Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - mod warnings in OP, Updated 06/06/25

1861862863864865867»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,622 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Like I said it's a side comment which is being focused in because my main point was rock solid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,986 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,903 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Looks like Tulsi Gabbard might be pushed overboard:

    “As we stand here today, closer to the brink of nuclear annihilation than ever before,” she says in the video.

    The clip continues, with Gabbard warning that "political elites and warmongers are carelessly fomenting fear and tension between nuclear powers."

    Trump reportedly had a problem with her comments. According to sources who spoke to the Times, Trump took Gabbard's video as a sign she was only using her time in his White House as a stepping stone. He reportedly told her if she wanted to run for president then she shouldn't be in his administration.

    His issues with Gabbard — who according to CBS was among the officials in the Situation Room Saturday — became more obvious after Trump was forced to respond to testimony she gave in March in which she said Iran was not pursuing nuclear weapons through its refinement efforts.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/tulsi-gabbard-trump-situation-room-iran-b2774707.html

    Netanarshole played him like the moron he is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,622 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Feel free to counter rather than get side tracked over the world Left.

    The discussion about the abortion and divorce referendum was quickly dropped. You can't make an argument about progressive rights of that Islamic regime and ignore all the brutality. It's at a point like that I start questioning are people on the far left. Because it's so obvious wrong and ridiculous to say. Anyway, no counter arguments have been made you'll hear from me if someone can formulate one not based off feelings but fact.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,057 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    Take a wild guess where most of the oil from gulf goes to?

    That’s right, China



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,986 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    They're not arguments that I made and I'm not about to start defending talking points I didn't even bring up.

    The point I made was about Mossadegh, the Shah and the outside actors (US/UK) that were at play with regards to the internal politics of Iran…

    …and you replied with "tHe lEfT".

    You don't even know which poster you're talking to, so we really are done at this point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,452 ✭✭✭Field east


    Pete Hegseth made a BIG DEAL about all the planning that went into the B52s / bunker busting bombs and attacking IRAN. We all knew that something was up over a week ago - that The US was preparing.
    so why was it necessary to fly some bombers over the pacific for decoy reasons m turn off responders, etc, etc, etc, when Israel and the US declared some time ago that Israel had achieved complete control over the Iran skies and knocked out all of its air defence setups. I was reminded of the concept of breaking a nut with a sledgehammer but a steamroller was used here by the US. The US said that it used 75 planes in the operation and NONE of them were were shot down - hard to believe this and is it because it is true that Israel had completely neutralised IRANS air defence capabilities



Advertisement