Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1153115321534153615371849

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    I think you're right on the leadership aspect, but would say that it's not a complete comparison at this point. From what I can tell, Keith Wood first captained Ireland in a game against USA when he was 24, but it was Jan 2000 before he took over as captain of the side on a full-time basis (when he was 28). Wood was clearly viewed as a strong leader within the Irish (and Munster and Harlequins squads), but I think Dan Sheehan clearly is seen the same way, and he's still only 26.

    Sheehan is in the leadership group for Ireland and Leinster, and was chosen to captain Ireland in this year's 6 Nations when Doris was absent through injury. He also captained Leinster a couple of times this season and captained the Lions in the first game of the tour in Australian soil.

    I wouldn't say it tracks that Wood is undoubtedly better in this regard- he was clearly a good leader but there's lot of evidence that Sheehan is viewed the same way at this point in his career.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,997 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Wood captained Ireland 30 odd times, as far as I'm aware (and at a time when there were fewer internationals iirc). Even with Sheehan in the leadership group, I'd be surprised if he's ever handed the full-time captaincy, or gets near that mark tbh.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    He may not - but, that's because there's a guy the same age as him or slightly younger who is deemed to be an excellent captain (and likely would have captained the Lions this summer).

    It's not the sole barometer though as to whether or not someone's leadership credentials are stellar or not - that was a largely utterly abject Irish team he captained, which wasn't exactly overflowing with strong alternatives.

    He didn't captain Harlequins during all his years there - he captained for one season, but they had some other really strong leaders around at the time like Will Carling and Zinzan Brooke - he also didn't captain Munster on his return there - I don't necessarily think those facts suggest Wood isn't a very strong leader, just like I don't think your prediction that Sheehan won't captain Ireland 30 times necessarily means he isn't a very strong leader.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,363 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    There's a difference between "Irish rugby" and "Irish rugby players" though.

    To captain a Lions tour to SA where they played 22 matches, losing none, starting in and winning three of the Tests and drawing the last (due to a ref decision as dodgy as any other) is the greatest individual achievement in Irish rugby, as far as I'm concerned. The series win in NZ, I agree, is probably the greatest team achievement in Irish rugby.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,648 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Not looking to diminish the accomplishments of that tour, or McBryde, but you're kind of conflating the achievements of the team with him. Captaining the team was a massive honour, but the fact the team won 22 matches isn't necessarily *his* accomplishment. In the same way Ireland going undefeated for 18 games wasn't Sexton's accomplishment.

    I'd personally hold that period from Nov 21 to the QF is probably the greatest accomplishment for Irish rugby to date, which Sexton was central to. For the professional era anyway.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,997 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    …which wasn't exactly overflowing with strong alternatives.

    Disagree. It was indeed a poor Ireland team, but there were really strong alternatives in both Mick Galwey and Anthony Foley. (Arguably a stronger group in terms of candidates for the captaincy than we have now).

    In any case, I haven't made the argument that Sheehan "isn't a very strong leader". I've just made the argument that I don't think he's ahead of Woody in that regard.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,363 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Yeah, I don't disagree on any of your points. It's the difficulty in measuring success of an individual in a team sport - the teams wax and wane while individual players might be exemplary or an empty jersey. It's also impossible to quantify leadership. It takes more leadership to get a mid-table finish out of a poor team than get into the final with a team of galacticos. And that's before we start worrying about coaches and their effect on team fortunes.

    But McBride is the most capped Lion ever. He went on five Lions tours (as did Mike Gibson). You still had to be one of the top two or three in your position, at a time when rugby was more popular in England, Wales and Scotland.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Yeah, and tbc I'm not saying I think Sheehan is ahead of Wood either (in leadership), I'm just saying:

    1. Players tend to improve their leadership as they age - and captains are likelier to be towards the end of their careers than the beginning. With that in mind - it's not a like for like comparison to compare Keith Wood's whole career in this regard to Dan Sheehan's career to date (when he's still just 26).
    2. I don't think the gap is that large here either though. They're very different characters, but clearly Sheehan is already seen as a strong leader, given he's already captained Leinster, Ireland and the Lions. He captained Ireland in Cardiff when there were strong and experienced leaders like Peter O'Mahony, Tadhg Beirne, Jack Conan & Garry Ringrose in the starting XV. He captained the Lions when the team contained the current Scotland captain, the current Munster captain, a former Leinster club captain, a former Scotland co-captain and some other very experienced Lions and internationals (including Tadhg Furlong who has captained Ireland, Elliot Daly and Josh van der Flier).

    The initial statement here was:

    One area that Wood was undoubtedly better in is leadership - in some sense a more innate thing and a nebulous to teach / coach / train.

    I don't think you've necessarily convinced on this argument.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,363 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    I just mean, recency bias is difficult to shake off. But when you look at what some of our past players achieved, we've had some phenomenal fellas who have distinguished themselves by doing extraordinary or unique things.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,997 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I don't think you've necessarily convinced on this argument.

    To be fair, I didn't necessarily expect to convince you, FTD :D

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Yeah, fair enough.

    Conscious I've quasi de-railed the thread here now, and I get it's difficult to compare across eras, but as I said from the outset, my initial post on this was more about emphasising just how good I think Sheehan is (he's the best hooker, and possibly the best front row player in the world right now IMO) than having a go at Keith Wood (who I think is an incredible player and an all time Irish great in his own right).

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,648 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Could argue that it's a point in Sheehan's favor that he stands out as an elite player, in team's full of them, where Woods stood out as elite when he was playing in much less talented teams, a la Parisse.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,997 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    But Woody didn't just stand out amongst his teammates, he stood out amongst his peers; to reiterate a point I made above:

    People often forget Wood was the first ever World Player of the Year winner, winning it ahead of all-time greats in Gregan, George Smith, Wilkinson and Drico.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,865 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    the amount of lions caps isnt a direct comparison either though since they were every 3 years rather than 4 and there were 4 tests in a series rather than 3

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,865 ✭✭✭leakyboots


    JGP is in a fine vein of form for a few seasons now but it wasn't always ever thus. Especially those few seasons after he arrived on these shores.

    Murray performed at the top level throughout most of his career.

    At their peak you might have an argument for JGP but across the career Murray is comfortably the better player.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,648 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Kind of overlooking that long period from the end of 2018 through to a couple of seasons ago where Murray was well off the pace.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,363 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    It doesn't need to be a direct comparison, does it? McBride was one of the top locks across these islands for fifteen years rather than twenty.

    I remember reading that Mike Gibson played 60+ non-Test Lions matches.

    They are completely different, I take your point - the only absolute consistency is that you're one of, or the best in your position.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,865 ✭✭✭leakyboots


    I never bought into that to be honest, he didn't just magically speed up at the end of his career. I was at his debut and attended most Munster matches, I don't subscribe to it to be honest.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 890 ✭✭✭darkened_scrum


    Murray performed at the top level throughout most of his career.

    I wouldn't go along with this. From about 2012/3 to 2018/19 he was one of the very best in the world, him and Aaron Smith were a cut above. I don't think that's been true for Murray at any point after 2019 RWC. He's had some really poor spells in that time as well.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,983 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    When you look at the impact they had on their teams, I think Wood had a bigger impact.

    The game has changed a lot since then. Everybody is expected to be playing at a high level every game now. Back then you could get away with being a bit sloppy in a game or two.

    Wood was always switched on and picked up the slack for other players.

    Sheehan doesn't have to do that. I'm pretty sure he would if he needed to.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    For me, it was a mistake for Murray (and a few others) to tour Australia in summer 2018, and I think that tour exacerbated a neck issue that subsequently kept him out for a prolonged period. I think he lost a certain amount of his athleticism when he came back from that and never really recovered it.

    He was still a quality top tier scrum half who delivered on some big days - notably the 2023 Grand Slam, but he wasn’t quite the player he was before it.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    I dunno, how do you quantify that?

    Sheehan is the definition of a big game player who has stood up massively on some really big days - he scored two tries in a man-of-the-match performance for us to win the Grand Slam against England in 2023, scored two tries in the European Cup final in 2023, even has scored crucial tries for the Lions in each of the two tests to date.

    I don’t think he’s a guy who coasts - he’s more often than not the standard setter who is our best performer in most games.

    It’s crazy, for me, as good as he is, I still think he’s underrated globally and even possibly within Ireland.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,997 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Ah he’s a class player and one of the first names on the team sheet but “best performer in most games”? That’s over stating it.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    I genuinely don’t think it is. I think his floor is exceptionally high and he has a great tendency to show up with big moments in big games.

    We 100% take his performances for granted IMO.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,983 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I don't underrate him at all. As a matter of fact I'm regularly raving about him. There's no doubt in my mind that he's the best hooker in world rugby.

    What I'm pointing out is that he's in a pack with Furlong/Bealham, Porter, Beirne, McCarthy, Ryan, VDF and Doris.

    How would Wood have done in a pack like that?

    Wood played in a pretty average pack his whole career. Never even won a six nations. He excelled in very average teams. Many times he dragged his team's to wins.

    He was the first world player of the year, that's an incredible achievement. Imagine being selected ahead of all New Zealand, South African and English players for the first award of the trophy. That shows how highly rated he was in the game worldwide.

    Trying to say one is better than the other is impossible. Wood was the best in the world when he played, Sheehan is the best in the world for maybe the last two years and likely will be for many more.

    Right now though if you had to pick it has to be Wood. He had a whole career and was World rugby player of the year.

    Sheehan is early in his career and to this point has no awards of note.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,336 ✭✭✭HBC08


    Except all his medals.

    Wood was the best hooker in the world for a couple of years.Sheehan has accomplished that when the bar is a lot higher and he has another 7-10 years in him.

    There is simply no comparison.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,983 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    The bar is a lot higher? They played in different eras. Fitness, weight rooms, diet and even psychology has improved massively. Sheehan is a much better player than Keith Wood ever was.

    But if Keith Wood was a young man now, would he be ahead of Sheehan? That's impossible to call.

    We are comparing players in their own eras. Wood was the best in his era, so good that he was awarded the first ever world player of the year award. Sheehan is the best hooker right now and for the past two years.

    The differences in their eras, Sheehan has played in a world class pack since he came into the Ireland team. Wood played in an average at best group of forwards.

    Would Sheehan impress as much playing with an average group of forwards?. We most likely will never know the answer to that.

    Wood carried a bad team to wins. Sheehan has never had to carry a team to a win. He's played his part and sometimes a big part but the team around him has always been very good.

    The only way to compare is to gauge the impact of both players in their eras. As regards Ireland Wood made a bigger impact, he was a much more crucial player.

    If you took Wood out of his Ireland teams that was a huge loss. If you take Sheehan out the impact is not severe.

    Having said all that I do believe that when Sheehan is 30 we will say he's the best ever from any era. He's a phenomenal player. He needs years and he needs some individual awards to become the greatest.

    I think he'll get the awards and I think it's very likely he will not only be rated the best hooker but the best player to ever put on a green shirt.

    As I said I'm a huge fan of Sheehan, I love watching him more than any other player. It annoys me when he's taken off because he's not tired and can easily play the full 80. It grates me because I'm going to see 15-20 minutes less of him.

    I'm not disrespecting Sheehan in any way here.

    A valid example is Sean Fitzpatrick whose rated as the greatest hooker of all time.

    Was he as good of a player as Keith Wood? Not even close to him but he was from a different era to Keith Wood and his impact was huge in the teams he played for. Fitzpatrick ended his career shortly after Wood began his but the professional had just begun and Wood had the benefit of massive improvement in training and diet etc. Again comparing players from different eras is not comparing today's player physically and fitness wise with the man from yesteryear. That would be ludicrous.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    I think some of your metrics for comparing them are a bit flawed - you’ve said a few times “Wood carried a bad team to wins” - but that’s not hugely true - he won 23 games total from 58 caps, and of that, 9 wins came against USA, Japan, Romania, Namibia and Russia, and the bulk of his remaining wins came against the usual suspects (Wales, Scotland, Italy) - the only wins of his whole career against Tier 1 teams were 2 wins against France, 1 against England and 1 against Australia.

    I know he was in a bad side, but the argument about dragging the team to wins doesn’t stack up really.

    Equally - I think it’s huge he won World Player of the Year, but don’t think Sheehan needs to win it to be considered better and wouldn’t overstate the importance of it either. Brian O’Driscoll never won it (Richie McCaw given a farcical one in 2009) and there have been some awards with significant subjectivity or skewed heavily by a small handful of performances (I.e Dusatoir in 2011).

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,997 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    And equally you could argue that there's recency bias when it comes to Sheehan etc. you can argue both sides of the coin.

    (And Fwiw, I think Dusatoir completely deserved his award, he was ridiculous in that RWC).

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,392 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    I don't think recency bias comes into it really.

    My argument about Sheehan being the better player is centered around their respective games - I think Wood was the substantially more flawed player, with a lot more weaknesses to his set piece game in particular.

    The things Wood was really good at though as a player - his pace, aggression in the carry, physicality, work rate around the field - are all things that while I'm saying Wood was elite and the best of his era at that I think Sheehan is better again in every area.

    He definitely brought a huge amount of leadership, energy and passion to a team, and Sheehan appears to be a somewhat more reserved character, but think there's a strong argument that both are viewed as very strong leaders.

    I'm not pinning my argument to the success of the team or individual accolades, I'm just saying Dan Sheehan is comprehensively the better rugby player IMO.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


Advertisement
Advertisement