Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

DART+ (DART Expansion)

1415416417418419421»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74,183 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The DART+SW RO details the underpinning and enbankment works that will be required. There's no extant OHLE there obviously, but things can be worked around. Particularly if all services are being operated by BEMU, which would allow just removing OHLE for a segment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,505 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/123890163#Comment_123890163

    DART+ between Parkwest and Heuston is not comparable to between Killester and Raheny. Parkwest to Heuston has working space and full accessibility along the northern side as far as Inchicore. Then there is the CIE owned Inchicore works to the south. A track may have to be closed to allow for working space on the trackbed, while rail operations continue on the other two tracks. They'll probably put up hoarding to separate the works area from the railway. You also don't have OHLE to worry about which significantly reduces the risk of operating machinery based the tracks and makes closing and reopening a track easier and quicker.

    West of Inchicore is more constrained but is generally wider and less steep embankments. That whole section needs to be reengineered anyway, including adjusting trackbed, realigning tracks, OHLE cables and supports, new signaling and drainage, etc. Even if not widening, you would still have major works there just more electrification so including the widening works doesn't add hugely to the complexity or disruption.

    And I didn't say that additional tracks on the Northern Line was impossible but it would involve significant disruption to rail operations and major CPO of private houses. I suspect that the report will say lots of things are possible but the full impacts of them would have to be assessed in further detail. Basically kick the can down the road in the hope the consultant gets another gig out it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,092 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    Why does driving sheet piling roughly halyway into the embankment to create a temporary work area to the sides of the running lines pose such a problem? Drive the sheet piling in, excavate a level work area outside the running lines and then you've got your access outside the running lines. It's almost certainly been done before elsewhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,092 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    The point L1011 made is also excellent…the new rolling stock with be BEMU. Just take the catenary down section by section if it's in the way!



Advertisement