Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Clampdown on TV 'Dodgy Boxes'

1111112113115117

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,382 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    Sky Italia is also a thing, so they rip off Italians too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,536 ✭✭✭batistuta9


    anything I'd say. he says it doesn't include apps downloaded from the amazon appstore.

    what does he think happens if it's turned on?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,602 ✭✭✭jj880


    Ok I get what you're saying. He shouldn't have said that. However he does mention turning it off to prevent possible data collection from KODI and although we mainly discuss IPTV only apps here its worth turning off. I still use Kodi the odd time for something that cant be got elsewhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,082 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    I knew that it was done in the past, but I had a feeling that it is not the current practice. If it was tried out again, probably GDPR would get involved.

    In the prosecutions of the Mister Bigs in the Dodgy Box criminality, I could see them trying to get their punishment reduced by co-operating with the Gardai. If Sky got details of some of the Low Level Criminals this way, it would make big news if they took a prosecution against a few of them. This is where I would envisage a lot of legal argument between Sky and those determined to keep the data of criminals a secret.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_licensing_in_the_Republic_of_Ireland

    "An Post maintains a database of addresses and uses this to inspect suspected cases of non-payment. As of 2019 the database is 30 years old, does not contain Eircode data, and has no data mining capabilities.

    Television dealers are required to supply details of people buying or renting televisions; this is no longer enforced as details supplied were unreliable. There is no obligation on cable and satellite providers to supply details of subscribers; in November 2012, a bill to change this was introduced. Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources Pat Rabbitte announced a planned government bill to the same effect in July 2014. In April 2015, the proposal was to allow An Post to access cable and satellite subscriber databases, in tandem with cost-cutting at RTÉ; in October 2015 it was reported that the plan had been shelved."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,479 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    its clearly obvious the whole model is a bust, and is now in rapid collapse,

    But it's not actually in rapid collapse.

    If it was then 18 months ago Sky and TNT would have said to the EPL, we are not paying for your product because illegal streaming is just stealing it straight away.

    What instead happened was that they ended up paying £6.7 billion for four years.

    Interestingly they are paying less for game than previously.

    It's more than double what Seire A got for it's rights.

    So Sky still believe their is value in broadcasting the Premier League.

    There are two podcasts linked in this thread, I listened to both and the conclusion from both seems to be that regardless of how ubiquitous illegal streaming is, it's not actually affecting Sky etc that much.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,382 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    Not affecting Sky?

    Are they not losing money hand over fist?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,479 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    But why did they pay what they payed for a rights renewal?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,750 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    Because the majority of people subscribe to watch premier League football.

    If sky didn't pay what the premier league expect, then the premier League would just go off and do their own thing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,329 ✭✭✭SteM


    No, my point is if someone wants to sign up to watch F1 then let them, if they want to sign up for golf let them etc. All of these sports have their own have seperate channels, why are people who only want to watch a certain sport forced to pay for all sports? That would lead to less pirating for a start.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,082 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    In which case the Premier League would have to find a way to stop the pirates. Which according to the experts here can only be done by doing very cheap prices. Big wage cuts for the footballers in that case I think.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,382 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    To stop others getting it.

    And to keep themselves in the game. Because if Sky lost the EPL, it would be the beginning of the end for them. They have had it from the start of the EPL in 1992. If it went elsewhere, there would be little reason to subscribe to Sky.

    But they have already starting sharing coverage anyway. TnT have some, Amazon are making in-roads.

    Who knows what will happen in the coming years? Sky could not compete with the likes of Apple, X, Meta, Google if they decided buying the epl games was a good idea.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,479 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    What will happen in the coming years is nothing, because a new 4 year deal is just starting.

    And rather than making in roads Amazon are not actually part of that 4 year deal.

    You see this is the problem with this thread, you have to deal with people who don't even know the facts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,602 ✭✭✭jj880


    Jaysus. What an ordeal for you 🤣. You could always listen to your own advice. Take it up with Boards if we're all so thick its an inconvenience.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,365 ✭✭✭xhomelezz


    More on dodgy boxes... I'd say guys get rid of your phones, PCs, mini PCs, fire sticks, tablets, smart TVs etc. asap, cuz they are coming for you!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,906 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Don't sky face this in all the regions they're in? So pulling out of Ireland would just be a financial hit more than anything.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 487 ✭✭PixelCrafter


    Sky Ireland's business produces €598.39m of revenue - it's small but one of their best performing markets and their subscriber numbers here have remained fairly steady. In contrast they're falling in the UK, and they face a lot more competition there as people will more readily dump Sky in favour of Freeview+Streamers.

    Sky doubled its losses last year, largely due to problems in Italy and Germany and a bit of a disaster with Sky Showtime which was joint venture with Paramount.

    They're desperately trying to become an aggregator by integrating their competitors into their platforms, as are the cable companies, but they're no longer the big glitzy gatekeeper to big name content that they were a couple of decades ago at their peak.

    Sky's basically's becoming a legacy platform and I think what you're seeing at the moment is desperation to maximise hold on the market. Cracking down hard on stuff like this will probably just backfire on them and do them a lot of PR damage.

    They've also cut a lot of staff, which is showing up in their customer care being far less than stellar.

    Sky Ireland's also just launched mobile here, which would tend to indicate they're digging in further, not pulling out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,223 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    apologies, what i actually mean by collapse, is that the model is now in a state of collapse, i also have the same belief in regards our housing market, i.e. i believe it to is in a state of collapse, but clearly prices are rocketing away, i.e. the financial model is extremely healthy but the overall model isnt actually functioning nor is sustainable, i.e. its a bust, we just dont know what exactly is gonna happen in the end



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,687 ✭✭✭dubrov


    It's the premier league that ultimately pay the price for a fall in subscriptions. Sky estimate what they will make from the rights and bid below that to make a profit. If that profit estimate drops, so will the bid.

    I don't think sky or the premier league are doing badly right now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭dublin49


    What technology do SKY use to put big fights behind pay walls and why cant they use this technology to block illegal streaming of all their events.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,479 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    I'm not a boxing fan and I've never gone looking for these events but I'm guessing that these pay per view boxing events are available on ones standard run of the mill illegal streaming service ?

    Or are they really something that are not "pirate-able" ?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,382 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    All the big fights are on dodgy boxes too.

    They can't stop anything being pirated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,382 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    I was simply pointing out that Amazon have had some games, I wasn't discussing any new deals.

    And I was also pointing out that there may be more competition for Sky in the future, by those with LOTS more financial might than Sky. You and me both have no idea what the future will hold for bidding for epl rights.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭dublin49


    thats gas ,so punters who subscribe to SKY fees have to pay extra while illegal streamers see it for nothing.Mad Ted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,602 ✭✭✭jj880


    Yip. PPV / Live Events section gets updated before any big event.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,384 ✭✭✭cullenswood


    What is Sky's revenue split between subs and advertising?

    If advertising is a large chunk of it then they might not care too much if people see the ads via a subscription or a steam. The more eyeballs via any source the better for this paying for advertisement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,479 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Amazon had a small package for the last two rights periods.

    That package involved two or three sets of midweek games, one of which was the Boxing Day fixtures.

    But this time they did not win any packages, nor did any other big tech.

    The EPL took what I would regard as a cautious approach this time, they reduced the number of packages, increased the number of games, and increased the duration of the contract, so there was no small package available like Amazon had last time.

    So there was no opportunity to "test the waters" as it were.

    Which is all good for customers because you have one less subscription to consider, and you know that's not changing for four years instead of three.

    If big tech enter the market the price for the subscription will not suddenly be cheap, it will probably be more expensive.

    NFL rights this side of the world used to be brought to you by the NFL themselves, but they sold it to DAZN a few years ago and the price went through the roof.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15 monkeyblues


    I’ve deleted my Facebook and WhatsApp now cause I’ve a dodgy box. Am I safe from Sky sending me to prison. I’m petrified.

    (Do Sky actually believe the nonsense there spouting)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,082 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    It seems the NFL and other American sports are also being scourged by criminals stealing their product. Maybe China has found some way to defeat them?

    AI: The NFL actively combats television and online video piracy through legal and technological means. They pursue copyright infringement claims against websites and services that illegally stream NFL games, and they also work with platforms like Facebook and YouTube to remove infringing content. Additionally, the NFL has agreements with various media partners to distribute games legally through television and digital platforms. 



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,479 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Do Sky actually believe the nonsense there spouting)

    Probably not, but they know that there are enough people out there who aren't tech savvy enough to see through it.

    Also they know no one in the media will really challenge them because no well known corresponded is going to go on air and defend illegal streaming.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement