Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Why do Men hate Sex & The City?

16791112

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,794 ✭✭✭JC 2K3


    WindSock wrote: »
    What's the certain type of Woman who can? The shallow kind?
    I dunno if shallow is the right word.

    Put it this way, if you said that all women could relate to SATC, a lot of women would have the right to be very offended.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 31,467 ✭✭✭✭Ghost Train


    WindSock wrote: »
    Well, I guess it's not very far from Men wearing sports jerseys going to a game, etc. Yes, I know it's to show who's side you are on, but I have seen guys wear different sports clothes to different types of sports.

    doesn't really seem the same, more like people dressing up to go to starwars or a sci fi convention... sort of an american thing?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,287 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    eolhc wrote: »
    doesn't really seem the same, more like people dressing up to go to starwars or a sci fi convention... sort of an american thing?

    I think that's just as worrying tho..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,737 ✭✭✭BroomBurner


    I don't think you can liken it to men wearing sports tops, some men only ever wear sports tops cause, God love them, they've to shop for themselves :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,239 ✭✭✭✭WindSock


    Yeah I dont know what I'm getting at at the moment. I'm tired and I want to go home :( I will make up my defence explanations later :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,287 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    I don't think you can liken it to men wearing sports tops, some men only ever wear sports tops cause, God love them, they've to shop for themselves :D

    Not at all, that's why we have womens!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,737 ✭✭✭BroomBurner


    ntlbell wrote: »
    Not at all, that's why we have womens!

    Women's sports tops?! A bit snug, no? ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 31,467 ✭✭✭✭Ghost Train


    ntlbell wrote: »
    I think that's just as worrying tho..

    guess its just a bit of fun... and only fair that people can laugh a little at people who get so involved in a tv show that they make it part of their real life :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,737 ✭✭✭BroomBurner


    ntlbell wrote: »
    But we don't PRETEND to be the footballer in question....

    and say on the bus to the match? who are you? oh i'm ronaldo i'm gorgeous "no way man your scholes your a red headed ginger"

    :p

    Hahahahahahahaha best image ever. Bunch of lads together describing why they're like their favourite players...


  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 47,413 ✭✭✭✭Zaph


    ntlbell wrote: »
    Probably the type with very little going on upstairs.

    They don't have to be shallow.

    I'd disagree with that, I know some very intelligent women who love SATC, and like I posted earlier, I can often be found in front of popcorn-tv where I don't have to engage my brain to watch it. I just don't think that SATC is a particularly good example of this type of tv as it tries too hard to be more "meaningful" and elevate itself above what it really is, poorly written brain-donor tv.
    ntlbell wrote: »
    It's a bit like the womens magazines which I got eaten alive for.

    Why would you sit down to an hour's relaxing just to have your intelligence insulted for an hour.

    This I do have to agree with. I fail to understand the popularity of magazines like Hello. It's just pictures, ffs, but that's one for another thread.


    eolhc wrote: »
    doesn't really seem the same, more like people dressing up to go to starwars or a sci fi convention... sort of an american thing?
    ntlbell wrote: »
    I think that's just as worrying tho..

    As a fan of Star Wars, and sci-fi in general, even I find the whole dressing up think a bit disturbing.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 170 ✭✭HoneyButterfly


    ntlbell wrote: »
    Probably the type with very little going on upstairs.

    You guys need to stop calling people who like it stupid and "vacuous". I love it and I am not sstupid, nor am I shallow.

    Lots of Love,
    PRINCESS


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,737 ✭✭✭BroomBurner


    I can't really take someone that signs off as 'pincess' seriously.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 170 ✭✭HoneyButterfly


    I can't really take someone that signs off as 'pincess' seriously.

    I said it as a joke! God almighty! Someone previously called me "princess" in this thread because I took offence to being called stupid for watching SATC.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,794 ✭✭✭JC 2K3


    Zaph wrote: »
    I'd disagree with that, I know some very intelligent women who love SATC, and like I posted earlier, I can often be found in front of popcorn-tv where I don't have to engage my brain to watch it. I just don't think that SATC is a particularly good example of this type of tv as it tries too hard to be more "meaningful" and elevate itself above what it really is, poorly written brain-donor tv.
    There's a difference between simply watching and enjoying something and relating to it and wanting to emulate the lives of the people in it.

    SATC as a piece of mindless yet entertaining drivel to occupy you for an hour? If it floats your boat and it's not too often I've no problem with that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 170 ✭✭HoneyButterfly


    JC 2K3 wrote: »
    If it floats your boat and it's not too often I've no problem with that.

    Here's the thing....why do you have a problem with people watching it more often, or even all the time, or if people would like to experience what their lifestyle would be like? You are you. I am me....just back off...and let it be


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,794 ✭✭✭JC 2K3


    I'm not stopping you from watching it, I'm giving my opinion on it....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,131 ✭✭✭MissHoneyBun


    Well it doesn't portray men very well in fairness now does it so why would they like it?!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,131 ✭✭✭MissHoneyBun


    Dudess wrote: »
    I actually did my final year sociology of the media dissertation on Sex & the City - to disprove the hypothesis that this programme is a positive, enlightened representation of women. I had no problem whatsoever finding 12,000 words worth of arguments to the contrary.

    :eek:
    What college did you go to? Disneyland IT?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,766 ✭✭✭Reku


    Have to say, the weirdest part of the SATC saga was seeing women getting dressed up to go to the cinema. Now, before anyone stomps any clown-feet, I'm not being derogatory, just thought it was weird.
    WindSock wrote: »
    Well, I guess it's not very far from Men wearing sports jerseys going to a game, etc. Yes, I know it's to show who's side you are on, but I have seen guys wear different sports clothes to different types of sports.
    ntlbell wrote: »
    But we don't PRETEND to be the footballer in question....
    Kinda funny is it not, if a grown woman were to dress up as Barbie and make believe she were her, she'd be locked up, yet somehow the SATC movie has found a loophole to this little clause of sanity?
    eolhc wrote: »
    doesn't really seem the same, more like people dressing up to go to starwars or a sci fi convention... sort of an american thing?
    Gah! LARPers!!!! *shudders*:(

    Zaph wrote: »
    I'd disagree with that, I know some very intelligent women who love SATC, and like I posted earlier, I can often be found in front of popcorn-tv where I don't have to engage my brain to watch it. I just don't think that SATC is a particularly good example of this type of tv as it tries too hard to be more "meaningful" and elevate itself above what it really is, poorly written brain-donor tv.
    Indeed, as a generic TV programme it's fine, the problem is that it seems to often be marketed as, and accepted by some females as, some sort of revolutionary programme, an embodiement of female empowerment and feminism. It's not, it's a soap opera type programme, that is all.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,497 ✭✭✭✭Dragan


    ntlbell wrote: »
    I didn't say all reality shows were bad, i haven't seen enough to comment on them I commented on one I had seen.

    nice shoes tho..

    But you have seen enough of every SATC fan to be able to comment on them it seems.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,287 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    Dragan wrote: »
    But you have seen enough of every SATC fan to be able to comment on them it seems.


    Yes, I sometimes forget how sharp you are.

    Now..you're point please!

    I have to be careful here g'em is due in soon...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,497 ✭✭✭✭Dragan


    ntlbell wrote: »
    Yes, I sometimes forget how sharp you are.

    Now..you're point please!

    I have to be careful here g'em is due in soon...

    My point was made. If it went over your head either stand on a box or pay more attention. Which ever suits your current mood de jour.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,287 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    Dragan wrote: »
    My point was made. If it went over your head either stand on a box or pay more attention. Which ever suits your current mood de jour.


    Let me slow it down for you as usual...

    I said "probably"

    Now will we start with a small lesson in probabilities or will I go right into the nitty gritty?

    If 1 million people arrive at a brick wall once a week and bang their head off it for an hour IMO there's a very high probability they're a bit slow...or a large percentage of them are at least

    So IMO watching SATC is pretty darn close to smacking your head off a wall...so I attach that probability to it..

    How we doing so far?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,497 ✭✭✭✭Dragan


    ntlbell wrote: »
    So IMO watching SATC is pretty darn close to smacking your head off a wall...so I attach that probability to it..

    How we doing so far?

    The key term there is "IMO" i think you'll find.

    IMO opinion anyone who will make a blanket statement as to someone's intelligence based on them watching a singular tv is a moron.

    Ain't opinons grand?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,287 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    Dragan wrote: »
    The key term there is "IMO" i think you'll find.

    IMO opinion anyone who will make a blanket statement as to someone's intelligence based on them watching a singular tv is a moron.

    Ain't opinons grand?

    Which gets back to..

    What's your point?

    It's my opinion, I'm allowed one...you're allowed one...is that your point?

    or?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 402 ✭✭newestUser


    I don't like SATC because I can't relate to it. Being a man, I'm not it's target audience, and just don't "get" it. I appreciate that it's a very well written and produced show, and I watched some episodes out of curiosity, but by no means would I feel compelled to watch it. I find the main characters irritating. I dislike the show's celebration of materialism. I agree that the show "objectifies" men. Apart from several main male characters, there are a slew of cameo appearances by men who are identified largely by their jobs (eg, in Carrie voiceover, "I met Bob, a successful promoter who owned three nightclubs on the upper EastSide", "I'm going to meet Friar Fvck", eligible doctor neighbour who has an unbelievably cool job the red-haired one can't stop telling all her friends about,various stockbrokers, etc.). I don't like that the program is taken waaaaaaaay too seriously by many. It's entertaining fluff for people who like that kind of thing, and there are flashes of insight and intelligence, but people are calling it high art when really it's more like an audio-visual version of Cosmopolitan.

    I don't like talking about the show with women because offering an opinion on the show is a minefield, where regardless of what opinion on the show you offer, you offend, casting yourself as anything from an ignorant idiot who criticises programs he doesn't watch, to a misogynistic pig who is threatened by successful women, to a screeching poof who shouldn't be watching, or enjoying, "women's programmes".

    All this has no doubt been expressed already at various stages in the thread by others. Apologies for repetition.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    :eek:
    What college did you go to? Disneyland IT?
    :D
    Close enough - UCC...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,737 ✭✭✭BroomBurner


    Agree with newestuser. As a woman, I never really understood it's apparant "brilliance". If is definitely soap opea style tv, which got worse over the years as it was diluted by believing itself to be something more meaningful. This might cause a little friction, or debate, but IMO whether you like SATC and bought into the whole shopping/Jimmy Choos/"all girls together" stuff is directly related to the level of oestrogen in your blood. This would apply to both men and women. 'Tis science, folks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 170 ✭✭HoneyButterfly


    Dragan wrote: »
    IMO opinion anyone who will make a blanket statement as to someone's intelligence based on them watching a singular tv is a moron.

    Couldn't of said it better myself!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,066 ✭✭✭✭omb0wyn5ehpij9


    Couldn't of said it better myself!

    X2!


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement