Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

BusConnects Dublin - Bus Network Changes Discussion

1559560561563565

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 82 ✭✭lateconnection


    What are the chances of Dublin Bus/NTA ordering the Enviro500EV tri-axle to boost capacity? I also see Wrightbus have launched a tri-axle version of the Streetdeck Electroliner in Hong Kong.

    Some of the busier routes like the 15, 16, 39A, C Spine or E Spine could do with these to boost capacity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,812 ✭✭✭Midnight_EG


    Wouldn't get a triaxle off the roundabout at Colmcilles on the 15, or around the bend at Supervalu either. It'd really struggle in Clongriffin too at the loop.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 504 ✭✭✭PlatformNine


    This is always an interesting question and there has been a lot of good discussion about it.

    At the moment probably not. The NTA is likely prioritising the general rollout of BusConnects and the retiring of single door and end-of-life vehicles. For as nice as the larger buses may be (15-20% extra capacity) everything I mentioned is just a much higher priority, and that means getting as many buses as they can as quickly as they can.

    The later point is probably the bigger problem of the two, as DB currently has around 170 buses past the normal end-of-life (14 years if I remember right), all of which also happen to be the single-door buses. Even by itself that is just a lot of buses, but the NTA don't need to just replace them, they need even more buses to continue BC rollout. Plus, from next year the GTs will also start to become life-expired too. BÉ and GAI also have some life-expired urban buses too, but it’s only a handful compared to DB.

    Additionally, I wouldn't expect them to order (or more likely setup a framework) any tri-axles before the current framework for the Wright double-deckers is complete. Which, I believe only 421 of 800 have been ordered so far. Though considering the framework is split between DB and BÉ, that will go quite quick, at the rate they have been order buses it could be complete in the next 2-3 years.

    That said, I do think they will eventually consider some tri-axles again. It is a good way to boost some routes' capacities by up to 20% without the need for extra services and drivers. However, as said above the bigger question is what routes (and depots) can take them. That I don't have the answer for unfortunately, but their sheer size (and some other comparatively other minor factors) is likely what contributed to only 70 tri-axles being ordered in the mid-2000s.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,610 ✭✭✭✭zell12


    CEO did a Q&A on Radio1 https://www.rte.ie/radio/radio1/clips/22558722/ . Bank card fare swipes incoming 2028



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 82 ✭✭lateconnection


    Yeah I definitely agree that their size would be an issue in depots. They could increase clearance at some of the tricky junctions mentioned. I’d say they will have to look at using them again though, especially as they seem to be reluctant to go down the articulated bus route at the moment. Standing on buses all the way from Knocklyon into town wouldn’t be popular I’d say. Over 400 housing units just got approved near the 15 terminus in Ballycullen. Even with the rerouting of the A3 in recent plans to serve Ballycullen, tri axles could go a long way towards helping capacity out that way. The route is bursting at the seams at the moment. Hopefully more bus priority under the corridor proposals will help.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,296 ✭✭✭trellheim


    For the days when it is not raining my all time record on a pushbike is 18 minutes from Superquinn Knocklyon to the Gresham on O'Connell St ( back in the day) and that is not made up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,766 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    Would they not? I'm surprised I've seen some of the spots BE get LFs into like Wicklow Town for example and would think that roundabout wouldn't be an issue for a triaxle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,753 ✭✭✭rx8


    A proper tri-axle would get into a lot of places. I agree, the BE one's are super nice to drive and to travel in, but don't you know some numpty will order the one's like the VT's that have the turning wheel nearer the front.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,487 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    And Katie Hannon takes the opportunity to try to take a swipe at BusConnects. CEO was having none of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,812 ✭✭✭Midnight_EG


    The roundabout itself wouldn't be an issue, but turning off it towards Supervalu would be



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,339 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    DLRCoCo have a consultation open on proposed bus layover points near Dundrum LUAS stop - this arises due to DLRCoCo planning to provide a civic amenity on the site of the current bus terminus beside the LUAS stop and move the buses to a more displaced set of termini.

    Details are at the link below with plans down at the bottom of the page.

    https://dlrcoco.citizenspace.com/transportation/dundrum-bus-layover-scheme/

    The consultation closes on December 7th.

    The one improvement that I can see from the original plans that were in the draft LAP (subsequently removed), is that some common sense is applying and that 6 layover places will be provided for the A2 and A4 terminus - the previous plan had only 3.

    I still consider this to be a significant downgrade in connectivity with the new termini all being anything but adjacent to the LUAS stop.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,710 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    I take it that stop 2866 will be treated as the "terminus stop" for the A2/4, L33 and 74? The L25 already has it's terminus stop as the Dundrum bypass set-down stop so not much will change there.

    Screenshot_20251114-201328.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,339 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Yes, just as it is now for the 14 and 74, stop 2866 would be the last set down stop. I don’t see too many people staying on the L25 beyond that stop to be honest.

    The 74 terminus will have to move to share with the L25 on the bypass - hence the extra bus layover space.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,710 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Actually the A2/4 will presumably start from stop 7719 on Taney Road, as they currently will keep the 14 routing via Taney Road, Sydenham Road & Kilmacud Road Upper to get across to Balinteer Road.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,339 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Well that has not been confirmed yet - there may be a pick up stop closer to the crossroads on Taney Road - there was one in the original plan in the draft LAP.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,710 ✭✭✭p_haugh




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,487 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Thanks for flagging this up. The proposed bus gate outside the library seems like a very fundamental change, routing motor traffic through a busy pedestrian area.

    image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,339 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Remember that this is predicated on the library moving to a new building where the bus terminus currently is, so that area won’t be quite as busy.

    It’ll only be a bus every 6 mins (A2 & A4) - so not high volume traffic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 353 ✭✭Kiteview


    Unless that bus gate is the sort of “bus trap” that I have seen elsewhere, lots of car drivers will just start using it for a short cut.


    And the “bus trap” I refer to is a bus gate that has a large sand filled pit in the middle. The pit is wide enough that a buses wheels can clear both sides of it but a car, being narrower, trying to use it ends up deep in the sand and the car owner would need to hire a crane to get their car out of it. Car users who get caught don’t tend to be repeat offenders 😀



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 353 ✭✭Kiteview


    Given how long it is taking to roll out BusConnects - it was initially supposed to be finished three years ago - criticism of it is justified.


    And payment by bank card has been around for a decade elsewhere in Europe, so delivering it on TFI buses etc more than a decade later is more of the perennial delay and stalling that just racks up the bill for taxpayers here.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,918 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    I think it helps that the bus gate appears to be designed such that only vehicles coming from Dundrum Main Street, and not from the Bypass, will have the correct angle to be able to use the road.

    I don't think there will be much temptation for cars to use the bus gate anyway, it would barely give you a 1 minute shortcut



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,487 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    She wasn't complaining about the speed of rollout, quite the opposite. She was suggesting that the rollout to date was responsible for passenger delays.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,738 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    And payment by bank card has been around for a decade elsewhere in Europe, so delivering it on TFI buses etc more than a decade later is more of the perennial delay and stalling that just racks up the bill for taxpayers here.

    This isn't really true, while London first to introduce tap to pay 12 years ago, people don't understand that they were the first city in the world to do it and basically developed all the technology behind it and more importantly the difficult process changes required with the banks and EMV consortium. They were way ahead of the rest of the world.

    Really it is only over the last 5 years or so that other cities have started rolling it out more widely and even then there are still many who haven't. Take Paris Metro and RER, the best transport system in Europe and one of the best in the world, they still don't support tap to pay and have no plans to do so, instead they use a card called Navigo, which is basically the same as or Leap card (though they do now have an awkward virtual version).

    I'm not really defending how long it is taking the NTA to roll this out, but it isn't as widespread or as easy as people think.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,487 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    I like the idea of a serious trap, particularly if filled with fire breathing dragons, but I suspect that a cctv camera would be the best we could hope for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,766 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    You can buy tickets through an app there so they are a bit more advanced than us. Why isn't the TFI Go app valid within Dublin it seems daft.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 756 ✭✭✭Tarabuses


    This idea is further DLRCoCo nonsense.

    Where are the new bus stops for boarding and alighting going to be? They give details of the layover sections but not bus stops. If the bus stops are to be where the layover sections are located then this is a significant downgrade of bus facilities.

    We will no longer have bus stops in a quite location next to the Luas. They will be on four sides of busy roads which pedestrians will have to cross. Where is the logic here? Are they trying to discourage public transport interchange?

    I very much oppose this ill thought out plan which will do nothing to connect public transport facilities in Dundrum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,339 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Unfortunately DLRCoCo want to build a new library and civic amenity space on the site of the current bus terminus, which isn't big enough to facilitate another high frequency route (for a route like the 14 / A2 / A4 there needs to be up to three layover spaces each).

    I don't think that the layover locations will be actual boarding / alighting stops - rather they will be locations for buses to park.

    The routes will all still set down at stop 2866 on the Main Street just opposite Bank of Ireland as they do now so that's no change.

    The 14 and subsequently A2 and A4 would still be accessible on Taney Road at stop 7718 directly from the LUAS stop via walking along Taney Drive and crossing at the pedestrian traffic lights. But there's no bus shelter there or indeed at any of the other stops.

    The 74 will have to move to the L25 terminus, which is being moved even further away along the bypass.

    You have to wonder how the NTA are agreeing to this sub-optimal solution with bus stops located quite apart from one another whereas in other locations they are building proper bus interchanges.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭Viscount Aggro


    There's talk about the developer and DLRCC doing a land swap here.

    .... The properties at Waldemar terrace and Usher House, on exchange for the council ncil car park at Sandyford road in Dundrum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 77 ✭✭hfjm20


    Is there a DB forum to talk about non-busconnects things?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,339 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    I think this thread really deals with the bus service as a whole in Dublin now.



Advertisement