Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Mayo GAA Discussion

1305306307308310

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,028 ✭✭✭mjp


    Hard to put it on the ref to call the 2 pointers being touched behind the line from where he standing. It's first time it's happened in big championship game so will be something umpires will have to be clued in on going forward. On the free at the arc Aidan o shea was more than happy to take it on from there for the 2 pointers rather than the easy one pointer in front of posts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭Sebastian Dangerfield


    It's such a stupid rule that you reward a long distance kick with 2 points, but reduce it if an opposition player gets a fingertip to it (let alone that happening if the ball is already behind the posts). They got a lot right with the rule changes but this one is an example of trying to be too clever in my opinion



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,532 ✭✭✭Westernview


    I agree completely. They were talking nonsense on the Sunday game about getting extra technology or improving umpire training to judge the position where ball is touched but all that needs to be done is give 2 points whether the goalkeeper touches it or not. Problem solved.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,930 ✭✭✭Coillte_Bhoy


    Exactly, its a completely differnet situation than if a forward punches it over the bar. Or just get rid of the 2 pointer for frees imo



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,532 ✭✭✭Westernview


    Yes either way is fine. The main thing is to reward long range points from open play. But it's a bit silly giving 2 points for a free just outside the D but only 1 point for a longer distance 45.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,008 ✭✭✭WesternZulu


    Didn’t deserve to win. Same failings in terms of poor attacking play and bad wides.

    I very much think the back card though was incredibly harsh. It was in no way a deliberate pull down. More like a tangling of legs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 121 ✭✭Gerianam


    On the contrary, we did deserve to win. Referring errors did not favour us yesterday. We were the better team for much of the game, down to fourteen men at a crucial point and only a kick of the ball between us and a highly favoured Galway team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,429 ✭✭✭✭km79


    if we deserved to win we would have won.

    We didn’t as we keep making the same mistakes on and off the pitch .
    Including putting players on the pitch who have shown they are just not good enough time and time again but hoping this time it will be different .
    PJ subbed a sub yesterday

    We left Towey on to kick a few more wides .
    that’s the difference

    Mentality



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,429 ✭✭✭✭km79


    One simple question tells us all we need to know about where we are 3 years into McStays reign and where we are going .

    What is our kickout strategy?


    Junior B teams have one

    We don’t



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,081 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135


    it was a carbon copy of what happened in the Kerry Clare match, the 2 pointer should not have been an option it should have been in front of the goal. These rules are a **** disaster, just keep the 3 up and the long kick outs, that’s what’s creating the space as it is all bunched to win breaks and who ever wins them has open road to get quick ball in. The other rules are just not feasible esp for club level



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,523 ✭✭✭MacDanger


    Agree 100%

    Kickouts are huge with the new rules, without a dominant midfielder we need to work harder than most on that aspect of our game



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 737 ✭✭✭ethical


    This might sound harsh but the game could easily have been dubbed :'a tale of two 'keepers'….and we know which one came out on top. ( The Galway 'keeper kicked longer and more accurately and made a decent save or two in the process while the Mayo lad was indecisive …and probably even more so when he had the wind,awful mistake gifting Galway a point and incurring a black card for the defender in the process.)

    Mayo had the winning of it definitely but PJ was busy on the sidelines and the subbing on of Peter Cooke gave a great lift to Galway and probably got them over the line.

    Our boyos, on the line, could have put P.Durcan on and he would,no doubt,have lifted us and brought us the Connacht title.

    At the end of the day the only ones getting paid are the management and unfortunately they didn't turn up yesterday as far as Mayo were concerned. Some people around me at the game questioned as to whether either manager wanted to win the match with a view to the grouping for the round robin series. The GAA made the same fcuk up last year…think they'd learn by their mistakes,not a hope,arrogant bunch of so and sos.Excuses about logistics etc….for God's sake the GAA own all the stadia and could work off any timetable they want to ,its not that they have to wait for Leinster rugby or some soccer ground to be available for the series of round robin fixtures.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,856 ✭✭✭HBC08


    Paddie was togged and about to come in when the black card happened. Plans changed then.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,523 ✭✭✭MacDanger


    Really? That's odd, no matter what the plan is, if Paddy is available he's part of the plan IMO



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,856 ✭✭✭HBC08


    Not saying I fully understand it myself but that's what happened, I was sat behind the dugout.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,226 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Its probably more about hotels, busses, Garda and Volunteer logistics and the likes morso than the stadium/ground availability.

    Although it's generally just about squeezing more games into a relatively tight schedulem



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,783 ✭✭✭muddle84


    Simple as that! We were not the better team on the day.

    I was disappointed with the last play that Ryan was not stepping up to take on the 2 pointer! All I kept thinking of was if Cillian was there he would be demanding the ball!

    Post edited by muddle84 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,096 ✭✭✭✭Cartman78


    Yep...he got the ball a couple of times and recycled it back.

    Both times with his back to goal 😞

    Surely they've worked on this exact scenario in training???

    He should be waiting in the pocket for an opening.....not passing to the likes of Ruane to shank it 5 yards wide



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,291 ✭✭✭spakman


    COMPOSURE.

    We are badly lacking in it, and will continue to lose tight games until we manage to remain composed and know what we're trying to do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,279 ✭✭✭crusd


    Ryan was completely gassed and likely recognised himself that he wouldn't have had the range. I left the ground raging at him for not stepping up and instead standing deep but watching back you can see clearly he had nothing left. The amount of work he putting in during the first half was unreal. He should always have been in the 3 up but on most Galway attacks he was one on those tracking back which should not have been the case. It was likely Galways plan for his man to go forward pulling Ryan all over the pitch and Mayo's plan should have been for Ryan to leave someone else go with McGrath. Very quickly you would have seen Galway abandon the strategy if Ryan was left up top with someone other than McGrath marking him. One of the consequences of this was on Conroys second two pointer Ryan was actually the closest defender. It was only after Conroy already had 3 two pointers, 1 from a free, that Coen went man for man on him, after which he only scored one point. How this was not the plan for Conroy from the start McStay only knows!!

    Again on the last play for the two pointer you can see we had no plan to get a man in space, like we never considered that a scenario for a last minute two pointer would even be on the cards, but Galway had a clear plan to defend it. They overloaded the left side and centre and left space on the right where Mattie ultimately shot from. They were ok with us getting a shot from there as they know it was an extremely low percentage option for our shooters. This is why Paddy needed to be on by that stage. While right footed, that zone is where he has consistently scored from for years. Even if lack of match practice and fitness might have meant he may not have been able to deliver, Galway would known that he was an option to be covered and potentially opened up something for Boland or Mattie in a better position.

    With all that said and done, I was pleasantly surprised with how close we got in the end as expected them to win relatively easily, however we actually left it behind us with our shooting and gameplan. Why we waited until we were 8 points down to start playing directly is beyond me. Then when we caught up we once again we abandoned the direct strong running style that got us back in to it. The decision to remove both Neary and McHale was baffling. While they weren't perfect, that gave the Galway defence something to think about. At least one of them should have remained on.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,058 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    Looked to me that they had worked on it, but what they had worked on wasn't very effective. RO'D was sitting back and then trying to pop up to get a shot away, think he made a couple of bursts but Galway had it covered.

    I've no doubt they're working on things like this, it just doesn't seem that the work is of much use.

    Not that I think Galway played particularly well (and lets not forget they were missing two key forwards for them), but their movement was just better. Simple things like the player carrying the ball offloading it and getting in the way of the defender while buying their teammate a second or two to get a shot away. It's not massively difficult but there's no sign of that kind of movement/cuteness in our attack.

    McDaid really stood up for them when the pressure came on.

    The main positive I took away from Sunday.… I've never seen the pitch looking as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,523 ✭✭✭MacDanger


    Why we waited until we were 8 points down to start playing directly is beyond me.

    The wind was a huge factor in that



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,279 ✭✭✭crusd


    There is direct kicking and direct running. Direct running got the goal but retreated into our shell after that. I'd say Davitt Neary got into trouble for not recycling the ball out to the 45 and instead turning and taking on the defender



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,783 ✭✭✭muddle84


    I thought thats why they must have taken him off because he was playing too directly!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,088 ✭✭✭Barlett


    I thought Mayo played fairly well to be honest - I just saw the photo of the two pointer there, miles across the bar. I felt the referee was lenient enough towards us in the game, but I think things like that evened it out. Instead of going a point up we ended up level. Massively important



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 737 ✭✭✭ethical


    Its a great pity that the naturally talented are being 'discarded' . Young Neary was brilliant and direct….in a few years it will be knocked out of him!

    A few years ago D.O'C was the same! Move forwarded a few years and,as was said here previously,when certain Mayo players got to the arc,they recycled.Neary preferred the direct route.

    A reference from their training from a person on the inside is that,'they get a bollocking' if they try something 50/50… (I'd have more praise for a lad that took something on and failed rather than not try at all!!!,) they are asked to be cautious,break this 'rule ' and suffer the consequences….it would seem! Would Kerry tell D.Clifford to do this.Would Armagh tell Riain O'Neill do same,and would Tyrone tell the Canavans to be overly cautious and what of the Dubs with Con O'Callaghan and there are others?

    Too much science and not enough given to the raw heart and courage effort.Yes science has its part to play but not to the determent of a players 'heart'.How many games would Kerry be defeated in if Paidí Clifford's sheer effort and heart did not break down teams for them?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,279 ✭✭✭crusd


    Unfortunately "play the percentages" is what worked recently if you didnt have a David Clifford. Our management have not copped that with 3up, 4 back this has changed fundamentally however. What was once a 50/50 or less with 15 players behind the ball is now more like 60/40 with only 12. You have increasingly seen players taking the risky pass or taking on their man being rewarded because of space. We are sending out our team with the same approach as pre the new rules though. And its only when they go behind and cannot afford not to take risks that they start to flow. A team that produces a 10 minutes like we did after half time should be able to sustain that but we go back into zombie football when there is a game to be won. Infuriating, as even though we may not have the scoring ability of other teams, we have players with the drive, tenacity and bravery to go for it. Its the question I want asked of McStay in every interview "Why are your team still playing in the old risk averse ways when the new rules are proving to reward risk taking over pragmatism?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,583 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    A ref would rarely if ever be in a position to see if the ball was touched after it crossed the bar. Even for umpires getting it right would be hit and miss. In gaelic games, unlike soccer, the goal line is not between the posts, its outside and the same applies to the crossbar. The ball has to clear either before it`s a score. For me a ball that hits the inside of a post and comes back out should in all likelihood be flaged as a goal but how often have umpires ever done that. For them to flag a point based on whether the keeper touches the ball behind the crossbar or not is even more unlikely to happen. The rule could be changed so that the keeper touching the ball before it crosses the bar would still count as two points, but then if by tipping the ball over the bar to stop it falling into the net should that still count as a two point score ?

    Not to be overly harsh on Aiden O Shea who had a fine game overall, but for that two point free attempt, especially with that wind, the first thing you teach a young lad is aim for the far post when kicking with the left foot from the right wing. Even without the wind that was there on Sunday it will curl inwards. As far as I recall he took a similar free in the league final I think it was, and that also went wide on the near side. I tight games it`s little thing like that that cost you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,058 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    I don't think playing the percentages is a problem unique to us. All those examples of players there have teammates who play the percentages to some degree or another… but it's generally done in order to get the main men on the ball. The problem with us is that we take the main'ness out of the man.

    Looking out and seeing Ryan O'Donoghue making tackles in or around his own full back line for years has me pulling out my hair. He role should be scorer - first, creator - second, defender - never really.

    I actually think it's part of our psychology and not all blame goes to the set-up. You have to be a big character to be an out and out forward in Mayo. I get the impression other counties encourage and mind them an awful lot more than we do.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,279 ✭✭✭crusd


    You are going to need to explain what you mean by "goal line is not between the posts"?

    As far as I can see every pitch has goal line running between posts

    image.png


Advertisement