What’s your most controversial opinion? **Read OP** **Mod Note in Post #3372**

Yes, there is, having a man in women's toilets or changing rooms is, at the very least, disturbing.

I already replied, stop sealioning.

But some posts deserve to get reported

well lets give it a shot and find out. who cares what women think anyway.

and if there is an incident of "demonstrable harm", well the aftermath is not going to be pretty.

in any case there will be an accusation, real or false, that i can guarantee. i would advise that community to think more strategically, accept compromise in an imperfect world, use a third option, dont put yourselves in risks way.

anyway. thats my 2c. crazy world, good luck out there.

If LOI clubs got more money they'd almost certainly spend it on outbidding their rivals for mediocre players so they could win the LOI. Thats pretty much what happened when Shelbourne had a big load of money from their good run in europe when they played Deportivo La Coruna.

LOI is really not much better than the FAI it's just people think that because some of the teams have had a couple of good results in europe and the league is a bit more popular now it means it's well run but in truth it underperforms compared to similar sized countires. Look at how much better Norwegian, Croatian and Danish (similar sized countries) clubs are in Europe compared to LOI clubs.

Rovers are extremely well run but they appear to be the exception unfortunately.

Cork should be one of the power houses in the league, they always seemed to get good crowds, they have a huge market having a whole city basically to themselves

That's how it should be. Someone i know once worked in the Dept for giving out sports grants etc They once told me you could almost guarantee when an LOI club would apply there would be something wrong wtih the application. Yet with the GAA ad Rugby there rarely if ever had any issues.

What do you mean it just "feels" wrong to the people saying they don't want biological males in a space where women are in vulnerable states of undress?

It is wrong. There is no feelings involved, it's just morally, socially and undoubtedly wrong.

There is a clear moral line in society, no matter how much brow-beating or string pulling you attempt on this matter it won't make a difference. It's a clear violation of the moral code of being a human.

Allow women their safety and privacy to undress with confidence, to know 100% they can bring their young daughter in there with them to get changed and not have to worry that a man (in woman's clothing) will waltz in and see them stark naked.

You keep harping on about "demonstrable harm" and proving it but let's make that situation more personal, give you a likely scenario to happen;

What happens when a woman who was sexually attacked in her past is getting changed and spots a man (in woman's clothing) walk in on her half naked? Do you have any idea what damage that would do to someone in that position? It would be an immediate psychological crisis – The poor woman would crash back down to the day of her trauma, reliving it and praying the man (in woman's clothing) doesn't repeat what happened to her previously. The man didn't even do anything, he doesn't even have to speak but his presence alone could destroy her. He may not intend to do harm but even being there could be harmful.

It's a hypothetical situation and before you ask, no, I don't have evidence but I truly believe it could and would happen.

Again, it's morally wrong and reprehensible. To even consider allowing men into those spaces is insane.

To top it all off, as another poster stated - You clearly do not care whatsoever about this, you're just here to drag out an argument for your own entertainment so do everyone a favor and jog on.

You should see the videos that sickos are posting on social media! Literally singing and dancing and jumping for joy. They are all in the early 20s age range. Not all, but a good portion of that generation have become completely desensitized to violence and are driven by hatred.

As long as someone is on the opposite side to you, they can be killed in cold blood and you celebrate it, they are not viewed as human beings. We have seen this phenomenon a lot lately.

Those videos are online for good, any chance of getting a decent career in future has been deep sixed by these idiots. Would you hire someone who dances around smiling ear to ear because a wife has just lost her husband and two young kids will grow up without their dad.

The left hail a career criminal a hero after his death but rejoice when a law abiding husband and father is brutally murdered.

They make me sick.

He traded his humanity for clout and now hes lost both. While I dont be celebrating his death, I wont be mourning it either.

Did RTE take these voters into consideration

Hahaha good one. All they take into consideration is the tv license - we can boycott that.