Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - mod warnings in OP, Updated 06/06/25

1705706708710711843

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,205 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Pretty sure someone like Elon 'empathy is a weakness' Musk would be only too happy to see social security be decimated and a lot of 'useless eaters' perish along with it. In his view, human life only has as much value as its productivity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,865 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    There's such irony here, Trump is incredibly corrupt. He's literally got the FBI jailing his political enemies ATM. I do agree though, the US has gotten what it deserves at this stage.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,253 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Aside from the UK Conservatives, it's hard to think of a more burnt out, useless party than Canada's Liberals. American Conservatism is so hateful and toxic that Carney and Trudeau's lot have risen from the ashes like a phoenix. It's a turn of fortune not often seen.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,115 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    People deserve the politicians they elect.

    That statement ignores the reality of how close many elections are. We see Trump and his staff insisting he has a mandate for what he is doing, when in reality only less then 1 in 3 of all eligible voters voted for him and of those who did vote, only 1.5% more voted for him than for Kamala.

    People who voted for Trump in 2020 got the fastest recovery from Covid, very significant pieces of legislation, strong stock markets and low unemployment because Biden won.

    75M People went out to vote in the last election and selected Kamala for President, they have to suffer through the most negatively impactful US Presidential opening of their lifetimes.

    It's incorrect to suggest they deserve that just because they took part in the election.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,105 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Trumps meddling? He repeatedly called for the end of Canada as a nation and threatened them with Tariffs if they didn't comply with his wishes.

    That is not meddling, that is outright hostility and open aggression.

    People aren't fickle; the situation changed. While they had issues with how the Liberals were running their country, these issues paled into insignificance when compared to an external threat to their very existence.

    Carney said he would protext Canada, would stand strong against the bully that the US voters put in. Sounds like a perfectly reasonable position for the lectorate to take. They put aside their small individual concerns for the greater good.

    Its a pity that Trump supporters could do the same and instead felt that Kamala's laugh or same sex toilets were the bigger issues than letting a fraud and SAer and declared wannabe dictator into the most powerful position in the country.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,838 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    Labour in the Uk say they have a mandate too.

    After all they secured 412 seats and the largest majority government in 25 years.

    Of course Labour only received 33.8% of the total vote, a measly 1.7% higher than the previous election.

    Carney said he would protext Canada, would stand strong against the bully that the US voters put in. Sounds like a perfectly reasonable position for the lectorate to take. They put aside their small individual concerns for the greater good.

    And Polievre wouldnt protect Canada is it ?

    Polievre is more of a nationalist than Carney, he would have been tough on Trump.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,035 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Give him a few more days after that and he'll flip it then to "I helped him bigly, if it wasn't for me, Carney would never have got elected"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,477 ✭✭✭dogbert27


    I think you'll find that people are patriotic and when the clown president of your neighbouring country decides to belittle you as a nation and a people, declare that you should really be a subservient state to him and not a sovereign country, those people will vote for who is most vocal in defending them.

    Carney came out fighting from the get go against Trump while Poilievre was too little too late. It was only in early March that the premier of Alberta, Danielle Smith said that, while there would always be disagreements, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre would be "very much in sync with … the new direction in America"

    Being patriotic is not fickle. I'm sure every MAGA will be able to tell you that!

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/poilievre-trump-smith-analysis-1.7496125



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,870 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Not only have the conservatives taken a huge beating, Poilievre seems likely to have lost his own seat.

    Looks like Canadians have taken a look at what Trump and the GOP have turned into, and have outright rejected it for their own country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,035 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    The irony is that the Govt initiated the deportation decision, not the mother, denying her child continuance of her medical treatment. The Admin chose only to see the small deportation picture that Trump & Co see, and not the bigger picture.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,115 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Labour have 63% of the seats in Westminster. If you have 100 people in a room, 14 of them have to change their opinion for them to lose their majority of opinion. On the same metric, in the US, it's just 2 people with respect to those who chose Trump at the last election.

    And there's a whole lot more reasons for people to have shifted from him than to have moved towards him since he won. The only thing he can hang his hat on, is his immigration policy, and everyone who would be pleased about that today, was already voting for him anyway.

    But he did win, and for about another 18 months, he has the office, the house and the senate, but from even as soon as this time next year, Republicans will be looking nervously at the mid-terms and he could find the voices agreeing with him that are there now, are not as loud then.

    Of course, given the incompetency of Johnson as leader of the house and Trumps style of Presidency, it hasn't really been a real use to him in the first 3 months of his term anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,838 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    The Conservatives havent taken a huge beating.

    They are currently projected to have won 144 seats - that's up from 120 before the election.

    In fact the last time the Conservatives won a majority was in 2011 with 39.6% of the vote. They are on track to beat that this time, with roughly 41.4% of the vote. They peaked at 44% in the polls in January.

    The key factor this time is that the progressive vote has coalesced around the Liberals. The NDP have been decimated, down from 18% to 6%.

    In a different election, this would have been a very successful one for the Conservatives.

    Image1.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,368 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    I don't understand how the Canada 51st state was ever taken seriously by anyone. Before Trump was anything more than a failed embarrassment in the real estate industry, Canadians rejoiced in telling visitors about how they burned the White House in 1814. Only at the point of a gun would they be annexed.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,253 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Or, more likely, he'd have been another Trump sycophant and Canadians rightly saw through the ruse and opted for someone who actually cares about Canada.

    Labour have a mandate. It's how the British electoral system works.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,355 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Yeah. A lot of the issues are because the systems people use to elect their governments are archaic and corrupt and force people to choose between 'a douche and a turd' every time.

    Canada, America, UK, all have first past the post systems that are almost impossible to reform because the incumbent party by definition always benefits from the system that saw them get elected, and two established parties tend to dominate with 3rd party voters essentially voting in favour of the the party they dislike the most.

    If the electoral system is rigged then you can't blame the voters for electing bad candidates.

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,865 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Also an expert in economics while the US is in a trade war with the globe seems pretty sensible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,870 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    They took a huge beating compared to their polling around a month before Trump took office, and that's the point of discussing it in this thread. The sharp turn in polling back to the Liberals was a direct result of Trump.

    Untitled Image


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,838 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    No they didnt take a huge beating.

    Conservatives are expected to get roughly 41.4% of the vote. They peaked at 44% in the polls in January.

    2.5% drop is not much at all.

    The people that primarily turned towards the Liberals were NDP voters, they likely wouldnt have voted Conservative.

    NDP have taken a huge beating, they have dropped 15% from the polls, thats where the Liberals surge has come from.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 382 ✭✭BP_RS3813


    Its not like that will change though. They have been using that system for so long that using modern systems in other countries would seem like too much of a change.

    It took how long for gay people in Ireland to get marriage rights? It took how long for black people in deep southern US somewhat equal rights (probably a few with old attitudes down there still!)?

    That sort of change happens over decades, not just 1 guy like trump coming in and upsetting world order.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,203 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    The UK did at least have a vote on it, coalition politics in a parliament can create a dynamic different to the US setup.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,253 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Of course you can. There's always a choice, even in the US and the voters made their choice and now we've to spend the next four years listening to them moaning about the predictable consequences.

    The UK did but it was literally the second referendum in British history and it was on a topic most people don't understand.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 591 ✭✭✭Stanley 1


    Daycent summary of present position.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,189 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    You can't overlook the machinations that happened to create Trump's win. Over 4 million eligible voters were purged from the rolls,.and that's not even talking about the quite credible possibility of actual election hacking fraud.

    It's like when folks say Americans aren't ready for a female perfect, despite a majority already having voted for one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 781 ✭✭✭RickBlaine


    One consequence of Trump and his administration's policies is a lot of people who work for hotels on the Vegas strip are loosing their jobs. This is due to fewer visitors because domestic tourists are concerned about an upcoming recessions and spending less on vacations; and foreign visitor numbers are dropping fast, especially from Canadians who make up the most amount of foreign tourism in Vegas. Nevada voted for Trump.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,208 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    REPORTER: Amazon will soon display a number next to the price of each product that shows how much the Trump tariffs are adding. Isn't that a perfect demonstration that it's the American consumer who is paying for these policies?

    LEAVITT: This is a hostile and political act by Amazon.

    Stay tuned for Burger King to object to having to list the calories beside their food on the grounds that such a requirement is a hostile and political act.

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,200 ✭✭✭Suckler


    Nevada voted for Trump.

    Turkeys voted for Christmas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,634 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    It's not taken seriously by anyone even now. The fact that the idea is delusionally unrealistic doesn't make Trump's advocacy of it any less hostile or offensive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,533 ✭✭✭circadian


    Astounding stuff, I wonder if there will be a more tangible response against Amazon. Turns out Bezos donated $1m to the Inauguration Fund via Amazon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,634 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    I can see why the Trump regime would be pissed about it, and presumably Amazon made this decision knowing that it would piss them off. But in the US context it's a more than reasonable decision. Ticket prices on goods in the US are quoted before sales tax; it's only when you get to the till that they add the tax to your purchases. If you're price-sensitive you have to remember this, and make sure you have enough money to cover the ticket price and the tax. So Americans are accustomed to being told the price and the applicable tax separately. This isn't quite the same, but you can see the parallel.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,151 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    You could have an Irish solution. Our constitution laid claim to northern Ireland until 1998



Advertisement