Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

[OC log] (\/)0n0L17(-) II

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭L31mr0d


    Stable at 3.3Ghz, loading around 62'c on each core now.

    CPU Multiplier: 12
    FSB – Memory Clock Mode: linked
    CPU FSB Mhz: 1100
    RAM FSB Mhz: 734
    FSB Memory Ratio: 4:3

    Timings
    TCL: 5
    TRCD: 5
    TRP: 5
    TRAS: 15
    CMD: 2
    TRRD: 3
    TRC: 24
    TWR: 5
    TWTR: 14
    TREF: Auto

    Volts
    CPU Core: 1.35
    CPU FSB: 1.2
    Memory: 2.2
    Nforce SPP: 1.25
    Nforce MCP: 1.5
    HT nForce SPP <-> MCP: 1.2

    Time Ran (hrs): 8
    OCCT: PASS


    EDIT:

    cpu_bench_3300.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,874 ✭✭✭✭PogMoThoin


    Your safe till 70'c Imo. Nice overclock, but 3.6 should be easily achievable


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭L31mr0d


    damn! failed at 1.4v. Ok going to try 1.45v now and test again

    CPU Multiplier: 12
    FSB – Memory Clock Mode: linked
    CPU FSB Mhz: 1132
    RAM FSB Mhz: ~750
    FSB Memory Ratio: 4:3

    Timings
    TCL: 5
    TRCD: 5
    TRP: 5
    TRAS: 15
    CMD: 2
    TRRD: 3
    TRC: 24
    TWR: 5
    TWTR: 14
    TREF: Auto

    Volts
    CPU Core: 1.4
    CPU FSB: 1.2
    Memory: 2.2
    Nforce SPP: 1.25
    Nforce MCP: 1.5
    HT nForce SPP <-> MCP: 1.2

    Time Ran (hrs): 8
    OCCT: FAIL


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭L31mr0d


    i'm stable now at 3.4Ghz, but it's coming at a price... my load temps are hitting 80'c as my volts are up to 1.45v now. Don't know if i'd be happy pushing them much further, so I think i'm going to drop back down to 3.3Ghz @ 1.4v for everyday use. I'm going to investigate also if there are any other settings I can change, besides CPU volts, that can stabilize 3.4Ghz.

    CPU Multiplier: 12
    FSB – Memory Clock Mode: linked
    CPU FSB Mhz: 1132
    RAM FSB Mhz: ~750
    FSB Memory Ratio: 4:3

    Timings
    TCL: 5
    TRCD: 5
    TRP: 5
    TRAS: 15
    CMD: 2
    TRRD: 3
    TRC: 24
    TWR: 5
    TWTR: 14
    TREF: Auto

    Volts
    CPU Core: 1.45
    CPU FSB: 1.2
    Memory: 2.2
    Nforce SPP: 1.25
    Nforce MCP: 1.5
    HT nForce SPP <-> MCP: 1.2

    Time Ran (hrs): 8
    OCCT: PASS


    cpu_bench_3400.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,227 ✭✭✭awhir


    ever condsider going WC ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,874 ✭✭✭✭PogMoThoin


    Just goes to show ya why extreme edition intel chips are not worth it (unless they come at a knockdown price), they're only for extreme enthusiasts to put under phase or ln2. I got my q6600 to 3.6 with similar voltage & temps and i can run at 3.3Ghz 24/7 with the same cooler, only difference is i lapped mine.

    Hopefully you'll tweak your voltages a bit & get 3.4 at lower temps. Good luck m8


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭L31mr0d


    PogMoThoin wrote: »
    Just goes to show ya why extreme edition intel chips are not worth it (unless they come at a knockdown price), they're only for extreme enthusiasts to put under phase or ln2. I got my q6600 to 3.6 with similar voltage & temps and i can run at 3.3Ghz 24/7 with the same cooler, only difference is i lapped mine.

    Hopefully you'll tweak your voltages a bit & get 3.4 at lower temps. Good luck m8

    got mine fairly cheap though, it was around the time a lot of people where shedding their QX6700's fearing the cheaper Q6600's. Can't believe some people paid near a grand for these things when they first came out. The main reason I got this chip so cheap was that the seller knew it had a heat problem. Still I like a challenge :D I've also lapped my quad and Tuniq to a mirror finish and installed a higher CFM fan. The problem is the CPU is generating heat faster than the metal (or the liquid in the copper pipes) can conduct it. Aside from using a TEC, water or ln2 I doubt i'm going to get much better. But i'll still try over the next week or so to see if increasing the other voltages, or lowering the HT multiplier will have any affect. I might also lower the multiplier and increase the FSB and see if that has an affect.

    here's hoping


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭L31mr0d


    Ok, well after hitting a thermal wall at 3.4Ghz, i've decided to, for now, get a working everyday overclock, which means seeing if my RAM can run at its rated speeds with a CPU overclock, and if possible have a CR of 1T (should be very possible) At this level i've already tested what is the stable voltage for both my CPU and RAM so if I run into any issues now, another variable will be at fault, more than likely the NB temperatures or voltages.

    I had to increase the multiplier to 13 as I tried 300*11 (3.3Ghz) but this gave me a QDR of 1200 which, for some odd reason, my system can't boot at. This would of been a perfect option as it gives me the stable 3.3Ghz and a DDR of 800 for the RAM, but c'est la vie :rolleyes: At a multi of 13, my clock is 3.25Ghz with a DDR of 800. I'm going to stress test this setting, then lower the timings to rated, then try 1T. Once I get a stable everyday overclock i'm to see about pushing past 3.4Ghz. I've noticed that increasing the multi to 13 has risen my idle/load temps higher than what they where at 12 @ 3.3Ghz, so maybe the high multiplier is the cause of the horrible temperatures.

    I'm going to drop it down to 9 and start upping the FSB instead and see if there is any change in temps at 3.4Ghz.

    CPU Multiplier: 13
    FSB – Memory Clock Mode: linked
    CPU FSB Mhz: 1000
    RAM FSB Mhz: 800
    FSB Memory Ratio: 5:4

    Timings
    TCL: 5
    TRCD: 5
    TRP: 5
    TRAS: 15
    CMD: 2
    TRRD: 3
    TRC: 24
    TWR: 5
    TWTR: 14
    TREF: Auto

    Volts
    CPU Core: 1.4
    CPU FSB: 1.2
    Memory: 2.2
    Nforce SPP: 1.25
    Nforce MCP: 1.5
    HT nForce SPP <-> MCP: 1.2

    Time Ran (hrs): 9
    OCCT: PASS


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭L31mr0d


    Ok so this will probably be my stable overclock for now. I have the timings back to 4-4-4-12 1T @ 812Mhz and my overclock at 3302Mhz. Weird thing is my RAM performance has dropped off considerable to what it was previously when I had the clock mode set to unlinked at these exact timings and this exact DDR clock. Plus the FSB is currently LOWER than stock so it shouldn't be affecting latencies negatively. I don't think i'm ever going to understand this mobo, its like shooting in the dark.

    3.3Ghz

    CPU Multiplier: 13
    FSB – Memory Clock Mode: linked
    CPU FSB Mhz: 1016
    RAM FSB Mhz: 812
    FSB Memory Ratio: 5:4

    Timings
    TCL: 4
    TRCD: 4
    TRP: 4
    TRAS: 12
    CMD: 1
    TRRD: 3
    TRC: 24
    TWR: 5
    TWTR: 14
    TREF: Auto

    Volts
    CPU Core: 1.4
    CPU FSB: 1.2
    Memory: 2.2
    Nforce SPP: 1.25
    Nforce MCP: 1.5
    HT nForce SPP <-> MCP: 1.2

    Time Ran (hrs): 9.30
    OCCT: PASS


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 254 ✭✭TheThreeDegrees


    any recomendations on benchmarking software?
    not just for the GPU but more for the system itself.

    I can see the improvements on my overclock but would like to get the stats also.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭L31mr0d


    any recomendations on benchmarking software?
    not just for the GPU but more for the system itself.

    I can see the improvements on my overclock but would like to get the stats also.

    as i'm mainly using this system for gaming I use 3Dmark06 to benchmark


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,874 ✭✭✭✭PogMoThoin


    Everest, sisoft sandra, super pi, what i've used to compare stock & overclocked benchmarks. Like L31mrod i also use 3dmarks & pcmarks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭L31mr0d


    Getting over 14k in 3Dmark06 now, after some fine tuning of the graphics card. Thats about 2k more 3Dmark points than when my systems at stock settings.

    GFX Settings:

    Core: 630Mhz
    Shader: 1640Mhz
    Memory: 1090Mhz

    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=4431284


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,227 ✭✭✭awhir


    hey can you post a recent pic of everest memory benchmark

    here mine atm :

    ram 5-5-5-15 2t 950mhz

    40065663st7.png

    shorter timmings 4-4-4-4 2t

    41684678fy1.png

    5-5-5-15 1000mhz

    31243045lg3.png

    5-5-5-15 1120mhz

    21107940pu8.png


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,874 ✭✭✭✭PogMoThoin


    Cant really compare, L31mrod's got a quad with 8mb level 2 cache, u got c2d with 2mb cache


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭L31mr0d


    whats with the weird images from everest? you know you can just click the "save" button and save it as a png file.

    whats the rated timings and speed of your RAM? Do you have 4GB or 2GB?

    Here's an EVEREST bench from what i'm at at the moment.

    mem_44412_1T_406.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,227 ✭✭✭awhir


    same as urself 4gb's of pc 6400 d9 chips :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 254 ✭✭TheThreeDegrees


    lads which version of everest are you using to get those reports?
    ive tried corporate and ultimate but cant seem to display the format.

    Heres mine in text format:)
    Memory READ:
    Core 2 Quad Q6600 3266 MHz [ TRIAL VERSION ] nForce680i-SLI Dual DDR2-806 4-4-4-12 CR2 9261 MB/s
    Memory Write:
    Core 2 Quad Q6600 3266 MHz [ TRIAL VERSION ] nForce680i-SLI Dual DDR2-806 4-4-4-12 CR2 6619 MB/s
    Memory Copy:
    Core 2 Quad Q6600 3266 MHz [ TRIAL VERSION ] nForce680i-SLI Dual DDR2-806 4-4-4-12 CR2 6451 MB/s
    Memory Latency:
    Core 2 Quad Q6600 3266 MHz [ TRIAL VERSION ] nForce680i-SLI Dual DDR2-806 4-4-4-12 CR2 56.1 ns


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,227 ✭✭✭awhir


    well i cant say how i got it :p but im using unlimited.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,855 ✭✭✭Grim.


    awhir wrote: »
    well i cant say how i got it :p but im using unlimited.

    I like to call it evaluation :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭L31mr0d


    lads which version of everest are you using to get those reports?
    ive tried corporate and ultimate but cant seem to display the format.

    open up EVEREST, click on Tools -> "Cache and Memory Benchmark"


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 254 ✭✭TheThreeDegrees


    L31mr0d wrote: »
    Weird thing is my RAM performance has dropped off considerable to what it was previously when I had the clock mode set to unlinked at these exact timings and this exact DDR clock. Plus the FSB is currently LOWER than stock so it shouldn't be affecting latencies negatively. I don't think i'm ever going to understand this mobo, its like shooting in the dark.
    [/B]

    I am noticing also that linked memory is slower.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭L31mr0d


    I am noticing also that linked memory is slower.

    I had the same thing happening when it was unlinked. Presently trying to troubleshoot a corruption issue with some downloads. I had this problem before on my old skt939 board. The Nforce NIC didn't like my overclock, its going to be a headache trying to track down what the issue is on this board.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 944 ✭✭✭SwampThing


    Hey L31mr0d, I was trolling a bit and came across this thread. I haven't overclocked a machine since I pushed my Wang 386SX 16Mhz to the limit (about 16.1Mhz) so, I was wondering if you could give me some pointers as to how to go about cranking up this beast.

    My rig is in my sig - any help much appreciated.

    Cheers.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,874 ✭✭✭✭PogMoThoin


    That should be easy SwampThing, You've got a great mobo to start with. The Asus bios is lovely to work with.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭L31mr0d


    SwampThing wrote: »
    Hey L31mr0d, I was trolling a bit and came across this thread. I haven't overclocked a machine since I pushed my Wang 386SX 16Mhz to the limit (about 16.1Mhz) so, I was wondering if you could give me some pointers as to how to go about cranking up this beast.

    My rig is in my sig - any help much appreciated.

    Cheers.

    Well this thread really was written as a guide. Just follow the steps i've taken here. Your experience will differ, but the procedure is still the same. Start up a new OC log and give all the relevant details including pictures of your BIOS settings that relate to overclocking, and then just ask questions on the BIOS settings that differ from mine. First off i'd run a 8 hour memtest86 stress test then run a 8 hour OCCT (or multithreaded prime) stress test to make sure everything is rock solid at stock settings. Better safe than sorry


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 944 ✭✭✭SwampThing


    OK, Thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭L31mr0d


    Ok i'm back. I kinda left my clock where it was for a while to actually use the PC for what I bought it for... to play games.

    But now i'm back and even more confused :confused:

    I'm going to try overclocking again but this time try and keep the CPU multi as low as possible and instead overclock via the FSB

    I dropped the multi to 6 and started overclocking the RAM again. This time I was able to get it stable at 940Mhz.

    These are the results in everest:

    mem_55518_470.jpg

    These results are pretty good. I don't know what the multiplier was doing but it was destroying my overclock. Funny thing now is if I increase the multi past x8 I can't boot?

    Does anyone have a clue why this would be happening?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,401 ✭✭✭✭Anti


    Havent a clue, Have you tried the evga forums?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,067 ✭✭✭L31mr0d


    Anti wrote: »
    Havent a clue, Have you tried the evga forums?

    Ok well I tried the evga forums and someone over there mentioned that a possible cause could be that I needed to increase my SPP or MCP voltage as increasing the CPU multiplier would be pushing a lot more traffic through the NB. Not knowing that these voltages had anything to do with the NB (it isn't exactly clear what they do, I had thought they related to the HT multiplier) I remembered something about the issues i'm having. In memtest I wasn't getting any RAM errors the screen would just freeze, the same happened in Vista when I ran OCCT, the test wouldn't fail only the screen would freeze. This reminded me that this is a sign that the issue is with the motherboard and not the CPU or RAM (otherwise a CPU or RAM error would be generated)

    So I proceeded to increase the SPP voltage and finally got the system stable with the x9 multiplier. After some more testing today I eventually got these settings stable after a half hour OCCT run (will run a stress test overnight tonight)

    My current 3Dmark06 score: 14182

    CPU: 3.4Ghz

    CPU Multiplier: 10
    FSB – Memory Clock Mode: linked
    CPU FSB Mhz: 1360
    RAM FSB Mhz: 907
    FSB Memory Ratio: 3:2

    Timings
    TCL: 5
    TRCD: 5
    TRP: 5
    TRAS: 18
    CMD: 2
    TRRD: 3
    TRC: 24
    TWR: 5
    TWTR: 14
    TREF: Auto

    Volts
    CPU Core: 1.45
    CPU FSB: 1.3
    Memory: 2.25
    Nforce SPP: 1.4
    Nforce MCP: 1.55
    HT nForce SPP <-> MCP: 1.25

    Time Ran (hrs): 0.5
    OCCT: PASS

    mem_55518_470_10x.jpg

    cpu_55518_3400.jpg


  • Advertisement
Advertisement