Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1180718081810181218131818

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    I highly disagree with your assessment of Keenan's physicality and it just goes to show that some have very short memories. He's an excellent athlete as well as a superb footballer. He can run those lines you speak of as well as act as another playmaker, beit as first or second receiver. It's no surprise that Ireland's attack isn't the same when he isn't in the team.

    There's this crazy thing with Irish sports fans (not just confined to rugby). A shiny new toy shows he's capable of stepping up to the plate when needed and suddenly the incumbant, despite being a superior player in almost every metric, doesn't come back when he's available.

    It used to happen with Sexton all the time. There was a clamouring for another 10 to play, be it Carbery, Jackson or whoever. They'd come in, play well, and the narrative was 'ThE jErSeY iSn'T sExToN's AnYmOrE'. It's the very definition of biting off your nose to spite your face, and it stems from this attitude in Ireland that people can't be getting above their station and have to be kept honest.

    You wouldn't have this conversation about one of the best players in the world anywhere else. Could you imagine French fans saying this about Dupont when he was injured?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 366 ✭✭john9876




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,785 ✭✭✭50HX


    Its in no way comparable to Sexton, what we have at 15 are viable options & now wing thankfully due to the injuries.

    No player should be deemed irreplaceable, we developed 2 viable options, I'm fully aware of what HK brings to the team

    Lets see where his form is post injury before sowing the 15 jersey on his back now tbat there are alternatives.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    It is comparable, because you’re looking for reasons why someone other than Keenan plays, even to go as far as making up things about his physicality.

    There is zero aspect to Osborne’s game which is better than Keenan’s at this point in time. All we know is that we have a more than able replacement for Keenan if he’s unavailable which, as you said earlier, is a good place to be in. However let’s not mistake that for thinking Osborne is at Keenan’s level.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,785 ✭✭✭50HX


    So you can see Keenan having the physicality to slot in at centre if he had to?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,224 ✭✭✭TRC10


    This implies that Osborne plays centre because of his physicality. But that’s not his game. He’s a tall guy yes but there are far more physical centres than him. McCloskey and Aki being examples. Osbornes strengths as a centre are his running lines, distribution and kicking. He’s a very different type of 12 to Aki or McCloskey.

    Keenan doesn’t lack for physicality. The notion that he does is ridiculous IMO



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,785 ✭✭✭50HX


    So thats a no then.

    I was responding to a post of making things up re Keenans physicality



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,224 ✭✭✭TRC10




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,591 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    Physicality isn't a word that springs to mind when I think of Keenan. Elusive, IQ, positioning, timing, running lines would be how I think of him. Tackle evader rather than tackle buster.

    And that is in no way saying he shirks the tough stuff. He's a good and brave tackler. He has no issue carrying into contact but that's not a major strength of his game and it's not what he's picked for.

    I also wouldn't call him a second playmaker like Lowe or Hansen but he picks great lines off those guys. And can draw a man before throwing a good pass.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,049 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Keenan isn't as physical overall as Osborne but he's a fullback so who cares?

    He is as physical in the areas he needs to be - contesting kick catches and tackling.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    Yes, I can. Especially if it's a support line off 12 that you're looking for, or are you shifting the goalposts on that one too?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,760 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    It comes up because he's played very little rugby for a long time now and he's turning 30 soon. Will he get back to the same level he was at? None of us know the answer and when you see a guy suddenly start getting injured it has a habit of continuing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,588 ✭✭✭ersatz


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/124325031#Comment_124325031

    Keenan has some of the best tackle technique in Ireland. Physicality is largely irrelevant to his game. I don't recall him ever being turned over on the ground and he rarely misses a tackle. Absolutely fantastic to have discovered Osbourne as an able backup. Hansen and Frawley also makes a decent fist at 15 so its one area we've gone from being very weak depth wise to a position where we are well covered to a. very high level.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,785 ✭✭✭50HX


    Not moving any goalpost

    I initially said Osbourne is more physical type of player..thats just an opinion of mine, you don't agree thats grand too.

    I could never see Keenan as a centre..thats also just my opinion.

    Keenan is a super athlete & covers the backline excellently.

    I just gave an alternative to starting someone else in certain type games.

    We are not in a Johnny Sexton situation at fullback now where for example at RWC27 Keenan is not required to start every game as we have developed alternatives.

    Didn't realise to suggest otherwise was such a hot topic for some



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,589 ✭✭✭standardg60


    Anyone who recalls Keenan's line against France in attack and his tackle on DVDM in defence for just two examples would not be placing Osborne anywhere near his level.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,760 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I don't think anybody is putting him near the level Keenan was at. He's been praised for doing a great job in his absence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,374 ✭✭✭visatorro


    Pundits pushing for otoole to play loose head for ulster, where does leave him for TH cover for Ireland if ulster move him across?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,784 ✭✭✭BoardsMember


    Keenan for 13 shirt. There, I said it. And its not so mad when you think about it. A worthy Ringrose 13 looks unlikely to appear before RWC. Why not give Keenan a run at 13 in a few tour games, just to see how well he goes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 934 ✭✭✭johnh6767


    yes well said the ‘shiny new toy’ syndrome applies now to 9 also , Casey still well ahead of alternatives although still a big fall off in capability from JGP but no surprise there given he is currently Ireland’s most important player



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,627 ✭✭✭Felexicon




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 934 ✭✭✭johnh6767


    because he’s one of the top 15’s in the world



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,064 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Or we could just play Osborne there, where he's done well before.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,583 ✭✭✭ElisaAtWar


    He better do what you say tommybojangles. I'm of the belief that he must and I believe that he believes he must. So let's see. First he needs to start playing team rugby at Connacht, and when I say team I mean playing as a team member.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    Literally the question I responded to which started this discussion was "Does Keenan walk back into the team?"

    The answer is yes. Every day of the week and twice on Sundays. Anyone who thinks otherwise is lying, or has no concept of what an outstanding footballer he is.

    Keenan would do a fine job at 13 the same way Osborne has done a fine job at 15.

    Seems madness to me to move one of the best 15s in the world out of position out of some stupid hypothetical to try and make a point but this is the level of nonsense we're at right now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42 shinana abu


    James Hume has been the outstanding Irish 13 this season, no question and only 27



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,224 ✭✭✭TRC10


    I think there’s some selective memory going on here. From 2021-2023, Keenan was undoubtedly one of the best fullbacks in world rugby and probably the most complete 15. Genuinely outstanding week in-week out. Aerially, kicking, running, distribution, defence. He was brilliant

    However his form the last 2 years hasn’t been at the same level, he’s starting picking up a lot of injuries and he’s 30 this year. Is he still our best 15 when fit? Yes, probably. Although I really liked what I saw from Hansen in November. I hope as much as anyone that Keenan can get back to the level he was at a few years ago, but there’s no guarantee he will do. And we shouldn’t handicap ourselves by not being prepared to explore other options if he doesn’t get back to top form.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,784 ✭✭✭BoardsMember


    There's no "Yes, probably" about it, Keenan is by some margin the best 15 in Ireland.

    My suggestion earlier re him being tried at 13 was based on the potential that he might be our next best 13 after Ringrose, so if we were very short there (i.e. nobody else we had tried had worked out), and we have good cover at 15 (Osborne, Hansen), then it might be no harm to see him play a half game or two at 13.

    I'm not suggesting we don't play Keenan at 15 when he's fit & everyone else is fit, or that we play Keenan at 13 if Osborne has shown himself capable to play at 13 and both Keenan and Osborne are fit.

    If Osborne turns out to be pants at 13 and is fit and trusted at 15, I'd like to see Keenan get a run at 13 if Ringrose is unavailable.

    The alternative is to try Hansen at 13 maybe. The point being, if nobody is emerges as the obvious Ringrose back up then it would be good to try out some other options.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61 ✭✭shimmieandshake


    Okay, maybe Keenan shouldn't play 13…

    …but I reckon we should give him a few games at 9. He'll be gas.

    Actually, maybe Mack learns to play 9.

    Both of them, for the sake of depth?

    We can figure out 13 later, but it'll probably involve Crowley/TOB. And Stockdale's playing 13 tonight!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,224 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Why would we play Keenan at 13 when he’s never in his professional life played there and there are plenty of good centres at the provinces doing the business regularly?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,489 ✭✭✭P.Walnuts




Advertisement
Advertisement