Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Manchester United Thread 25/26 - Teamtalk/Transfers/Gossip Mod Note in OP 26.09.24

1120712081210121212131308

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,874 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Mainoo left his desire to go on loan comically late in the window.

    If he announced in late July something mighta been worked out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,902 ✭✭✭keeponhurling


    You'd hope that if Mainoo can perform well when given the chance, then he can push Casemiro out of the team.

    Casemiro will leave next summer anyways. Also possible Bruno will leave.

    Definitely keep him, he's still young.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,769 ✭✭✭crusd


    For Bruno we need at look at Liverpool with Coutinho, best player but when he moved on Salah was unstoppable for the rest of the season, goals per game went up and reached CL final, then used proceeds to sign Alisson in the following summer.

    At a certain point may still be perceived as the best player but their overall value to the team is diminished. And his performances on the pitch have significantly deteriorated also. Should be so long and thanks for your service next summer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,408 ✭✭✭caviardreams


    TBF I would say he probably thought he would get decent game time and only wanted to go on loan when he discovered he wouldn't which is fair enough imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,603 ✭✭✭randd1


    Is there too much made of Mainoo?

    He's a good player with real potential no doubt, but hardly world class looking either. For me, he lacks intensity and fitness for the two man midfield, and his tracking back leads a lot to be desired for that position. He's certainly much better going forward, but he's not a control the middle/guardian of the defence type midfielder, on evidence seen so far at least. He reminds me a lot like Bruno, and maybe that's the problem for Amorim, why play someone like Bruno when you can play Bruno. Neither are pulling up any trees at the minute, so go with the one you know is the better player, and right now that's Bruno.

    But Mainoo isn't going to get better if he's not getting games too. I would argue too he's more a player than plays in front of a holding midfielder than being a central midfielder outright, so there's an argument he's being played out of position when he does play, which isn't going to help him get games wither as he doesn't shine when he does play. He seems more of a player more suited to 3 in the middle than one dropping deep, and in the current setup there's more proven options, so he's not getting the games.

    In al honesty, if Amorim turns the ship around and ends up sticking around as manager, Mainoo's career will probably be outside Old Trafford. As a young player, you wouldn't blame him from going, or wanting to, if he knows he's not going to be getting games.

    But I don't think he's the type of player that'll drive the club forward at the same time. Maybe I'm wrong and he turns out to be top quality, but I'm not seeing at the minute. Put it this way, if he's not going to be a regular, and we sold Mainoo for 50m and used it towards getting Baleba for 90m, I'd take it right now.

    Honestly, I don't see him being the player his earlier appearances promised him to be, and I certainly can't see Mainoo doing anything for us under Amorim's system where he's either looks surplus to requirements or not at the races.

    A move away might be his best option if he wants to play regularly.

    The big problem I would see with shipping off another young player is that it send out the message to other youngsters that United won't develop you properly or give you a proper chance. That would hardly entice younger players to choose United, especially if he starting ripping it up away from United.

    Hard to know what to make of it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,710 ✭✭✭Caustic


    This is pretty much bang on the money for me about Bruno, obviously he is a talented guy and one thing he certainly has over counthino is work rate he does bust his arse every game even if some of that work could be done smarter not harder.

    People will point to his goal and assist numbers at united and the argument for sure has merit but he has been pretty much been the sole creator in the team for years now, plays every minute, taken every free kick and corner until recently and had license to play as many low percentage balls as he wanted as no one else had any ability to create.

    Most would have seen hojund goal assisted by de byrune for Napoli and lovely through ball that splits the two defenders and perfect for hojund to run on and finish Bruno just doesn't have that in his locker near often enough to be considered a great player for me, he has a range of passing and an ability to find players but it's always to wide players in space or balls over the top for them to run into. The only forward he has ever had a good connection with at united was Ronaldo but again it was much more crossing or short passes for shots.

    His whinging and inability to take responsibility for his mistakes must also be exhausting especially when he is having one of his really **** games.

    He is a good player on his day a very good player but with his inconsistency in performance levels and bad attitude, he shouldn't be considering the best player or captain at a club who has ambitions for too prizes



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 488 ✭✭kyleman


    If Mainoo could have the same work rate as Bruno he probably would get a lot more playing time.

    From reports Bruno could be gone in the summer but unless Mainoo can physically mature he will still struggle for game time even then.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,936 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Bruno as a 10 was difficult to repalce.

    But we have, effectively, done that. We signed Cunha and Mbeumo. We play mount there ahead of him. We play Amad there ahead of him.

    Bruno as an 8 is not difficult to replace, imo.

    His presence and attitude around the club? I would say so, but as an 8? I just don't see it. I think, similar to Countinho, Bruno is already surplus to needs and the team could be quite easily improved in terms of balance after selling him (or dropping him as a CM).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 488 ✭✭kyleman


    He will be an easy sell. Even at his age one of our few players that will command a huge fee.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,309 ✭✭✭davemckenna25


    Mainoo has never struck me as a defensive midfielder, so to be honest, I dont see him replacing Casemiro.

    You obviously must view him as a defensive midfielder if you think he could replace him.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,261 ✭✭✭✭billyhead


    I see SJR wants Amorim in charge for the next 3 years. God help us.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,936 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Uh huh.

    If you chose to ignore him being here a year already.

    And yeah, I think it would be much better if the owner said he'll be sacked if we don't beat Liverpool, would be a much better way to run things.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,180 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    I think the fee wont be as dramatic as it might have been this year. By next summer he will have just 12 months left on his contract. He will be about to turn 32. The highest fee the Saudis have ever paid for a player was 90 million Euro for Neymar, which was about 75m GBP when Neymar had 2 years left on his deal.

    I would think Bruno would go for less than 75m. Maybe significantly less. Given his record at the club, if he isn't motivated by Saudi money and wants a return to Portugal (for example) instead, the club wont be in a good position to be seen to force him into a move he doesn't want. And if he isn't sold next summer, the only choice is to extend his deal for another 3-4 years (nope) or let him leave for free in 2027 (also nope).

    Don't get me wrong - he will raise a good fee, but talk of huge 9 figure deals is unbelievable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,168 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    Saying "3 years" in an interview is daft. If Amorim keeps losing, he will be sacked and Sir Big Jim will look like a fool.

    Put your money where yer mouth is... Subscribe and Save Boards!

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,300 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    only taking this from sky, so presume its not the full interview. its all bollox anyway, cos he will be sacked if results dont improve dramatically. jim also mentions would, thats not definitive.

    arteta having a miserable time is not entirely accurate. he improved the team, amorim has disimproved our team.

    arteta: finished 8th (took over in 11th, 23 points from 18 games) and won an fa cup, 8th again, 5th, 2nd.

    amorim: finished 15th (took over when we were 13th, 22 points from 17 games)

    "Ruben needs to demonstrate he is a great coach over three years"

    Asked if Amorim is going to get three years, Ratcliffe replied: "Yes. That is where I would be. Three years. Because football is not overnight.

    "It's three years. You also look at [Mikel] Arteta at Arsenal. He had a miserable time over the first couple of years. "We have to be patient. We have a long-term plan. It isn't a light switch.

    "You can't run a club like Manchester United on knee-jerk reactions to some journalist who goes off on one every week."

    Asked what would happen if the Glazers told him to sack Amorim, Ratcliffe said: "It's not going to happen."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 217 ✭✭1wizards sleeve


    Sky haven't stopped talking and analysing amorin and his system in 12 months. Its a non stop targeting that no other club or manager will get. And the past utd players constantly giving him grief, they obviously didn't save enough of their wages to constantly feel the need to criticise him. Im praying he is successful.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 397 ✭✭Iecrawfc


    Feel its a year too late for getting big money for him



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 32,453 ✭✭✭✭Mars Bar


    The women's team beat Valarenga last night 1-0 to secure the clubs first ever women's championships league victory 🥳



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,437 ✭✭✭Quags




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,776 ✭✭✭Iseedeadpixels


    I'm gonna call BS on that tbh, prob trying to drum up hype for a friendly.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,603 ✭✭✭randd1


    Or maybe its because United are box office, and garner that much attention?

    Or because United are the biggest supported club in the world by a mile, and who's image and international fanbase help build the Premier League into what it is, and consequently drove Sky's power as a TV provider?

    Or perhaps it's to do with what can only be described as one of the worst managerial appointments in the clubs history and the fascination around it as the world's biggest club falls down repeatedly under said manager?

    Or all of the above.

    There's a worse scenario, and that is they never mention United at all, either because we've become an irrelevance to the league, or we're relegated from it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,603 ✭✭✭randd1


    It doesn't exactly inspire confidence all the same.

    It's one thing to stick by the manager in tough times, it's another to accept what this manager is doing as being good enough since he first walked into the job and stick with him.

    You'd hope that interview was simply a case of talking out of one side of his mouth while the other side was saying the opposite in private, because if that's in any way genuine how Ratcliffe and INEOS are going to approach the club, then the club is in serious trouble.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,936 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    I would say there is zero chance we are on the verge of being sold - waaayyyyy too complicated for it to just appear like that.

    The glazers CAN solicit new interest, as of August, but to force Ineos to sell their shares the new investor has to agree to buy ALL the shares (A and B) for $35 - and even then INEOS would have to reject the opportunity to match that offer and buy the shares themselves.

    What I could see happen, and I still don't think we'd be on the verge of it with little scuttle about it before hand, is someone coming in to purchase a large stake in the club, to come in as a partner to INEOS, with the main part of their money being used to (1) pay out the glazers to some level and (2) fund the stadium to some level. I think any additional investment at this point is going to be stadium related and not a change away from INEOS in general.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,961 ✭✭✭✭Zeek12


    Except that's not unique to Amorim. United are a bad Soap Opera and are a dream for the likes of Sky and the media at large. ETH and Ole had this constant scrutiny and criticism all the time. Mourinho too.

    Utd seems to be a club constantly in a state of turmoil,….."Coach is under pressure, the signings have been crap, the owners are useless, the team has no identity" etc. etc. etc.

    Its just part of the job.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭johnnyryan89


    Didn't he play as the 6 for England when they got to the finals of Euro 2024? Now that would never work with the current midfield options but if they pull off the signings of Baleba and Anderson I can see Mainoo playing as the deeper midfielder of the two. It's already been reported that they see Baleba as a replacement for Bruno.

    Yup when you see that they supposedly want to bring in both Baleba and Anderson they're targeting athletic midfielders that can play ball. Mainoo will have his work cut out to force his way into the starting XI if both are brought in or even one of them and someone else of a similar profile.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 576 ✭✭✭Seattle


    You should listen to the interview.

    The interviewer caught him on the hop slightly with the way he phrased a follow up question. He first asked a general, open ended question about Amorim. Ratcliffe responded saying it hasn't been the best of starts but things take time and he can't be following the whims of the media all the time. Then the interviewer asked a tricky question - he said '...so Amorim is safe until the end of the season whatever happens' or something along those lines. Ratcliffe paused, because he didn't want to affirm that. He was clearly thinking of a way to answer the question without committing to saying he will definitely last the season. And then he answers a question he wasn't asked - he said for Amorim to prove he's a great coach, he needs 3 years. Honestly I wouldn't read much into it, he clearly didn't want to be seen to be undermining the manager or signalling a lack of confidence in him which is the right thing to do while he's still at the club.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,168 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    it might take 3 years for him to prove he's a great coach, but he can prove he's a terrible coach much quicker than that.

    Put your money where yer mouth is... Subscribe and Save Boards!

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,211 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    I think that if Real Madrid/Barca/Bayern/Liverpool were in 15th place and couldn't win 2 games in a row you would be hearing a hell of a lot about it.

    The crazy thing isn't that pundits are constantly talking about Manchester United, it's that even they have normalised the historically bad performance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,936 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    I have no doubt aht SJR doesn't want to sack him.

    Clearly everyone would like Amorim to work out - that is only a good thing.

    I have no doubt he will sack him if it is decided he isn't working out.

    Even the talk of 3 years (2.7?) is silly cause I think there is very little chance we go into next season with him going into the last 9 months of his contract. So at the end of this season (At the latest, imo) we will have to decide to sack him, or give him a new contract - and imo he will have to earn that new contract by showing significant and sustained improvement over the coming season. What we are seeing right now in terms of results won't keep him in his job - its all well and good the club feeling the underlyings are improved or work at the club is going well - we need to see that translate to points. and i reckon that is the view at the club; they see reasons for failings or understand the failings, but the mitigation will only last so long or excuse so much.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,299 ✭✭✭Charlie69


    That would be Leeds United in 15th place though.



Advertisement