Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

DART+ (DART Expansion)

1415416417419421

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 116 ✭✭citizen6


    If they go high density with housing on that site, would it be worth putting in a new Dart station half way between Clontarf Road and Killester?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,192 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Or closing Killester and having a new one closer to the city.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 116 ✭✭citizen6


    Yeah ideally Killester station would be at the north east corner of the golf course, off Collins Ave. Not sure that moving it is a priority though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 471 ✭✭PlatformNine


    Clontarf Rd and Killester Stations are about 1.7km apart (from end of platforms), which is probably far enough that it would be fine to put another station inbetween them. Especially considering it is only the second station from Connolly and that if Clontarf Golf Club was redeveloped (as it should be!) it could house thousands.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,370 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    Better off just moving Killester a bit more south, and locate the station where the golf course is.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,370 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    Removing current Killester station makes it a lot easier for any quad tracking plans.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 471 ✭✭PlatformNine


    Ehhhh, Killester quad tracking may not be easy but neither will the other stations, and if anything I think might be one of the easier stations to quad track as there are plenty of large back gardens to use. Which is also why I believe it is important to keep it roughly where it is, and then open a new station for a redeveloped Clontarf Golf Club, as the spacing would be pretty even for the first few stations.

    tbh, I think if the location of Killester is a problem we might as well give up any hope of quadtracking. Harmonstown and Raheny would be just as difficult to quadtrack, and Killbarrack (which is likely the hardest to upgrade) would just have to be closed.

    That said I would support shifting the station and platforms about 50-75 metres south to Collins Ave as someone else said. That could add a little extra to quadtrack (although I am not sure if it is practically any different), but more importantly it would be an easy connection to the bus stop which serves the N4 and 104/8.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,192 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    I’d say there is zero chance of Kilbarrack closing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,370 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    Moving the station removes the need to take a lot of back gardens along that section.

    You don't need to be so defeatist. Not every problem carries equal weight, and some solutions are easier than others.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,674 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Actually I just realised “Killester DART station” car park is to the South of Collins Avenue, a good 500meters and across a busy road from the entrance to the actual DART station! Absolutely mad stuff.

    I’d vote for moving it to south of Collins Avenue, next to the car park. Not only next to the car park and big new development, but also an entrance directly onto the very important N4 stops and the H stops around the corner. Much better location then where it currently is.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 823 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    I also never realized there is a car park there. This makes it even more ridiculous that there isn't a southern entrance to the platforms.

    The end of the current platforms are only 70m from the overbridge. Versus >400m to the actual entrance. No need to move the entire station, at least until 4North, if even then.

    1000024458.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,192 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    I think it’s safe to say the current location for Killester station isn’t good enough in this day and age.

    It should definitely be on a main road connecting with other public transport and not hidden in the middle of housing estate.

    The cost of building a new one would be money well spent and if allows for more four tracking, even better.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,674 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I’d fully support either solutions, though I expect it might just be easier to move it South for quad tracking.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 218 ✭✭OisinCooke


    It is quite useful to know that CIE already own 2 acres of the gold club site, I wonder which part of the site it is. If it’s the track-side of the site that would be a great advent for DART Underground, given the site would be probably the best place for the northern tie-in.

    Still intriguing to know that finally there’s a potential plan to relocate the golf course. How likely is this to actually happen is the only thing I’m wondering…?



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,674 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Ah, it turns out Clontarf Station was originally in this area, I think half way along the golf club if I’m to guess! It closed in 1956 and they moved to the new Clontarf Road Station!

    I didn’t know that!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,512 ✭✭✭bikeman1


    Clontarf station was a basic halt with two simple platforms. It was located at the bridge over the Howth Road. The old station building is still there.

    https://maps.app.goo.gl/CumyBo6ABS7bf8G4A?g_st=ipc



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,049 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    The old station house is still there, with the steps at the bridge up to the platform still there, being used by IR staff as access.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,674 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Thanks to you both, I was just coming back to correct myself after looking it up, but you are both too fast :) Further south than I thought. I’ve passed there hundreds of times but never noticed! Very interesting bit of history.

    Good view of the steps up to it on Google Maps:

    https://maps.app.goo.gl/4hAUzzN46Fpz4YrQA And the station house if you swing it to the right.

    Some old pictures of it here:

    http://eiretrains.com/Photo_Gallery/Railway%20Stations%20C/Clontarf/IrishRailwayStations.html#Clontarf_20090622_100_CC_JA.jpg

    Just south of Collins Avenue is probably a better spot once quad tracking happens.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,192 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Also very curious about what two acres they own, but it probably isn’t hugely important as it can be used in a land swap.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,674 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I looked up the DCC zoning report and while it confirms the CIE ownership, it doesn't show where. I'd guess it is along the rail line.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,448 ✭✭✭spillit67


    I’d like to removal of the DART car parking to the east of Clontarf Road as part of any development here. In it’s place put in a smaller land consuming multi-storey P&R as part of any Clontarf Golf Club development.

    Improving density around that station should surely be a goal. It’s great that it’s surrounded by a park, a health club and sporting facilities but it is sorely lacking residential. There must be decent scope here to even build out Clontarf Road station as it is into a mixed use site.

    In terms of the Clontarf GC lands and 4 North. Irrespective of a wider project going ahead here, how useful would passing loops be for this stretch?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,370 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    Nah mate, can't build there. There's a sewer pipe. That's why DCC insisted in leasing the area to the local gym for a car park, rather than look at building housing there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,448 ✭✭✭spillit67




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,992 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    Quad tracking is dead. It will never happen (Even though it probbaly needs to)
    ABP allowed large developments to be built right up to the track edge. We're not talking about taking some garden space or knocking a 3 bed Semi-D. we're talking about knocking entire blocks of apartments and even cutting off people from road, water, sewage, power access for weeks while new bridges are built.

    The Problem is Connolly in any case, there is not enough platforms and no grade seperatation.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,511 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    The latter problem can be solved with Dart+ tunnel. This will provide the necessary grade separation.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,511 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    I just had a read of the Wikipedia page on Killester station. Interesting history. It opened in 1845 on Collins Ave but only lasted two years. It then reopened in 1923 at the current site when the area must have still had very little in it. But as the 20th century progressed it ended up at the centre of a huge amount of development. When the Dart was created, I guess they just grandfathered it in even though they surely must’ve known it was in a poor location.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,263 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    Quad tracking is an active project though. You'd be amazed what can be done. Of course we're talking a couple of billion



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,192 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    At a guess, with a lack of money in the 80s, it just wasn’t a priority.

    Was always very odd tho the relatively long distance the DART travelled non-stop between Killester and Connolly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,173 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Ah so you clearly know more than the engineers who are currently carrying out an EU funded feasibility study into the options to expand track capacity on the Northern Line.

    There is a full project team working on “Project Four North” so perhaps you should tell them that they should give up now?

    Frankly none of us know the actual answer to what is feasible in terms of additional line capacity, and that is what this study will finally answer.

    Capacity certainly is an issue on the Northern line due to the inability of semi-fast or Enterprise services to be able to overtake stopping services until Clongriffin. Connolly has no impact on that.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,674 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Obviously we will need to wait and see the report. But personally I don't see anything particular about the line that would make it impossible, certainly no extreme difficulty like the coastal south faces. In fact much of the line looks like it already has sufficient space for quad tracking.

    Sure, I know it isn't that simple, there are some pinch points that would require CPO's and bridge widenings, etc. but nothing too wild IMO.

    My opinion is that it will have to happen at some stage regardless. DART+ is going to go to 10 minute frequency, could we see it go to 5 minute frequency on the Northern line at some point in the future like is apparently being planned for the coastal south line? Could we see the Enterprise with new trains eventually go to 30 minute service?

    Of course non of that would happen overnight, but over the next 20 years, probably. So better to do this work now before even more homes are built close to the line thus require even more CPO and cost.

    As an aside, I suspect this will be a big want for the EU, given it's cross border nature and TEN-T core route status.



Advertisement