Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - mod warnings in OP, Updated 06/06/25

1862863864865867

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,626 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Like I said it's a side comment which is being focused in because my main point was rock solid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,989 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,905 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Looks like Tulsi Gabbard might be pushed overboard:

    “As we stand here today, closer to the brink of nuclear annihilation than ever before,” she says in the video.

    The clip continues, with Gabbard warning that "political elites and warmongers are carelessly fomenting fear and tension between nuclear powers."

    Trump reportedly had a problem with her comments. According to sources who spoke to the Times, Trump took Gabbard's video as a sign she was only using her time in his White House as a stepping stone. He reportedly told her if she wanted to run for president then she shouldn't be in his administration.

    His issues with Gabbard — who according to CBS was among the officials in the Situation Room Saturday — became more obvious after Trump was forced to respond to testimony she gave in March in which she said Iran was not pursuing nuclear weapons through its refinement efforts.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/tulsi-gabbard-trump-situation-room-iran-b2774707.html

    Netanarshole played him like the moron he is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,626 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Feel free to counter rather than get side tracked over the world Left.

    The discussion about the abortion and divorce referendum was quickly dropped. You can't make an argument about progressive rights of that Islamic regime and ignore all the brutality. It's at a point like that I start questioning are people on the far left. Because it's so obvious wrong and ridiculous to say. Anyway, no counter arguments have been made you'll hear from me if someone can formulate one not based off feelings but fact.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    Take a wild guess where most of the oil from gulf goes to?

    That’s right, China



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,989 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    They're not arguments that I made and I'm not about to start defending talking points I didn't even bring up.

    The point I made was about Mossadegh, the Shah and the outside actors (US/UK) that were at play with regards to the internal politics of Iran…

    …and you replied with "tHe lEfT".

    You don't even know which poster you're talking to, so we really are done at this point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,452 ✭✭✭Field east


    Pete Hegseth made a BIG DEAL about all the planning that went into the B52s / bunker busting bombs and attacking IRAN. We all knew that something was up over a week ago - that The US was preparing.
    so why was it necessary to fly some bombers over the pacific for decoy reasons m turn off responders, etc, etc, etc, when Israel and the US declared some time ago that Israel had achieved complete control over the Iran skies and knocked out all of its air defence setups. I was reminded of the concept of breaking a nut with a sledgehammer but a steamroller was used here by the US. The US said that it used 75 planes in the operation and NONE of them were were shot down - hard to believe this and is it because it is true that Israel had completely neutralised IRANS air defence capabilities



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,581 ✭✭✭twinytwo


    Also BiBi needs war to stay out of Jail. He has put off his cross exam in his trial for as long as possible. Got out of his last 2 appearances by suddenly being sick and having to take a important diplomatic call.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,024 ✭✭✭✭Discodog


    I asked the enrichment question a while ago & no one answered because there isn't an answer. They have enriched way above the level needed unless you are trying to build a bomb.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,626 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    "Iran is the place it is today precisely because of interference by outside actors. The same outside actors that are banging on about "regime change" once again."

    The biggest outside actors who created regime change for the Persians were the Islamic arabs which is still effecting them till today , thanks to the 1979 revolution which was assisted by left wing activists.

    You ignored this point and focused on left wingers because you know it's true. We're done here because you've nothing to say.

    At the same time @yagan acting like it's been a good thing because Sharia and Islam allow abortions and divorce.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,839 ✭✭✭Hoop66


    So, turns out you were wrong. And not for the first time.

    How anyone could think Trump was going to pass up an opportunity to show off his shiny bombers, particularly against an adversary that can't strike back at the US, is a mystery to me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    You ain’t gonna get an answer to that enrichment question as there is no good reasons to enrich above 5% and kick inspectors out

    There’s another question you not gonna get an answer to

    How the hell is Iran having nukes helps Palestinians, are the Iranians gonna threathen to wipe Israelis and Palestinians (look at how small an area both peoples occupy)?

    A country having nukes doesn’t stop it from being counter attacked, they could just ask Putin



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,395 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Iran was fully complying with the deal they negotiated with Obama, then Trump tore up the agreement and directly attacked Iran and then Israel and America both attacked Iran directly (Trump in 2020 with his assassination of Soleimani)

    Iran needed to develop some kind of deterrent or even a bargaining chip if it came to renegotiating a new deal

    That is why they were enriching Uranium. They were nowhere near actually having a bomb, and and even further from having anything that could deliver a bomb.

    Ironically, they're much much closer having something now that the Russians have floated just giving them a few fully functioning warheads https://www.newsweek.com/russia-says-countries-now-ready-supply-iran-nuclear-weapons-2088979

    (even if such a suggestion remains very implausible, its a higher chance of Iran actually getting a nuclear weapon than they were at before the attack)

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,249 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    They've really ramped up the god talk this week



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,989 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Of course. Netanyahu is on the hook in his own country. But so long as there's a crisis, manufactured by him or not, he gets to avoid any legal entanglements. It's the reason why he broke the ceasefire in Gaza and the reason why he's expanded chaos in the region elsewhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,032 ✭✭✭yagan


    Nukes were always a pretext. Israel only ever wants to neutralize any resistance to their extermination of the Palestinian state.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,067 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Has anyone figured out where the trucks with the withdrawn material have taken it? I'm assuming they did have another location to store it and not keep driving the trucks around in circles. The US and others MUST have been watching the original sites and seen the use of the trucks to remove the material. Has it been moved beyond reach into a friendly nation in the area?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,875 ✭✭✭✭For Forks Sake




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,465 ✭✭✭halkar


    Who knows. They could have sold to Pakistan for one dollar and will buy back later for two dollars.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,748 ✭✭✭jacool


    I'm presuming that the Iranians are also using the "decoy run" playbook and half these trucks are just driving around to confuse people following them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,712 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    all very anecdotal but there seems to be a big push back on Israel or possibly just supporting it from within America including a lot of conservatives. This could be a big mis step by Trump. All rights and wrongs aside it seems this is the closest he’s come to splitting the party.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,696 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    There is no way this war is popular outside the 'neocon' bubble i.e. the assorted right wing cranks and warmongers, religious nutcases etc. Apparently, even JD Vance was opposed to the bombing of Iran and felt Trump was being used by Netanyahu.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,531 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    About 30% goes to China. I just find it ironic that after the US illegally bombs Iran and after declaring a trade war on China, the US have to ask China to talk to Iran about keeping the straight open.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,989 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Certainly there will be MAGA voices who would be opposed to what Trump has done. But, ultimately, it won't really diminish their support for him in the long term. They'll find some way of seeking to forgive him even if they're made to look like fools.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,246 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    "Apparently, even JD Vance was opposed to the bombing of Iran and felt Trump was being used by Netanyahu."

    JD Vance compared Trump to Hitler, and then took the position of VP, so Vance has history of saying what he believes is true and then abandoning it completely when power comes knocking

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,531 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    If Iran attacks American interests and the US responds, I think you'll see more splits. However if Iran just focuses on Israel for the foreseeable future, I think many who are vocal now will just row back into the MAGA camp.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    And none goes to US so they don’t care. Especially since they pump out more than Saudis by now

    Closing the straights only turns Iran from having one large problem to having half a dozen large problems as they then be **** about with economies of gulf states that are armed to the teeth and the East Asian consumers of gulf oil

    The last time Iran tried to **** about their whole navy was sank in rapid order

    To quote the Guardian

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jun/23/what-is-the-strait-of-hormuz-iran-threat-close-global-trade-oil-shipping


    “But it would also be an act of dramatic economic self-harm. Iranian oil uses the same gateway, and shutting Hormuz risks bringing Gulf Arab states, who have been highly critical of the Israeli attack, into the war to safeguard their own interests.

    In particular, closing the strait would significantly harm China. The world’s second-largest economy buys almost 90% of Iran’s oil exports, which are subject to international sanctions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,036 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Indeed they pump out more than the Saudis now but they also use nearly twice as much they produce so are still reliant on other countries production and this is all affecting those prices which will affect the US, in comparison Saudi Arabia only uses half of what they produce.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    Once again closing the straights only ensures Iran endsup in conflict with countries who stayed out of this

    IMG_5942.png

    Saudis alone has a military larger and as well equipped as Israel

    They won’t sit back and have their economy destroyed by mad Shia mullahs they hate



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,696 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    This latter outcome seems quite possible. Would be positive enough news for Trump but very bad for Israel - it appears certain Netanyahu was / is hoping for all out conflict between the US and Iran, tit for tat bombings and retaliation etc.



Advertisement