Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 6,391 Mod ✭✭✭✭Macha


    Er...no they're men's jeans...so I can't agree with what you say about if reflecting worse on women but I'm guessing you're saying that because you think the ad is targeted towards women.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 6,391 Mod ✭✭✭✭Macha


    Zulu wrote: »
    Well now hang on. You asked for an example, which you got. You can't disregard it that simply. The fact of the matter is, both men and women are objectified.
    Seriously Zulu - have a look at the site when you get home. There's objectification and then..there's this.
    I mean you have to say that you're over 13 to get a tour of the website while the Riverrock TV ad was allowed on TV at all hours of the day.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,967 ✭✭✭✭Zulu


    Fair enough, I'll get a look at it when I get home!

    I think he was suggesting that the women are morons for swooning for your man. I think.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 43,044 ✭✭✭✭Nevyn


    Zulu wrote: »
    I don't know if that is such a sound argument tbh. Soaps make up a large portion of prime time viewing and are amongst the most watched shows. I'd say add comedies to soaps and you've got a huge portion of tv (that has actors - ie: not news/current affairs shows), wouldn't you agree? (of course I'm just guessing here - this is purely anecdotal. Stats anyone?)

    The thing is those numbers on what people are watching are not as relevant any more, the facts are that those numbers are based of certain view numbers at a certain time of the day and do not take into consideration people who record programs, watch them on line, or buy shows by the series box set. Also it disallows for new media such a games which more and more people are likely to by and play investing hours in rather then sitting down with a cup of tea to watch soaps.
    Zulu wrote: »
    But that more hollywood/big budget movies isn't it? Not saying your point doesn't stand, but we watch far more tv than we do movies. I'd imagine there is plenty of work in tv for these people, but it not something they'd like to "lower" themselves to.

    But trends start in movies and trickle down, devil wears prada spawns shows like ugly betty and with Warener Bros having announced they will no longer be making any movies with a female lead things get worse and worse.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 6,391 Mod ✭✭✭✭Macha


    Zulu wrote: »
    Fair enough, I'll get a look at it when I get home!

    I think he was suggesting that the women are morons for swooning for your man. I think.
    Lol, I bet you will ;). Yeah, I figured that's what he meant.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    taconnol wrote: »
    Er...no they're men's jeans...so I can't agree with what you say about if reflecting worse on women but I'm guessing you're saying that because you think the ad is targeted towards women.

    Oh well shoes how much I know. I wouldn't buy any clothes with woman on the tags. I'd just think, "Oh, ladies jeans" and move on. (Men wear skinny jeans now.. damn metros.)

    And I wasn't calling the women (fictional as they are) morons. I was moreso reflecting on how such ads portray women as being unable to resist a muscle man or a big wang.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,967 ✭✭✭✭Zulu


    Thaedydal wrote: »
    The thing is those numbers on what people are watching are not as relevant any more, the facts are that those numbers are based of certain view numbers at a certain time of the day and do not take into consideration people who record programs, watch them on line, or buy shows by the series box set.
    I disagree. Most people still watch old fashioned TV. The certain number, watching at a certain happen to be the most viewers at the most watched time. I'd suggest, in the context of this discussion that's most applicable.
    Recording programs, are recorded from prime time mostly; that's why the show is on at prime time. And box sets are watched once, then shelved. Soaps are a daily fix.
    Also it disallows for new media such a games which more and more people are likely to by and play investing hours in rather then sitting down with a cup of tea to watch soaps.
    True, but games while a massive industry (more so than Hollywood I understand) are still limited to a (albeit growing) market. In fact, I'd go so far as to suggest that people who don't play games may never be so, but will be exposed to TV. Those who play games however will be exposed to TV. I fear you are misrepresenting TV entirely. Small children see tv. "Silver tops" see tv.
    But trends start in movies and trickle down, devil wears prada spawns shows like ugly betty
    Meh perhaps. What movie spawned Corrie? The point is, people I watch, perhaps on average 1 movie a week, however, I watch at least 2 hours of TV every night, and I don't follow any soaps/tv shows.
    and with Warener Bros having announced they will no longer be making any movies with a female lead things get worse and worse.
    I missed that. I wonder what their reasons were?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    Holy media sensation Batman! :eek:

    Warner bros are continuing to make movies with female leads.
    http://www.monstersandcritics.com/movies/news/article_1364270.php/Warner_Bros._Robinov_counters_no_women_leads_allegations

    That whole fiasco was based on a misquote.

    I wonder how well the Sex and the City movie would have done without female leads.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 62 ✭✭Alarums


    Zulu wrote: »
    I missed that. I wonder what their reasons were?


    They made two films with female leads which flopped. They then made the rather large assumption that all movies with female leads were a bad risk.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,967 ✭✭✭✭Zulu


    Alarums wrote: »
    They made two films with female leads which flopped. They then made the rather large assumption that all movies with female leads were a bad risk.
    Or as Galvasean pointed out, it's all BS.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    Alarums wrote: »
    They made two films with female leads which flopped. They then made the rather large assumption that all movies with female leads were a bad risk.

    Or the media made that assumption for them based on a misquote. But hey, no one needs to hear that. It makes women look less persecuted.
    How many films have recently had a female lead shoe-horned in to help out the gross? lord of the Rings was one major example. The character Arwen was little more than a vague reference in the book but in the film was boosted up to one of the key players, action scenes and everything. Then there was Lois Lane Superman Returns.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 43,044 ✭✭✭✭Nevyn


    When did it come out that it was a 'misquote' ?
    I didn't hear about that, the orginal story broke this time last year.
    http://www.firstshowing.net/2007/10/08/warner-brothers-president-says-no-more-female-lead-characters/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    Thaedydal wrote: »
    When did it come out that it was a 'misquote' ?
    I didn't hear about that, the orginal story broke this time last year.
    http://www.firstshowing.net/2007/10/08/warner-brothers-president-says-no-more-female-lead-characters/

    Well the very first link beneath the article is them denying it.
    http://www.firstshowing.net/2007/10/09/warner-brothers-denies-comments-about-female-leads/

    Of course we may never know the full extent of what was or was not said. Considering that it would be extremely foolhardy for someone in his position to make such a statement, not to mention the fact that he (Robinov) fronts a company which has gone on to make many films with female leads since, suggests that it was mostly made up by the media.
    I would imagine that he may have said something along the lines of how we have to rethink are strategy on how we do films with female leads (or something equally open ended) and the press took what the wanted from it and ran with it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,649 ✭✭✭✭CDfm


    taconnol wrote: »
    Sorry I don't watch soaps or those other programmes so I take your word for it. I would argue that these roles exist but they are in the minority. You constantly hear about actresses complaining about the lack of decent roles for them and particularly older women:
    http://extratv.warnerbros.com/2007/09/demi_moore.php

    And lots of people are excited about the new Ricky Gervais movie because they feel there's finally a leading man that people can identify with. I'm not saying get rid of all the hot young actors and actresses but y'know, variety is the spice, etc etc. Don't get me started on Hollywood teen movies..!


    Thanks for the article. It is very accurate. Funny, if you notice at the two semi-naked women to the right of the article with no similarly clothed men to be seen. One article links to what the "ideal woman" is. And Sunday Times is the most hypocritical paper to be running an article like that. I have stopped buying them because they are just obsessed with printing photos of "tastefully naked" women under the guise of art-with no corresponding ones of men (I have looked!)


    Well..yes it is a leap of faith to say they "run" the porn industry. I really don't know so I can't say either way. I would hardly consider Anne Summers part of the porn industry.


    Why are women the target audience for Mayonaise? :confused: It was pulled because of complaints to the company about the kiss between two men.


    Er..why would it stereotype young men? The whole point of it would be to educate people to see through stereotypes as portrayed in advertising..

    I would guess the lack of roles for older women is because the fans of such movies are women - a male actor will star in a movie as a murderer etc. Was it Goebbels wife that poisoned their kids in the bunker- I cant imagine any named Hollywood actress taking that role.

    What I said - its not a huge leap of faith to imagine that women control the porn industry.

    I didnt notice the photos of the Times article - but similarily I would deem Olympic Sports like beech volleyball a non sport and wonder why there is such a demand for olympic womens gymnastics from women -when its just little more than child abuse at best.

    AS for Mayonaise -its not really a guy food-its a diet food or thats how its percieved. I can imagine my kids hollering with that and the Gayonaise jokes flying. But women are the target audience. Just like ads for laxatives for busy bloated women. Its targeted at women. Get slim take laxatives - is the subtext I get.

    AS for -educating guys - there was a pilot programme from the Department Of Education run on the premis that being male is a social construct. In other words -you can be retrained to be not masculine - as if being male is inherently bad. Is that what you mean as education.That programme was so secret that the parents of the participating students were not able to access the syllabus and it was impossibe for a TD to get a copy.
    http://historical-debates.oireachtas.ie/D/0526/D.0526.200011280267.html

    Thankfully Willie O'Dea made his copy available.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 6,391 Mod ✭✭✭✭Macha


    CDfm wrote: »
    I would guess the lack of roles for older women is because the fans of such movies are women - a male actor will star in a movie as a murderer etc. Was it Goebbels wife that poisoned their kids in the bunker- I cant imagine any named Hollywood actress taking that role.
    Well that's exactly the problem. Hollywood is supposed to be fantasy - so invent a little. All they do is reel out the same old romatic comedies, thrillers ets and replace the actors with younger models. Snore..zz.. And don't tell me women don't want to be villains-that's just more gender stereotyping!! What about Theron in Monster??

    Hang on a sec..so in advertising women are used to sell products to women but then women can't be given big roles in Hollywood? What rubbish.
    CDfm wrote: »
    What I said - its not a huge leap of faith to imagine that women control the porn industry.
    Well I like not to assume things that I don't know are true. So I'll stick with my opinion until you support your assumption with some facts.
    CDfm wrote: »
    I didnt notice the photos of the Times article - but similarily I would deem Olympic Sports like beech volleyball a non sport and wonder why there is such a demand for olympic womens gymnastics from women -when its just little more than child abuse at best.
    What exactly does beach vollyball have to do with this...?? And both men and women do gymnastics. Where are you getting that there's so much demand specifically from women and what exactly are you referring to - to compete or watch. The age limit on participation in the Olympics is 16. It's a biological fact that girls of this younger age are more flexible than those in their early 20s. I don't really see the big difference between male and female gymnastics...er and I don't see what it has to do with the ads that were in the Times. (although I do agree that forcing such young kids to train to such a high level does raise ethical questions)
    CDfm wrote: »
    AS for Mayonaise -its not really a guy food-its a diet food or thats how its percieved. I can imagine my kids hollering with that and the Gayonaise jokes flying. But women are the target audience. Just like ads for laxatives for busy bloated women. Its targeted at women. Get slim take laxatives - is the subtext I get.
    WTF??? Mayonnaise is a diet food???:confused: Seriously I don't know what to say to that. Do you know what the nutritional profile of mayonnaise is? I do and it is not a diet food. Are you actually comparing mayonnaise to laxatives as a similar diet supplement. Get thee over to the Nutrition and Diet forum!
    And mayonnaise is only for women? Better tell all those men who like eating it. When you're talking about how it's perceived, you're really talking about how YOU perceive it.
    CDfm wrote: »
    AS for -educating guys - there was a pilot programme from the Department Of Education run on the premis that being male is a social construct. In other words -you can be retrained to be not masculine - as if being male is inherently bad. Is that what you mean as education.That programme was so secret that the parents of the participating students were not able to access the syllabus and it was impossibe for a TD to get a copy.
    http://historical-debates.oireachtas.ie/D/0526/D.0526.200011280267.html
    Well the programme I am suggesting would have nothing to do with telling people what they are or aren't or that being male and female is good or bad. It would be about making people aware that their choices shouldn't be restricted by their gender (er, except for the right to be pregnant, etc :pac:).


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,555 ✭✭✭✭Sir Digby Chicken Caesar


    taconnol wrote: »
    . It's a biological fact that girls of this younger age are more flexible than those in their early 20s. .


    giggity, giggity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,883 ✭✭✭shellyboo


    taconnol wrote: »




    WTF??? Mayonnaise is a diet food???:confused: Seriously I don't know what to say to that. Do you know what the nutritional profile of mayonnaise is? I do and it is not a diet food. Are you actually comparing mayonnaise to laxatives as a similar diet supplement. Get thee over to the Nutrition and Diet forum!
    And mayonnaise is only for women? Better tell all those men who like eating it. When you're talking about how it's perceived, you're really talking about how YOU perceive it.




    Mayonnaise is not a diet food, but it is marketed to women. All grocery products are marketed to women, because it's women who do the grocery shopping for the most part, and they have pretty much complete control over what goes into their shopping basket at the end of the day. Same reason that kids' breakfast cereals are marketed with vitamins and minerals on them - it's the mother that's buying it, not the kid.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 6,391 Mod ✭✭✭✭Macha


    shellyboo wrote: »
    Mayonnaise is not a diet food, but it is marketed to women. All grocery products are marketed to women, because it's women who do the grocery shopping for the most part, and they have pretty much complete control over what goes into their shopping basket at the end of the day. Same reason that kids' breakfast cereals are marketed with vitamins and minerals on them - it's the mother that's buying it, not the kid.

    This is exactly what I'm talking about. Advertising grabs a stereotype and runs with it. Families where men do the shopping? Male students? Unmarried men? These people don't exist in the world of advertising.

    I'm not arguing with what you say shellyboo. But we need to be more aware of the messages that are being broadcast. One study shows that kids see over 3000 adverts every day. OK some you can avoid by reducing TV-viewing time but it just isn't possible to filter them all out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,883 ✭✭✭shellyboo


    taconnol wrote: »
    This is exactly what I'm talking about. Advertising grabs a stereotype and runs with it. Families where men do the shopping? Male students? Unmarried men? These people don't exist in the world of advertising.

    Why would they exist? Companies have to advertise to their target market. If you're spending millions of euro on an advertising campaign, you'd better be damn sure it's influencing the people who are going to be buying your product. If stereotypes sell product, that's what they're going to use. They have to appeal to a GROUP of people, and address that group as all having similar characteristics...

    However, I totally agree with you that it's impossible not to be influenced by advertising. The content is never going to change - marketing appeals to neat little groups that don't really exist - but people do need to be more aware of its effects, especially on kids.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,375 ✭✭✭metrovelvet


    Mayonaise is marketed to women?

    Kids cereals are also marketed to the children with bright colours and being put on the lower shelves in supermarkets so the little rascals can lift them up and sneak them into the buggy.

    Interestingly, playboy centerfolds were added to playboy after it initially got confused for a gay magazine, as male vanity had to be counterweighted with naked women so it was not thought to be gay.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,883 ✭✭✭shellyboo


    Mayonaise is marketed to women?

    Kids cereals are also marketed to the children with bright colours and being put on the lower shelves in supermarkets so the little rascals can lift them up and sneak them into the buggy.

    Yeah, child pressure has a lot to do with it... but if you look at a good proportion of the TV ads, they're aimed at the mothers (parents, to be fair!) with info about vitamins, minerals and the like. Even the 'kiddy' ads have this info in them. Why would you spend money marketing something to a two-year old who has no buying power?

    And as a rule, grocery products in general - including mayonnaise and all foodstuffs - are marketed to women. Not because it's stereoptypical to say that women do the shopping like good little wives, but because in reality, most grocery shopping is done by mothers/wives for their families. Simple as that. They don't sit around in JCDecaux just pulling these demograpics out of thin air - it's based on real shopper stats.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,649 ✭✭✭✭CDfm


    shellyboo wrote: »
    Mayonnaise is not a diet food, but it is marketed to women. All grocery products are marketed to women, because it's women who do the grocery shopping for the most part, and they have pretty much complete control over what goes into their shopping basket at the end of the day. Same reason that kids' breakfast cereals are marketed with vitamins and minerals on them - it's the mother that's buying it, not the kid.

    Ah cmon- Ive just had a snack - a rasher sandwich with mature cheddar cheese on white - with ketchup . Chocolate and extra strong fresh coffee.

    Now lets talk social construct.

    Could it be perhaps that women are more influenced by image and advertising than you all want to admit.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,649 ✭✭✭✭CDfm


    taconnol wrote: »
    . And don't tell me women don't want to be villains


    What exactly does beach vollyball have to do with this... The age limit on participation in the Olympics is 16. It's a biological fact that girls of this younger age are more flexible than those in their early 20s. I don't really see the big difference between male and female gymnastics..

    WTF??? Mayonnaise is a diet food???:confused: Seriously I don't know what to say to that. Do you know what the nutritional profile of mayonnaise is? I do and it is not a diet food. Are you actually comparing mayonnaise to laxatives as a similar diet supplement. Get thee over to the Nutrition and Diet forum!
    And mayonnaise is only for women? Better tell all those men who like eating it. When you're talking about how it's perceived, you're really talking about how YOU perceive it.


    Well the programme I am suggesting would have nothing to do with telling people what they are or aren't or that being male and female is good or bad. It would be about making people aware that their choices shouldn't be restricted by their gender (er, except for the right to be pregnant, etc :pac:).


    Women want to be cast in super lovely roles. I thought Nicole Kidman would be perfect as Mrs Goebbels.For most actresses taking on a role as an evil depraved woman would upset their financials. What they mean by an absence of good roles is sexy female godess roles.

    Take Farrah Fawcett - she played a battered housewife in a movie but in real life was prosecuted for battering her husband.

    There are plenty of lower budget crime movies that show women in less heroic lights - if they were willing to take the risk. Money is worth more than integrity methinks.

    And come off it. Gymnastics - the demand is from women.Any guy watching them in a pub would be called a perve. There are enslaved kids in the middle east in camel racing.

    Mayo isnt a guy food. Plenty of gay themes are used by guinness from time to time -those ads dont get pulled. You must be aware of the advertising push on laxatives to women. You cant be that isolated. Its fairly gross if you ask me. Theres not even warnings- like use laxatives sensibly.

    There is a lot of stereotyping on how bad it is to be a man. Men cant cook blah blah blah. I can shop better than most women.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    Mayonnaise isn't for men? Better tell Dad...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,649 ✭✭✭✭CDfm


    Galvasean wrote: »
    Mayonnaise isn't for men? Better tell Dad...
    No wonder you post anonymously - dont post anything to give away his identity. it would be v v uncool.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,649 ✭✭✭✭CDfm


    shellyboo wrote: »
    Mayonnaise is not a diet food, but it is marketed to women. All grocery products are marketed to women, because it's women who do the grocery shopping for the most part, and they have pretty much complete control over what goes into their shopping basket at the end of the day. Same reason that kids' breakfast cereals are marketed with vitamins and minerals on them - it's the mother that's buying it, not the kid.
    explain this to me.

    women buy breakfast cereals with 70% sugar cos some wiseass says he has sprinkled some vitamins on them.

    and McDonalds is a health food resterant according to its advertising

    so we should eat there every day


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    Mayonnaise. The topic of discussion has nearly come full circle.

    So.. how about them misogynistic attitudes in porn?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,649 ✭✭✭✭CDfm


    Galvasean wrote: »
    Mayonnaise. The topic of discussion has nearly come full circle.

    So.. how about them misogynistic attitudes in porn?
    Never touch the stuff myself

    but misogynist attitudes in porn affecting attitudes to women- nah

    women have changed in all kinds of ways and want the world to change totally for them.

    its like saying we work on building sites now so we want them swear free and pc -so they want to integrate into what they percieve is a manworld but pretty it all up

    its also like saying that women arent involved in the porn industry and benefit financialy - or even own or run it.

    its like saying i want to play hurling with a hockey stick

    There was always banter between the sexes -how else would people get together - and women treat men very differently too. I nwonder if its rhis tats the catylist.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,255 ✭✭✭anonymous_joe


    CDfm wrote: »
    Never touch the stuff myself

    but misogynist attitudes in porn affecting attitudes to women- nah

    women have changed in all kinds of ways and want the world to change totally for them.

    its like saying we work on building sites now so we want them swear free and pc -so they want to integrate into what they percieve is a manworld but pretty it all up

    its also like saying that women arent involved in the porn industry and benefit financialy - or even own or run it.

    its like saying i want to play hurling with a hockey stick

    I'd say it's all too easy to dismiss the effect.

    I doubt many people's attitudes to women are defined by porn, but I'd say it's a safe assumption to say that a majority of young lads have seen porn before they did the deed. That's bound to give you ideas.

    I also obviously think it depends on the context of sex - misogyny (not relaly entirely apt as a word) as fantasy for want of a better term can make for some pretty great sex. I've had some pretty aggressive (from both partners allow me to assure you ;)) sex and it was great. For both people. I've also had tender, gentle, loving sex - it's a wonderful thing, but it's not what you always want. However, I'd be worried about the fact that I know people who would certainly treat women as objects to be fúcked and then discarded and happily boast about how they treated the latest conquest.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,649 ✭✭✭✭CDfm


    yes but Ive seen war movies and used firearms in sport.

    but that doesnt make me go down the road and take over mcdonalds.

    Young guys see movies -but I doubt very much that informs their views.

    its like they have spent 17 or 18 years with their mother bringing them up - go to school with girls etc and suddenly when faced with sex turn into movie guy. thats stretching it.

    some people might experiment with what they see in movies but i imagine -thats car chase movies

    lets not forget its two concenting adults - so the likliehood of being told get oput of dodge if your partner doesnt like it is almost totally guaranteed


Advertisement