Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Immigration and Ireland - MEGATHREAD *Mod Note Added 14/08/25*

1220221223225226323

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,017 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/2025/01/18/new-government-must-build-more-and-face-down-opposition-to-development/

    Behind a pay wall but the headline says it all. This is from David McWilliams by the way, very much a well-heeled southside Dubliner and seems to be pretty well-liked by a the so-called Dublin professional class.

    I agree that the Irish Times has a slant — every publication does, because sadly the ones that don't are ones that don't tend to be viable. But it's not like they're entirely shutting out critical views on the downsides of immigration.

    Will we see articles on Gript offering critical opinions on migration alarmism, or inward-looking admissions that some of the failures / challenges of migration policy are also creations of the Right too?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 840 ✭✭✭Hungry Burger


    I don’t know anything about the author, but that headline screams “Please don’t cancel me for this”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,289 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Looks like it was printed on the 18th of January. Now unless I'm mistaken, but it seems McWilliams doesn't have conviction in his writings as I haven't seen any more of his immigration opinions referenced in the meantime, so your take is probably valid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,780 ✭✭✭ericzeking


    It's interesting that when people want to sneer at gript they call it a newsletter or a one man website but when it comes to critiquing the bias of the Irish Times or RTE, Gript is posted up as the comparison for the bias the other way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,696 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    Yeah I’m not saying they’re entirely shutting it down - I acknowledged earlier that, while very much in a minority amongst their staff, they do occasionally have articles from the likes of Michael McDowell or your example, in their opinion section.

    I’m mostly taking issue with their news section - there is very little critical analysis or articles of that nature in relation to how our asylum system operates. Or in their reporting stories involving asylum seekers we see half reporting of stories to minimise the unpalatable aspects that might give rise to further questions they don’t want to see.

    I would very much doubt you would see any such articles coming from Gript, but that being said they wear their bias on their sleeve. The Times, the Examiner etc. are also biased but feign impartiality, which is irritating.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,409 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    I am all for fair evidence based criticism.

    But when criticism is based on evidence that can't be produced and can't be explained.

    Or when written news articles are produced as evidence but no actual specific example can be shown in the article text.

    I dispute it.

    But lets be real here. The real reason for disputing these news sources is so that when less credible news sources make a crazy claim and it cannot be supported by traditional news sources.

    This can simply be waved away as these traditional news sources obvious bias.

    So If this bias is so obvious for the Irish times why can no one on this thread provide an actual example and cite their concerns?

    I mean Irish times is a written media but you can't provide an example written evidence of them doing something you claim they are doing in their written media.

    🤣

    Most self proclaimed free speech absolutists are giant big whiny snowflakes!



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,998 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    You don’t know anything about Ireland’s most famous economist? I suggest you google him so.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,998 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    So Gript are ok for being flamingly biased, but the IT etc. aren’t ok because they don’t openly advertise their bias.

    Even though the IT etc. make an attempt at balance and are in general, much more balanced than Gript.

    Am I summarising your point?

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,696 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    No you’re not summarising my point, you’re making your own point

    Tell me where I said Gript were ok?

    In any case the other distinction I made was that Gript are not mainstream media while the IT etc. are, and in this manner their obfuscated biases have scope for much greater societal impact



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 57,745 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    Mod: @Stephen_Maturin, @RobbieTheRobber, @ArthurDayne and @Brian? in particular but also to all other posters - that is quite enough of the Gript/Irish Times discussion. There is a thread to discuss Gript if you wish to use it. What you are all doing now is effectively derailing the thread. Drop the discussion now, agree to differ and move on or warnings and bans will follow. This will be the only warning on thread relating to this.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 919 ✭✭✭creeper1


    It's true. There's literally endless millions even billions earmarked for this.

    https://www.tipperarylive.ie/news/clonmel/1828406/how-much-each-modular-home-for-ukrainian-refugees-in-clonmel-to-cost-436-000-on-average.html

    It's just as well the economy is going gangbusters and the surplus is massive from big tech and pharmaceutical companies corporation tax take.

    I'd have real problems dealing psychologically if I thought my personal wealth was being confiscated in this swindle.

    I can just shrug my shoulders at this point and rationalize it as big business paying for this sham.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,289 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Sounds about right, for the first 3 months of the year over €415m was spent. Thats over €4.5m a day, there is some amount of money being made by these scam landlords.

    https://x.com/Nick_Delehanty/status/1935273323685986328



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 919 ✭✭✭creeper1


    Interesting the party who endlessly repeated mantra of "no veto" and "legal and moral obligations" is now appearing on Virgin media making noises about how much hoteliers are making on the back of this fiddle.

    While I have not heard Pearce Doherty personally utter those catch phrases I certainly have from his party.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,635 ✭✭✭Mr. teddywinkles


    As i keep saying its not till the well starts runing dry that questions will be asked. And when theres a drought the anger really starts up. Dont believe this massive corp tax take will go on indefinitely.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 919 ✭✭✭creeper1


    Well if that's true it's very bad news.

    The recent purchase of city west has dispelled any myths about this being temporary.

    This is a permanent and recurring cost.

    I see costs for this crazy project going one way - up.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,998 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    how much hoteliers are making on the back of this fiddle.

    I agree it’s an obscene amount of money. But why is it a “fiddle”?

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,299 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    Because the belief is that most of the asylum seekers housed are not genuine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 919 ✭✭✭creeper1


    Because they could have stopped at Poland and we could have contributed to building modular homes there at a fraction of the price.

    And what has been spent is ridiculous.

    Whether your are talking about money for their pets or money for their car repairs or whatever else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,289 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Edit, seems the €415m figure also includes Ukrainians, so my calculations were off.

    So its €267m for Ipas for the first 3 months, or approx €3m a day, 33k iipas residents equals approx €89 per head.

    So to bring back to my pre edit point, if we are to believe the reported 80% non genuine cases, that means we are wasting €2.4m on this scheme, which would be greatly welcomed by many struggling schools and community groups aaround the country.

    RTE news : What do State spending figures on IP accommodation say?

    http://www.rte.ie/news/clarity/2025/0620/1519404-ipas-clarity/

    Post edited by prunudo on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,017 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    115,000 Ukrainians crossed into Poland within 72 hours of the invasion. By just over a month later, that was 2.3 million. In the time since Feb/March 2022, millions more have crossed that frontier.

    It is understood that 6.3 million Ukrainians fled the country up to June 2023 — which is (to repeat what I constantly repeat) the most significant displacement of people in Europe since the Nazis swept across the continent. The Syrian Refugee Crisis by contrast, one of the major pan-EU crises of the 21st century, involved less than 2 million.

    You act as if we could have just unilaterally decided to make Poland host all of them by unilaterally deciding to build modular homes in Poland and that Poland would happily have gone along with this because they were getting a bit of money handed to them for the mere exercise of hosting a volume of refugees equivalent to somewhere approaching 20% of its existing population (bearing in mind that I believe Ireland's intake represented something like 2%).

    Criticisms of Irish policy towards the Ukraine crisis are perfectly valid — it's important that we try to learn from it, because something similar is going to happen again some day. But the criticisms could do with a little tempering of realism and acknowledgement of the sheer enormity of the crisis we were dealing after just starting to emerge from the enormity of the Covid crisis.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,722 ✭✭✭Lotus Flower


    I think people need to stop making excuses. Arthur you’re right that the crisis was after the Covid crisis. That doesn’t excuse the over the top generous benefits that Ukrainian refugees got



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,094 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    The Irish Times is way better than Gript, no question about that, none at all. Has it show a left wing bias in terms of immigration? Absolutely it has. Even the headline on the McWilliams article is an example 'to some extent' ffs. The IT could have covered immigration far more comprehensively, from the point of view adopted by McWilliams, but has only done so very belatedly. Much like our political leaders.

    It was that failure to be honest in media coverage and political discussion, that opened the door for Gript, which is clearly ideologically motivated in its coverage of the issue. If the Irish Times, Independent and RTE had been a bit more honest and far less sanctimonious, there would have been no room for an ideologically motivated outlet like Gript.

    Mod Edit: Warned for ignoring mod instruction



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 774 ✭✭✭Phat Cat


    RTÉ have just published it now and the figures involved are eye-watering. How can anyone say that this is not a scam on a huge scale



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,652 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    Does anyone have any solutions as to where we put IPAS people coming here every day? Just leave them on the streets? How do you deport them without papers? Bar having massive detention centres at the airports and setting up a new agreement with the UK over travel between our border with them I have no idea how we aren't going to keep having tens of thousands coming every year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,069 ✭✭✭✭Panthro


    Scary reading those figures.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,069 ✭✭✭✭Panthro


    The Danish have introduced immigration policies aimed at reducing numbers. Maybe ireland could try some of their methods possibly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,017 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    The benefits given were in a scramble to aid a fellow European people who were subjected to the jackboot of a full military, mechanised invasion by a larger aggressor — and their homeland being sacrificed on the altar of imperialism and the doctrine of might being right.

    You grumble over the financial benefits given to a people who have paid for the defence of European freedom, liberty and democracy — things which we have benefited greatly from — with the blood of their loved ones, the bombardment of their country by drones and missiles and the imminent loss of many of their actual homes when their country is now seemingly inevitably partitioned.

    Yes, we need to look at the ways we went about things. Yes, humanitarian concerns and European solidarity can still co-exist with financial efficiency and understandable levels of self interest. But in the grand scheme of things, in all the years to come, of all the regrets I curse in my dying days — I am not going to look back on the year that a tyrant scattered innocent people across our continent and cry tears over the fact we probably shouldn't have paid so much to get their dogs washed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,652 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    That could take years though, what do we do with them in the meantime?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,746 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    We had 4.5 years of a Minister in charge of this who made no effort whatsoever to tackle the problem, and dismissed anyone who sought to tackle the issue at source.

    It's gonna take time to catch up and deal with the mess he has left behind.

    I note no IPAS statistics on the website for 5 weeks now. It'll be interesting to see how the numbers are in the next update, as the numbers within the IPAS system have been essentially flat since the turn of the year. If the numbers started to drop, it would relieve pressure on the system for now at least.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,468 ✭✭✭ShagNastii


    In terms of "being value for money" I understand the purchase of Citywest. Having it as opposed to paying out extortionate funds to private landlords. It hasn't been touched on but are we getting funding from outside bodies to fund this or it is exclusively on Irish government funds? The EU or the like.

    If not, it seems gravely wrong for us as to taxpayers to be penalised yearly to the cost of billions solely because we are a put-together "doing-well" country that is desirable for the world to come to.

    Call me heartless but I'd be happier throwing money at a motorway from Cork to Limerick, a Metro North than on countless IPAS centers for the next few decades.

    Bar virtue, what are the positives to doing this?

    Post edited by ShagNastii on


Advertisement