Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Interesting articles

19293949597

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,213 ✭✭✭sparky42


    More on the "MSS":

    https://www.thejournal.ie/maritime-security-strategy-insights-6966396-Feb2026/

    Interesting how some of the papers have avoided the defence topics yesterday and today?



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,702 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    That seems an odd requirement, and probably not one which is in the official paperwork but is instead more a case of examples being put out to press..

    Unless it's badly written, or corruptly written to specifically exclude or favour certain companies, a requirement is going to be written with a capability requirement, not a method requirement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    The UK can barely put there own ships to sea. I hope the DOD have asked the UK about this. Even outside the 12 mile limit would another nation shoot down something for us if needed with all the possable issues that could arise?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,213 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Well the Type 45's are likely what they are looking at, and they at least have improving availability, but realistically none of this is likely to be "out of the blue" for the UK or France, the Department is unlikely to have floated ideas like embedding officers on allies ships or in the command structures without said governments being talked to already and agreeing to it.

    As for actual shot down actions, is it any different than whatever "agreement" we have with the UK for RAF protection?

    As a side note, really interesting that the Indo seems to have decided to ignore this week's defence news, they had a couple of small insight articles on Cathal Brugha Barracks (good, hopefully reduce the "make it housing" BS), but nothing on the Arms deal, or on the MSS today? The IT has given much better coverage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,874 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Exactly. Its just tosh.

    The very same as RTÉ News coverage of the armour deal:

    1000011696.jpg

    Now that SCORPION has been chosen over Boxer, or other platforms, there'll be no new 8x8 armoured vehicle.

    I do, however, look forward to the full regiment of LeClerc XLR MBTs that RTÉ are anticipating 🙄

    1000011700.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,213 ✭✭✭sparky42


    ”public money”…

    As opposed to what RTÉ? Everything the state buys is funded by “public money”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,874 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    The government should have leaked that they were going to contract the whole lot out to Blackwater private military contractors, and give them all passports too.

    What a sigh of relief Paul Murphy would have heaved when the actual intent came out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Its not really as Mupper said the Griffon is not a APC as such. It will be used for more support as a Motar carrier etc and Eng units. The Griffon also will not carry a Irish section.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,702 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    Ok, but what has that to do with the wheel arrangements?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭vswr


    The person who wrote it has a cousin who owns a tyre shop.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Off anyone that posts here you should be the one person able to tell us. But i presume an 8 wheeler carrying a section has a better chance of Survivability on the battlefield if it gets hit as its a bigger frame than a 6 wheeler?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,874 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    No, thats not relevant. Survivability is about the protection inherent in the design of the vehicle, and the redunancy designed into the driveline, not the number of wheels.

    And lets be clear, the Griffon is 7,000 kgs heavier than a Mowag, because it is a modern platform with all the lesson of Afghanistan designed in, including ballistic protection and modular armour to NATO L4.

    And to be clear also, Griffon is indeed an armoured personnel carrier, in its basic 'Félin' model.

    Where a Piranha III 8x8 can carry 3 (commander, driver and gunner) + 5 troopers, the Griffon can carry 2 (driver, gunner) + 8 infantry with kit. With the additional saving, due to the networked operation that each vehicle doesn't need a commander, the driver will take his cues remotely from a unit CO.

    And so, though the French have turned Griffon into something like 10 different iterations so far, at its basic, it IS an APC, and it IS superior to the Piranha III in every measurable metric, except for top speed on road, which is 90, rather than 100 km/h.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,213 ✭✭✭sparky42


    McEntee in the committee meeting has voiced her support for using SAFE, now we have to wait and see if that works out any better than last time or if the EU actually opens a second round of funding.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,874 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    The initial 150 Bn was an initial tranche of of an objective of 800 Bn. I'd be surprised if a second tranche isn't agreed before the Irish presidency.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    If Only someone had told the State about this EU Presidency they could have had time to get ready.

    https://www.thejournal.ie/security-operation-garda-defence-forces-eu-presidency-drones-dublin-summit-6968388-Feb2026/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,177 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    The reason Paschal Donoghue didn't want to engage with this is because he didn't want to be borrowing money from the EU at higher interest rates than the market if we had to borrow any money at all.

    We shouldn't voluntarily be increasing our debt servicing burden in the next 30 years when we don't have to.

    This is only beneficial to countries with higher borrowing costs.

    I'm totally against it because it makes no fiscal sense for Ireland to borrow through that mechanism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    It looks like Leonardos threating to close yeovil worked. The UK are signing for 23 AW149s for a Billion Sterling.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,213 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Late in the day, and clearly a mess with Healy's visit cancelled yesterday and the mixed stories currently with the Telegraph saying its not happening and blaming the Chancellor, while the BBC is saying it is because she overrode the Treasury to avoid the closure.

    Messy either way in optics.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Yeah seams to be utter confusion now if they have signed a contract or not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    i Know this is hard but somehow the UK MOD is making the irish DOD not be the only clowns around.

    https://www.army-technology.com/news/live-no-decision-made-says-uk-mod-amid-helicopter-deal-reports/?cf-view



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,874 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    The civil servants at the Treasury didn't want to approve it, because a) it had been de-prioritised as a project by the MoD and b) Britain is as broke as ten eggs.

    But the PM and Chancellor intervened and signed it off regardless to save the investment and the jobs.

    Its no way to run a country, but such is politics, and after the by-election result in greater Manchester last night, Starmer absolutely could not afford another bad news story to end the week. Though his stock could scarcely be worse regardless.

    It does make for an interesting situation for Ireland too, though.

    We heard during the week that the intention is for closer military cooperation with GB and France, but the Brits won't do it for free, I'm guessing. After us putting so much business the way of France, maybe the strategic choice would be to buy the Irish Super-Medium chopper from the Italians, built and supported by a workforce in the UK.

    1000011814.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,874 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    The Journal reporting that the British PM and four cabinet secretaries will lead a delegation for the annual British-Irish summit in the week before Paddy's Day.

    The venue is somewhere unnamed in east Cork, presumably Castlemartyr or Fota Island.

    That should be a useful dry-run for the EU presidency protocols.

    Assuming the situation in the Middle East hasn't deteriorated to the extent that Starmer is too preoccupied to travel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭roadmaster




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,874 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    They're being paid, and accommodated. If the food isn't up to scratch, they should complain up the chain.

    Just pick 30 guys best versed in what skills are needed and order them onto a plane. Back in 8 weeks, no whining.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 378 ✭✭mupper2


    The MD of KNDS France is talking about up to 400 vehicles for Ireland.

    https://www.latribune.fr/article/defense-aerospatiale/defense/2513877909753114/nicolas-groult-met-deja-knds-france-en-ordre-de-bataille



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    If Helen reads the below she might get notions.

    As revealed by La Tribune , Irish Defence Minister Helen McEntee confirmed on Tuesday that France had been identified as the preferred partner for the future armored vehicle fleet for her army 

    "



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,874 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Operation distraction continues apace, but of most interest today was the sinking of the Iranian frigate Dena.

    Why, because it is only the second ever surface combatant sunk by a nuclear attack submarine after the ARA General Belgrano, and the first enemy surface ship sunk by any American submarine since World War II.

    Considering its an illegal war, and she was operationing in international waters 3,000 kms from home, its probably a war crime, but nobody gives a sh1t about that stuff anymore anyway, so ho hum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,874 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    The contract for Phase I of the special operations force HQ at the Curragh has been signed.

    The project will be delivered in 3 phases for a total of about €50 million.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    I think we may have to be fully relying on our EU friends for Air Defence in July rather than the lads across the Irish Sea.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/hms-dragon-royal-navy-cyprus-uk-b2933239.html



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,169 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Givwn the demands across the continent for Air Defence?
    I hope our EU friends are more magnanimous than we deserve.


    This shouldn't be an "I told you so" moment, given the sheer danger inherent in the world currently.
    But as many, many posters here have warned for years, almost decades at this point.
    The inability of our politicians to see Defence as a priority, to ensure we equip our forces adequately has spectacularly come home to roost.


    The generosity of our EU neighbours and hopefully, the disinterest of the EU's enemies are where our defence currently lays.



Advertisement
Advertisement