Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

The Kerry Babies Case

1596062646570

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,594 ✭✭✭jesuisjuste


    "I was aware that an investigation had been ongoing for a week or two prior to my involvement…. It would seem an enormous fluke that something like that didn't come to light"

    Well it's unlikely to be a fluke, and that is what he is saying really. In this, and other similar cases (Sophie TduP), in my opinion a local Garda (or maybe multiple) who first comes on the scene is able to frame/scope the whole subsequent investigation with some simple decisions. It doesn't even need to be intentional. It could be a simple as one Garda mentioning a suspect, and another Garda, who knows them personally saying "don't even go there, they're definitely not involved", and then the first Garda crossing them off the list. Sure it can also protecting one of their own, or a friend/powerful person, but equally possible they know the perpetrator and just think it is not possible for them to do it. This in addition gives them a strong incentive to never consider them again, because they don't want to get in trouble in the future either.

    By the time the proper investigative team get involved they are being directed to look in a certain way, or at certain suspects, and the real perpetrators are not even considered, so there is no hope of finding them until a cold case team starts to look at it. It's why these days protocols and processes are much more strictly enforced.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,594 ✭✭✭jesuisjuste


    What is the lie that are you referring to @csirl spreading then? They said they were not optimistic, clearly an opinion based on what has been reported as a fact.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,064 ✭✭✭chooseusername




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,961 ✭✭✭csirl


    Time will tell whether anyone is ever convicted or even whether the Tribunal findings are ever revisited.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,159 ✭✭✭Caquas


    It says a lot that you and @csirl and @choseusernam can’t distinguish between having a Garda in the family and perverting the course of justice (or, in this case, creating one of the biggest and most enduring scandals in the history the State).

    The lie, obviously, would be @csirl’s claim that there’ll be no prosecution because there was a Garda in the family.

    In reality as opposed to conspiracyland, if there is no prosecution it’s because there is a serious gap in our legal system, most basically that the right to silence has been taken to absurd limits where parents can sit schtum for 40 years after their child is stabbed to death and his body washes up and the wrong family is accused and the State institutes a tribunal and the Tribunal is a nightmare and books are written and defamation claims are paid and DNA proves they are the parents and still they say nothing but get their solicitor to moan about the search while the media who feasted for decades on the fiasco (and demanded that Tribunal in the first place) ask not a single question.

    But you think it’s because he Da was a Garda😰



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,594 ✭✭✭jesuisjuste


    I think that is an opinion, not a lie, in any case I don't agree with it.

    Whether there will be sufficient grounds for a conviction I don't know, but it certainly speaks to the integrity of the guards in this day and age that they were able to get it all the way to the DPP, and recommended numerous charges to boot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,594 ✭✭✭jesuisjuste


    Ok I see you added to your comment. I don't know if you were directing it at me but I have said nothing of the sort.

    In this current day, with the cold case review identifying and arresting the parents, and pushing a prosecution, it would seem the guards are acting with high integrity here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,961 ✭✭✭csirl


    This is a very embarrassing situation for the Gardai.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,571 ✭✭✭phormium


    Was it not the case that the deceased father of the mother was a garda but so was her brother at the time, now also deceased, just for clarity!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,537 ✭✭✭mrslancaster


    It’s weird that those parents aren’t pushing AGS to find who brutally killed their baby unless they know what happened. Yes it was a different time and different attitudes to unmarried parents, but it didn’t happen in the 50/60s when a single mother would have been sent off to the laundries. The parents haven’t stayed silent for 40+ years because they were unmarried when they had baby John, that didn’t stop them having other children. Also very peculiar that they are even denying the dna evidence. At the very least they know who took the infant away, most new mothers would be hysterical if their new baby completely disappeared at 3 days old but they’ve carried on as if nothing happened. Even stayed silent throughout the whole Hayes investigation and tribunal. It’s a very disturbing case.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,159 ✭✭✭Caquas


    “Weird” is putting it mildly. Their baby was brutally murdered but they said nothing to no one for 40+ years, even after their arrest and identification.

    There is a valid question to be answered by the Gardai - When every baby born in Kerry was traced in 1984, how did the Gardai miss this baby who was born so near the spot where Baby John was washed ashore?

    I don’t believe the conspiracy theory that the Gardai pinned the murder on an innocent family in order to protect the daughter/ sister/ cousin of a Garda. That lunacy would have destroyed everyone involved. But everyone who knew of Baby John’s birth had an obligation to come forward in April 1984 when the whole country was in uproar over his murder and the Gardai were knocking on doors all over the county. A questionnaire was delivered to every house from the White Strand to Cahirciveen and the adjacent areas but no one knew anything about Baby John.

    Will we ever get the truth?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,961 ✭✭✭csirl




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,571 ✭✭✭phormium


    Not sure, definitely in Cork in early 80s, possibly in a couple of North Kerry areas later but don't know when.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,064 ✭✭✭chooseusername




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,159 ✭✭✭Caquas


    The lie I objected to was the claim by @csirl that no charges would be brought because of the family’s Garda connections. Whatever about the fiasco 40+ years ago, it is simply false to claim that the Garda file sent to the DPP was doctored to prevent a prosecution (the only conceivable way the family’s Garda connections could block a prosecution).

    That claim is false and a distraction from the real issue - what charge can be brought if there is no evidence that the parents had any involvement in the murder?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,961 ✭✭✭csirl


    Dont put words in people's mouth - nobody has said anything was doctored.

    I appreciate this must be a difficult subject for some to talk about, but there are difficult questions that need to be answered about what happened back then and why.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,994 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    It was mainly the detectives thinking that the two babies were related that meant no real trawl was done. They felt rather than knew that they had the guilty party. That's why the death of baby John wasn't rightly and independently investigated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,094 ✭✭✭Packrat


    No guard today is going to try to protect a family member/members of a guard who was dead when the baby was born. Yes, it looks as if there was another family member in the force as well but he appears to be deceased with some years, and doesn't seem to have been prominent within it.

    In all likelihood, the actual perpetrator/perpetrators are now dead unless the parents themselves did it.

    One would imagine that the parents could be charged with lesser charges of concealment of a crime or whatever if not outright murder.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,159 ✭✭✭Caquas


    I’m not putting words in your mouth, you said there wouldn’t be any charges because the family has Garda connections. How could that be true unless the Garda file was doctored?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 97 ✭✭Polly701


    I can't think why the parents never spoke up? Or nobody in their family spoke up? Could the parents be vulnerable adults? In the sense that they have additional needs of some sort?

    If it was for religious reasons that they hid the pregnancy and birth it seems very strange that they then didn't go on to marry?

    A strange case - I hope that there is accountability.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,094 ✭✭✭Packrat


    Pretty obvious why they didn't speak up:

    Either they or someone they knew close to them did it.

    What's confusing you?

    Do you think that most people would voluntarily face justice for their crimes or those of their immediate family if they thought they could get away with them?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,700 ✭✭✭✭cj maxx


    Jayus I thought if a thread was started it meant new news haď surfaced . Nothing only a ex poster who's mother allegedly comes from the locality .Rip baby .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,064 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    I re-started the thread 2 days ago as there was new information about the progress of the case in the papers. You could always find something else to annoy yourself with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,961 ✭✭✭csirl


    What's your view on the original Garda investigation? Do you think it was adequate? Do you think there was any wrong doing on the part of the Gardai?

    As for the recent submission of a file to the DPP. While I'm hopeful that the truth will come out, I"m not optimistic. The submission of a file in this type of scenario means nothing. Where a case has alleged wrong doing by the authorities in the background, it is standard procedure for the file to be reviewed by the DPP, regardless of whether the Gardai believe there is sufficient for charges. All the file submission means is that the Gardai have finished their investigation.

    We do know that the Garda file contains spurious information from the 80s, but, surprise surprise, AGS has done nothing to address this over the years . Zero accountability.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,159 ✭✭✭Caquas


    The Gardai did a massive tracing exercise in April 1984 checking every baby whose birth was registered in Kerry that year and appealing for anyone who had given birth to come forward. The Gardai had accounted for all these babies when a couple of Gardaí went back again to Tralee General Hospital and discovered that a doctor who examined Joanne Hayes found that she had been pregnant but there was no trace of her baby. And thus began a fiasco in a murder investigation that may never be concluded.

    Almost certainly, therefore, the pregnancy and birth of Baby John were carefully concealed but, nonetheless, the Garda should account for their failure to trace Baby John in 1984. Did the mother not attend any doctor during pregnancy or shortly afterwards?

    Some posters here, like commentators in the media and in academia, claim that the stigma of birth out of wedlock was so great that mothers would do terrible things. What anachronistic nonsense! Do they imagine that Ireland in the 1980s was like Ireland in the 1950s? In 1984 thousands of births "out of wedlock" were recorded and Lone Parent Allowance was paid to the mothers. The media and academia don't mention the inconvenient truth that Joanne Hayes was a single mother with a two-year old daughter and she had not suffered as a consequence - in fact, she continued to work for Kerry Co. Council in the local leisure centre.

    The former head of the Garda cold case unit comments today:

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/munster/arid-41822909.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,961 ✭✭✭csirl


    I agree with a lot of this. The stigma thing is way over played.

    As for the tracing exercise, yes, how come it didnt pick up the mother, and if it did, why wasnt it looked into.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,229 ✭✭✭spaceHopper




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,571 ✭✭✭phormium


    Her father died in 1976, well before Baby John was born. Mother couldn't have been as young as 13 if she was late 50s on arrest in 2023

    I would also say that even though 1984 was not the dark ages it was still not a good time to be an unmarried pregnant girl in a small local town and could easily believe she would have concealed it entirely until birth.

    (PS I'm not a local, don't know them from Adam, all available on google if you can research! Death notices and condolences tell a lot!)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,128 ✭✭✭griffin100


    Remember, Ann Lovett died alone trying to hide the birth of her baby in 1984, the same year we are talking about here. There most certainly was a stigma around 'single mothers' in the 1980's, probably more so outside of the cities. Certainly growing up at that time in Dublin 'single mothers' were not uncommon but were still unusual enough.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,835 ✭✭✭ProfessorPlum


    Ann Lovett concealed her pregnancy and died giving birth in 1984. Plenty of girls concealed pregnancies due to social stigma at that time.



Advertisement
Advertisement