Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1171317141716171817191818

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Completely agree. It's like watching games from 2016, except even moreso… kicking and winning contestables now seems to be hugely over-rewarded since the change to the escort laws, and it's clearly at the expense of fluid attacking phase-play, which is what Ireland built their success on.

    When one of our best attacks on Thursday is a bomb into the 22 that Garry Ringrose is a hand away from recovering, you know something is off.

    That said, we haven't adapted to it as well as other teams have.

    If we're going to persist with this, we need to be selecting our best back 3 players under the high ball. Keenan would make a huge difference here. Mack Hansen would help too (and at stepping in as first receiver). That leaves one wing option.

    For me, Osborne is good, but I hate him as a wing option. Imo, Calvin Nash is amongst those next up as being a quality option for contestables.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 401 ✭✭Tommysocks11


    Excuse my ignorance but is it a change to escort laws that means we cant play lovely free flowing attacking rugby like we played on new Zealand tour a few years ago? Why did they change the rules as now we have a hybrid game of catch and kick which is honestly puke to watch



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,658 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    I think it's more to do with how the breakdown is refereed now.

    There seems a very clear trend in refereeing over the past 18 months or so where jackaling players are unduly rewarded, and teams run a high risk of conceding penalties when attempting to play phase-play attack.

    This leads to a scenario where teams seem very reluctant to attack from deep, because the risk of conceding penalties is so high.

    The real solution to this is the way the French play at their best - a high offloading game which avoids the need to commit high numbers to the breakdown, but's it's obviously not without risk in and of itself. You need to largely be winning collisions to play this type of game.

    I struggle to think of any Irish sides who've ever had an awful lot of success with a heavy offloading gameplan.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,049 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I struggle to think of many Irish sides who have ever tried a heavy offloading gameplan mind you.

    Unless we count Snyman's efforts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 439 ✭✭The Macho Man


    The Italian defensive lineout got away with murder on Sat. Zambonin guilty of jumping across the line to steal ball, never got pinged. Their scrum was very good. Schoeman got butchered by Ferrari.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,409 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Any squad updates? I don't remember any injuries from Thursday night. Although I did wonder if McCloskey was carrying a knick towards the end, simply because I can't think of any other explanation as to why we went down the aerial route from those two off the top line outs in the last 10 minutes rather than give the ball to McCloskey and let him run into 10 metres of space!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,658 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Yeah, agreed.

    There aren't many teams anywhere who've been hugely successful with it as a strategy tbh. Toulouse are so so good at it, but with their quality of players, they'd be successful playing almost any strategy in all likelihood.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 331 ✭✭letsbefair


    We need to keep in mind, France in Paris is one of the toughest games in rugby. Not sure many teams could have looked good against them. Very hard for both forwards and backs to shine going backwards. The ref was no help and they got every bounce of the ball. We need perspective, even the greats have bad days.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 818 ✭✭✭MangleBadger


    It is not just the escort laws. It is also to do with the breakdown. The new laws with regards head contact/croc rolls etc make it harder to remove the jackaller. So the more rucks there are the more likely a turnover is. Even just slowing the ball down. It is much harder to play a high phase count game.

    What France also did is a lot of offloading in the tackle to remove the ruck. If we want free flowing running rugby we need to get better at offloading and running support lines.

    We also need to have better support lines in the chasing of the contestable. Not just the catcher but others to pick up on the scraps.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 202 ✭✭jimbob955


    there will be very few changes, if any.

    Andy will want to give the lads a chance to right the wrongs of Paris. They have enough credit in the bank……….

    We might see Lowe back in, Maybe Conan/Ryan start, that's it.

    Andy needs to right the wrongs of Paris. Italy are looking good, and have a bounce in their step and no pressure on them. All the pressue will be on Ireland. We also need to build for the England game, so again, few changes if any.

    I would like Timoney at 7 and maybe Edogbo on the bench…… but is it wirth the risk dropping VDF?

    I do hope Andy rotates a bit more against Wales, but again that could be a must win game, and Wales are improving…….nada nada, drivel talk

    Another QF exit is looming fast over the horizon……….



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 319 ✭✭cantwbr1


    I watched the most of the other matches at the weekend. No other team in any way matched the speed/power/accuracy of France. England was probably the closest but even they were probably only approaching 75-80% of what France were bringing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,102 ✭✭✭shootermacg


    JGP did not have a bad game. His box kicks were exceptional as usual. The fact that he's playing under a coach who has gone from a running rugby game to a turgid kick chase game might make it appear that his form has deserted him.

    Sure he missed some tackles, but also stopped the man's momentum. They were tough tackles to make and he didn't shirk them.

    Get Lancaster in, why have the guy who copied his homework, when you can have the original?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭almostover


    We also need a reality check. The same French team beat us off the park in Dublin last year with their best player off the field injured.

    We then laboured to a narrow victory over Italy and followed that up with an autumn campaign that included losses to an average NZ team and a beat down to SA.

    The trend is obvious. Our level has fallen and we're in the pack now behind SA, Fra, Eng and NZ.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭Rayray98




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,012 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    England are at the forefront of the game when it comes to the revamped escorting laws. Ford is an excellent kicker and they always have at least three players at every contestable. One to jump and slap back and another two or three to pounce on the ball. It's a very well coordinated effort and one that takes a long time to develop accurately. It's not just what happens with those three or four players. If England win the contestable the entire team then needs to snap into a new attacking shape to make the most of the quick turnover ball against a disorganised and retreating defence.

    Ireland, in comparison, look at least a year behind the leading sides. The kicking is mostly fine tbh. JGP hung up some excellent contestables. But our chase and slap down needs so much work. TOB and Stockdale were really struggling to win anything. The odd time we won a battle in the air we made metres in the following phases. It's the best tactic for making those entries into the opposition half. We just aren't that good at it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,898 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    The big difference between now and 2016/17 is the capitulation of Welsh rugby and Wales going from a contender to by far the worst team in the competition, they have won only 2 of their last 21 6 nations games. That will put a gloss on our final position compared to the Schmidt era that has little to do with us. We were at least competitive in every game in 16' and 17' we were not competitive on Thursday .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    What from that analysis would you disagree with?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,226 ✭✭✭bingobango12


    Similar to the Monday before France, sticking my colours to the mast on what I think should be the team for Saturday:

    1. Loughman 2. Sheehan 3. Clarkson 4. McCarthy 5. Ryan 6. Beirne 7. Timoney 8. Doris 9. JGP 10. Prendergast 11. Lowe 12. McCloskey 13. Farrell 14. TOB 15. Stockdale 16. Milne 17. Kelleher 18. Furlong 19. Edogbo 20. Conan 21. Casey 22. Byrne 23. Osbourne

    Changes: Ryan to start, Beirne to 6, Timoney to start, Lowe back in, Farrell replaces Ringrose, Stockdale to fullback.

    Team I think Farrell will choose:

    1. Loughman 2. Sheehan 3. Furlong 4. McCarthy 5. Ryan 6. Beirne 7. JDVF 8. Doris 9. JGP 10. Prendergast 11. Lowe 12. McCloskey 13. Ringrose 14. TOB 15. Osbourne 16. Milne 17. Kelleher 18. Clarkson 19. Edogbo 20. Conan 21. Timoney 22. Casey 23. Crowley

    If my prediction on the starting team for what Farrell chooses is correct, my next prediction is this place will be a sh*tshow and extremely negative, and probably right to be 🙂.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    As critical as I've been of Farrell's conservatism in the past, I can't see him picking that starting 15. But if he does, I think it'd be a huge disappointment…

    I like the look of your 15 tho. I'm not sure I love Beirne at 6, but it is a way to get all of McCarthy, Ryan and him into the start 15 so I'd be fine with that. Personally think Crowley needs to start this one at 10, he needs minutes there, with a view to starting Prendergast in the rest. I think that'd make it easier to pair him with Casey, who also needs to gametime too, imo. I've no idea who I'd pick to cover 10 from the bench then tho, think you could make an argument either way….

    It does feel like a pretty significant and difficult selection for Farrell this time round tho…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,758 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Amazing that you put in Ryan and Timoney, who both did really well, when arguably the most outstanding player to come off the bench was Milne.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭Rayray98


    But then in the flip side France have gone from mid table fodder to being a major contender again.

    I would also question the quality of the sides in 2016 & 2017, were any on par with the France side on Thursday? I know we were utterly abysmal in Murrayfield and Cardiff in 2017 but were lucky that Scotland/ Wales just weren’t very good (both finished bottom half) so we were able to stay competitive. Even the French side we lost to in Paris in 2016, which was probably the worst game in the 6N for about 10 years I’d wager, that very French team would end up coming 5th…I would argue that’s just as bad as losing to a great French side like we did on Thursday.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,226 ✭✭✭bingobango12


    Milne offers far more as an impact sub than Loughman. Loughman was very solid in the scrum, something I was worried about him pre game. No need to change that up imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,789 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Ireland, in comparison, look at least a year behind the leading sides. 

    World Cup is a year and a half away, so what you're saying is we're on track to peak just at the right time?

    4D Chess.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭Rayray98


    Well saying Ireland are “part of the pack” behind the 4 sides mentioned when in the last year the sides in that pack we beat in comfortable fashion. Let’s also not forget we beat England in the last 12 months as well.


    Ireland are still certainly part of the top 5 group, granted probably towards the lower end like 4th or 5th. Like I said in a previous post I think SA are 1st, France 2nd and then England 3rd with NZL/Ireland 4th/5th with NZL edging 4th due to beating us in their H2H recently.


    I do think in reality 3-5 the gap isn’t that big, the only difference being how consistent England have been but if Ireland beat them in 2 weeks there could very easily be a shake up in the 3-5th place ranking…I don’t envision us doing so as we look a mess right now but far from mission impossible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,226 ✭✭✭bingobango12


    My thinking on 10 in general is the constant changing isn't helping either of them. I think they need to just give one of them a run of games. I would though be in favour of giving Crowley the Wales game to try build some confidence. It looks shot at the moment.

    In relation to the bench spot, I think Ireland will be leading with 60 minutes or so gone, but it will be close. I would be rather Byrne on to close it out, mainly due to his kicking in general being better than Crowley. That said if we losing with 20 minutes to go it would be Crowley that I want to bring on. So it really swings on what position they see Ireland being in with 60ish minutes gone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,758 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    You could say the very same thing about Ryan and Timoney. Milne deserves his opportunity after that performance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    But this:

    Well saying Ireland are “part of the pack” behind the 4 sides mentioned [SA, NZ, Fra and Eng] when in the last year the sides in that pack we beat in comfortable fashion

    isn't accurate? Correct me if I'm wrong here but, as you mentioned, England are the only team from that group we've beaten in the last year, and that was a 1 score game. This time round we're away from home versus them, and the're on, what, a 12 game winning streak?

    The "beat in comfortable fashion" realistically came from our opponents in our 4 losses vs SA, NZ and Fra (twice).

    That's the reality, unfortunately. I think we're currently miles behnd FRA and SA, and definitely behind NZ and Eng. Let's hope we can turn that form around in a couple of weeks in Twickenham, but at the moment, it'd very much be against form and expectation. I reckon we'll 2 score underdogs going into that game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,012 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    I think some of Ireland's issues are also mental. We're just slow on the uptake when we win turnover ball or make a big line break. It's like we aren't anticipating it and don't have enough players ready to support and execute the next phases of attack.

    This clip was made to highlight Dupont's excellent defence in sacking JGP, but where is the matters support? He picks up the ball and snipes because it's the only thing he can do. Other than the players resourcing the ruck there isn't anyone else ready to receive a pass and keep the attack going. We're subsequently turned over and a promising attacking position is wasted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,012 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Italy confirm that Brex is unavailable for selection this weekend. Capuozzo is available however.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭almostover


    I fail to see what Joe McCarthy did last Thursday to keep his starting jersey. If he was named on the bench he should consider himself lucky.



Advertisement
Advertisement