Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Meanwhile on the Roads...

16768697173

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 175 ✭✭TerrieBootson


    mod note - sorry folks, no speculation or repeating what could be inaccurate reports.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 832 ✭✭✭Morris Garren


    RTE Prime Time— Tuesday 25th November-- a report from the Cycle Lanes to Nowhere in South Kildare. This utter fiasco needs a national conversation as TII are becoming a law unto themselves; local concerns over safety, never mind the extraordinary overspend, are continuing to mount. If this becomes national policy, we might as well just sell our bikes and be rid of them



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,452 ✭✭✭07Lapierre


    watched this. Apparently the road was “perfectly fine” before the cycle lane was built as the hard shoulder was used by pedestrians, cyclists AND motorists!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 832 ✭✭✭Morris Garren


    Yes, that is correct. Landing this urban style infrastructure on to a rural community has seen an extraordinary increase in incidents and injuries (at least 50 since July, with a number of hospitalisations) whereas the past 20 years has seen only a handful of such incidents on either hard shoulder. Ivory Tower engineers and commentators hold a lot of influence in Ireland and here we see the unfortunate unfolding of same



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,575 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Source please for the before and after incident counts



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,826 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    What’s the cause for the current incidents? Seems a bit of an odd uptick



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,248 ✭✭✭fat bloke


    It's clearly a pilot project so hopefully they'll listen to the feedback. Cyclists having to cede straight ahead priority at every junction is pathetic. If they want wider lanes for all then maybe some of those farmers will have to accept compulsory purchase orders for strips of land to accommodate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭Large bottle small glass


    For a random KM of regional/national road you could easily have 5-10 landowners.

    Each landowners is entitled to

    *Compensation for lost land

    *Compensation for effect on rest of holding

    *Professional fees for solicitor, perhaps barrister, valuer and maybe engineer.

    If we want to create a massive cottage industry for professionals CPO would be the way to go.

    There's a reason councils avoid them where possible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,248 ✭✭✭fat bloke


    Fair enough. What is the solution then I wonder, given that that type of road is all over the country and simply not wide enough to service vehicular traffic of all sizes in both directions, and segregated cycle lanes, AND pedestrian footpaths. At 2 million euro or whatever for 3km, neither approach is cheap.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,962 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    That's why CPOs are largely avoided and you can regularly get over 50% more than your land value from any council looking to buy your land

    One good solution is to build cycle lanes without taking over road space. Doing so would reduce any unnecessary tension between road users, particularly cyclists and drivers. When it comes to cost we're building a bike lane, not a bike shelter, so there should be better value there for all



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,248 ✭✭✭fat bloke


    How do you do that though? Where else does the cycle lane space come from if not from the existing road?

    One of the motoring contributors / objectors said something like "We're not NIMBYs. When we heard there was going to be a cycle lane built we were delighted but we thought we were just getting a line on the road."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,962 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    There are many things you could do. Some of the suggestions that were already here such as in a rural setting above you buy the land from the nearby landowners. In an urban setting you could cut back footpath space or only have a path on one side of the road. New bridges for river crossing points

    All sensible stuff and the right team could probably get them done for less than the price of a dáil bike shelter

    Post edited by Red Silurian on


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 54,527 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    only have a footpath on one side of the road in an urban setting? set out on a mass CPO of land?

    you have not thought this through at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 832 ✭✭✭Morris Garren


    Previous stats for RTA's on the old N9 are held in the Garda database; local consultation in previous months unearthed a very small number (single figures) on this specific stretch of road since this road by-pass opened. Recent stats are being logged by the local resident group, who forward them to the Gardai and the contractor. 62 incidents so far— that's only the ones that are being logged. The recent uptick is easily explained if one was to visit the site itself, especially in darkness or bad weather



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 832 ✭✭✭Morris Garren


    One of the more bizarre outcomes from the law of unintended consequences, is that TII and Kildare CC have noted that these cycle lanes are likely to stop the 'Sulky Racers' from using the road, as heretofore. A win for animal rights I suppose



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,452 ✭✭✭07Lapierre


    The Cycle Lane is still under construction? Any new infrastructure will take a bit of getting used to by those who use it.

    The same old arguments were used when this cycle lane was under construction. Locals said the road was now too narrow as "slower vehicles couldn't pull into the hard shoulder to allow faster vehicles to overtake" in Real english what they were saying is "now that the cycle lane is built, drivers have no option but to drive with due care and attention and only overtake once they have passed blakes Cross where the road has two lanes in each direction".

    https://maps.app.goo.gl/owMKk6JKuyNNktV87



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,575 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    What Garda database? Who got the figures from it?

    You're counting apples and oranges there, with very different criteria for the before and after counts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,452 ✭✭✭07Lapierre


    They should be protesting about getting guarantees from the local council that the lane and road will be Kept free of debris/standing water after storms/Heavy rain and improvements in street lighting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 832 ✭✭✭Morris Garren


    Ok-- you have an opinion on the matter, that corresponds with a lot of the condescending and dismissive communication locals have become accustomed to since the diggers and trucks arrived. There are no apples or oranges involved and if you are supportive of this scheme, then so be it.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,353 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    So far the incidents reported are "nowhere to pull in when they got a flat tyre" and another person hitting a kerb and puncturing their tyre. So the incidents seem to be a person having a flat which if it happened on any other nearby road, they would have even less space and someone not paying attention and hitting a kerb. The latter being someone who might have killed a pedestrian or cyclist if we want to get to full pearl clutching hysteria about it.

    I say this as someone who thinks it has huge issues but if you are going to point out issues, point out ones that are actually issues.

    Simple ones like, why do you need a study when there are numerous examples of best practice elsewhere in Europe to learn from. Would an average speed camera not have been quicker and easier to install for these types of road. Would phone usage cameras also have been a far more useful trial considering we want to target low hanging fruit in regards road safety.

    I don't have anything against a trial but there are so many things wrong with the actual trial, forget the local protests which don't actually make sense unless you become accusatory and say the only thing it stops a motorist doing is overtaking at speed. The losing priority at that junction, it is like road junction design 101, how did they fluff that so badly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,891 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I'll go further and say that there was almost no need for this study in the first place. The National Cycle Design Manual is already of a higher standard than TII's one and it provides them with plenty of best-practice examples. The whole play here was that they don't want to adhere to the National Cycle Design Manual, want to water it right down and want to create their own low-quality cycle design guideline for non-urban roads. But by watering the cycle design they effectively got a result of "everyone loses".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,575 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,891 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I don't think that's a reasonable appraisal of the post you were replying to. I didn't think the poster was being condescending or dismissive. And I suspect the poster may actually not actually be supportive of the scheme because of its low quality cycle design features.

    I think this project is rubbish too, but my own initial thoughts were also that the data you're referencing unfortunately isn't fully reliable. This can best be summarised as "higher levels of reporting correlates with higher levels of monitoring" if that makes sense. The Gardai themselves do this the opposite way around, with press releases on "reduced recorded crime numbers" etc which can be realised through lower levels or recording rather than actual reduction in crime.

    Anyway, the TLDR version: your data here could be indicative but it's unfortunately not conclusive right now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 832 ✭✭✭Morris Garren




  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 44,455 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Looking at photos of the road in this article, how exactly does a driver manage to clip the kerb which is a metre or moore out from the yellow line? What am I missing?

    17641720241008150942042755266365.jpg

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 832 ✭✭✭Morris Garren


    You are not looking at the junctions, traffic islands, and other near-invisible road furniture scattered at various points along the 3.5km route. Seeing is believing Seth-- if one sees that everything is fine, then what's the issue? If you see it, or hit it, in real life, the experience is likely quite different



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,962 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Depends on the urban setting obviously. Point is there are ways to go about building cycle lanes but taking over road space is the current go-to. Probably all done to create a divide and conquer situation

    They are not stopping the sulky races, they just moved them to another road. You need strong legislation and strong enforcement to stop the sulky racing outright



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 44,455 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Can you share photos of the junctions, traffic islands or near-invisible street furniture - I'm only able to judge on what I've seen but hopefully you can help clear people's idea of what it is like there.

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 54,527 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    IIRC in britain recently they updated the highway code so that motorists turning onto a more minor road are expected to yield to pedestrians on the major road; can someone confirm i didn't dream that?

    expecting a cyclist who would presumably be visible to (or even forward of) a motorist who knows they are going to turn across their path, when the cyclist would otherwise be maintaining their progress on the main route, is insanity.



Advertisement