Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1180618071809181118121840

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,801 ✭✭✭All_in_Flynn


    I'm not sure to be honest because he can clearly pass off his left hand. Case in point was the 3rd try off the back of the scrum where he passed it out the back before McCloskey threw it wide.

    He started all 5 games so obviously deemed vital to the team. Jones been getting plaudits left and right but once again Ringrose shut him down completely. Give me Ringrose any day.

    Post edited by All_in_Flynn on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,307 ✭✭✭TRC10


    This bullshit of Leinster being rewarded for "having their whole team payed for" - when in reality, for the best part of a decade Leinster have produced players who have substantially carried the national team.

    That’s the point of the system. They supplied players to the national team, and got reward for it by having said players paid for. It’s not a criticism. Crowley, McCloskey and Baloucoune have established themselves as important players for Ireland. If it weren’t for them, we’d be in the midst of a post mortem of a 6N that included our first loss to Italy in 13 years and an embarrassing home loss to Wales. Their provinces should be rewarded accordingly, as Leinster have been. Hardly controversial.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,316 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Yeah, sure, and while we're at it - Edwin Edogbo had a big 11 mins off the bench in the Italy game, and Nathan Doak had a great cameo against Wales, should we stick them on central contracts too?

    Grow up for God's sake.

    As I said before, if Crowley & McCloskey had expiring contracts, I'd have no issue with him getting bumped to centrals. Baloucoune has more to prove.

    Ulster & Munster haven't had many central contracts for the past 5-6 years because they haven't been producing enough players. That could change over the next 5-6 years and early signs are promising, but as I said, if you want to go through the list of players who didn't get CCs over the past 6 years or so who should have had them, then you've likely got two Leinster players (Conan & Lowe) at the top of that list.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,016 ✭✭✭antfin


    There's probably many players that you could add to the list that show how silly of a suggestion is it is that Balacoune has earned one. I could be wrong but I don't think Simon Zebo ever got a CC, which, along with Lowe, shows that it's not something handed out for one good Six Nations. There are also many other players that had to put in years of work, eg Josh Van Der Flier won World Player of the Year in 2022 while not a CC, before he got a central contract the following year having played for Ireland since 2016.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,307 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Yeah, sure, and while we're at it - Edwin Edogbo had a big 11 mins off the bench in the Italy game, and Nathan Doak had a great cameo against Wales, should we stick them on central contracts too?

    Obviously not. Stop being disingenuous.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,724 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Obviously Ringrose sometimes does pass the ball playing 13 in a test side! The point is he dies with the ball very often. And yes, he is a top class defender and has many other great facets to his game. But he is not dangerous in attack these days. A lot of this team seem to have benefited from the higher level of competition for places and being dropped for a game or two as a result. We just don't have the depth at 13 yet to give Ringrose than break/kick up the arse. I think he could do with it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,801 ✭✭✭All_in_Flynn


    I wasn't being disingenuous when I mentioned the pass off the left hand vs Scotland. I just meant that I know he can do it but doesn't do it often.

    Hmm, I take your point that he's not the one making the breaks. I'm just not sure that a large part of that is not by design. We seen in the Lions that he can do it if needs be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,858 ✭✭✭A-Train


    wrong thread



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,472 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    McCloskey was on a BBC podcast yesterday and he was stressing how important Ringrose is to the team, not just on the pitch but off it. He's integral to this team in the minds of those that make the decisions or play with him.

    On the depth issue at 13, I'd argue James Hume should be looked at. The summer centre selections will be interesting. Presumably McCloskey, Aki and Ringrose travel and Osborne will be in the squad. Is there room for a younger centre rather than Farrell or Henshaw?

    Edit - I'd be happy to see Postlethwaite or Gavin in the squad, but back up at 13 seems more of an issue which is why I'd be looking at Hume. I'm not dismissing Farrell, but having 5 centres well over 30 is a concern.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61 ✭✭shimmieandshake


    Yep, I'm a big Ringrose fan, but agree his attacking ability has waned, and would like to see some of the younger generation snapping at his heels.

    Apparently Gavin will be back for Connacht's SA Tour in April. Hope he gets back up to speed quickly and becomes the player we'd hoped. He's 22 now. Needs an injury-free run to start fulfilling the huge potential he showed at u20s.

    But for now, Hume should be ahead of Gavin - I know Hume has a concussion issue right now, but hope he has a big end of season push when fit again. He's 27. Should be coming close to his peak.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,653 ✭✭✭P.Walnuts


    Still can't help but think Osborne at 13 running off SMc has absolutely tons of potential



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 593 ✭✭✭exiledawaynothere


    post 6N - who is the best 23 to play New Zealand assuming everyone is fit?

    Does Keegan walk back in at 15?

    Lowe and Hansen on the wings?

    Porter at loosehead ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,874 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    Keenan absolutely walks back in at 15.

    Why does this come up every now and again? Yes, Osborne played well at 15 in this 6N, but Keenan is one of the very best 15s, if not players, in the world when he's fit.

    Osborne, as good as he is, doesn't lay a glove on him.

    Absolutely nonsense to suggest that he doesn't get back in the team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 597 ✭✭✭Tommybojangles


    Interesting question, everyone magically fit tomorrow my 23 would be:

    McCarthy

    Sheehan

    Furlong

    McCarthy

    Beirne

    Baird

    VDF

    Doris

    JGP

    Crowley

    Hansen (can switch to the left fairly easily with his skillset imo)

    Mcloskey

    Ringrose

    Baloucoune

    Keenan

    Porter

    Kelleher

    Bealham

    Ryan

    Conan

    Doak

    Frawley

    Osborne

    Harsh on Osborne to be dropped and on TOB to miss out but we have excellent options in the backs now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,472 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    I'd love to see it as well, we did see it a bit with Osborne running centre lines off him during the 6Ns, but most on here seem to be of the opinion that he is a 12 rather than 13 for pace issues?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,653 ✭✭✭P.Walnuts


    Personally I think criticism of his pace is over blown, if he was as slow as some allude to theres no way he wouldn't have been completely found out at 15.

    I accept he's not a speedster but we saw him run some beautiful lines in the centre and finish well, I'd take that over top end pace at 13 tbh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,626 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    That's a great team. I think I'd go for Clarkson or O'Toole ahead of Bealham at this stage. Really hope Baird can come back playing at the level he was before his injury. He will add so much to the team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,018 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,626 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Not the worst injury though. Shite for Ulster



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46 inbloom427


    Fit and in form needs to be the criteria, and the likes of Mac (to a greater extent) or Keenan (to a lesser extent) need to demonstrate that in order to displace the likes of TOB and Osborne. If Keenan does come back in, perhaps might be time to drop Ringrose.

    Same with Baird. Should be settled on McCarthy (if his form doesn't dip again), Ryan, and Beirne at 6. Lineout is going well and Ryan doesn't come out of the XV easily.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,042 ✭✭✭50HX


    I think it could be horses for courses going forward.

    We've now seen a bigger body of work from Osbourne & what Hansen brought v Aus.

    For me he absolutely deserves to go back in provided his club form backs it up on his return from injury.

    Its not inconceivable to see Osbourne at 15 with 2 v pacey wingers against certain opposition, we've seen the physical attributes that Osbourne has brought when running lines off Stu Mc this past few weeks..Keenan doesnt have that level of physicality imo.

    We are in a far better position option wise at 15 now than we have been since Rob K retired.

    He has enough credit in the bank at the minute but I wouldnt be throwing the toys out if he didnt start specific games either



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,874 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    I highly disagree with your assessment of Keenan's physicality and it just goes to show that some have very short memories. He's an excellent athlete as well as a superb footballer. He can run those lines you speak of as well as act as another playmaker, beit as first or second receiver. It's no surprise that Ireland's attack isn't the same when he isn't in the team.

    There's this crazy thing with Irish sports fans (not just confined to rugby). A shiny new toy shows he's capable of stepping up to the plate when needed and suddenly the incumbant, despite being a superior player in almost every metric, doesn't come back when he's available.

    It used to happen with Sexton all the time. There was a clamouring for another 10 to play, be it Carbery, Jackson or whoever. They'd come in, play well, and the narrative was 'ThE jErSeY iSn'T sExToN's AnYmOrE'. It's the very definition of biting off your nose to spite your face, and it stems from this attitude in Ireland that people can't be getting above their station and have to be kept honest.

    You wouldn't have this conversation about one of the best players in the world anywhere else. Could you imagine French fans saying this about Dupont when he was injured?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 370 ✭✭john9876




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,042 ✭✭✭50HX


    Its in no way comparable to Sexton, what we have at 15 are viable options & now wing thankfully due to the injuries.

    No player should be deemed irreplaceable, we developed 2 viable options, I'm fully aware of what HK brings to the team

    Lets see where his form is post injury before sowing the 15 jersey on his back now tbat there are alternatives.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,874 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    It is comparable, because you’re looking for reasons why someone other than Keenan plays, even to go as far as making up things about his physicality.

    There is zero aspect to Osborne’s game which is better than Keenan’s at this point in time. All we know is that we have a more than able replacement for Keenan if he’s unavailable which, as you said earlier, is a good place to be in. However let’s not mistake that for thinking Osborne is at Keenan’s level.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,042 ✭✭✭50HX


    So you can see Keenan having the physicality to slot in at centre if he had to?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,307 ✭✭✭TRC10


    This implies that Osborne plays centre because of his physicality. But that’s not his game. He’s a tall guy yes but there are far more physical centres than him. McCloskey and Aki being examples. Osbornes strengths as a centre are his running lines, distribution and kicking. He’s a very different type of 12 to Aki or McCloskey.

    Keenan doesn’t lack for physicality. The notion that he does is ridiculous IMO



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,042 ✭✭✭50HX


    So thats a no then.

    I was responding to a post of making things up re Keenans physicality



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,307 ✭✭✭TRC10




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,687 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    Physicality isn't a word that springs to mind when I think of Keenan. Elusive, IQ, positioning, timing, running lines would be how I think of him. Tackle evader rather than tackle buster.

    And that is in no way saying he shirks the tough stuff. He's a good and brave tackler. He has no issue carrying into contact but that's not a major strength of his game and it's not what he's picked for.

    I also wouldn't call him a second playmaker like Lowe or Hansen but he picks great lines off those guys. And can draw a man before throwing a good pass.



Advertisement
Advertisement