Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Manchester United Thread 25/26 - Teamtalk/Transfers/Gossip Mod Note in OP 26.09.24

1114911501152115411551309

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,008 ✭✭✭AidoEirE


    If my 6 year old asked me for a liverpool kit, never mind salah on the back ill always say the machine is not working right now like they always say when I want a McFlurry.

    "Machine not working"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,820 ✭✭✭DellyBelly


    Agree..much bigger games these days...unfortunately we won't be part of it for another while...heartbreaking watching pool scoring another last minute winner …we were once like that...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,309 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    not having a go at you here, but i really wish the media would going on about this. levy was never selling him to us, or any other PL club.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,374 ✭✭✭El Gato De Negocios


    Congratulations fella, hope baba and mother are doing well 🤝



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,309 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    but what about just the jersey to fit in with his mates? its only anecdotal evidence of course, but i presume the brains trust realise the fan base is aging cos kids generally follow the best team.

    at least we have project 28, project 150 and project 90 all running concurrently.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,999 ✭✭✭Acosta


    It wasn't something I was in favour of, but going on the evidence of last season, it looks to me like Uefa have got it right with the format change. More big games in the early stages and with the league format, the last game week or two is exciting. City just about scraped though into the knock out stages last season.

    It's a bit sad that United are not in it. But while the club doesn't deserve to be next to near the competition, it does bring back the frustration of the club not turning up for the Europa League final. It was a massive get out of jail card on the disaster that was last season, and they blew it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,309 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    amorim blew it. bad team selection plus no changes in game to combat spurs sitting deep.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,008 ✭✭✭AidoEirE


    Big games that dine mean as much for the latter rounds. Look at Liverpool last season.

    Group games had more of a threat home and away



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,471 ✭✭✭FrankN1


    Hate the new CL format. Basically zero point in watching until the knockout round now. Or maybe the last league game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,008 ✭✭✭AidoEirE


    Thats my point,

    "its more big games between top team's with the new format"

    The new format has changed so much they are giving away CL spots for thos league system.

    Olympiclacos vs Pafos FC was some champions league game.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,309 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    i'd say if we were in it and challenging, we'd all love it.

    i like it. the jeopardy coming into the last few game weeks is great. same as always



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,837 ✭✭✭Hodors Appletart


    As a long time fan and ST holder at Shels, I absolutely love the changes UEFA have made to the whole lot of the European Competition landscape.

    The CL is really none of our business, but we did get the "Champions Path" meaning that if we won the CLQR1 we were then guaranteed at least a play off for the Conference League Group Stage, we did win that tie (Linfield Part 1) and then went into CLQR2, lost, dropped to ELQR3, lost there and then dropped into the UCL Play-off round.

    What UEFA have done is, in my opinion, created a pathway for the best teams in the smaller leagues to try to keep improving, have something to aim for, win prizemoney and maybe, like a team like Pafos (or Shels, or Shamrock) could get a favourable draw somewhere along the way, or just spend prizemoney wisely and incrementally improve and get into the CL.

    Like you've people here who were presumably dead against the European Super League also decrying having to watch Olympiacos v Pafos. You can't have it both ways.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 169 ✭✭MercuryBoy


    I think you're right. Amorin probably wanted to sell Mainoo and I'd say he got push back on that. It's also interesting/baffling that they've only bought one wingback, Dorgu, when his system relies on them, I'd say they're not convinced either



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,603 ✭✭✭randd1


    I'm not a fan of the current format, but can definitely see the merits of it.

    The one real gripe I have is that I think the Conference League could be expanded to include a lot more teams. I'd go so far as to say they should have the same format, but with two leagues tables (72 teams, 2 x 36 and use the current format).

    Add in another guaranteed team from the top 10 ranked leagues, add in another team into the final round of qualifiers from the top 5 leagues, and bump out the qualifiers to include more teams from the minnow leagues.

    It's a conference league, no-one is expecting it be chock full of quality in the group stage, so just add another 15 or so teams from the bigger leagues, but adding a lot more teams from the smaller leagues (even if it's just the qualifiers stage) and it would do wonders for the smaller clubs, and leagues, around Europe.

    And to save time in format, while the UCL/EL are having their playoffs to make the last 16, at the same time the Conference League would have two direct knockout rounds. The first would be between the teams ranked 9-24 in each league, with teams ranked 9-16 getting home advantage. The second would then between the top 8 of both sides of the draw against the playoff winners, with the top 8 teams getting home advantage. Then at the round of 16, the competition runs alongside the UCL/EL at the same stage.

    If UEFA competition is to expand anywhere, then let it expand for the minnow leagues, they're the ones that need it most.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,837 ✭✭✭Hodors Appletart


    I think Crystal Place shouldn't be in it, there should be no teams from counties with 3+ CL spots (or something, I'm typing on the fly here).

    Are you saying "minnow" on purpose to be antagonistic in a conversation with a Shels fan, or what? Weird choice of word in a supposed good faith conversation. Just wondering.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,837 ✭✭✭Hodors Appletart


    What purpose does it serve adding more stronger teams to a competition for teams from smaller leagues? We will benefit nothing from playing Crystal Palace, they are so far removed from our scope of competition, we'll be humbled, the players won't be able to learn anything and palace will treat it like a pre season kickabout.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,051 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    I'd guess TNT Sports (and their equivalent broadcaster in Germany/Spain etc) would pay zero towards the Conference League if there wasn't a club from their target country/audience in the competition. So it's probably a necessary evil, and ultimately it is just the (theoretically) 7th or 8th best team from these countries so not always a powerhouse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,837 ✭✭✭Hodors Appletart


    but even compared to Shamrock, Palace are a powerhouse.

    I get the point about the TV money, but adding even more of those teams to the competition seems insane.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,603 ✭✭✭randd1


    No, no antagonism intended, minnow is used merely to express the position of smaller leagues in the co-efficient rankings. An expanded Conference League mainly for the benefit of the likes of teams in the Irish/Bulgarian/Finnish leagues is what I'm talking about, minnows was the word used to express that sentiment regarding the weaker leagues.

    I get the idea of Crystal Palace not being in it given the strength of the Premier League, but at the same time having teams from the top leagues in it does help the teams from the weaker leagues by giving them some quality opposition to face, and perhaps a bumper payday.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,837 ✭✭✭Hodors Appletart


    I don't get your logic, but continuing to use the disparaging language means I've no desire to continue the conversation with you.

    Good day sir.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,603 ✭✭✭randd1


    Maybe given you can't seem to grasp simple phrases, it's for the best.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,837 ✭✭✭Hodors Appletart


    so what's with getting personal then?

    Are you like this in real life too? Or is it an online thing?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,603 ✭✭✭randd1


    Given you've completely got the wrong end of the stick to begin with, and then seemed insulted by it simply because you couldn't get the simple phrasing when no insult was intended at all, and then started getting passive aggressive about it by calling it disparaging language, then I can only assume you take things personally no matter what.

    Either way, I can confirm in my original post there was no intent to insult or be personal to you, or anyone, in describing teams from weaker leagues, or the weaker leagues themselves, as minnows, but that I was merely suggesting in the post that those teams/leagues could do with an expanded Conference League to give them a better chance at European football.

    And I apologize if I've upset you, or anyone, in doing so. I was not my intent, no matter how it was interpreted by you.

    Either way, it's the United thread, let's refocus on that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,176 ✭✭✭NITRO95


    TBF the way we are playing, I think we can all agree Utd wouldn't even get into an expanded Conference League



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,471 ✭✭✭FrankN1




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 498 ✭✭GolfPar


    Rasmus and Ballon d'or nominated McTominay back in Manchester tonight. Be interesting to see how they get on…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,309 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    agreed. i'd ban the top ~30 clubs based on coefficient. like no way chelsea should have been in it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,837 ✭✭✭Hodors Appletart


    Yeah, Chelsea made a mockery of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,603 ✭✭✭randd1


    In one way, you're right, they were too strong for it, made a joke of it.

    In another way, they were there because of their league performance the previous season, which given what they've spent, wasn't great.

    And I think I can safely say, despite our current woes at United, I'd be happy if the best league position Chelsea can muster on a regular basis is Conference League football (I know currently they're in the UCL this year and we're in the deep sh!t, but you get my point). Personally, I love to see them there, means we're more likely to go past them if we (somehow) get our house in order.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,938 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    I've always wondered if PL teams that are in europe should be removed entirely from the league cup.

    would offset the fixture pile ups. create additional space in the calendar in general. create a rotating cast of winners.



Advertisement