Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Star Trek thread

Options
1319320321322324

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 260 ✭✭Perfidious Cretin


    36730.jpg

    My joint favourite Trek movie up next.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,110 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,044 ✭✭✭JayRoc


    The odds tell us it's either The Voyage Home or First Contact, maybe he'll throw us a curveball and say it's The Final Frontier!



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 5,615 Mod ✭✭✭✭Rawr


    When it comes to Trek movie myself, it think my "favourite" really depends on my mood. Sometimes it can be Wrath of Khan, sometimes First Contact. Sometimes it can even be Star Trek 5: The Final Frontier. (Yes…really….).

    I think the only movies that never really got into that slot in my mind are Insurrection, Nemesis, and the latter 2 JJ-verse movies…both of which I have only ever watched once.

    As for an overall favourite regardless of mood; it's a hard choice between Wrath of Khan and First Contact. Both work as excellent space adventure films that use Trek lore but are presented in a way so that non-Trek viewers can still understand the threats in play without watching hours TV Trek.

    When I first watch Wrath of Khan many many moons ago, I had not watched Space Seed, but the movie was so well presented that I understood that Khan was intelligent, dangerous and that he hated Kirk. It was clear to follow, and easy to enjoy.

    Although I was a well indoctrinated Trekkie by the time First Contact came out, I could see that they also took the time to present the horror of the Borg, so that by the time the drones were taking over the decks of the Enterprise, the viewer had enough knowledge to understand how terrifying that was.

    Both films had a fantastic music score, SFX and cast. They are both fantastic Sci-fi adventure movies…that also just happen to be Star Trek.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,173 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Good shout on the music. Those 2 films are the ones where Star Trek had a proper movie long Star Wars style soundtrack where you can practically visualise the whole movie when listening to the score.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 260 ✭✭Perfidious Cretin


    I love all the Trek movies but The Undiscovered Country is up there with TWOK for me.

    The Motion Picture has a special place for me since it's the first piece of Trek anything that I watched. Generations too as that was the first Trek movie I saw in the cinema..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,044 ✭✭✭JayRoc


    I love Insurrection. I'll honestly watch it it for fun!

    Nemesis, however, was an abomination.

    (The JJVerse flicks don't exist)

    As far as score goes; Undiscovered Country is tops for me.

    Having mulled it over I reckon IV The Voyage Home is still probably my favourite ST flick



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,717 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Both Undiscovered Country and TWOK were directed and part written by Nicholas Meyer, so they have a similar feel to them.

    He was also involved in The Voyage Home - he had directed and adapted time travel film Time After Time set in 1979 San Francisco and wrote the STIV sections set in contemporary San Francisco.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,173 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    I love TUC but it does that really annoying thing of shrinking Starfleet and the Klingons down to 1 planet each. The whole premise is Klingons becoming refugees on Earth. JJ later made the same mistake with Romulus.

    Other than that it's brilliant. Possibly the most thoughtful, well written and well acted Trek movie.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,988 ✭✭✭Evade


    Sci-fi writers almost always struggle with scale, see the death toll numbers give for the occupation of Bajor. The only series I can think of that gets its numbers kind of believable is Legend of the Galactic Heroes where for example fleets regularly about 7,000 ships



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,499 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    My two favourite Trek films are TUC and First Contact but I love all the TOS films and all the TNG ones too. I think TWOK is overrated in fact I prefer and put TSFS before it. I love The Motion Picture because its the Most Star Trek of all the films. Something I think TWOK lost it just became an all action film.

    I love TVH too.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,110 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    I'm the same Undiscovered Country and WOK are my two favorites.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 5,615 Mod ✭✭✭✭Rawr


    It's a good point. I sort of explain it away in my own head-canon by considering if the Klingon Empire and Romulan Star Empire were hopelessly centralised on their homeworlds, and that despite the size of their territories most of their Empires were sparsely populated out at the various colonies and outposts. Losing Q'onos or Romulus won't destory all of the Empire for sure, but in my mind I'm imagining a couple of states that suddenly cease to operate properly without everything that has been built around the homeworld.

    As a comparison, although Earth is very important to The Federation, the state would survive the loss of Earth. You'd still have Tellar, Andoria, Bolarus and Vulcan to name a few worlds. The Federation would be badly crippled by the loss of Earth, but it would continue. I guess it's a good analogy of a diverse union of equals, verses a mono-ethnic totalitarian state. One is far more adaptable than the other.

    I do kind of wonder what became of the Cardassian Union after Cardassia Prime got leveled. I'd imagine a similar situation to both the Klingons and Romulans. Lower Decks implys that Cardassia Prime is still a functioning world some time after DS9 finished, but it's unclear what condition the Cardassian State is in. In Picard Season 3, the Titan hides in the ship-remains from the Second Battle of Chintoka. Cardassians are not shown or refenced which was either an oversight by the writers, or an indication that Cardassia lost control of Chintoka after the Dominion War. It could be that post-war Cardassia is a much much smaller nation.

    I could go on, but sometimes my head-canon fills the gaps that the likes of Undiscovered Country might leave in the story.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,988 ✭✭✭Evade


    One of the key differences between the Federation and all the other states mentioned is the Federation is a multi species democratic endeavour and the others are empires with vassal states, at best. So if the central bureaucracy falls apart the Federation will proceed more or less the same after some turmoil, the rest will fall into full on civil wars.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,499 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Ok I just saw this and have to share it lol,

    https://www.instagram.com/reel/DXDbbmmP8qo/?igsh=YjU5cTBrbmk5OXE5

    Opinons.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,942 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,512 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 5,615 Mod ✭✭✭✭Rawr


    As I've said before AMKC, if you care at all about the creativity that created Trek you wouldn't support or consume this kind of Gen-AI slop. Like before I know you mean well so don't take this as mean-spirited, but more of a cautionary tale that Trek fans should be well used to.

    Gen-AI doesn't just steal from the hard work of 100s of Thousands of people without paying them…but it also normalises the idea that you don't need to put any effort into your creative works so long as you can throw a few prompts into an engine. If we keep normalising this destructive trend we may end up with whole generations of kids who never once considered taking up a pen to write their own story, a pencil to make their own art, or even an instrument to create some music.

    Why bother when you can just get Gen-AI to do it for you? This is what myself and others are working hard to fight against, and I would hope that my fellow Trekkies would share some of those same values of preserving this part of our humanity in the face of a soulless digital replacment for it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,942 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    Some of it is good and funny, that one is the lowest effort type



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,110 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    After the attack on Mars, The federation banned Synths. Here in the 21st Century, I am genuinely waiting for some kind of accident or disaster caused by AI to make governments rethink the entire AI strategy.

    Amazon already had to rethink giving their AI full write access: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/feb/20/amazon-cloud-outages-ai-tools-amazon-web-services-aws



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,044 ✭✭✭JayRoc


    I was watching a video of Adlai Stevenson and the Soviet Ambassador having that famous exchange "Don't wait for the translation, answer me now!" on YouTube.

    Someone said they had heard the line in Star Trek VI which they had just discovered (pun intended) was "full of cold war references".

    Gee. You think?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,383 ✭✭✭✭The Continental Op


    You probably have to have visited Australia or have Ozzy mates for this to be funny?


    Star Trek but the Borg are Australian

    Wake me up when it's all over.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,942 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    Saw it yesterday and moved on after a minute, not funny. The Ozzy computer one was half decent but got boring still



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,383 ✭✭✭✭The Continental Op


    Thats why I said you have to know and Ozzy, I've a neighbor that sounds just like that.

    Wake me up when it's all over.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,499 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Ok this is funny and its not A.I,

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,044 ✭✭✭JayRoc


    Observations on later seasons of DS9:

    Worf, like many men we all know, is a good man who is simultaneously a shite father.

    Rick Berman gets a lot of **** nowadays but he was (arguably) responsible for the best of 80/90s Trek. Having said that, allowing Terry Farrell to be replaced for what everyone knew was the final season of DS9 is something that will tarnish his legacy forever and rightly so. It was absolutely criminal.

    One of Sisko's defining characteristics was being a good father. Leaving your wife and two offspring behind to "find yourself" is weak **** sauce



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,173 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Its good that DS9 showed Worf was a sht father and let Alexander say so. TNG either played it for laughs or kinda let Worf off the hook.

    Criminal to drop her but equally criminal to pair her with fascist leaning, traditionalist Worf. Riza should have been the end of them.

    I do think Sisco essentially died so it's not abandoning the family the way some read it.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 5,615 Mod ✭✭✭✭Rawr


    Although Ezri Dax was an ok addition to the cast, she really wasn't Jadzia. Also, one season really isn't enough time to get people invested in a character*. To their credit, they tried, but Ezri turned up after the other characters had been years together on varous adventures and through half of a War.

    It's kind of telling that in "What you Leave Behind", the Flash-back sequence for each character included memories from the past 7 years, but then we get to Ezri and the flashbacks include stuff we saw only 2 episodes ago. It's petty and indefensable that Jadzia didn't feature at all in those sequences…even in the Worf flashback where she was a major element in his life on DS9.

    As for Sisco fecking off on his family. Yea, that was pretty bad form, especially considering that his relationship with Jake is possibly one of the best Father/Son pairings I've ever seen on television. Jake surviving Wolf 359 with his father and both moving on in life after the loss of Jennifer is a signifigant character beat for both of them, which is why that's where we meet them in "The Emissary".

    Jake at very least has grown into a man by the time we get to "What you Leave Behind". Unlike with "The Visitor" where he was still a kid and very much lost without his father, the Jake we see at the very last scene of DS9 had been through so much that you knew that he was better equipped to cope with that loss. That however does not excuse him fecking off on a pregnant Cassidy Yates. He loses a tonne of points for that one.

    *(In fairness though, I should say that one season is enough time if you do it well but I don't think they really did.)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,044 ✭✭✭JayRoc


    I've absolutely nothing against Nicole DeBoer or the character she played, I really felt for her. An impossible task.

    If it was nowadays the twitter fanboys would have had a coronary and roasted her alive.

    Rewatching the show and seeing someone crowbarred in like this, it was actually difficulty to believe they did it. Berman should have been hauled over the coals for allowing petty studio politics ruin multiple 7-year storyline. Whatever it was necessary to do (or in Berman's case, not do) to keep one of your most beloved actors (along with Worf, Dax was probably the most popular character) in the show for the last season should have been done. End of story.

    ....

    ....

    And yes, Jake was a man by the time of the last episode, but still a young man whose entire back story centred on his father being there for him. He wasn't a child, however.

    But abandoning your unborn child is a crappy, crappy thing to do and totally at odds with the character of Ben Sisko that had been created over seven years

    Post edited by JayRoc on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,173 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Back then you didn't find out the reasons why till much later. I just assumed it was a narrative choice for a long time.



Advertisement
Advertisement