Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Manchester United Thread 25/26 - Teamtalk/Transfers/Gossip Mod Note in OP 26.09.24

1114711481150115211531309

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,302 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    I'm not sure we've seen signs of any significant culture change. Don't get me wrong, its great to get rid of some of those listed, we've gotten rid of some negatives, but I'm not seeing any real signs of positive changes. We seem to be in the midst of another bad egg forming in Mainoo for example... Not that I think he's a bad egg, but it's in the making due to many factors.

    2025 is an important year, it's more or less the end of the honeymoon period (bit of a stretch to call it that I know) for Ineos. They'll soon move away from the relatively nice position / period of being able to talk about fixing other people's problems... and will likely have to start fixing some of their own problems soon.

    Will 2025 go down as some watershed moment... There's not a lot pointing to that at the moment other than getting rid of a few of those players.

    It could be the year that Ineos signed an unknown keeper to solve their problem, the year that they persisted with Bruno in CM due to going all out on two no.10's, the year they created Hojlund 2.0 by repeating the same mistake, the year that they didn't act fast enough on the manager they went all in on.

    I hope things get better but there's nothing to say they can't get worse either. That's my cheery thought for the day.

    Post edited by PARlance on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,211 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    The year they persisted with a <1ppm manager for 12 months solely on the concept that other managers failed so this one must be good.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,607 ✭✭✭kerplun k


    Seven managers in twelve years.

    That’s the stat. That’s the cycle. And that’s what’s driving people bananas.

    How on earth can you look at that and not see the problem is beyond the manager. The constant reset, the rinse-and-repeat chaos.

    Until that cycle breaks, nothing changes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,211 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    So you stick with the manager no matter what. And utterly destroy the club should he actually turn out to be the wrong choice.

    It Is a logical fallacy to assume that because the club made mistakes in the past, that they should now stick with somebody no matter what.

    You are basically saying that United should have kept Hojlund because Weghorst and Cavani failed.

    The club was badly run, and Amorim is a bad fit. Both of these things can easily be true at the same time. Both these things are true at the same time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,999 ✭✭✭Acosta


    The club keeps hiring the wrong guy, so you end up in the same position. With the exception of Amorim, the decision to appoint all managers post Fergie has been made not by experienced football people, but by bankers.

    But besides that, other than Moyes, it's not like any of them weren't given plenty of time. They were all left in place until they were stinking the place out.

    Unfortunately INEOS came in and immediately made the wrong decision in retaining Ten Hag. They then brought in Amorim who had to be pushed into the job mid season. It started badly and got worse from there. I think it was game over after Grimsby. Persisting with him for another month or two, probably until the next international break, only writes off another season.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,779 ✭✭✭Iseedeadpixels


    Sometimes its the manager sometimes its the players.

    This time its 100% the manager.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 488 ✭✭kyleman


    Just bring in Roy Keane for the rest of the season.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 955 ✭✭✭ollkiller


    Hes getting rid of players he dosent want and buying players that are improving the side. I get the calls to sack him but id give him time. It takes a long time to change the culture we've had since Ferguson left and the culture is going in the right direction. Took Ferguson 4 years to get it right. I'd give him till Christmas anyway. If it doesn't improve then move on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,262 ✭✭✭✭billyhead




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,309 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    is there anything to say he's the right man for the job though? we prob average 35 PL points per season under him.

    jose for example wanted rid of shaw, martial and pogba. the glazers wouldn't let that happen.

    so does amorim or ineos deserve the credit for getting rid of players? thats irrelevant now anyway cos those players are gone. so its defo not a reason to keep amorim.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,902 ✭✭✭Julez


    I agree. Its been 5 games into a season where people predicted we'd finish around 8th.. 6th at a push.

    Game 1: Arsenal at home. Based on how we played, we should have at least got a draw. An expected result for a team that would finish around 8th.
    Game 2: Fulham Away. Unlucky to draw this, should have put it to bed in the first half. An expected result for a team that would finish around 8th.
    Game 3: Grimsby. A shocker, no excuse.
    Game 4: Home win to Burnley. Scraped a win really, but dominated this game. An expected result for a team that would finish around 8th.
    Game 5: City away. We didn't play well at all, but lost away to City. An expected result for a team that would finish around 8th.

    People said they could accept losses or draws if we look like the team is making progress and playing a bit better. We all knew it was a difficult start to the season, but there have been definite signs of improvement. We need a convincing win somewhere to build the confidence to go and score goals and put teams to bed.

    Amorim might not work out, and I know it doesn't look great, but I've no apatite to tear it up and start again with someone new just yet. Get through this tough start, get a few wins on the board and see how we are in a few months at least.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 955 ✭✭✭ollkiller


    I think in this instance it is Amorin saying which players he dosent want and they're moved on. We are playing better than last year. Just need to start converting chances.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,470 ✭✭✭✭Father Hernandez


    He’s persisting with playing our best player out of position where’s he’s not as effective. Constantly, every game.

    Theres a lot him and the club have done right off the pitch in the past 12 months but on the pitch, its the worst it’s been in 30 odd years.

    He’s had 12 months to make us semi decent. Hes utterly failed, the Europa League Final should’ve been his swan song. Desperate that game and Bruno one of the worst on the pitch. We hear he needs new players for his system but sure all managers want new players - make do with what you have and improve the players at your disposal. I’m sick of listening to him tbh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,441 ✭✭✭The Big Easy


    This would be my view on it so far, taking this season in its own context, I know people want to weld the two seasons together and who doesn't love an alternative league table.

    A week is a long time in football and a comfortable home win against Chelsea would go a long way. I don't rate Chelsea particularly highly and personally am expecting a win.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 31,173 Mod ✭✭✭✭Insect Overlord


    Grimsby are through to the next round...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,820 ✭✭✭DellyBelly


    I see the bounce Spurs are getting under Frank....I've banged this drum but that's who we should have gone for during the summer...he'd have been a massive upgrade



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,222 ✭✭✭Jofspring


    Spurs got a similar bounce from Ange and the media and people were raving about him for his first 5 or 6 months. That went south quickly. I like Franke but wouldn't be judging him at spurs yet.

    Franke, Glasner and Ireola are good managers but I think they would carry the same risk as any other manager coming in. A huge jump in expectations and pressure compared to any job they've had so far.

    I wouldn't want Van Nistelrooy near the job but in fairness he had the best run of results of any manager in the last few years. He had Ugarte and Casemiro playing well in midfield and won what 4 out of 5 games?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,302 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    Ruud won 3 out of 4 games. Beating Leicester twice and PAOK. Drew the 4th versus Chelsea.

    Not sure that sample size is big enough to read anything into it. Rocked a polo neck like no other though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,554 ✭✭✭fergiesfolly


    I'd be unhappy if Amorim isn't given at least another 5 games. I'd still give him the season but I'd understand why some would want him gone.

    On another point.....I've been reading through the posts here, what's been written in the press and the never ending inputs from former players and worse post match interviews from current players. And what stands out with all of it, is that everyone still treats Manchester United as a big club. We're not. We haven't been for a while now. There's a big stadium. A big fan base. And a big financial arm. But we are not a big club. Big clubs win or compete for the big prizes. And we're nowhere near. Everyone talks like all we need is the tweak this or that and all of a sudden, the sleeping giant that is Manchester United will suddenly burst back to life and rule the PL again. And that's not happening. Liverpool fooled themselves for three decades that they could bounce back if only...... something. And it took a mammoth overhaul for LFC to retake the summit. But they have.

    It'll be the will, skill and determination of the management Glazer/Ineos and the manager / coach be that Amorim or whoever that might be.

    But we go nowhere while we all believe that all we need is the name Manchester United and some magic dust sprinkled on top to reignite the winning machine we once were.

    Accept we're a mid level club and that it will take a herculean effort to bridge the gap to the top and we might have a better mindset to achieve that aim.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,937 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Nope.
    We are a big club.
    Evidence - Mbeumo, Cunha and Sesko signed for us after finishing 15th, because of the stature of the club. Rightly or wrongly. We are a big club.
    Juventus are still a big club.
    Milan are still a big club.

    We are not a good football team.
    We are a big club.

    Who is saying we only needed a tweak? Is it not the consensus we need a massive retooling of the squad? Improvement in facilities? Improvement in attitude and mentality before we can compete at the top of the table?

    Who is saying we only need the name and some magic dust? What are you talking about?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Seattle


    Yeah and I wouldn't even put us in the same category as Milan and Juve. They are big clubs but they're missing the revenues to be able to compete with the most powerful clubs in the future. Liverpool were also in this category recently but being in the Premier League gave them the opportunity to move out of it (for now).

    Utd have never been in that category and probably won't anytime soon because they're too big, they'll continue to generate massive revenues for the foreseeable future.

    Expectations are broadly set by what a club can do financially, not the sporting success they've achieved in recent years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,961 ✭✭✭✭Zeek12


    I think he will get the next 5 games definitely.

    Problem is, I can only realistically see us winning one of those games…..Sunderland at home represents our best shot at 3 points, but that said you couldn't be hugely confident of the win either. Burnley came within a whisker of taking a draw at OT after all.

    Chelsea, Liverpool, Brighton plus Brentford away - these will be really challenging games for us. And were we to lose 3 or 4 of those, which is very likely, he will be under huge pressure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,302 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    From Ineos' perspective, I think they'll definitely give him those 5 games. We/they still haven't seen the front 3 they've invested so heavily in play together yet (for any decent period of time), so time will be given. 6 or 7 points from those 5 games probably gets him another month or so as well. Hard to see 7 points from those games at present though.

    Amorim is their guy, their decision, they won't be quick to get rid of him / acknowledge a mistake of their own.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,961 ✭✭✭✭Zeek12


    Agree. INEOS want to give him time.

    But realistically, I'm seeing only 3 or 4 points from these next 5 games.

    Then, we have two tricky away games to Forest and Tottenham after that. The fixtures don't get any easier for him. We have a terrible record vs Ange. And Tottenham I expect will be much too strong for us.

    It's difficult to see him turning this around, especially when we continue to concede goals at an alarming rate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,811 ✭✭✭DataDude


    The inability to score is a more pressing concern (and has been for some time under Amorim).

    We have 1 non penalty/OG goal in 4 PL games. That is astonishing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,208 ✭✭✭thegreengoblin


    Jose about to become Benfica boss, it seems. Amorim's most logical escape route is closing.

    I know people are saying we have a tough run of games over the next few weeks but that would be the case whoever we're playing. The fact we struggled to get four points out of Fulham and Burnley proves this.

    I think we'll beat Chelsea this weekend, but nothing suggests to me there is going to be some big turnaround in results after that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,832 ✭✭✭ericzeking


    We weren't exactly free scoring under EtH either, remember Big Wout up front.

    It's so odd given the attacking talent we have and have had.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 498 ✭✭GolfPar


    He doesn't seem to have a way of playing that wins football matches. Everything has to go right for chances to be created and it takes very little to go wrong for us to be giving up chances. If he doesn't change we'll be in a relegation battle until they sack him. Does he value his principles more over getting results for Manchester United. I would hope Wilcox has taken him aside and told him to focus on getting results.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 668 ✭✭✭Pete Moss




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Seattle


    And that 1 goal came from a long kick from the GK, knock down, defensive error, cut back and tap in.



Advertisement