Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Leinster Team Talk Thread (Love you Furlong time)

1149014911493149514961530

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,462 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Nah - you do that, and all you've done is inflate the cost base of the whole thing, and increased the risk that your very best, most in demand players, still leave. So basically you're paying the average player better than you are now, but the elite guys are doing worse in your model.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,633 ✭✭✭daithi7


    back to Leinster and their coconsistent failure in the late stages in Europe every season:.

    Leinster failing , and Leinster's clear coaching failures are not good for Irish Rugby. None of the other Irish Provinces' failings at competitions, or, in bringing thru talent, &/or, in consistently good coaching, selection & preparation are good for Ireland either btw e.g. Munster's floundering & decline for 15 years has been at a loss for Munster, but also Ireland e.g. where are young players of the calibre of Murray & O'Mahony for instance? Ahern looked like one of those guys, but has the environment at Munster really encouraged his further development?! No. Imho. It has failed him.

    He suffered from injuries but he has done so as a young player with a coach from Leicester who over trained players in physical contact & had a woeful injury profile amongst all his players over the term he was at Munster. That was a provincial & national issue also, as is the Cork- Limerick divide tbh, but i digress.....

    Back to Leinster, Cullen & Nienabar must go. Cullen cos he just can't win, & when he should have won last season, his selection vs Northampton was simply deluded. I.e. picking a crocked Cian Healy to start rather than bench (???), and, not picking Barrett to start when they had ponied up all that cash for a proven NZ gallactico & instead opted not to start him in their biggest knock out match of the year 😳 🙄😅.

    Nienabar at Leinster has been a failed venture sadly. He was brought in to try to add a cynical, hard SA edge to Leinster's play, he's done that tbf, e.g. much of Leinster's defensive rucking now is very much living on the edge, which gives their defence valuable time, but his coaching has also apparently neglected the ball skills, handling & running skills that made previous Leinster teams great. The lack of development of Leinster's midfield, the failure to source & develop an accomplished 10 who can handle the white heat of Euro semis & finals have all cost Leinster dearly imho. Even the departure of Frawley, looks very much the case of losing the better midfield player (10, 12 & 13) imho. Frawley is better than any of the 3 starters for Leinster in midfield imho & streets ahead of SP also.

    Leinster with a fresh new coaching set up will be back contending & winning 🙌 handily enough, imho. These other coaches must go.

    P.s. if only Munster's woes were so easy to solve.... sadly not.....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    There are been periods where the split of CCs has skewed more towards Munster.

    There have. But never to the same extent. Not even close. That's the point being made, and was the point of difference that predicated the change.

    And I understand why you're frustrated, FTD - particularly with the week that's in it. But the reality is, none of the fans of other provinces are going to be sympathetic to the notion that Leinster are being "held back, dragged back, punished, hobbled" because of a "player development tax on Leinster".

    I can't put it any better than El Duderino earlier:

    It doesn't punish them for producing ireland players, it reduces the reward. The IRFU paying less of their wages isn't a punishment. Be serious.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,012 ✭✭✭Ben Bailey


    Interesting question indeed. But does it not follow that any one team's success must result in less success for all other teams ?.

    In any case, it's about providing whichever system is most likely to result in being competitive. Altering a system which has been successful in it's core purpose, albeit not at World Cup level, should be done carefully. Time alone will tell.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,988 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    vdF had a load of strapping around his right ankle for the game.

    Not sure but I think he injured it v Sale and has been 'managing' it since and looked to have hurt it again v Toulon.

    I doubt I'll be able to wipe that image of him breaking down after the Toulouse final.

    I'm just after making myself angry again.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 397 ✭✭El Vino


    It's good to see the Leinster forum has got over their Champions Cup loss so quickly and everyone has got back to the most important topic of how Leinster and Munster manage their resources. The truth is Leinster have some structural advantages which they have cultivated well over the last number of years. Munster production line has been poorly managed historically but signs are it has improved recently. My view on the Leinster loss and a lesser extent the Ulster loss is they looked a lot like Ireland's loss to France. This team and the Ireland / Leinster team are slightly past their peak, add in a few injuries and that is enough to ship a hiding against a better team, especially away from home.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,707 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    That inflationary pressure already exists, due to the Top 14. I'd argue focusing on retaining that 2nd echelon of players is more important in some respects than the elite ones. By and large, current internationals aren't going to be looking to leave, no matter what their agents might hint at. Sexton only left because the IRFU were **** him around. It's players like JOB, Deegan, Penny and the like that are at a higher risk of leaving. JOB is an international quality player, who'd probably start on any Premiership team and a lot of Top 14 ones. He's not making the starting 23 for Leinster or Ireland lately. He's exactly the sort of player that would be susceptible to an offer from overseas.

    Raising the floor of contracts for guys like that would benefit Irish teams. With the reduction in IRFU money for CCs, Leinster will have less cash to keep guys like him on their books. That could be a positive with regards giving young players more opportunities, but it will come at the cost of Leinster's overall ability to compete imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,462 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    I would absolutely not argue that the CCs were of no advantage of Leinster, all of the CCs are a huge advantage to which province gets them. That's obvious.

    But, that was our model regardless of which players held the CCs. We don't change the full model just because the way things have evolved at a particular point in time is more beneficial to one province.

    I firmly believe the reason they have evolved in the direction they have though has way more to do with incompetence and decisions being made within the other provinces, than just accepting the constant poor mouth comments about population and private schools.

    I'm not saying for a second it isn't obviously a factor, but it isn't what has led to the current disparity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    But we haven't "changed the full model". We still have a Central Contract model.

    Nor have we changed it "just because the way things have evolved at a particular point in time is more beneficial to one province.". Things were more beneficial to Leinster when the split was 7:5, but we didn't change it then.

    It's the extent of the benefit that has predicated the change.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,462 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    I'll be frank - Leinster don't care about the perceptions of the fans of other provinces about this either.

    This is the reality: there was a model whereby if you produced players of a sufficient quality, and those players earned central contracts, you got the benefit of their contract shifting to the IRFU cost base and away from the provincial one, and this served to mitigate the loss of access to those players, the risk of injury on international duty and the additional miles on those players every season.

    All of the provinces understood that was the model, Leinster just did a significantly better job than the others at actually producing players for the national team.

    Now, that model is being changed, the net effect of which is a material additional cost onto Leinster. Frame that however you want, but whatever way you want to, Leinster are effectively suffering for doing too good a job at something that all the provinces understood was the mission.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,462 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    The best summary I have for it is it's a change that will see an immediate impact being felt by Leinster, supposedly to be offset by a much more longer term benefit for the other three provinces, and the latter still requires an assumption that the other three provinces manage to get and keep their **** together and not just squander the money.

    Given how we have virtually zero additional detail on how this will be spent, that is a hard sell to me right now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    You keep saying "there was a model / all the provinces understood the model" as if it could / should never be changed.

    It's not some sacred creed or doctrine that cannot be challenged, here.

    It's, ultimately, a policy that was subject to change.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,090 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    I like how you're trying to tie the success of Ireland to the success of Leinster.

    Am I wrong? I presume what you're referring to is my observation - 100% factual - that the second tier of Leinster players, those on provincial contracts, make up a good chunk of the Ireland squad. If that changes and we actually see more Ulster and Munster representation, that will be fantastic, but no one, and definitely not you, has been able to explain how the new system will facilitate that.

    I also like how you also tried to spin option 3 as a negative. 

    I didn't, and more game time for Irish players is always a good thing. This is another example of a very weak and anger-driven argument being backed up by strawmen. What I said was that it defeats the purpose of pumping money into development pathways. If a native Ulster player is coming through and finds his path blocked by an international who's moved up from Leinster, who's that helping? Ulster have been doing this for years with players way off international level and it's cost them massively. If suddenly a bunch of Leinster guys with with 20/30/40 caps arrive up, is it really going to improve things?

    I can see why you're moaning

    The only things I've complained about are the re-signing of RG Snyman, which I'd complain about even if we had 50 central contracts, and the complete absence of any detail on how the new changes will help Ireland. If you see those pretty reasonable comments as moaning, I don't really know how to respond, but I don't think it's constructive or reasonable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,881 ✭✭✭leakyboots


    Yes, if you're talking in terms of trophies. I was more talking generally about there were a good few years where France and England didn't have their house in order internationally. They weren't vintage French or English sides, or NZ or Australia, in that time.

    But that's not our fault, just wondering (purely hypothetically) if we had those players again at their peak today would we do as well against a better England or France.

    As for the system... if the production line is as good as being claimed then we (Ireland) and they (Leinster) shouldn't have a worry I guess.

    Time will tell, everything is cyclical. You could fast forward five years and Munster could have an animal pack of the currently young players at their peak allowing us to compete and Leinster's backs could be still trying to readjust from the loss of JGP, Lowe, Henshaw, Ringrose, Keenan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,192 ✭✭✭typhoony


    Your assuming theres a strategic plan in place for that development. Unfortunately that wont be the case when you have big areas of munster where rugby isnt even on the map. Do you think any child in Waterfod is going to be convinced not to want to play hurling. Schools are geared towards hurling and thats not easy to change even with mini-rugby outside of schools.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,462 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    There had been virtually no material change to the model since its inception, and the changes in 2024 by any definition constitutes a major reform of that model.

    The point you seem unwilling to accept is that the primary culprits for why the other provinces don't have as many central contracts as Leinster do right now is those provinces themselves (and decisions they've taken), rather than Leinster, the IRFU or private schools etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,012 ✭✭✭Ben Bailey


    Agreed. Looking at where the WRU is in recent seasons, who would have forecast that ?.

    My own take is that the IRFU's job is to provide for all it's Branchs. Over time we may see core assumptions being challenged and the graduated changes to the CC system may be just one of those assumptions. In the short term it's going to impact Leinster more, but hopefully not to the extent that many fear.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    We halfed the number of central contracts from when it was first introduced. I'd suggest that's pretty material, and certainly doesn't seem like a policy thou shalt not change.

    Also, far from unwilling to accept Munster are the primary culprits of their own downfall. Indeed, it's a point I've conceded to you countless times on here at this point.

    My point about the change to the CC model was never about the cause and always about ramifications, unless a change was made.

    But the point you seem unwilling to accept is that things have improved a lot particularly with regards development at Munster over the last 7-8 years. If you're positing a CC distribution of the following:

    • Leinster - 4 (Sheehan, Doris, McCarthy, Clarkson)
    • Munster - 2/3* - (Crowley, Edogbo, Casey)
    • Ulster - 3/4* - (Ward, McNabney, Postlethwaite, Doak)
    • Connacht - 2 (Bohan, Hurley Langton)

    Yet also suggesting "I suspect if you looked over the past decade the trend would be the same." i.e.  the poorest track record (by far) of actually giving opportunities to young players …

    … that doesn't seem to stack up to me. Nor do the stats seem to bear that out.

    For example, no comment on the stats I posted from 2023?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 896 ✭✭✭darkened_scrum




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 582 ✭✭✭Dont Be at It


    Leinster can't win anything, even with 10 central contracts. What difference does it make if they lose some of them anyway.

    Yes, let's have leinster have a stacked squad of 35 players so they can just go and lose the only 2 or 3 games that mean anything every year regardless.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,349 ✭✭✭hold my beer


    Sure why bother getting out of bed, you're only going to be getting back in later....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 373 ✭✭VayNiice


    If their URC win last year means nothing then what's the point of having a league at all?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,462 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    I genuinely don't understand the stats you posted earlier - are you saying you took Munster & Leinster's squad from the 2022/23 season, and then counted the minutes from the 3 seasons preceding that for all players who had come through their respective academies?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,360 ✭✭✭Mike Murdock


    The URC is a Farmer's League, which would be even worse if the SA teams weren't involved.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    It's the minutes played in the preceding 3 seasons for players promoted from the Academy who were still at their respective Province.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,462 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    So, for example, would guys like Stephen Archer or Johnny Sexton etc have been included in those numbers?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Nope. It's minutes for the guys promoted in the 3 preceding seasons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 922 ✭✭✭HanShotFirst




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,080 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    The league isn't as big as the champions cup, but I don't agree it's bad. And the knock outs are all good teams. I'm looking forward to it.

    Agree the South Africans add to the league. But so do the Irish teams. That's a good thing.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,633 ✭✭✭daithi7


    ah jeez, 1 URC win in 5 years is a paltry return for a province with the resources of Leinster, and with the previous CC model for a side that is so subsidised by the IRFU e.g. Munster have achieved just a many titles in the same juncture with far lower resources & much less subvention for their players through the CC system. In truth Leinster have been laggards & have badly underperformed relative to their resources in terms of URC titles (which they should win every other year imho) & European Cups (which they should win at least 1 year in every 3 imho).

    1 URC in 5 years. Cullen's (& Nienabar's ) Leinster have underperformed badly imho.



Advertisement
Advertisement