Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Cross-border review of rail network officially launched

1555658606164

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166 ✭✭BestWestern


    Intesting how the CEO went from calling for it in her last role to ignoring it in her new one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 300 ✭✭OisinCooke


    I was about to ask actually.

    Frequency improvements between Limerick and Athenry are listed as an ongoing project (phase 1 apparently… wonder what phase 2 is…) and the map of ongoing projects in the report shows infrastructure upgrades accordingly - station upgrades at Gort, a passing loop at what looks to be Crusheen, which makes sense given the talk of reopening the station - but weirdly, at Cratloe by the looks of it and not Sixmilebridge.

    Why on earth aren’t they adding a second platform at Sixmilebridge?? There is a 5km section of perfectly straight track west of the station which could easily house a dynamic loop, and a second platform at the station would do wonders. It is exactly halfway between Ennis and where the line branches off from the Limerick Junction line, so would be ideal for a loop.

    I do remember IÉ talking earlier in the year about undertaking a study to look at loops at either Cratloe, Clarecastle, or one other location, but it wasn’t Sixmilebridge and I really don’t know why.

    Adding a brand new loop somewhere where there isn’t a station seems ludicrous to me, it would slow services heavily and any delay would be immediately obvious to the passengers. At least when th delay is in a station loop, the doors remain open and passengers can stretch their legs or smoke or wherever. Why on earth are they not even considering Sixmilebridge for a loop??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,487 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Loops outside stations are much cheaper than adding a second platform and modern access requirements; basically.

    Will need pressure to show the benefits of having them in a station.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,513 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    I'm pretty sure even the original Derry/Portadown line was faster between Derry and Belfast than the current one, let alone Dublin.

    With the Belfast/Dublin line improvements and a line built to modern standard that line would very likely take the majority of both Dublin/Derry and Belfast/Derry services so it would definitely be a good idea to go double from the outset. Would also mean you definitely want to have no reversing manoeuvres for Derry/Belfast or Derry Dublin movements.

    Boards is in danger of closing very soon, if it's yer thing, go here (use your boards.ie email!)

    👇️ 👇️



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,585 ✭✭✭Consonata


    The current alignment was kept, more for Coleraine, than for Derry



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,513 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    Oh absolutely, sure there was serious discussion even into the 2000s on closing the line to Derry altogether, a disgrace.

    Boards is in danger of closing very soon, if it's yer thing, go here (use your boards.ie email!)

    👇️ 👇️



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭gjim


    The alignment is nowhere near capacity even with all the single track - there’s 9 services a day with an average of about 30 passengers per train. This is the unfortunate reality of the sort of demand there is for “regional” passenger rail in the modern era - it’s just not the compelling option it was in the donkey&cart and high-nelly era.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,922 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    it isn't.

    in reality it costs buttons for what you actually get in return and we have one of the cheapest if not the cheapest railway to run in europe in terms of subsidy when examined against taking parts of bigger networks similar to our network size.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭gjim


    Rail is phenomenally expensive when used inappropriately - and the AIRR is full of inappropriate rail ideas.

    The (in)famous Limerick to Nenagh cost study from a few years back showed that each passenger trip by train on this service cost €550 per passenger per trip. It is literally more expensive for IE and the state to provide a (slow) seat on a train than providing a free helicopter taxi service would be.

    And the AIRR includes a lot of replicating the Limerick-Nenagh model. Quite bizarre in the 21st century when the rest of the world has moved on. NO other country with advanced rail spends money on connecting small population centres like this these days. They spend on urban metro/commuting and actual intercity where rail has clear and unbeatable advantages over the alternatives.

    The response to the Nenagh-Limerick study was also interesting. Instead of admitting that even attempting to run a decent rail service between two destinations like this was Quixotic folly, a common response was "the reason it's not packed with passengers is because we haven't spend enough money on it" - ignoring that there are simple limits to the demand (regardless of mode) for travel between destinations like this. Many suggested that, despite finding itself in a hole, IE should keep actually dig even more furiously, and put on hourly peak services, upgrade the alignment, build more stations in the middle of nowhere, etc. I'm not sure to what end - perhaps if we were spending €1000 per passenger rail trip between Limerick and Nenagh, it could be considered a "success"?

    No amount of Percy French nostalgia is going to bring back the old days of railways being the primary means of traveling around the country. The rest of the world has moved on and concentrated on rail investment where rail makes sense and where rail beats its modern competition - high frequency metro/commuting or long distance/high speed intercity. The dark enemy's of successful rail in Ireland are a disparate lot: the haters/climate-change-deniers/car-lovers/etc. but also the "rail fans" who champion all sorts of projects and services which are doomed to fail from the off.

    The decision to put DART-SW on funding "hold" while announcing providing a 6 services a day rail "link" to Claremorris has the full backing of the Minister shows how warped this country's notion of the role of rail in an overall transport system.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,439 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    The decision to put DART-SW on funding "hold" while announcing providing a 6 services a day rail "link" to Claremorris has the full backing of the Minister shows how warped this country's notion of the role of rail in an overall transport system.

    that's political expediency, "something for everyone in the room", and not unique to Ireland. What's bizarre is that people in Galway think this is the best use of their slice of the pie. It is relatively cheap and straightforward to do compared to say GLUAS, but there must be something more productive they could spend a hundred million on.

    Put your money where yer mouth is... Subscribe and Save Boards!

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,552 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    That's the annoying part. Who has convinced people that a rail link between claremorris and tuam is just what their community needs? Nobody seems concerned that those trains cant actually get to Galway as long as Athenry to Galway remains single track but that seems to be a detail missed by all.

    It would be more advantageous for the people of Claremorris if the same resources were put into double tracking portarlington to Athlone.

    Or more to the point the same money could make every town in Mayo walkable, cycle able, renovated and liveable.

    I suspect they know its not what their locality needs, its quite simply a case of begrudging for the sake of it. They hear Dublin is getting a new train so they want a new train. A very sad attitude in this fay and age, most small countries are quite proud of their capital city but that just isnt the case here for some reason, pride only extends to the front gate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,361 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    The DUP will combust at pretty much any project with Dublin in the title, so I'd be skeptical about any big works north of the border.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,273 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Just call it the Dublin cash for ash project and they’ll be all over it like FF on a brown envelope.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,922 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    rail is not used inappropriately in this country however, so it's not really expensive at all, any genuine inappropriate rail closed in the 50s to the 70s and even then there were a couple of mistakes even for the time.
    when we look at any of the actual full on rail reopenings that have happened in this country, they have all been a lot less cost then motor way projects.
    the claimed costs for the limerick nenagh ballybroaphy line were debatable and very much so, some could and would argue they were hugely exaggerated but that's for another day.
    when we really examine them vs the rest of the network when it had similar issues such as crossings and staffed boxes and manual signalling, none of the other lines even got anywhere near a fraction of that cost, so therefore they make no sense.
    people are correct to point out that the run down of the line which was deliberate in reality, was not going to bring any sort of decent usage even though nenagh in itself is a reasonable size town which is correct to connect to the network, and forget about whatever suggested stations you claim are in the middle of nowhere as they aren't being built so are irrelevant.
    the all ireland review is investing in inter city rail and high basis regional rail which will connect large populations and will hvve the numbers.
    the only oddity is mullingar to porterdown which seems a bit random i would agree, but perhapse with some actual detail maybe it will turn out to have some merrit but i doubt it.
    nobody is suggesting railways should be the primary way of traveling around the whole country, that's just the usual guff people such as yourself come out with because you are unable to deal with the reality that rail is having a renaissence and we have a very viable rail network as a whole, + there being more recognition now that there are a small few areas which aren't on the network that need to be as spending on road transport to serve them and have that as the only option is not cost effective in terms of all of the goals we need to achieve.
    ireland is doing exactly what you are on about, investing in rail where it makes sense and is similar to or beats the competition, we tried it your way and it didn't work.
    dart+sw being put on hold is nothing to do with athenry to claremorris, even if that line was not going to be reopened (and i'm not convinced it is) dart+sw will still be on hold.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,922 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    fenian cash for fenian ash? not a chance they would go for that, it would send them into such a rager they would self-combust.

    so yes actually lets do it and finish that backward party off for good.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,079 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    A lot of the right foundations are being put in place but the "renaissance" itself is still to be realised in the future I think. We're only a few pulled projects away from describing it as a "moderate improvement" and forces are currently at play to water down many aspects of previous transport commitments.

    Sean Canney has recently u-turned on speed limits and RSA reforms and is likely a champion of Western rail corridor (he has been quite active in publicising progress of that scheme). I don't believe that the future of all previously-committed rail projects are as secure as most of us would like. It looks like Darragh O'Brien is keeping things under control to a degree, but we could well be back to "buying local votes with National infrastructure funding". In that regard I would say the WRC and Dart+SW etc are inextricably linked. I say that as someone who would typically use neither: I have no horse in this race and am just glad the Cork Commuter projects haven't all been axed (yet).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,684 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Nenagh - Limerick might do better if it actually had a commutable train home from Limerick in the evening. It's like it's designed to fail as "proof" this stuff can't work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,481 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    17.10 seems quite reasonable I presume they can only schedule one service- is it too early for must office workers?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,684 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Most people would finish at 5 or even 5:30. Factor in having to get there and that's not viable for many. If it had commute times like the Ennis service (sucessful despite what saome say) it would do better numbers and help the congested Limerick feeder roads.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 892 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    Nobody seems concerned that those trains cant actually get to Galway

    Conviently ignoring the Oranmore passing loop which will more than double capacity into Galway City. Double. That's twice the number of trains. Add one or two carriages onto each of those trains and you've tripled capacity.

    Athenry crying out for more train capacity, which can, "drumroll", be served by trains starting in Tuam or Claremorris or Westport. For some reason, some people seem to think that Tuam trains will directly compete with Athenry for capacity.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 298 ✭✭Bsharp


    It wouldn't be possible to get a clockface time table with just the passing loop when InterCitys are considered. My guess is a mix of flighting and against the tide peak time dwells. Athenry Claremorris needs to be confirmed as two phases as soon as possible to release NDP funds for other projects. Phase 1 to Tuam and aim for no RO if possible. Longer term planning for the rest, which is less straightforward due to all the bridges and LCs to not need a RO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,487 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Even in a "nine to five" that actually finishes at at five, a 17:10 train needs you to basically work in the station.

    If there's a single service running somewhere as an evening commuter, 17:50 is probably more sensible



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,964 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    There are a number of reasons why Nenagh-Limerick is always going to be a struggle

    1. A lot of employment in Limerick is nowhere near Colbert station
    2. There is an empty freeway between Limerick and Nenagh that takes 15/20 mins to drive
    3. There is no density of note near Nenagh station, low population density and sprawl and many people living in the hinterlands rather than near the station

    The service is more likely to work as a feeder to Dublin intercity services rather than a commuter service into Limerick



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 892 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    Yeah but here's the thing. With the current single track constraint they manage to operate 12x trains in the morning between 5.25am and 9.55am, 6x outbound and 6x inbound. Maximum "clock face" frequency in that period would be 14x trains, so they do pretty well given the constraints.

    They manage this by effectively bunching inbound and outbound services together, so you have 3x outbound trains before 6.30am, then a gap of 1hr and 1hr 20mins.

    Here's where the passing loop is a total game changer. 14x maximum becomes 28x. That is an ENORMOUS increase in potential frequency. Add in additional carriages and you've added even more capacity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,684 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Outside of the fact Nenagh is smaller than Ennis all those things apply to both lines. It also applies to Limerick to other Tipperary stations and they have decent amounts of commuters.

    By road Nenagh to Limerick is 20 minutes to the absolute edge of the eastern suburbs. Unless you work in Annacotty you are gonna be a fair bit longer than 20 minutes. 40 to 50 depending on traffic to the centre or Raheen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 300 ✭✭OisinCooke


    I absolutely agree with you here, all of the Athenry commuter services will be extended as far as Tuam (with maybe a few extra services added), and then additional Westport services will not be too frequent so shouldn’t take up too much capacity.

    I’m not at all saying that the line shouldn’t be doubled, it absolutely should, and should have been done first, but in this county, the only way to get something done is for things to get so bad that it actually needs to happen.

    When Oranmore, Athenry, Tuam, Limerick, or Athlone commuters start demanding more trains more regularly, then the case can easily be made for this ‘’magic easy fix” which will as a result get public backing.

    In terms of doing Tuam in phases, is this actually happening, or just a thought? Because I agree I think that would be a far more sensible way to do things, both in terms of freeing up money by only building one phase at a time, but also by making the Tuam-Claremorris section more viable and actually usable by going for planing permission to actually bridge the N17 or even realign either it or the railway.

    I suppose the only worry is that a Navan situation would happen again where the ‘immediately to follow’ phase 2 gets postponed indefinitely (and is still nowhere near construction…). But Tuam is the priority and probably the biggest traffic driver on the line, so getting that built first would actually be pretty sensible I suppose.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,633 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The problem with the Nenagh service in the evening is all to to do with constraints imposed by the signalling on the branch line, staffing and the availability of train sets.

    To be fair to the schedulers, they are trying to do the best they can in those circumstances.

    First of all, as far I am aware there is only one train set available in the evenings to operate on the branch and that operates at 17:10 to Ballybrophy - it provides connections there to and from Dublin (into the 17:25 Cork-Heuston at 18:59 and then out of the 18:00 Heuston-Cork at 19:05).

    Conceivably, you could push this train back an hour to 18:10, and defer the connections an hour, but I suspect that would cause problems with the working hours of the level crossing keepers and signalmen along the line.

    Even if you had a spare set to do a short run to Nenagh, the constraints of the signalling on the branch, which is split into three sections (Killonan Junction-Birdhill, Birdhill-Roscrea and Roscrea-Ballybrophy), make it difficult to schedule it.

    The middle section is one hour long, which means that any second train has to leave one hour behind the first - that's fine going to Nenagh at 18:10. But, the problem is that even with a five minute turnaround at Nenagh, that would mean that the 19:05 service from Ballybrophy would have to sit at Roscrea for 10-15 minutes until the Nenagh commuter service had cleared Birdhill on the return to Limerick, which is far from ideal and just extends journey times again.

    Realistically, it's the best that can be done given all of those constraints.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,361 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    I only have one datapoint - I used Nenagh to Ballybrophy at 8am(ish) one morning and there were 5 people on it. Max line speed of like 80kmh.

    And the upgrade north of the border could of course be called "Dublin Ulster Project". That should satisfy them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,684 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Every problem you mention is infrastructure related and can therefore be solved. That's a very different argument to how viable the line could be and I don't blame the people doing the actual current schedules.

    It's the practice of using the numbers on the sht service provided as a way to say the line is not viable that I have a problem with.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,552 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    A passing loop isnt going to cut it im afraid. Look at the proposed frequency increase kn Dublin to Galway



Advertisement
Advertisement