Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Grand Theft Auto 6

1789101113»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,416 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    I would note in addition to the above that obviously, I didn't really expect GTA Online to be anything other than people blowing the sh*t out of everything and trying to kill everyone once you're in the open-world map. I just find GTA more fun when you're the blower-upper and the fulcrum through which all the absolute carnage and mayhem in the world pivots around, rather than just essentially a limitless free-for-all battle royale.

    It's my sandbox. Get out of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,901 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Think this will probably be the first GTA that I haven’t gotten at launch since GTA3. I have no doubt online will be the main focus considering the money it makes, but it doesn’t interest me at all. And while I expect the map to be meticulously crafted and a huge technical achievement I’m not sure how fun it will be to play.

    I finished RDR2s story but didn’t really find the gameplay all that great - the mundane stuff you needed to do like bathe and brush your horse etc was more annoying than anything else and I don’t think they’ve ever managed to make shooting that satisfying considering how much of it you do in their games. The mission design got old quickly too. Go here, shoot, escape.

    Might change my mind if we see any actual single player gameplay. It’s probably moot anyway as I won’t have something that will be able to run it half decently for a few years!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,416 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    If they go down the realism route like they did with RDR2 it'll really damage the game. All people wanted was the fun of being a cowboy without having to clean your f*cking gun and brush your horse all the time.

    Similarly here, if I have to refuel my car or have to take weapons out of the boot rather than just pull rocket launchers and sniper rifles out of my arse it's going to really make the game a chore to play.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,546 ✭✭✭Unearthly


    it can’t get any worse than a phone call every 10 mins from your girlfriend or cousin asking to go bowling to be fair



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,324 ✭✭✭✭Jordan 199




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 551 ✭✭✭Anois_




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2 greyjoker


    I think it's going to be the greatest game ever! I just have to wait a year for the PC version.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,956 ✭✭✭✭Potential-Monke


    I dunno. As I said on the Crimsom Desert thread, CD was made with a dev team of approx 250 a peak, ans a budget between 150-300 million, and created something amazing. So my expectations for GTA 6 with its 600 devs and 3 billion budget is probably unrealsitically high, and I suspect it will go the RDR2 route of realism > fun. There'll be fun there, but marred by realism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,416 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    I've always found that the games I've typically enjoyed the most have often been the ones I've gone into with minimal or reduced expectations. I'm going to try treat this the same way. If anything, RDR2 has helped temper my expectations a good bit. The amount of money and time they've spent, and the size of their teams etc isn't going to matter a damn if the core design isn't up to scratch.

    I'm expecting a bit of fun, some nonsense, play it for 3-4 weeks, and then probably move on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 551 ✭✭✭Anois_


    3-4 weeks it will probably take me about 12 weeks to play the game.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,546 ✭✭✭Unearthly


    I play the single player game, finish the story, mess around on the map. Then I’m done. Probably clocks in at 50-60 hours. No interest in the online play or the inevitable PS6 and PS7 versions with shinier graphics



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 551 ✭✭✭Anois_


    I've no interest in online either but for those 60 hours or so it would still take me 12 weeks. But I suppose if the game really sucks me in I may find time someway like just staying at home playing it at the weekends.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,956 ✭✭✭✭Potential-Monke


    I hope I'm wrong, I would love if it brought back the joy of Vice City, and I'll openly admit i was wrong. But I dunno, I got a tingle that tells me it won't be as fun as previous games. And all that money and dev talent would be wasted if it's just a shinier version of 5. My comparison was to show much smaller teams and budgets can produce amazing results, so I expect mind blowing results from Rockstar now. Considering they haven't even hinted at a 60fps mode for consoles (specifically the Pro) on launch, I am worried it'll be visually amazing but not well optimised.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 58,507 ✭✭✭✭Necro


    They generally don't do that on launch because they can flog a 'new and improved 60fps version' 6-12 months after release for a shameless cash in.



Advertisement
Advertisement