Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Interesting articles

1929394959698»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,870 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    We have to look at the distinction between the UK and France.

    The maritime security strategy calls for more cooperation with both the UK and France and with the northern European group maritime security group known as the Joint Expeditionary Force.

    And while we share far more sea boundaries with Britain, its clear that the greater depth of strategic partnership is to be with France and the wider EU. And thats how it should be.

    I don't see any circumstances where Royal Navy ships will stand picket outside the Irish 12-mile limit during the presidency, if for no other reason than Britain is no longer in the EU, but rather it will be French and Dutch and German assets assisting the security effort.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,213 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Given it’s most likely to be the RAF that continues to safeguard our airspace both during and after the Presidency I wouldn’t rule the RN out at all, baring in mind the demands on the air defence ships from the Med to the Red Sea and who knows where else at the rate we are going this year. Assuming of course the attacks on Cyprus aren’t used as the logical example of why we should be stripped of holding events domestically.


    Given the clean up on the Fota Road, I do wonder if Martin is bringing Starmer there, be interesting to see how that goes in terms of securing the event and the airspace.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,126 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    I assume the French will happily be involved in security, because we're currently buying a fair bit of equipment off them , and its straight sale- not looking for local production - or domestic components ect ..

    I'd imagine there may be similar " good will " if we were to announce buying helicopters from Taunton..

    Maybe not since it's largely an Italian firm running the plant ..

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    I dont know if an Irish Order for 8/12 units would make a big difference for manufacturing jobs long term in Yeovil but it would make a big difference to the jobs for a MRO line if we were sending our fleet there for the next 25 years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,168 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    I've been banging the drum regarding "Fighter Diplomacy" in the ME and the implications of the rise in both China and South Korea as potentially becoming large scale hardware suppliers to the Middle Eastern states as the gap between US and East Asian capabilities narrow but the price gaps widen, along with the American requirement to ensure that Israel maintains a qualitative edge over neighbouring countries.

    Over the course of the recent conflict, the Gulf states have burned through THAAD and PAC at a rate that not only exceeds the US ability to resupply but also represents multiple years of production capacity before even a return to pre-War stockpile is attainable.
    Also of note is widespread reporting that the Gulf states are not receiving any interceptor resupply.

    In view of those limitations. The speed of South Korea's response in resupplying the UAE's KM-SAM batteries is worthy of note IMHO.
    Yes, the resupply is from S.Koreas own war stock rather than immediate production but it demonstrates a supplier recognising the urgent need of a customer.
    It demonstrates that despite S.Korea's own military needs, needs exacerbated by the US withdrawing THAAD & PAC missiles from S.Korea.
    That the S.Koreans still place the current needs of their customer as at least as pressing as their own. https://defencesecurityasia.com/en/south-korea-cheongung-ii-interceptors-uae-iran-missile-threat-emergency-air-defense/

    Apologies that the article wont directly embed.

    A related tweet.

    The type of responsiveness and accomodation shown by S.Korea here will only do their efforts to export their defence equipment to Arab countries the world of good IMHO.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,420 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    I agree. Jonny Korean is a damned fine fellow. We could do worse than doing business with him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,213 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Seems Polish domestic politics may have blown up their SAFE deals, with the President (member of the PiS party) saying he will veto the defence bill, wonder if it does what happens to the money?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,870 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I daresay it will sit there until whatever constitutional crisis this has created is solved.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    I think we do need the 4th Western back as these lads dont seam to know the issues that happened outside of Dublin if the Defence Forces think there will be a social collapse in 48 hours without power. The North West was left without power for nearly two weeks in places during last years storms.

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-41810798.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,915 ✭✭✭Alkers


    It's a different ball game if the whole country is down, which is what was described at the Engineers Ireland event referenced in the article (I was at it). I don't think it's scaremongering, resilience in terms of sabotage / deliberate interference is not something that is really considered by infrastructure operators in Ireland currently.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,702 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    As a side note, keep an eye on the Sullivan Cup this year, and also the Fort Benning sniper competition. Might be an interesting team or two.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭vswr


    If Engineers Ireland are involved, it'll be a load of Civil Engineers charging subscription to fix anything. Definitely screwed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Ironcially are electric and telecoms have had plenty of Deliberate Interference from a certain ethnic community.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,420 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    I agree with the gentleman who suggested th 3rd brigade be re established. And…A fourth Northern brigade intobthe bargain



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,870 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I presume you mean a paper Brigade, like Patton's ghost Division at aimed at the Pas de Calais?

    Because in case you haven't noticed, we cannot keep two Brigades fully manned and operational.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,213 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Well the neighbours are still fucked…

    https://x.com/larisamlbrown/status/2034729593995702483



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Do not be suprised to help the UK cashflow if bulldog or Campbeltown become Irish Ships. They are already doing with Norway to help cashflow.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,213 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Sunday Times is reporting that the Government is to remove the restrictions on the IDA/Enterprise Ireland from supporting Irish businesses in the defence sector:

    Irish state agencies will be permitted to invest in military-linked companies without prior government approval under proposals due before cabinet this week.

    The significant policy shift aims to cut red tape for agencies seeking to invest in firms operating in areas such as drone technology, cybersecurity and telecommunications.

    Ireland and the European Union are seeking to accelerate defence capability in response to geopolitical tensions. Ministers believe reducing administrative barriers will enable Irish companies involved in defence and dual-use technologies, including artificial intelligence and space systems, to compete for EU contracts tied to plans for a so-called “drone wall” designed to strengthen the bloc’s external security.

    It is also expected to improve access for Irish firms to the €409 billion European Competitiveness Fund, scheduled to come on stream in 2028.

    Peter Burke, the minister for enterprise, will bring a memo to cabinet on Tuesday proposing the removal of a long-standing requirement that IDA Ireland and Enterprise Ireland obtain government approval before supporting or promoting companies engaged in activities of a primarily military nature.

    The change will involve deleting section 8 (5) of the Science and Technology Act 1987, which states that the agencies “shall not engage in or promote any ­activity of a primarily military relevance without the prior approval of the ­government”.

    The proposal is likely to face criticism from the opposition, but senior government sources described the provision as “an outdated constraint” that no longer reflected the modern economic and technological environment, where defence and civilian applications increasingly overlap.

    They argue that sectors such as cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, advanced materials and space technology are inherently dual-use, and that Irish companies have developed significant expertise in these areas over recent decades.

    According to sources, removing the restriction would better position Irish industry to benefit from emerging EU innovation and industrial programmes, ensuring that SMEs, researchers and the wider technology sector do not miss out on big funding opportunities.

    “This course of action sets us up to access new EU programmes so Irish firms can fully participate in initiatives like the European Competitiveness Fund,” one source said.

    Officials have stressed that the proposed changes will not alter Ireland’s defence policy, but are aimed at enabling businesses to operate more effectively in a rapidly expanding global market.

    The official said existing safeguards, including export controls, defence procurement rules and project appraisal requirements, will remain in place.

    The amendment forms part of a revised Industrial Development (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill, which is designed to modernise the legislative framework governing the state’s enterprise agencies and equip them to attract investment, support job creation and reduce unnecessary bureaucracy.

    A senior government source told The Sunday Times: “Governments across the EU have committed to increasing spending on defence significantly, including the Irish government, so there will be opportunities for Irish SMEs to be involved in this as a result of the measures that Minister Burke will ask ministers to approve on Tuesday.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    I am starting to think Micheál Martin is planning on never leaving office and having a coup as another Cork Man has got a high ranking role in the Defence forces with the job of General Officer Commanding the Defence Forces Training Centre



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,213 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Ah sure, it’s just that we have the best people…!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,213 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Sums up the SG totally, when asked about defence her reply was "she believed Ireland was shifting to take defence more seriously, noting an enlarged department and public engagement with the issue of maritime security."

    I think perhaps, an enlarged and improved DF might be more of a response than your own department having another think in.

    When is she gone?

    https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/2026/03/25/irelands-neutrality-a-difficult-path-to-follow-senior-official-says/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    I see today on RTE Jim O'Callaghan in an interview is drawing a line on AGS Role for the EU summit. Jim said that he is fully sure that AGS will have everything they need to secure the summit on LAND were there juristcation is only.

    Since The recent changes to Naval Powers does this mean Navy are now in charge of all Military and Civil issues at sea?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,870 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Those powers are not in place yet. They require a Defence (Amendment) Bill to the 1954 Act which hasn't even emerged as an initial draft, so far.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Taken from an article in the times this evening:

    I’m very confident gardaí have the appropriate technology to respond to any threats that may arise from drones on land where their jurisdiction operates,” he said.

    Those comments appeared to stress the Garda’s responsibility did not extend to the sea, where the Defence Forces is the primary security agency



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,213 ✭✭✭sparky42


    it’s just fallout from the drones in Dublin bay and the finger pointing that went on there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Oh 100% but the big question is has anyone told the Navy that its now there baby apart from Jim O Callaghan in an Interview.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,213 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Seems the Part Time Minister wanted to go visit the Troops in UNFIL this week, but the DF recommendations were against it over security issues, turns out going to Kyiv was the safe option.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/world/middle-east/2026/04/03/mcentee-forced-to-cancel-trip-to-lebanon-after-defence-forces-flagged-concern-over-risks/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭roadmaster




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,473 ✭✭✭Heraldoffreeent




  • Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement