Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

The Kerry Babies Case

1606163656670

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,571 ✭✭✭phormium


    I agree and I was early 20s those years and certainly would not have liked to have had to face my mother with that news! I lived in rural Ireland and I definitely did not know any single mothers at that time around my age in the locality, plenty of hasty marriages arranged though!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,974 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    A pointless insult exposing your own ignorance!

    Saying a post is nonsense = not an insult.

    Calling a poster ignorant = insult.

    Irony much?

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,974 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Oh she suffered for that alright when the Gardai started inventing their bizarre and entirely evidence-free theories. She suffered even more during the public enquiry, she was in effect put on trial while the Gardai were never held to account. If she was not an unmarried mother she would not have been targeted by them in this way.

    Just because other births were not concealed at that time does not mean there were no concealed births. And yes it's entirely possible for a woman to go through pregnancy and birth without any medical attention, it's what happened for millennia.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,063 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    There was an Unmarried mother allowance in 1984 alright, unlikely she qualified, as she lived at home with a supportive family, unless you know different.

    (Edit, I know you didn't say Joanne got the Unmarried Mothers allowance, but it's inferred)

    Are you saying that the fact Joanne Hayes already had a 2 year old daughter was kept secret, even at the tribunal?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,159 ✭✭✭Caquas


    I didn’t imply Joanne Hayes was in receipt of unmarried mothers allowance but over 10,000 women in 1984 were in receipt of unmarried mothers allowance-so the idea that she was driven to conceal her third pregnancy for social reasons is nonsensical. Even more anachronistic and absurd are the constant claims that the savage murder of baby John was somehow mitigated by the social opprobrium attaching unmarried mothers in Ireland in 1984.

    And I am saying the exact opposite about the fact that Joanne Hayes had a 2 year-old daughter - this fact was well known to everyone in the local community and was stated frequently at the tribunal and in the tribunal report, but this highly salient fact is rarely mentioned and never really explored in the vast literature on this scandal. Can you guess why?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,159 ✭✭✭Caquas


    Another useless and nonsensical post.

    Irony overload



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,537 ✭✭✭mrslancaster


    highly salient fact is rarely mentioned and never really explored in the vast literature on this scandal.

    Curious, why do you think it’s never mentioned?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,159 ✭✭✭Caquas


    The terrible and tragic Ann Lovett case is very different from the Kerry babies.

    She was 15 so she had to conceal her pregnancy if she wanted to protect her boyfriend, who was never charged. Absolutely horrible but cannot mitigate the horror of Baby John’s savage murder.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,063 ✭✭✭chooseusername




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,698 ✭✭✭✭cj maxx


    Do you think you can post the new information ?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,063 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    The new information was on the progress of the case: That a file on the case had been sent to the DPP . Here's the link again,

    https://www.rte.ie/news/munster/2026/0405/1566796-kerry-babies-case/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,835 ✭✭✭ProfessorPlum


    Caquas I’m not sure where you got the idea that I was in some way mitigating the murder of Baby John.
    I was just pointing out that in 1984 plenty of girls and women were concealing their pregnancies. We might not have been in the dark ages, but we were certainly not in the times of enlightenment that you envision.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,063 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    First bit, ok maybe you didn't imply it, but as I said, that's the way it came across to me anyway, easy mistake to make, given your obsession with Joanne Hayes' finances.

    Second bit, no idea.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,159 ✭✭✭Caquas


    That is the myth I am trying to correct - "plenty of girls" were not giving birth to babies after concealed pregnancies in 1984. No doubt there were cases but I have yet to hear of any case in the mid-1980s which was the result of society's attitude to unmarried mothers. That very powerful stigma had been effectively challenged in the 1970s and no longer a decisive factor in the mid-1980s but, for reasons I can't explain, that revolution in social attitudes, which was part of a broader revolution in women's role in Irish life, is being written out of our history.

    How do I know there weren't "plenty of girls"? Because the Gardai went door to door in Kerry checking every baby whose birth was registered that year and every rumour of a concealed pregnancy. Until they double-checked in Tralee General about Joanne Hayes, they had only found one such case in the whole county and their response was to bring in the health and social services to assist the family and the baby.

    Of course, the Gardaí missed the case they were searching for and we should get an explanation for that but that was far more than a concealed pregnancy, that was a murder cover-up.

    I'm glad your are not trying to mitigate the murder of Baby John on these grounds - plenty of others are even though we have virtually no information on the circumstances of the pregnancy because the parents and their loudmouth solicitor will tell us nothing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,159 ✭✭✭Caquas


    Au contraire, I'm too old to accept the myth that women in Ireland in the 1980s were treated like in the 1950s. Equally, I know that the 1980s were a low point in Irish history, with a reversion to mass emigration of young women and men, including many of our best and brightest, as the economy stagnated and violence in the North seemed insoluble.

    The Kerry Babies fiasco fed into the sense of national dysfunction at that time and it would be terrible if the parents, having at last been identified by DNA, said nothing and faced no consequences.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 156 ✭✭Widows Son


    @caquas: are you saying a cover up was done by the Gardai?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,159 ✭✭✭Caquas


    I have never heard any explanation. I can't imagine anyone thinks it irrelevant that Joanne Hayes had a two-year old daughter living with her on the family farm.

    Here's what I have learned - the media and academics are rarely neutral (many don't even pretend to be, some even believe that no one can be).

    When was the last time you read an opinion piece which said "I used to believe X but the new data shows I was wrong"? (Not one of those bait and switch pieces "I was wrong…..the truth is even more X than I thought).

    If you want to find their biases, look for what is left unsaid or minimised. Eamon Ryan's response to the ESRI report on retrofitting was a classic - he simply ignored the two key take-aways.

    The Irish media played a very large role in the Kerry Babies fiasco and (as usual) has failed to come clean about its failures, even when forking out large defamation payments and shredding thousands of books.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,159 ✭✭✭Caquas


    No, but the Gardaí disgraced themselves at the Tribunal by the BS claim that Joanne Hayes gave birth to twins by two different fathers. The Tribunal was scathing in its rejection of this idea which had prompted the most intrusive questions of Joanne Hayes i.e. the reason the Tribunal is now condemned.

    I can't imagine how the Garda Commissioner allowed the "Murder Squad" to run this line of argument at the Tribunal, an extreme long-shot with no supporting evidence. He had already received an internal report which was highly critical of the investigation. He may have given the investigating Gardaí plenty of rope at the Tribunal so they would have no grounds for complaint when he took disciplinary action against them.

    In any case, the Gardaí do need to explain now how they missed the parents of Baby John in their door-to-door inquiries. Of course, they were facing a murder coverup, not just a concealed pregnancy, and whoever murdered Baby John would stop at nothing to avoid detection. Ultimately, it is a question of how many people in Cahersiveen knew of the pregnancy and what did they say to the Gardai who came to their door.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 156 ✭✭Widows Son


    Id say that the answer to your question is at most, probably 2 people in Caherciveen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,537 ✭✭✭mrslancaster


    You may be right. It’s hard to fathom how grandparents or other close family wouldn’t know about a pregnancy but it must still have been taboo in parts of the country in the 80s because both JHayes and ALovett hid their pregnancies and gave birth at night, in a field, alone. Even though JHayes had two previous pregnancies, the third was kept hidden so there must have been huge stigma from family or in a small community. If baby John’s parents wanted to keep their secret, who knows what happened after the birth to keep it that way.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,835 ✭✭✭ProfessorPlum


    Maybe your experience of the 1980s was different to mine. I was a teenager in the ‘80s and I personally know 2 girls who concealed pregnancies at that time. One girl went into labour when on their summer holidays with her family, and the other girls parents discovered the pregnancy fairly late on and threw her out of the house. So I don’t think it’s a myth that you need to dispel. It wasn’t quite the 50s with the parish priest beating a path to the laundries, but there was a good degree of fear and many families had very conservative views.
    The Gardaí may only have found one such case in Kerry, but the only reason we know they missed baby John was that he was murdered. They might well have missed others. They will also have missed girls who ‘went away’ to have their babies. But we know they missed at least 50%. And if it weren’t for baby John, Joanne Hayes child would probably not have been discovered either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,571 ✭✭✭phormium


    In Feb 2007 I was coming home from a holiday after visiting relative in US, l had got talking to a woman on the plane who was taking the bus home couple of hours away. As I had a car in airport and was going same way I offered her a lift as it was on my way to save her waiting on next bus, anyways random small talk etc but we got stuck in traffic for nearly an hour due to an accident (not us) while stuck there she told me how her 20 yr old daughter had come into her bedroom previous Christmas eve in labour.

    Neither she nor her husband or any of the other siblings living in the house had known or noticed anything. Nice ordinary normal people so it does happen and that is a long time after 1984. I can't remember the rest of the story, they took her to hospital but I don't recall what happended about the baby, it was a shocking conversation to be honest and I think she was still fairly shocked herself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,159 ✭✭✭Caquas


    We are reduced to anecdotal evidence about the number of concealed pregnancies. I have no doubt that there were, and still are, teenage pregnancies that are concealed even today when most end in abortion.

    But that's not the case with Joanne Hayes. She didn't hide her previous pregnancies and her daughter lived with her on the family farm without no adverse effects. But no one in the media wants to consider why then she went to such lengths to hide her pregnancy in 1984 and, disastrously, lied to the Gardaí about it. We have absurd comments here that she didn't get medical assistance because "it's what happened for millennia". As if Kerry in the 1980s was still in the stone age.

    As for Baby John, the parents have made no such claim or offered any explanation so I deplore the baseless speculation (by others) which seeks to mitigate his murder on the grounds of a social taboo which no longer had any real force in the mid-1980s.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 156 ✭✭Widows Son




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,594 ✭✭✭jesuisjuste


    I may be completely mistaken here, but I was under the impression that J Hayes baby was stillborn (I know this wasn't categorically said by the pathologist but seems the likeliest scenario), and that a doctor had previously examined her, that is how the gardai were able to identify her. She may have been hiding her pregnancy somewhat but it doesn't sound it was being concealed from everyone. There are many cases where people have had late miscarriages or still births in their own home.

    To be honest, I kind of feel we should be discussing this case without including J Hayes in any case. She was a victim of a botched investigation, and nothing to do with baby John in the end. Whatever was going on in her personal life can be a personal matter as far as I'm concerned.

    As for single mothers, although things had improved a fair bit, there was certainly still a very strong stigma in the county, and especially in more rural areas, however I do agree, we really have no indication of what occurred at all, and the speculation is pretty rampant. Some people are imply the mother was underage etc. with no evidence of that in the public record.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,571 ✭✭✭phormium


    Re the fact that JHayes already had a child so why would she hide the second one as such if that is what the references are to, I am a big fan of Long Lost Families and there are countless stories there of where one child while single was kept but parents who might have been supportive with one said outright no to second one and they were put up for adoption or abandoned in some cases.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,063 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    "To be honest, I kind of feel we should be discussing this case without including J Hayes in any case."

    Well the thread is " The Kerry Babies Case" . It is probably as notorious as it is because of Joanne Hayes. I don't think we would be here today discussing it if Joanne hadn't presented at the hospital as a recently delivered mother with no baby. Baby John would have been just another footnote in history.

    But here we are discussing Catholic Ireland in the 80's.

    this

    Edit,

    Apologies, I didn't realise you were talking about Baby John. (It's still worth a read though)

    Edit 2 ,

    Baby John's mother was late 50's when arrested in 2023, so would be 17/18/19 in 1984

    Post edited by chooseusername on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,537 ✭✭✭mrslancaster


    Any mother who chooses to deliver a baby in a field, alone, at night, is trying to keep the child a secret like JHayes or ALovett. So far nobody knows what happened with baby John’s mother, where in the county he was born, or who vandalised the grave for years. It’s possible only the parents know the full story but they’re even denying the dna evidence that he was their child.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,167 ✭✭✭Duvet Day


    It's also possible that baby John's father never knew about his birth .

    I really hope the truth is uncovered. Such a horrific death for a tiny baby. Anyone who was aware of the real story and allowed Joanne and her family to go through their horrific ordeal should be also brought to justice, all done to avoid bringing 'shame' on the family imo.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,537 ✭✭✭mrslancaster


    Also the truth about the grave being vandalised, it happened so many times and it’s a real mystery why anyone would visit the graveyard in the middle of the night to destroy the headstone. It’s a bit unsettling to think someone could still have such hatred for a 3 day old baby after so many years.



Advertisement
Advertisement