Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

2025 F1 General Discussion Thread

13537394041

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,203 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Thank You. Bi-weekly would have been great monthly just does not cut it. Such s pity. I don't see it lasting much longer sadly and its there own doing.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,231 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    Max Verstappen's jet has landed in Sardinia. This comes one day after Ralf Schumacher claimed Toto and Max will be meeting there.

    So both Toto and Max's private jets and yachts were in Sardinia yesterday.

    image.png

    looks like it is happening.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,203 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Is anyone here going to this?

    https://www.ticketmaster.ie/artist/5561429?venueId=198928&fbclid=PAQ0xDSwLftglleHRuA2FlbQEwAGFkaWQBqyNmh-g8UgGnl2G-D7z9AcIebUMM6wb2W6IFaxCxq1YN9we-MZAHhl2cpAnKEW0291OWjDI_aem_0MKIY6bCSriHK4mMpKw7ug

    1000012713.jpg

    Not cheap.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,536 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    What are you on about?

    The title went to the last race in 1998, 2000, 2003, 2007, 2008, 2010, 2012 and 2021 (these are off the top of my head. These were with different teams as well as drivers, so what are you even trying to say?

    Nowhere have I sad single team dominance is new, it sounds like you’re angry at the wind.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,637 ✭✭✭Slutmonkey57b


    It sounds like you're extremely angry at the idea that drivers might not be very important in the grand scheme of things.

    To any long term fan of the sport, that genuinely isn't news. It's not controversial.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,203 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    I am confused. Are them dates for the constructors or drivers titles?

    Of the top of my head Mclaren won the WCC in 1998 and the WDC too with Mika Hakkinin.

    2000 was Ferrari with Micheal Schumacher.

    Anyway I got lazy so here you go

    From 1998 to 2012, the Formula 1 Constructors' Championship winners were: 

    McLaren (1998), Ferrari (1999-2004, 2007-2008), Renault (2005-2006), Brawn GP (2009), and Red Bull Racing (2010-2012)

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,143 ✭✭✭Jacovs


    It does beg the question; why are some teams willing to pay $65mil for a driver? Or if you will, why are some drivers worth $60-$65mil and others only $1mil?

    1000023693.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,536 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    More so drivers, as the poster was saying that F1 has mostly been characterised by one team dominating. I was pointing out that 2 teams and drivers had battles that went to the last round, so domination is a bit misleading.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,536 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    You’re argument doesn’t hold water, if it were the case then if a dominant car was the only factor, both drivers of that team would be first and second in every championship.

    To long term fans of the sport, we know it’s horseshit to think like that.

    You seem to know best, we must tell all the teams they are overpaying these superstar drivers for nothing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,637 ✭✭✭Slutmonkey57b


    F1 is a sport based on spending farcical amounts of money to extract every marginal gain possible. Literally millions on hundredths of a second. I make no differentiation between them spending it on a wind tunnel or a driver.

    Driver salaries are usually largely or wholly paid by sponsors, because there's a marketing element to them. You can bring a driver to a marketing event but that's less easy with a wind tunnel. Bernie famously said he never paid a driver in his life.

    If Alpine or Haas offered verstappen double his salary to drive for them, would he do it? No. Why?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,381 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Put any other driver in the red bull last year and they don't win the driver's championship. Saying the driver isn't important is a nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,263 ✭✭✭thefa


    Bit late to the party but just watched the F1 movie and went straight to YouTube to get the proper fix from the last race of Days of Thunder!

    F1 movie takes itself fairly seriously and I was engaged throughout. Some of the tactics though (like the Apex drivers tag teaming LeClerc & Hamilton) was more akin to Talladega Nights.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,203 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Because he would know they are lying to him and could not afford to pay him double his salary.

    Awe ok. Yes I agree with you especially during the Red Bull years. Alonso could have had ot in 2012 had Ferrari not fucjed up the strategy in Bahrain was it?where he got stuck behind the Renault and could not pass.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,536 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Your first paragraph gives it all up pal, you’ve no idea what you’re on about. Have you heard of the budget cap at all?

    Bernie was full of his own praise.

    “If”, I don’t go with hypothetical scenarios, it shows the weight of your argument that you have to rely on one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,536 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,637 ✭✭✭Slutmonkey57b


    It's not hypothetical. There is no way a "star" driver is going to volunteer to drive a **** car from a bad team. You want a different example of how that goes other than Alonso? Emerson Fittipaldi, greatest driver of the time, left Lotus and took a chance on building up his own team with his brother. How did that work out? Spoiler alert: badly.

    You made the argument that driver salaries prove something, all I've done is rebutted it. Again, I don't know why you're so adamant that a well known truth is somehow a fringe opinion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,536 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Emerson Fittipaldi, greatest driver of the time

    Now this is a new one…

    You’ve rebutted nothing pal, your “well known truth” isn’t based on an ounce of fact either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,231 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    has this been posted? it's quite good, long, but good.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,637 ✭✭✭Slutmonkey57b


    Fittipaldi was a journeyman nobody, then, according to.... a tedious troll?

    Good thing the ignore button still works.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,536 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    This is all very confusing now.

    Take care there.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,381 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    In this era of double and triple headers, having a 3 week gap between races when it's not the summer break should be banned.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,986 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    So the driver does make a difference, hence spending millions on them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,637 ✭✭✭Slutmonkey57b


    If you think there's some amazing gotcha between "a difference" and "a miniscule difference" then I'm sorry to tell you I'm not writing in pain from a burn here.

    Driver salaries are outside the cost cap and are largely subsidised by marketing partners. Again, not news to anybody so I don't know what the excitable crowing is about.

    You want to believe that your favourite driver X is the defining thing which wins races? Go ahead. The facts don't back you up 99% of the time, but sure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,986 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    You like rewriting your own posts when an internal inconsistency is spotted. Nowhere do you say "miniscule difference" in the post I quoted and no post facto quotation marks will change that.

    The fact is, tens of millions are spent on the best drivers whether that be by the teams or sponsors - and I see little difference in the two since it's the driver who's the ultimate beneficiary. But you go on dancing on the head of your pin in ever more frantic attempts to deny it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,637 ✭✭✭Slutmonkey57b


    You're jumping on a perceived wording gap pretending I changed my mind. My point has remained consistent: driver performance is vastly outweighed by car and team performance 99% of the time. Drivers are paid for the 1% where they do actually make a difference. If you had to choose what's important when spending money to win races, you spend it on things other than drivers practically all the time.

    Hamilton is paid more than Leclerc or Russell. Both were faster than him in the same machinery. Why pay him more, by your logic?

    Because he's an enormous marketing asset that goes far beyond F1. Which is why drivers are paid by sponsors and sit outside the cost cap, whereas wind tunnel and cfd time is heavily regulated. One provides a significant bearing on performance, the other might, possibly, on the right day, in the right circumstances, if there's an opportunity and they don't make mistakes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,381 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Car is obviously important, but the driver's championship has been won 12 times by a driver not in the winning constructor. So driver is vital too, and it's absolute nonsense to suggest they only contribute 1% to the overall performance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,986 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    I'm not pretending anything. You've pretended to quote yourself when you didn't say what you put in quotation marks and I've called you on it.

    You're quoting percentages as if they're fact "99% of the time" is an opinion not a fact and one I'm disputing. Hamilton is paid highly because he's a seven time world champion. That's proven success and what dictates his pay. Same as any other professional athlete. If teams thought like you, they'd never get a top driver.

    Edit: And btw, if you're going to reply to me, then quote me. Unless you don't want me to be notified of your reply of course.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,536 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Hamilton is paid more than Leclerc or Russell. Both were faster than him in the same machinery. Why pay him more, by your logic?

    Why is a 7x world champion paid more than Leclerc or Russell? Really?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,986 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    We're in the realms of the ultra-ridiculous at this stage. Quite something.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,221 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Ah here. Somehow you've all divided yourselves into groups that are either saying drivers are 1% of total performance or denying that driver pay is heavily linked to status and marketability rather than just raw pace.

    Neither side of the discussion is covering itself in glory



Advertisement