Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Abortion Discussion, Part the Fourth

19899100101103

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,156 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Gonna be a vote on the legislation today, pleasantly surprised at how quick things are progressing considering how long the issue had been fingered up to now

    This doesn't sound too promising though

    A government spokesperson said feedback received identifies that some of the proposed amendments are unnecessary and are already addressed through the existing legal framework. 

    It is also of the view of the government that other provisions within the proposed legislation are problematic from an operational and legal perspective.

    Hope Holly had her homework done…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,156 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Bill currently being debated, Peadar Toibin putting the boot in as I type



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,156 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Not sure if vote has been taken yet on bill but presume it will be defeated cos SF are opposing

    The Labour PartyPeople Before Profit and the Green Party have supported the legislation but the Minister for Health Jennifer Carroll MacNeill has rejected it as has Sinn Féin, Independent Ireland and other Independent TDs.

    SF surely going to get slaugntered by the rest of the left over this?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,635 ✭✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    Just seen this was defeated

    Have I got this wrong or were they trying to decriminalise abortion up to birth?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,950 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Someone should have told SF it was supposed to be a free vote 🙄 all of their TDs abstained. Do any of them have an opinion on anything which is not dictated to them from West Belfast?

    Disgraceful and constitutionally ignorant comment from the SF health spokesperson Cullinane, any legislation passed by the Oireachtas has full democratic legitimacy.

    We expressly voted to NOT put the conditions under which an abortion may be obtained into the constitution. It's a matter for legislation. The current law is not and should not and indeed must not be regarded as set in stone.

    Does the government have any proposals on making the changes recommended by the independent review published nearly three years ago now?

    At the very least abolition of the three-day wait should have been put forward as a standalone measure, it is indefensible and a straightforward change.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,079 ✭✭✭Simi


    Agreed incremental bills are probably the only way forward. A bill like this was pretty much guranteed to be defeated. Shame as it would have essentially ended abortion as a political issue once and for all.

    I was already planning to not vote Sinn Fein in the future over their populist lurch to the right, but this cements my never voting for them again in any capacity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,079 ✭✭✭Simi


    It would have removed all criminal sanctions for abortion. The gestational guidelines would have remained in place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,635 ✭✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    I'm actually surprised how little discussion there was (on here and in general) before the last vote in December, and for this vote, I had no idea it was happening at all…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,785 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    That's government speak for

    We can't support opposition bills no matter how good they are.

    There's a lot of commentary lately on the SF populist lurch to the right. I largely ignored it and brushed it off as govt supporters trying to gaslight the SF supporters

    Indeed the last few months, their support of the anarchists that blocked up our roads last month, and now this, leads me to think there might have been a level of truth to the commentary

    With all that being said, the Social Democrats are doing a lot of the right things. Holly Cairns is looking more and more like our first female taoiseach every day



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,156 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    At the very least abolition of the three-day wait should have been put forward as a standalone measure,

    This will surely happen before the year is out, given the total consensus for it. Hard to see it getting bundled in with any other liberalisation now, now matter how incremental, given the line the shinners are taking.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,950 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Labour even with 37 seats in 2011 didn't get a shot at Taoiseach, it'll never happen for the SDs even if they hoovered up every single former Labour voter.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,960 ✭✭✭Benedict XVI


    Holly Cairns is looking more and more like our first female taoiseach every day

    They'd have to be part of a government for that to even be a possibility.

    And as we have seen from the last two general elections they are afraid of going into government.

    Much easier to be in opposition and come up with these grandiose bills and impress the likes of yourself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,785 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    I'd argue it's easier to be in government than in opposition - when in government you have a better chance at getting your policies over the line and improving your likelihood of gaining voter share. As long as you don't blatantly lie to your electorate when seeking election of course



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,586 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    RTE News has it on it's F/B news page from 2 hours back that Government TDs are to have a free vote on Sinn Féin legislation to remove the mandatory three-day wait period for abortion in early pregnancy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,156 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    My understanding is FF TDs get this automatically on all such legislation? Anyway will surely be overwhelmingly approved, SF doing the bare minimum to regain some progressive cred on this issue…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,950 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Presumably SF will be supporting their own bill…

    Question is what is so different about this one compared to the previous one that they couldn't support it. Apart from not being written by SF of course 🙄

    For a party which goes on and on about a 'left alliance' they seem hell bent on doing everything they can to piss off every other potential ally. Maybe they now see Independent Ireland as their potential ally, who the feck knows these days.

    FF always give a free vote because otherwise 1/3 to 1/2 of the party would defy the whip. FF like to keep quiet about this sort of thing (in urban areas anyway) but there's still a large socially regressive element in the party

    Say what you like about Enda Kenny but he had the guts to stand up to the FG knuckledraggers in 2013 and had no hesitation in expelling them from the party (over legislation whose sole function was to stop women dying ffs - this was 5 years before Repeal - opposition to that minimum possible legislative change was always such a ridiculous hill for the Renua lot to die on)

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,586 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    It's certainly got the Liveline show on RTE astir.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,635 ✭✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    Question is what is so different about this one compared to the previous one that they couldn't support it. Apart from not being written by SF of course 🙄

    Well, this one is just about removing the 3 day wait period, not about fully decriminalising abortion.

    Also, currently a fetus with a fatal abnormality, which would not survive beyond 28 days post birth, would be eligible for an abortion. The previous bill sought to remove this 28 day limit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,156 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    FF always give a free vote because otherwise 1/3 to 1/2 of the party would defy the whip. FF like to keep quiet about this sort of thing (in urban areas anyway) but there's still a large socially regressive element in the party

    Not sure this is true anymore? IIRC only four FF TDs voted against the final reading of post-repeal abortion legislation, and that's a while ago now. This SF bill will tell a tale in that regard I suppose…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,156 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,950 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Just takes a couple of loquacious cranks to make it sound like the whole country is for or against something on that show, it's a joke

    Imagine having nothing better to do on a weekday afternoon than to phone Liveline for a whinge

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,586 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Even in the "hope" of resurrecting the late referendum expecting to get the opposite result.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,950 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    https://www.irishtimes.com/politics/2026/06/17/some-of-those-who-added-the-three-day-wait-to-irish-abortion-law-look-set-abandon-it/

    Interesting to note that the three day wait was not recommended by the citizens' assembly or even the Dail committee. It was pure politics. But it may well have been what got Simon Coveney - the anti-choicers' last great hope within the Cabinet - onside.

    Breda O'Brien wrote a very nasty article about Coveney in the IT when he retired from politics. (How "christian" of her.) They've never forgotten, or forgiven him. But repeal would have happened regardless of his support.

    Maybe the three day wait was politically necessary in 2018 (in my view, probably not) but a review of the operation of the legislation was envisaged from the outset and this was published a full three years ago. The government has not moved forward with a single one of the report's recommendations for change, or promised to do so, and it's not part of the programme for government - no doubt the rural independent TD's wouldn't have liked it 🙄

    Basically SD and SF have shamed them into this minimal change. But what about the rest of the review report's recommendations?

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,156 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    bill passes by 86 votes to 70. Tighter than I would’ve expected. Suggests it would be difficult To get further liberalisation though and therefore there is unlikely to be any attempt innthe current dail.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,950 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    So we're back to cowardly politicians again and an anti-choice minority in this country being pandered to.

    The absolute brainlessness of what some of them are coming out with is something to behold. The Irish people expressly voted to NOT have future referendums decide what abortion policy in this country should be. To claim the 2018 legislation must somehow be set in stone is idiotic.

    It seems there are plenty of closet anti-choicers in the Dail, I hope the electorate are taking note. There is one local TD who will never again get a preference from me

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,362 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Is there a list of which TDs voted against it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,950 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,362 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Am i correct in think that somebody not mentioned abstained from the vote?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,950 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Give us a clue.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 4,692 Mod ✭✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    I think to an absolutist, there should be either a complete ban, or no regulations at all.

    As someone who voted yes, I did not believe I was voting for no regulation.

    I assumed the number of abortions would be similar to before. Instead it's about twice as many.

    I dont see 3 days as making much of a difference but I do think that when someone is making an irreversible decision, a period of reflection does no harm. It does seem from what several TDs have said that thousands of women decided not to proceed with abortions after the 3 days kicked in.

    I'm not making a moral judgement but I am concerned about declining birth rates, which are ironically happening despite high immigration. It would seem to show that the latter doesnt remedy the former.



Advertisement
Advertisement