Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Aer Lingus Fleet/ Routes Discussion Pt 2 (ALL possible routes included)

1296297298299300302»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 155 ✭✭Lapmo_Dancer


    On the contrary. This particular flight, during an industrial dispute which doesn’t involve him/her, would be exactly the time for the Captain to keep things by the book and not get involved. If the non flying manager wanted the cabin crew to position in Business, he should have had that reflected on the loadsheet before departure and not expected the Captain to intervene in a dispute to which he/she was not party to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,867 ✭✭✭lintdrummer


    Checking toilets and galleys for fire I'm guessing? There's a lot of electrical equipment on an A330. Think about all the power supplies and tv screens at the seats. You'd have to keep an eye on things.

    As for the 400 pilots flying I think that's probably an over simplification. But you'd have 2 pilots minimum on all narrowbody flights. Some would have 3 if there's training going on. Some of the widebody flights would have 3 for the longer flights and then you'd have some crews away overnighting at outstations. Some would be on holidays and others out sick. Some commute from abroad.

    So I think the intention was to say that of all the available pilots (around 400) 300 showed up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,337 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    I'm not a pilot but a quick sum would show that having a crew of that size sitting out of position would move the centre of gravity, even on a lightly loaded aircraft by centimetres. So the safety reason does seem to be a big stretch on the face of it but I stand open to correction. Crew would be fully aware that weight and balance can sometimes (yes, not always) be a half truth used to get passengers to comply. Theyd also know that it wouldn't have prevented crew sitting in business on other ferry flights in the past.

    And on the management side, it hardly seems like a good idea either to issue a directive in flight. That does look like a needless distraction and while it would have been less comfortable for the crew in economy, I'm sure they survived just fine. Passengers do.

    Like many disputes, it's rarely about the incident at hand fundamentally. As a complete outsider It seems that there are major unaddressed industrial relations issues that are long standing in the airline. We passengers will probably see more of these incidents and unrest until those underlying grievances are addressed and put to bed. Hopefully management and unions can see this too, for everyone's benefit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,041 ✭✭✭Qprmeath


    Your last paragraph is on the money.

    Also this quieter time of the year is the time for both sides to engage in these “petty” squabbles.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 972 ✭✭✭HTCOne


    Deviating from published procedures can get you absolutely hanged in this industry. During times of industrial unrest it is especially crucial to follow standard operating procedures to the letter so as to avoid the being nailed to the wall by anyone with an agenda in either direction. Following procedures is supposed to keep you safe. If this individual did that and is facing sanction then Just Culture is not being followed and that would be extremely concerning.

    I also still think sending a message of this petty and trivial nature whilst the aircraft is in flight is unsafe. Ring the individual after they land, or send an email/memo out to crews after the fact, but don't try and intimidate a colleague while they are performing safety critical duties.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 722 ✭✭✭Nibs05


    Any news on DEG,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,873 ✭✭✭donkey balls


    How can you have a situation were by you have Union members which has always being the case in EI, Then have non union staff? My current company is heavily involved when it comes to employees apart from mgmt having to be members of Siptu.

    Even when we have temps/summer staff working they have to join the union. I'm surprised that they employed non union members.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,867 ✭✭✭lintdrummer


    It's not compulsory to join a union in the UK or Ireland. When you say that you have temps that have to join the union, I'm guessing they are strongly encouraged to by the reps and perhaps led to believe that it's compulsory, but it isn't.

    Why some people don't join a union is a matter for them I suppose. Potential reasons might be that they don't want to pay the subscription fees, don't agree with the union policies or leadership, or maybe they had an experience before and felt the union wasn't helpful so they left.

    Personally I'd rather have the backing of a union and the strength of numbers, but I know others that don't.



Advertisement