Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

BusConnects Dublin - Bus Network Changes Discussion

1555556557559561

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,313 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    The point being they need to rework the timetable to something more realistic



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,952 ✭✭✭tnegun


    As we're discussing timetables! My daughter missed this W6 in Tallaght https://bustimes.org/vehicles/650487?date=2025-10-29#journeys/798397788 she said it was a no-show. It looks to me like it may have been delayed getting to Tallaght after working a W4 to Blanchardstown, so it started the W6 mid route to get back on time?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,594 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    Who is in charge of writing the schedules? NTA?
    How does a non working schedule get highlighted to the NTA (if it’s them that write the schedules) to be re written?
    How many people do the NTA have working on the schedules?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 568 ✭✭✭B2021M


    I'm glad somebody is finally asking these qs. Simply unacceptable to have buses in zero traffic travelling at about 15 mph



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 299 ✭✭Stephen Gawking


    None. The NTA publish timetables, the operators do schedules based on that for lowest cost. As far as the NTA are concerned schedules are a matter between employers & employees. They couldn't care.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,301 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    That’s not correct.

    The NTA draw up the initial schedules for the routes in each phase of BusConnects, while the bus companies draw up the rosters to operate them.

    Thereafter, the bus companies take them over.

    Sorting them out can take weeks, especially if they need more resources (as was the case with the G-Spine).

    Within hours of this coming into operation, you can be fairly sure that the operators will have become aware that the schedules are not working - the drivers will certainly be making noise about the lack of running time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,301 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    That’s exactly what it looks like - it was 15 mins late getting to Blanchardstown.

    That is a daft decision on a route that infrequent and not acceptable.

    Far too often the operators are trying to avoid penalties by resuming mid-route without looking at the picture of people being left behind at certain stops.

    Post edited by LXFlyer on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,301 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The timetable is actually wrong though, that’s the fundamental problem here.

    It’s pure BS.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,672 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    So how do they continue to botch spine launch after launch without learning any lessons what so ever?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 814 ✭✭✭BP_RS3813


    We don't learn lessons in Ireland don't ya know? Have to feck it up ourselves multiple times instead of looking at tried and true methods or learning from our mistakes.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,275 ✭✭✭trellheim


    What spine launch is this now 3rd or 4th and still can't get it right ( and I fully expect bedding-in issues), this is like nothing whatever has been learnt , and a penalty regime that encourages bad behaviour.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79 ✭✭Taisteal Éireann


    Is there a more unrealistic scheduled service than this one?

    https://bustimes.org/trips/548238929

    37 minutes from Newcastle to the City Centre with loops of Charlesland and Cherrywood included. You couldn't even do that in a car in the middle of the night!

    While it was never, ever going to be on time, the bus got to its destination 49 minutes late this morning.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 162 ✭✭The Mathematician


    Yes I agree with that. But there is no way a bus driver should take it on themselves to leave 15 minutes early, especially for the last bus.

    If we want people to use public transport then it is absolutely vital that it is reliable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 299 ✭✭Stephen Gawking


    Ok, I was told otherwise, thanks for clarifying, every day is a school day.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,301 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Ok to be clear here.

    The bus left the terminus on time. The driver did not “take it on themselves to leave 15 mins early”.

    You really need to look at the map on bustimes and check the actual timestamps before making statements like that - that’s the second time you’ve accused a driver of leaving early without any foundation. Any driver doing that would set alarms off in central control.

    The bus was on time per the “schedule” until Glasnevin.

    The running times are wrong mid-route in Glasnevin between Ballygall Road East and Old Finglas Road creating artificially lengthy journey times.

    The scheduler has put in 11 minutes to travel between three stops when it should only be 1 minute.

    The timetable is therefore wrong.

    The effect of this is that buses are likely to show up at stops beyond that point faster than the “schedule” because the “schedule” is wrong.

    It also means that if you look for a 24 further along the route inbound than Old Finglas Road on RTPI before the next bus has passed that point, then the buses are likely to arrive at stops further along the route faster than the RTPI will have told you because the running times are wrong.

    The schedule needs to be fixed as it is not fit for purpose. I suspect that this has been copped on by the bus company and the drivers have been told to keep going.

    Also, a further point - there are set locations agreed with the unions along each route where buses will pull in and wait for up to 2 minutes if they are potentially ahead of schedule due to light traffic etc.

    These locations are ones where it is safe for the bus to wait for a short period without causing disruption to other drivers.

    What I am trying to get across here is that people are putting far too much faith in the schedule being right.

    That’s the issue here - the schedule is wrong - it’s got added time mid-route that shouldn’t be there and is therefore saying that the bus should arrive at stops later than it actually will.

    Post edited by LXFlyer on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 162 ✭✭The Mathematician


    When I said 'left', I meant left Glasnevin, rather than left the terminus. Perhaps I should have said that explicitly, but I thought it was clear we were talking about the picture in Post 17634.

    Maybe I am under a misapprehension, but I am going by what bustimes calls 'timing points'. I am assuming thats buses should not leave these points more than one minute early. If that is not the case, then there is no point in having a timetable, we should go back to the old system of just detailing when the buses leave the terminus.

    In my opinion, the timing points are one of the gamechangers in Bus Connects and it is vital that they are adhered to. If not, what is a passenger going for the last 24 from Glasnevin to do? Should they aim to be at the stop say 20 minutes early, and then have to wait 20 minutes if the bus is on time? Or should they aim to arrive 5 minutes early and then miss the last bus if it does arrive 15 minutes early? More likely they will just decide to go by car next time. And while this will not have much impact on the traffic at that time of night, their journey in the other direction might be at peak hours.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,301 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Again the timetable in this case is WRONG.

    I don’t know how many times I can write this or how else I can put it.

    You’re measuring the bus against something that is wrong because someone goofed in preparing the running times along the route.

    That error needs to be fixed ASAP.

    As far as punctuality is concerned, the NTA measures punctuality at every single stop - the “timing points” on Bustimes are irrelevant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 162 ✭✭The Mathematician


    Yes but how are passengers (who are not transport enthusiasts) supposd to know that? We can agree to differ, but my opinion is that the last bus leaving a timing point 15 minutes early (relative to the published timetable) is absolutely disastrous customer service. It is like Tesco advertising that they close at 11pm and you arriving at 10.45pm and being told 'sorry the advertised hours are wrong'.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48 burgerKev


    Is it me of have they broken up a load of routes so where you used to only have to get one bus you now need 2 or 3?

    IS this just to get people paying more fares?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,301 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    First of all I’m not a transport enthusiast - I’m someone who has an interest in the business of public transport.

    Secondly, the company and the NTA just need to get the finger out and sort the timetable out ASAP. It’s a mess entirely of their own making because someone messed up when preparing the schedule.

    As I’ve pointed out - there are no “timing points” - every stop is measured.

    Sadly this is far from the first time that this or similar has happened.

    But I do also think that blaming a driver for something that is not his fault is not right either.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,313 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    What? The new routes are longer so they're not broken up, and the fares are the same. What do you mean?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,310 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Some routes have been replaced with situations where you will need to connect; but if everything is running as expected you should have similar end to end journey times and more frequency. Not every street can get a route to everywhere else.

    Leapcard fare covers unlimited transfers within 90mins



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,301 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    It’s a new network - that’s means things will change.

    There are going to be winners and losers.

    Whether people need to connect now is entirely dependent upon their particular journey - some will and some won’t.

    No one is paying more money - the TFI 90 €2 fare allows you to transfer as many times as you need to within 90 mins at no extra fare.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 162 ✭✭The Mathematician


    Sorry, I must have misunderstood your reply in Post 16728. I assumed you meant that buses should not past a timing point more than 1 minute early. If there are no timing points, then does that mean the time is only taken at the start of the route? If so, we are back to the old system of just detailing the times buses leave the terminus. I'm afraid that is not going to do anything to get people out of their cars.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 568 ✭✭✭B2021M


    How do they make these timing errors? Do the drivers review the reasonableness of the timing points before they are enacted? Or is it all done by people with no local knowledge?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,301 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    No, you are misinterpreting me.

    I was referring to the "timing points" on BusTimes - these are not official timing points per se in Dublin Bus.

    The NTA measure punctuality against every bus stop along the route (something utterly unique that I have never seen anywhere else). The "Pressit" Box in the cab (which measures where the bus is compared to schedule) will start buzzing if the bus is running early.

    Now that being said, it is not realistic to abide by that all of the time as many stops are not suited to a bus stopping for any longer than it takes for passengers to board or exit.

    My understanding is that Dublin Bus have agreements with the unions that where buses are running ahead of the schedule, which can happen if traffic is particularly light, that buses will wait at certain agreed stops along each route that are safe and suitable for a bus to wait at (these are a relatively small number of stops along each route but are not in the public domain) for up to 2 minutes, but no longer, to try and get the bus back on time.

    Now this particular situation on the 24 is way beyond that because someone has made a total mess of scheduling the timetable massively beyond what is recoverable and doing so would breach the agreed procedures.

    The only way that can be addressed is with a new timetable. That needs to happen ASAP.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 162 ✭✭The Mathematician


    Well that is extremely disappointing. I thought we were at last going to get a proper bus service that we could rely on. My experience with the S6 is that buses do stop if they are running early, and for longer than 2 minutes. Apparently this is not widespread. I wonder if it is a difference between Go Ahead and Dublin Bus.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28 pk1991


    A lot of the current commentary is around the F-Spine & 23/24 but I am curious if the same issues are present with the 83 80,82 etc. launched during this phase?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,301 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    I’m not sure what you expect?

    Buses to wait at every single stop? That is simply not practical from a safety perspective from a start.

    If the timetable is done properly, buses shouldn’t be waiting anywhere, but it will occasionally happen due to light traffic or light numbers using the bus.

    They certainly shouldn’t need to wait for longer than 2 minutes anywhere. If they are then the timetable is badly designed.

    That just gets people’s backs up who are already on the bus.

    Earlier this week I was on a Dublin Bus service at 06:30 that paused to catch up time three times en route to the city centre, and is scheduled so slowly that the bus rarely exceeded 30kph, and is taking 10+ longer than it used to totally unnecessarily. That is just utterly frustrating.

    There is a trade-off to be struck here. But the bottom line is that the schedules need to be right in the first place. They should be achievable but not at crawling speed.

    The reality is that most bus routes don’t have enough running time to get from one end of the route to the other at peak times - in fact the 23 & 24 have that very issue at other locations.

    Until the core bus corridors are rolled out with the necessary enforcement then unfortunately the bus service is subject to the vagaries of Dublin traffic.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,301 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The 80 and 82 are both suffering from running time issues particularly at and around peak times.

    In other words, the running times are too tight and the result is that some trips are being cancelled or curtailed to start mid-route.

    Basically, every route bar the L89 needs revised timetables.



Advertisement