Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Aer Lingus Fleet/ Routes Discussion Pt 2 (ALL possible routes included)

1295296297298300

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,367 ✭✭✭kevinandrew


    Strange one and impossible to judge without the full details. At face value it seems inappropriate for the COO to make such a call over a captain, the person in command of the aircraft. However I'm not sure what operational issue, other than weight and ballance, would come into play otherwise? I wouldn't have thought it would be a problem during cruise.

    It's very possible the COO overstepped the mark and that the captain wasn't justified in their original decision. The union involvement could lead to things escalating very quickly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 971 ✭✭✭HTCOne


    Sending a message like that to a Pilot mid flight is totally inappropriate. Its distracting and dangerous and I hope the Pilot filed a safety report with the IAA if true.

    Post edited by HTCOne on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,927 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Crew not part of Unite or the indusctal action…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,367 ✭✭✭kevinandrew


    Pilot is an IALPA member though, hence their involvement and why the article states they had to deny any suggestion their members may have brought industrial relations issues on board.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 511 ✭✭✭exiledawaynothere


    Is there a chief pilot?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,927 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Rule one would be deny in this or any circumstance.

    I do hope what happend was for a valid reaon and whoever may have overstepped the mark admit and move on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,713 ✭✭✭Noxegon


    Genuine question here — could there be a legitimate weight and balance issue in an empty plane if the crew sat up front?

    On the face of it it seems awfully petty to tell the crew to sit in economy.

    I develop Superior Solitaire when I'm not procrastinating on boards.ie.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,335 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    You'd imagine a wide body jet would be able to easily cope with a crew sitting out of the ideal position. They'd weigh a total of what 500-800kg on an aircraft that's 130 tonnes empty? That said a positioning flight is lightly loaded so maybe the plane is more sensitive to the location of people. Everything like that is at the captain's discretion anyway regardless.

    When passengers are told the two/three front rows are closed on an otherwise busy flight, the old weight and balance excuse gets rolled out and clearly nonsense. There it's quite obviously done for operational reasons to aid turnaround since it would have a negligible impact on the balance of the aircraft, even a relatively small one like a 737. It's just easier to say weight and balance to passengers rather than its policy to close rows to reduce the amount of cleaning and checks for turnaround. You can't question safety.

    On a quiet flight it's obviously different.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45 StakeholderValue




  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,335 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    Not sure it’s a fair comparison.

    Part of the pilots job is to communicate with the company.
    A communication was obviously sent.
    The crew I believe have an agreement whereby if they have to position, and a business seat is free, they are entitled to use it.

    Reading between the lines here, I think this captain wasn’t happy the company sent a Dublin based (non Unite) non striking crew to operate this flight.
    It seems a challenge to an agreement (about positioning in business class where available) was made and a member of management clarified the procedure and agreement.
    This wasn’t to the liking of the pilot and pilots union.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,713 ✭✭✭Noxegon


    If the Irish Times article is correct, then the crew was Manchester-based but non-union.

    I agree that it's utterly inappropriate for management to send a message like that to a pilot mid-flight. I think the pilot's decision to file a safety report is absolutely justified.

    That being said, IMHO telling cabin crew to sit in economy in an empty plane because they're not part of your union is at best unprofessional – especially since these are people who you will likely be working with again at some point. Nobody needs a pissing match between staff on board an aircraft.

    I think the correct solution for all parties would have been to have a tea and biscuits session after landing to decide if further action is warranted.

    I develop Superior Solitaire when I'm not procrastinating on boards.ie.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45 StakeholderValue


    Aer Lingus claim they put safety first and its pilots have just passed a unanimous motion of no confidence in its CEO and COO on safety grounds. Hard to see how CEO and COO remain in their positions with any credibility after this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11 airboos


    If the company wanted the cabin crew in business class then why not ticket them as such and account for their position on the aircraft for weight and balance from the get go. My understanding was that the cabin crew were in uniform, passed through the airport in question using staff channels, they sat at their normal operating positions for take off and landing and that the loadsheet was prepared and the flight operated on this basis.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,863 ✭✭✭lintdrummer


    The crew I believe have an agreement whereby if they have to position, and a business seat is free, they are entitled to use it.

    Open to correction but I think that's the case for Flight Deck crew but not Cabin Crew.

    I have heard other details about this story and my conclusion is that the managers were way out of line and the captain was correct to ignore this nonsense in flight. How they ended up suspending him is hard to fathom.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,863 ✭✭✭lintdrummer


    Good point, if they were entitled to business class seats from the off then surely they would have been given those seats at check in.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,335 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    They were essentially operating a ferry/positioning flight, so I doubt there was even an option to check in.
    There were probably no desks open as no pax.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,335 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    I’m told it is most definitely an agreement for Irish based crew anyway and it’s on an availability basis.
    If they seats are available the crew are entitled to sit in them.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,335 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    Tbh i wouldn’t see it as anything other than Industrial relations tit for tat as we always see in these sort of disputes.
    Something that will hopefully blow over in a few weeks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45 StakeholderValue


    I’m afraid this is clearly a safety issue. Not an industrial relations issue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 411 ✭✭user060916


    Genuine question - is the safety issue the fact they moved to sit into business seats or the fact the COO sent a message?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,713 ✭✭✭Noxegon


    From everything I've read they did not move to the business class seats. The cabin crew did what they were required to do, which was obey the instruction of the aircraft captain.

    It sounds to me very much like the captain was flexing his ego, but any discussion on that point should wait until after landing rather than during flight.

    The safety issue is that someone on the ground attempted to override the decision of the captain in flight.

    I develop Superior Solitaire when I'm not procrastinating on boards.ie.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 411 ✭✭user060916


    I suppose my question is was there a safety issue with them moving to the business class seats?

    I understand shouldn't interfere with PIC, but if there was no safety issue with them moving, the pilot does not sound like someone I want in charge of any aircraft I'm flying in.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,335 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    Basically no, and if there was a safety reason for the crew not being allowed to sit in a business seat for the duration of the flights cruise i would love to hear in detail what the “safety “ reasons are!



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,335 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    I don’t really see how safety was compromised at all.
    Someone on the ground may have sent a message but at no point was the captain no longer the captain.
    What I see here is a power struggle, should the captain be reprimanded for punishing cabin crew in a petty power move? Probably not. But it’s also true that it’s not the captains place to punish crew for an industrial relations issue.

    This all boils down to an industrial relations row.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭Qprmeath


    EI Handling taking over the loading of American Airlines flights in Dublin in a couple of weeks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,713 ✭✭✭Noxegon


    Many of us respond emotionally when we are given out to and/or given an instruction that we disagree with.

    It's not a good idea to do that to the person in charge of an aircraft in flight, ever.

    I develop Superior Solitaire when I'm not procrastinating on boards.ie.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,335 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    Indeed!
    And it probably shouldn’t have happened the way it did, it’s also true that an emotional response was already in play onboard that aircraft, by the captain weighing in on an industrial relations row. It was not his place to punish the cabin crew involved here. That was an emotional response on his part to an issue that had nothing to do with the operation of that flight on that day.
    He caused a CRM issue out of a Union row.

    That is a safety issue!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,713 ✭✭✭Noxegon


    ….and that's why, assuming the reporting is accurate, that I think his suspension is justified.

    I develop Superior Solitaire when I'm not procrastinating on boards.ie.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 151 ✭✭Lapmo_Dancer


    How did he “weigh in”? It seems to me that he didn’t get involved. The non flying manager attempted to bring the industrial row into the flight deck mid flight by ordering the Capt to reward picket crossing cabin crew by moving them from their operating seats as per the load sheet to business class. He rightly ignored it and didn’t get involved. If that’s what the non flying manager wanted, It should have been sorted out on the ground pre departure.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,367 ✭✭✭kevinandrew


    It boils down to the nature of the message from the COO, messages sent inflight is not in itself a safety issue. However if it was an order to the captain to let cabin crew sit in business class, then yes that's a safety issue as he's attempted to overrule the person in command of the aircraft. If however the message was worded as a simple clarification of company policy, that crew can sit in business class if available, I'm less convinced this can be seen as a safety issue.

    It does appear increasingly like an industrial issue has been brought on board with the captain's initial decision making, an IALPA union member flying non-unionised cabin crew to operate a flight during Unite strike action.

    This appears to have been escalated very quickly while investigations are ongoing which is unfortunate.



Advertisement