Advertisement
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Tesla Talk 2

1262729313238

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,110 ✭✭✭Buddy Bubs


    Is robotaxi likely to get past legislators worldwide to make it profitable?

    I can see that being a long way off after the technology becomes better than humans



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,812 ✭✭✭maidhc


    the smugness gets the better of you every time. The actual work on robotaxis seems to have only lately started.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,812 ✭✭✭maidhc


    the figures are mostly to 2019 and even if. There were to 2021 that’s almost half a decade ago… a long time in the ev landscape.

    As usual with these threads Cyrus… you are wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 190 ✭✭reaction238


    Every Tesla with fsd is a robotaxi. They've effectively been working on robotaxi's from the start. Even those of us using autopilot are contributing to it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,812 ✭✭✭maidhc


    I know the original plan was ok. I assume the bits about abandoning the company and hollowing out its resources to buy twitter, start doge, divert resources to xai, etc aren’t in the plan though!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,196 ✭✭✭September1


    Chinese brands take some steps to separate China from car, they but European brands for example. I'm also not sure if CEOs would take exposed political roles. Meanwhile Tesla is closely intertwined with Elon and they showcased their cars in White House during second Trump presidency.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 190 ✭✭reaction238


    Didn't he also use many of his Tesla shares to buy twitter? I agree the distractions have not been welcomed by Tesla, with rhe exception of xAi which clearly has some cross over, as does SpaceX (Telsa motors are used in Starship for example).

    I'm going off headlines and haven't looked too much into because as I said, I just like rhe car and I'm not too interested in the noise that comes with it. But I believe his latest package comes with conditions that he focuses on getting Robotaxi's and Optimus over the line and simply because they cannot do it without him. In my opinion, he will be gone after that. This is the natural progression of a Ceo. There is a start, a middle and an end in their tenure which are planned out in advance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 34,213 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    All this talk of robot taxi etc , yet the company was exposed to be doing some very egregious acts with crash detection and auto pilot after the case it lost last week.

    https://electrek.co/2025/08/04/tesla-withheld-data-lied-misdirected-police-plaintiffs-avoid-blame-autopilot-crash/

    Within about three minutes of the crash, the Model S uploaded a “collision snapshot”—video, CAN‑bus streams, EDR data, etc.—to Tesla’s servers, the “Mothership”, and received an acknowledgement. The vehicle then deleted its local copy, resulting in Tesla being the only entity having access.

    So they've programmed in self destruction of evidence. Also rumoured to knock off Autopilot when crash is imminent meaning the last flagged setting is that it was off so it avoids blame.

    This is worse than VW and their emissions gadgets.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,289 ✭✭✭sk8board


    I think that’s a bit ot a generalisation - you can’t just dismiss the opinions of people you disagree with.

    You should consider being more of a ‘free speech absolutist’ 😏



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,034 ✭✭✭MojoMaker


    I often wonder about the bit "cannot do it without him". For sure he's charismatic to a degree, and persuasive to a degree, but he doesn't appear to be a good leader and certainly doesn't seem any more qualified in the core subject matter of the company than the executive staff around him.

    As Tesla started and became a success before him, I think they would be fine without him and let a new generation of CEO step into the role - one with less polarising views and more unifying & strategic nous.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,289 ✭✭✭sk8board


    Building cars in China is really no different to the 90’s when all the worlds best cars started to come from Korean and Japan. We had a 1986 Datsun cherry that was years ahead of the rest by having a 10 year anti rust guarantee and an electronic choke!

    I don’t particularly mind where the cars come from, as long as they are reliable, good value, and can still be easily serviced when 15 years old.

    VW have made cars in China since 1985 btw



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 190 ✭✭reaction238


    I've had autopilot disengage on me. Car ahead of me was taking the same exit off the M11 and unexpectedly come to a standstill on the off ramp. I was a safe distance behind, but autopilot was not slowing down as we approached and as I got closer it just completely disengaged.

    I'm still not sure if this was a bug. Obviously disengaging causes the car to brake, maybe it was intentional? The point at which it disengaged could not be described as right before a crash. It disengaged with time for the car to stop. I didn't even need to use the brake pedal.

    I have to admit, I did initially think it was disengaging in preparation for an imminent crash, but because it felt like that doesn't necessarily mean that was what it was doing. I'd love.to hear peoples thought on reason why it might have.disengaged like this.

    I have to add though, as the driver I was very much alert and ready to take action. I was never going to crash.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 190 ✭✭reaction238


    I think the part they can't do without him os transition away from an EV company to an autonomous vehicle company. Plus Optimus.

    Maybe can't is the wrong word. It's more like won't do it if he's not around. Whatever.company Tesla is at the time he leaves, is the company it will be for.decades to come. I mention the start, middle and end of a ceo tenure. This is musks end game, but really he's basically creating a new company with a different product. He is unique in that his end game is a whole start, middle and end wrapped into one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,354 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Tesla would be a better car company without Elon. That has been true for some time now.

    However 1- the other products (of varying levels of nonsense) would stop and thats a problem because 2 -the share price has years of exponential growth already baked in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,274 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    its an opinion the same as any other, you disagree that people are influenced in this way?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,274 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    you are really clutching now maidhc, as usual you are misinformed and incorrect.

    As i have pointed out to you a) teslas strategy around robotaxis was announced in 2016 to suggest work began 'lately' is just plain stupid and misinformed and b) i stated that for a period tesla had higher margins than anyone else, i then presented a chart that illustrates that, you dont like the time period (despite it not being what you stated it is)

    You can engage in good faith or continue to troll, ill do my usual ignore you for a bit and then bite and we can do the merry dance again. And dont talk to me about smug.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27 toolshead


    I agree. In general, Elon was a good CEO for the company. However, his antics this last year have made his name toxic. His association with Tesla have made the brand toxic, reducing the numbers sold. He absconded from his role as CEO to play around in politics, and this also affected the company. Now he is somewhat back at the helm, but it is hard to see how the brand can recover from the damage he has done. He has annoyed all the left-leaners in countries around the world. Now he has annoyed the Right in the US with his public falling out with Trump. The company would be better off with a complete rebranding, and someone else being the face of it.

    Im not sure how this could be done. Maybe they could split the company, with Elon giving up his seat as CEO in Automotive-Tesla and lead the other tesla projects instead. But I don't believe his ego will let him give that up, let alone share power with someone else in Tesla. He has a history of being unable to share power, as we saw with Trump, the original founders of Tesla, etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,832 ✭✭✭pah


    Ye can talk about robotaxis, autopilot and how long it's actually been going on but absolutely nobody here can claim that Elon is not absolutely full of sh1t when it comes to his predictions about when the company will make good on their products. It's all about pumping the share price. Haven't seen him hit a mark yet for something he promised.

    One of the dumbest genius's I've ever seen grace the world stage.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/22/elon-musk-says-tesla-robotaxis-will-hit-the-market-next-year.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,274 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    has anyone claimed that? your article again reaffirms that the push for robotaxis isnt a recent one regardless.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,866 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    "It's all about pumping the share price"? I don't see how. Yes you could get away with that once, but if your promise doesn't come good, the share price will come down by at least the same amount. And you will lose your credibility the next time you make a promise and the market won't respond (much) to it

    My take is that Musk simply is ridiculously optimistic. Quite likely linked to Asperger's syndrome, which he says he has



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,027 ✭✭✭JOL1


    That's fair comment, few would argue about his optimism in terms of timescales but it is a stretch to believe that the comments are made to pump share price. That implies that the market is dumb enough to swallow anything time and time again which clearly is not the case. Tesla shares are traded in volumes and active amongst institutional and retail clients. Everytime they trade, to buy or sell it is expressing "their view" with real money and to presume they are stupid and swallow everything that Mr Musk says is simply not credible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27 toolshead


    He has got in trouble for pumping the share price in the past.

    The timing of when to pump stock is important. You want to get it in before quarterly reports, or when its strategically important for the company. To give one example, back in 2008, Tesla was the most shorted stock in Wall street. He was pretty vocal in his tweets about how annoyed he was with the shorts. Then he made this infamous tweet:

    image.png

    This caused the stock to surge. It resulted in a short-squeeze, causing the original shorters a big loss and humiliation when they were forced to buy back their shares at an inflated rate.

    But the funding wasn’t secured, and the information was misleading. The SEC filed charges for securities fraud, citing that Musk’s statement was a false and misleading statement that led to manipulated trading.

    Result: Musk paid a $20 million fine, stepped down as Tesla’s chairman, and agreed to have his tweets about Tesla pre-approved.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,812 ✭✭✭maidhc


    maybe we all want to believe musk. I wanted to believe the cybertruck would be what he originally promised rather than what we got, the the model 3 would be follows by a mkii, that we would have reverse charging to the grid through a whole Tesla eco system.. like apple only for cars and power… we got a humanoid that doesn’t work (probably never will) and a phallic shaped ride hailing service in Austin Texas. It’s undeniably rubbish in the context of the Hope value of the shares!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,866 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    Yes the funding secured incident. Wasn't he cleared of any wrongdoing in court over that though? And just as I said, when the deal didn't go ahead a few days later, the share came down straight away to what it was. You can get away with that sort of thing maybe once. Won't work again as people won't believe you. The boy who cried wolf and all that…

    Personally I am delighted some shorts lost a lot of money over it. People who deliberately tried to bankrupt a company that is largely doing things for the greater good (electrification of transport)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27 toolshead


    Nope, its not entirely true to say that he was cleared of any wrongdoing. He was legally found not liable in a separate civil lawsuit brought by Tesla shareholders. He settled with the SEC without admitting or denying wrongdoing, but agreeing to pay $20 million for what he did. He also had to step down as Tesla’s board chairman for three years, and had to get pre‑approval for his tweets, as I said.

    He brought his case as far as the Supreme Court to try and overthow the settlement, but they sided with the SEC.

    https://www.businessinsider.com/supreme-court-rejects-elon-musk-remove-twitter-sitter-sec-2024-4



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,812 ✭✭✭maidhc


    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/aug/05/elon-musk-lawsuit-robotaxi-tesla

    I’ll just leave this here. Elons main skill is in extracting cash from investors!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,289 ✭✭✭sk8board


    isn’t this exactly what he’s doing? e.g the reaction in Apr ‘24 to the SP crash when he finally admitted that the promised model 2 wasn’t happening? He scrambled out another promise-tweet about ‘something big’ on 08/08/24.

    He quite literally does exactly what you describe, for about 5-6 years now, since the Y was initially announced back in March 2019(!). That might be the last day he promised and delivered?

    Promise after promise, all designed to do what a CEO is supposed to do ( the fiduciary duty bit) - deliver shareholder value.

    Once he has a new promise to cover for the promise that’s being sunset without reason, the ponzi continues and the SP retains its value.

    It’s not hard to see - just List out all the failed promises since March 2019, and then list all the delivered (revenue-generating) promises.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,107 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Seems many hate the man, but even more love the cars.

    IMG_2197.jpeg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,812 ✭✭✭maidhc


    doesn’t seem to reconcile:

    https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2025/08/05/elon-musk-tesla-sales-in-britain-germany-plunge-as-chinas-byd-soars.html



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,027 ✭✭✭JOL1


    Both links may are not in conflict or difficult to "reconcile" as they compare two different and distinct metrics

    a) the best selling brand of EV's in Europe for first half of 2025 (6 months). Tesla's share of EV market may be falling but it is still best selling brand, and

    b) a fall is sales for two European Countries (UK and Germany) for the month of July, continuing a downward trend. Not positive for large volume markets

    Conflating both serves only to mislead…both metrics are valid and readers can interpret and draw their own conclusions!

    Post edited by JOL1 on


Advertisement