Advertisement
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Tesla Talk 2

1313234363794

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,775 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    Exactly. If and when the car has taken over, the car manufacturer is responsible. Whether this is in a strictly geofenced bit of Autobahn at max 60km/h only for a few minutes like in a current Mercedes with level 3, or in any fully automated, no steering wheel, level 5 car

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,775 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    It feels like people who don't believe fully self driving will ever be a thing, seem to think people who oppose this view are Tesla fans?

    BTW I tried before and started a thread about level 5 autonomous driving and the path there to (which is inevitable in my view, no matter who gets there first), but it didn't really take off

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,826 ✭✭✭maidhc


    The car will still need to be insured by an insurer under the current Road Traffic Acts anyway. We then have the in inevitable blame game between the representatives of the autonomous vehicle and the owner and the driver.

    It has often crossed my mind that there is going to be a point soon when we will be naming car manufacturers as defendants in motor traffic claims; I almost did it earlier this month for the first time when it was disclosed the automatic braking appears to have malfunctioned at the wrong time in a car, but ultimately didn’t as nothing could detract from the fact the driver failed to stop anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,614 ✭✭✭✭josip


    "We then have the in inevitable blame game between the representatives of the autonomous vehicle and the owner and the driver."

    With autonomous driving vehicles, there is so much more data and evidence about what happened that it will be easier to attribute responsibility and legal costs will be considerably less. Those legal costs and insurance margins all add to the business case for vehicle manufacturers. Think of all that insurance revenue and expenditure on legal costs. That's potential 'up-sell' for the manufacturers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,080 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    It's not about belief, it's hard to argue that the technology will get to a point where something can be presented as self-driving.

    It's more about the pragmatic reality - the technology barrier is miniscule compared to the regularity barrier that L5 self-driving will face, especially in Europe. Maybe in the regulatory Wild West of the US they'll see something happen in the next 20 years.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,826 ✭✭✭maidhc


    legal costs are very much the thin end of the wedge. The upsell is less accidents, the issue though is not simple, e.g. if there is a deficit in maintenance, road issues, appropriateness of letting the machine do its thing (eg in icy conditions).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,239 ✭✭✭wassie


    Seems we've all been helping Google train Waymo for free



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,647 ✭✭✭sk8board


    will they do it ‘better than humans’ though 😏



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,080 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    A thing I always think about in regards to full automation is there's a vandalised speed limit sign I pass regularly (in the north) where someone has changed the 30mph sign to an 80, and the camera recognition on my car constantly picks it up as 80.

    I had to change the auto-speed-adjust to require confirmation because the car would be rocketing up to 80 otherwise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,647 ✭✭✭sk8board


    there is absolutely no doubt in my mind that level 5 autonomy will happen - it’s actually reasonably simple - have every vehicle on the road be aware of all other vehicles around them, and they will communicate and flow around each other to their respective destinations. Done, right? (it’s massively more complex, but you get the idea).

    However, getting there requires new autonomous vehicles to interact with the old current fleet of vehicles, roads, weather and geography.

    To use that overused metaphor - it’s swapping the engines on an airplane while it’s in flight - that’s what makes it so complex.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,647 ✭✭✭sk8board


    We’re here in the Tesla thread because they’ve tried for a decade to make their cars interact safely with the current fleet of old vehicles, roads, weather and geography, using vehicles with hw4 that I can buy today for €37k - and it highlights just how complex this is and how far we have to go to make progress (same with waymo - lidar or not they have similar issues, but I can’t buy a waymo)

    Post edited by sk8board on


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,157 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    not sure this means anything but thought of this thread when I seen it.

    IMG_2463.jpeg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 7,497 ✭✭✭zg3409


    Added more "rural" areas, does not seem that big a deal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,647 ✭✭✭sk8board


    Sawyer Merritt, one of the biggest TSLA shills on planet earth!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,775 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    Maybe not a big deal. But fact is that Tesla now have more total coverage in the USA after 2 months than Waymo has after 6 years

    That said, I won't really be impressed until robotaxis (of whatever make) are available in pretty much all major urban centres…

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 34,906 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    Surely you cant be taking sawyer at face value.

    I'd believe absolutely zero of that dataset, nor its capability in that space.

    Its the wild west of lies at this point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,080 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    Tesla pushing even further away from EVs and talking vaguely more about robotics and AI

    https://arstechnica.com/cars/2025/09/tesla-has-a-new-master-plan-it-just-doesnt-have-any-specifics/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,775 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    As expected. I think Musk recently said that 80% of the future value of Tesla will be the robots

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,647 ✭✭✭sk8board


    ”It's the fourth such document for Tesla, replacing the goals Musk laid out in 2023 when he said the company would sell 20 million EVs a year in 2030. This time, it is not entirely sure what Tesla's plan actually entails. The text, which reads as though it was written by AI, is at times anodyne, at times confusing, but always free of specifics.”


    imagine having a North Star just 23 months ago to sell 20m cars by 2030, getting to just 8% of that stretch-target to date, and then simply binning that in favour of this new, um, whatever this is.
    It really does read like it was written by an Ai chatbot in fairness



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,080 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,647 ✭✭✭sk8board


    to be fair to Musks truly awful taste in what he thinks is funny, he might’ve just used grok and lashed it out in a tweet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,647 ✭✭✭sk8board


    reasonably short synopsis from Bloomberg of this latest master plan:

    https://podcasts.apple.com/ie/podcast/elon-inc/id1714619846?i=1000724626205



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,106 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,647 ✭✭✭sk8board


    No mention of FSD either. Presumably they don’t see any future vehicles or FSD as significant revenue projects. In fairness we’ve said that about FSD for years. Remember this is a trillion dollar business - FSD has taken so long to bring to market that people won’t pay for something others give for free or very cheaply.

    It’s very hard to see Tesla announce any more vehicles in future that aren’t 3/Y derivatives.

    Optimus (for home applications) has Cybertruck 2 written all over it - expensive, too complex, low sales beyond wealthy early adopters and fans videoing it for fan channels - but yet it’s expected to be 80% of the value of a (presumably in future) multi-trillion dollar entity. This document is bizarre really.

    Post edited by sk8board on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 680 ✭✭✭DrPsychia


    Musk knew early on the value of hype in valuations. His promises of FSD, Dojo, Cybertruck, and Optimus were/are and are the primary narratives used to justify Tesla's tech-like stock valuation.

    It reminds me of the lunch scene from Wolf of Wall Street;
    Mark Hanna: You know what a fugazi is?

    Jordan Belfort: Fugazi, it's a fake.

    Mark Hanna: Fugayzi, fugazi. It's a whazy. It's a woozie. It's fairy dust. It doesn't exist. It's never landed. It is no matter. It's not on the elemental chart. It's not real.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,775 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    You keep making that same argument, but it makes no logical sense. You can hype something up once. Then if it doesn't happen, deflation and you won't be able to do it again.

    By definition, the current market cap of a company is the consensus from the whole world, including people who have shares and people who do not have shares, of what the company is worth. Or do you think TSLA is only worth a fraction of the current market value? This implies that you know best and everybody else in the world has been fooled 😂

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,080 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    By definition, the current market cap of a company is the consensus from the whole world, including people who have shares and people who do not have shares, of what the company is worth

    This is just fundamentally not the case! It has rarely ever been the case, but especially hasn't since r/WallStreetBets proved that you can make any company become worth anything without any connection to reality.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,647 ✭✭✭sk8board


    there’s a logical separation that’s always existed in Tesla -

    On the one hand, it’s a car company that builds two very profitable models. Simple.

    On the other hand, there’s the actual value placed in the company, which is by using those profits to fund a long line of ‘future projects’. Again, really simple and a much-followed model.

    However this is a trillion dollar entity, which has cycled through many many different ‘future’ projects without ever having to deliver them (which is fine, because the car company is very profitable). Once one project has shown it has no future, another project pops up like a mushroom to replace it as ‘the future of the company’.

    Is FSD now just a small side project?

    What happens if the car business goes cash flow negative in Q4 as expected?

    an incredibly expensive robot that will be in your home to do ‘stuff’ is not in the near future - there’s not nearly enough customers for it for a start to justify 80% of a trillion dollar business. If Tesla continue building physical things to sell to the public, it’s going to lose. It should licence it and/or commercialise it, but either way you destroy shareholder value (ie shrinking market cap)



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Hey lads, need some advice. I've got a slow puncture. Down 4 psi in a week. I know from experience a slow puncture becomes a flat tyre pretty quickly.

    Can I bring this to any tyre garage? I'd be worried they'd rip out the insulation or something. Or is Tesla the route to take? I might be willing to drive 60km to Sandyford to get it sorted properly (assuming I make it).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,900 ✭✭✭...Ghost...




Advertisement
Advertisement