Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Aer Lingus Fleet/ Routes Discussion Pt 2 (ALL possible routes included)

1273274275276277279»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,741 ✭✭✭WishUWereHere


    Having lived for a couple of years in the greater Joburg/Pta region 30 years ago, it’s so depressing reading Your link and discovering just how far a once great region has degenerated to this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 148 ✭✭Lapmo_Dancer


    The 200 does have a trim tank. Same capacity as the 300 ~4900kg

    No, the whole point was to increase the Max Take Off Weight to allow more fuel in the tanks at Max Zero Fuel Weight.

    The MZFW of the HGW 300s is 171 tonnes. EI’s are configured for 313 paxs. A full load of paxs plus a decent cargo load will have you up towards MZFW. At MZFW you’re limited to ~71 tonnes of fuel which is ~5 tonnes less than full tanks without activating the centre tank.

    For that reason, I believe very few (if any?) operators have activated the centre fuel tank option on the 300s. Any extra fuel in an activated centre tank would have to be traded for payload. Perhaps, the economics might work on a premium heavy configuration.

    The 200s are configured for ~60 less paxs but the MZFW is ~1 tonne less. The tanks carry ~30 tonnes more fuel albeit the MTOW is ~9 tonnes less.

    Post edited by Lapmo_Dancer on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 258 ✭✭Qaanaaq


    Thanks for the details.👍️

    Just looking into this a little bit more i didn't realise EI had such a dense A333 config compared to other airlines. A quick check online i found the following seat count comparisons:

    • EI 313
    • DL 282
    • AY 279
    • IB 292
    • KL 292
    • HU 292
    • LH 255
    • SK 266
    • VS 264
    • AC 297
    • SN 295
    • 4Y 283
    • HX 303
    • TS 352

    I wonder when premium economy is introduced will we see much change in seat count?

    Also would anybody speculate what kind of config EI will go with on the A339?

    I see that Hong Kong airlines are flying YVR-HKG daily with a 303 seat A333 + 13hr flight westbound, so they must have the center tank option activated. Its 169NM longer than DUB-CPT



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 380 ✭✭Shamrockj


    And the ones fitted for east coast are 317, definitely at the higher end of configurations , the A321neo is similar in that sense very dense configurations. The introduction of premium economy should bring that down a bit.

    The old old configuration with only 24 in business had 327 total!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 452 ✭✭sherology


    And one would assume the new business class product (retrofit from 2026? on whatever-300s they're planning on keeping) will take up more floorspace if the new industry and IAG standard 1-2-1 layout is adopted, and/or have a reduced seat count than the space efficient current Vantage product.

    Now that we know the future fleet make-up (330-900, 321XLR/LR, and 320neo), excited to see what the cabin will look like. Recaro R3 in LH economy as per XLR, and then... ??

    Post edited by sherology on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 238 ✭✭jwm121


    LAX reduced from 5 to 4 weekly from 9th of Jan to 28th of Feb 2026.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 148 ✭✭Lapmo_Dancer


    Yeah, it would be interesting to know if they have the centre tanks. The HGW 333 might just about do it without, assuming there is a very close-by alternate at HKG. Not sure what the winds are typically like on the North Pacific. The centre tanks would certainly make it more comfortable.

    Interestingly, Qantas are using their A332s on LAX-BNE which is 836 nm longer than DUB-CPT on a great circle track.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 452 ✭✭sherology


    EI's HGW a330s (the latest models - last 4 I think) have requested 'paper weight limitations' meaning they are 'documented' to fly at a certain maximum weight (230T or something like that) which allows the airline to reduce it's airport/landing/navigation charges etc. They don't need any more than that so why pay more.

    The actual airframe is capable of 242T operations, with a change to the documentation, and has all the bits and bobs, and certainly the centre fuel tank which is a core structural component the wings are bolted onto and traverses the entire aircraft centre width. It is deactivated as a fuel store as per previous posts (I'm guessing... I would have thought it was just limited... But don't have that definitive knowledge).

    If you have to fully fuel an aircraft (all tanks) to get to your destination you are in fact burning fuel purely to carry that extra fuel, as that extra fuel has enormous weight, so very long routes that require a full load of fuel (all tanks filled) are suboptimal in terms of fuel efficiency. Every aircraft has a sweet spot/curve for fuel per passenger per km.

    The fuel in trim tanks in the tail is used to balance the aircraft and adjust it's center of gravity by pumping fuel to/from the back to the center/wing tanks dynamically to ensure that aircraft is optimally balanced during flight, controller by the flight computer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 148 ✭✭Lapmo_Dancer


    No, GAJ, GCF, EIM and EIN are 242 tonnes MTOW. On days when they’ve a full load and lots of cargo, it’s needed on LAX and SFO.

    FNG and FNH have the paper limitation of 233 tonnes to save on navigation charges.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1 KB77


    can anyone shed any light of possible new routes out of Cork. Friend of mine works there and he’s hearing Paris ( CDG) been looked at and maybe Prague with Ei. I read today that Air France are going to run CDG all year round, so that route sounds odd for EI.

    Also I read EI going to use A330 on Dublin to Madrid in the winter, twice weekly, Fridays and Sundays. If 330 is been used either they are doing very well on that route or they are linking up with Iberia to South America



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 178 ✭✭Kev11491


    A330s being put on certain Madrid rotations for the winter



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,277 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 452 ✭✭sherology


    Ahh. Apologies. I didn't read that they'd taken them with full load paperwork.

    For comparison, the newest 'step 4' upgrade to the a330-900, just certified, gives it a 253T MTOW, and a range of 7350nn (take away 15% for real world/safety). RR is also currently developing a derated Trent 7000 (68000lbs) for airlines that don't need the full power, which would reduce wear and tear. This will be available by the time EI receive (along with already certified improvements and soon to come further improvements).

    Step 5 cabin upgrades have also thinned out the cabin walls and ceiling panels removing some weight and adding a little space.

    Shows you how far the aircraft has come from it's original specs.

    Post edited by sherology on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 258 ✭✭Qaanaaq


    Do you have any guesses on what the EI A339 cabin plan might be like? seat count etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 452 ✭✭sherology


    I don't. No involvement with EI - like the technology of flight, and the design elements of cabins. I think I read in the annual IAG results they were launching new biz and premium economy cabins starting this winter/spring so whatever those are will likely follow through to the -900. I could be wrong. I forget more than I remember these days.

    BA and IB have different business seats, so EI could stick with Thompson, go with Recaro or Collins or pick another. They have free reign as a company.

    Whatever fits between doors 1 and 2 will be biz. EI is very commercial focussed so a high density product will be a leading factor I'd guess. Can one seat do both 321 and 330? It'll likely be a fully fledged doored product as they don't change their products very often so they'll pick something that'll keep up appearances.

    Recaro's winged R4 is a very pretty seat for 3 rows of premium 2-3-2, used by AA in the upcoming XLRs, and I think IB on their 350s. With wait times for everything so long I'd be pretty sure it's all decided already.

    Economy will lose a few rows but the overall aircraft density will still be high as a value carrier. Newer economy seats tend to be thinner/carved, so you can often get an extra row in to compensate. A little shy of 300, if even.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭kevinandrew


    The new business class seat has been chosen and may have already been shared internally or at least the basic specs. It's supposedly 1-2-1 with herringbone configuration, likely very similar to Iberia's XLR and JetBlue's Mint seat which is the Thompson Vantage Solo. A privacy door is optional on this design, I assume Aer Lingus will go without it.

    PE will be installed at the same time and is only about 3 rows, no idea about the seat itself. The combination of a relatively small W and the herringbone config in J will help maintain the higher overall density Aer Lingus requires.

    I'd hope they'd take the opportunity to update economy class too, makes sense to do a nose to tail retrofit when you consider some of those A330s are flying economy seats from 2007!

    I'd expect the A330neo, if arriving in 2028, to look the exact same with the only differences being the Airbus features like the Airspace lighting, side panels and XL bins.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 335 ✭✭cloudhopper19


    Just teaser shots of the new business have been shared internally with a public launch very soon. The new R3 Recaro on the XLR will be the new standard for 330's also in economy. 2 versions of the PE seat have been teased so no idea which one they are going to go with until launch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,325 ✭✭✭kevinandrew


    Good to know, thanks! I like the look of the new economy seat, those screens are definitely impressive and will be a big improvement for the A330 fleet.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 10,101 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    28 J class, herringbone.
    28 Y+, 2-3-2 Recaro seat.
    No sure about Y. If the Y+ takes the space of 5 rows of 2-4-2 then it will be down to 243 in Y.
    So maybe 28/28/243 =299?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 452 ✭✭sherology


    I'm kinda hoping it's the new Vantage Nova product, although it doesn't specifically list the a330 as an option (787, 350, 777 listed in a video tagline).

    No real reason other than launch customer of an Irish seat on an Irish airline, and it looks like a great, well thought out product.

    Q: did EI launch the original Vantage with Thompson way back when?

    Recaro have optimized their herringbone offering for the 330s sidewall profile recently... Fitting better into it's space, and giving a little more room.

    Anywho… not like I'll be flying up there and we'll know soon enough.

    Post edited by sherology on


  • Advertisement
Advertisement