Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Organ Donation becomes Opt Out from June

13567

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,757 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    Does anyone know what happens if you die in one of those countries, and are not signed up to their opt-out registers?

    Is it at the discretion of next-of-kin, or assumed consent?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,533 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    based on a quick google, it's a 'soft' law in that several of the countries won't interfere in a family's wishes. which is what that orla tinsley article is about.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,581 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    It hits different when it’s the State saying we’re calling dibs on your organs, and if you have a problem with that, then you have to let us know.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,204 ✭✭✭Rubberchikken


    If they're any use them whoever wants them is welcome to them.

    Having said that I am down for medical science donation, all going well, so we'll have to see.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,533 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    I don't think bodies are needed for medical science research nearly as much these days; a lot of the use before now would have been for teaching of student doctors and the like. But that is on the wane.

    But a fascinating, and very funny book on the subject is 'stiff: the curious lives of human cadavers' by Mary roach.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,496 ✭✭✭AyeGer


    I’d be happy to donate my organs but I don’t think they’d be accepted



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,078 ✭✭✭TokTik


    if the state wants my organs, pay me for them. Otherwise I’m out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,581 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    I called this one earlier TikTok 😁

    I don’t expect the State would waste public funds on the retrieval of non-viable organs

    Jokes aside (cos honestly I don’t think flippancy really is appropriate), the State isn’t going to be ‘harvesting organs’ or anything, it’s just laying claim to them while individuals are still alive. That’s why it’s important to let the State know you’re not interested while you still have the opportunity, as opposed to the decision being made for you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,660 ✭✭✭SuperBowserWorld


    Too lazy to read previous stuff in the tread ... but ...

    does this mean every funeral is going to be delayed when someone dies to see if they have suitable organs and then to extract them ?

    Also, isn't it highly specialized and resource intensive surgery. Carefully extract and store organs in bulk ?

    There must be some process to immediately exclude most people or ?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,533 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    I suspect they'd only harvest organs if they know the donor is a match for the recipient?

    I mean, they're not going to go to the trouble of doing it if they don't have an immediate use for your organs.

    Would also be curious as to how many organ transplants would take place normally vs. the number of people dying who would be viable donors?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,533 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    Not much you can do with the money if you're dead. And have no heart, lungs or liver any more.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,151 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    it should be noted that precious few people die in circumstances that allow for arcane donation



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,863 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Those Arcane organ donations can't be trusted 👀

    1000022911.gif


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,284 ✭✭✭jackofalltrades


    Disappointing to see the government going for an opt-out solution.

    Who cares about the ethics as long as you get the results. The less effort involved the better.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,603 ✭✭✭silliussoddius


    You mean that state operates the entire health care system, the one that people keep complaining about them not doing a good enough job.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,533 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    one issue here is that before now, action was a feelgood one. i.e. 'i'm opting in and that makes me feel good'.

    now, the action required is to opt out and that's not a feelgood act; maybe people will feel judged for doing so? whereas before inaction was their friend.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,679 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    I'm not seeing an ethical issue. People have a literal lifetime to opt out if they feel strongly about it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,862 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    How much would you like the victim of kidney failure to pay your estate for your otherwise useless organ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,581 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    Not to nitpick, but I don’t think the State operates the entire healthcare system; Minister for Health is where the buck stops in terms of the operation of the health care system.

    But yes, the one that people keep complaining about them not doing a good job. While this measure certainly increases efficiency by removing the barrier between the organs and the recipient, it’s not how I would go about increasing efficiency!

    I’m sure it’s happened to you before that you’re out for a meal and you’ve your dessert in front of you, and your dining companion says “are you eating that?”, or worse, just takes it off your plate! You don’t have to start the meal by declaring that your dinner companion is not welcome to eat your food.

    A trivial example by comparison, but I hope you get the idea.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,284 ✭✭✭jackofalltrades


    An assumption is going to be made that is known to be incorrect. That's unethical.

    People have a lifetime to opt out provided they are aware of it. Go out onto the street now and do a poll about this and I'd guarantee you that loads of people who wouldn't know about it.

    We also have no idea as to the nature of the opt out process.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,679 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Firstly, the family can ultimately opt them out after the fact if they want. Secondly if somebody is adamantly opposed to donating their organs, they should make themselves aware of the fact they need to opt out.

    The people who are oblivious that you are referring to could equally have previously assumed that they were by default opted in. So you could as easily argue that is unacceptable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,757 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    What if someone has no family, or the family can't be contacted?

    The State has a free-for-all to just take what they want because consent is assumed?

    No. That's not right.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,840 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Then they should opt out. Same principle as making a will but much, much easier.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,533 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    the state dip into my income without my consent. and my consent is ignored anyway if i refuse!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,863 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    How are medical treatment decisions normally made for a person in such an instance? Who assumes responsibility for the funeral? What happens any assets belonging to a person in such circumstances?

    Much like a person with other assets and no recognised or acknowledged family under the succession acts deciding to protect their assets from reversion to the Govt in case of dying intestate. The opt-out should IMO be viewed in much the same way. If a person in such circumstances doesn't wish their organs considered for donation, the opt out is their protection. Much as they would make a will to ensure their assets are distributed as per their wishes. (To be clear though, a will won't help regarding the donor register IMO as it will be dealt with well after the fact)

    Edge cases such as the one you propose will happen, they should be considered and gamed out. How likely is it that someone in serious/end of life care in an ICU is estranged from family and also in such good health that they are a viable donor? Given the prevalence of alcoholism and other addictions in such circumstances?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,581 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    The people who are oblivious that you are referring to could equally have previously assumed that they were by default opted in.

    You’re stretching the bounds of credibility there to suggest that people who are oblivious to the idea of organ donation assume that they are by default included in something they have no awareness of! That’s part of the reason why there aren’t more donations in the first place - the lack of education around the issue and an effective campaign to inform the public. The number of donors would increase, and while they might never be needed, they’re happy to do it and they in turn would be more willing to have the conversation with their family and friends. That’s one of the advantages of advance healthcare directives over this initiative.

    I don’t know are many people aware of advance healthcare directives either. I certainly don’t assume they are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,078 ✭✭✭TokTik


    I’d have 3 options.

    1. Opt in for the feelz, but you can opt out at any time.
    2. Opt out.
    3. Opt in for a fee, maybe €5-10k and you can’t opt out in the future.

    People get saved, people get paid and everyone’s happy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,032 ✭✭✭Yeah Right


    I hope they pass a law whereby anyone who opts out is automatically placed at the back of the queue when it comes to receiving a donated organ.

    Call me a cynic, but if you aren't willing to do your part to help your fellow man, then you should not be willing to accept (or be precluded from accepting) help from your fellow man.

    If you're not willing to put into the pot, you don't get to withdraw from it either. I'd rather my liver was given to an alcoholic who was guaranteed to relapse over a teetotal opt-outer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,581 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    Declaring that you’re only willing to help your fellow man with terms and conditions attached, is far worse than being unwilling to become a donor.

    Thankfully for everyone the Irish healthcare system doesn’t function on the basis of judging a person’s character to determine whether they’re worthy before providing healthcare.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,757 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    It's easy to say they should opt-out. But not everyone is internet literate enough to do that, or would fully understand it. I have worked across many areas of the civil service and I have encountered many people who struggle with basic reading and writing, let alone computer literacy. Yes, even in this day and age.

    This is a big part of why I am against assumed consent.

    Organs may be harvested from people who if asked, or if they had family to ask, would not have consented - and that doesn't sit right with me.



Advertisement