Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Cross-border review of rail network officially launched

1383940414244»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 104 ✭✭Paul2019


    Think you might get one or two noise complaints if Baldonnel is made into a civil airport for Dublin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,706 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Not for the huge numbers of residents under the main runway approach it isn't.

    It was and is a complete non-starter.

    Anyway that's waaaaayy off topic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,197 ✭✭✭Economics101


    You should take a quick look at the map before posting this nonsense.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,320 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    I see no reason why Baldinnell couldn’t be made into a civil airport? There are mostly industrial estates under the flight path according to SDCC‘s development plan maps. Residential houses could be compensated or CPOd.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 748 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    Celbridge is very nearby...

    I don't think it would work anyway due to proximity to Dublin Airport and angle of runway - would surely create a nightmare for air traffic control. Though I'm no air traffic control expert..



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,197 ✭✭✭Economics101


    You have to look at the extended centerline of Baldonnell Runway 10-28. It goes East over a huge swathe of South Dublin as far as Killiney. Civil airpors generally have long straight ILS approaches. As for Easterly take-offs (from Rwy 10) you can't have a Right turn until well clear of the Dublin mountains so its take-off all the way to Killiney.

    If you think a few houses in St Margarets could cause such a fuss, what about a few hundred thousand Southsiders?

    PS: Why is this in the all-Ireland rail network thread?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,178 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Tens of thousands of houses in the noise footprint.

    Conflict with Dublin Airport flight paths.

    Mountains nearby constraining available flight paths still further.

    Site is far too small.

    Transport links poor (yes, even with the N7)

    Most importantly of all - we already have a perfectly good airport with two runways, room to expand and a metro on the way. The passenger cap in Dublin is a nonsense even with "only" the existing two terminals - it can handle far more.

    Finally - who would pay for this folly?

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,579 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    Anyway, Dublin is already getting a second airport. In Arklow.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,358 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Mod: Can we keep on topic.

    Airports do not figure in the Cross Border Review.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25 Skyte


    Sorry to reopen this thread.

    I had a question RE: rolling stock choices for new Intercity and Enterprise services which will need to be replaced soon enough, Enterprise is already in motion.

    What's the reasons why double decker trains like in Europe are not done here for these services in particular?

    I understand why not for commuter/dart services but surely the drawbacks don't apply to Intercity/enterprise. You may say bridges too low or tunnels, is there much bridges or tunnels from Heuston or Connoly (North) that would interfere with this?

    Just to add one more question what do you think your theories are on what stock they would go for? My guess is some Alstom set considering the partnership with DART.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,746 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Loading gauge is too small. There are multiple bridges over the line before it even leaves County Dublin



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,622 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    There is a thread here discussing the Enterprise replacement and possible options:

    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058341796/enterprise-replacement-and-connolly-station-based-trains-generally#latest

    They need to be a tri-mode train, basically run under Diesel power, DC overhead power or AC overhead power and while it isn’t a requirement, I’d be surprised if they aren’t railcars / Multiple Units, rather then loco hauled as they currently sort of are.

    I think the Stadler FLIRT would be a great flexible, modular, option, but I’m sure there are other great options too.

    BTW the Mark 4 are only mid life, so they will likely just get a mid life refurbishment and be around the Cork route for the next 20 years. The ICR’s are even younger, so very long time until any consideration is given to replacing them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,409 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    The tender requires a bi-mode train, 1500V DC and diesel, with option of conversion to dual-voltage electric operation during its operating lifetime…

    The thing about the Mk4 carriages is that while they're only mid life, the locomotives that haul them are 10 years older, so there will come a point where the decision has to be made for new, electric, locomotives, or (as I think is more likely) retiring the carriages and moving to multiple units for passenger services.

    I wonder if the 22000s DMUs currently used for Intercity services could be electrified, as the newest sets should still have another 20 years ahead of them, while I hope mainline electrification would be well underway in 10.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,622 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Ah, excellent point on the Mark 4, I forgot about the age of the 201’s!

    It is a sticky one, I do feel IR would like to go all railcars for passenger services. They greatly improve reliability. It will be an interesting space to watch, I think what gets selected for the Enterprise will tell us a lot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 269 ✭✭PlatformNine


    Personally I don't think Alstom will be chosen for the Enterprise tender. The Alstom stock is perfectly good and I have very high hopes for the new 80/90Ks, especially since I am hoping they might also get picked for CACR. But when it comes to their regional or IC options, I don't think it is as well suited to both our needs and our loading gauge. Their two options either appear to be fully electric which we aren't prepared for, or they haven't made a model with a loading gauge like ours, which could make new units more expensive.

    I think it's more likely either a Stadler like bk mentions, or my personal hope CAF will be selected. They both make models for the UK that could with minimal modification be made for us, in addition to having tri-mode options which I don't believe Alstom has. Supposedly the selection for the Enterprise sets has been narrowed down to two companies for a while, but I only heard that here in passing, and I have not heard any updates in months.

    Post edited by PlatformNine on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    they theoretically could be by buying new cars with pantographs but it's not likely as you would only get a short life span from the new cars.

    i think (all though maybe it's just waffle so am very much open to correction) but apparently similar was looked at with the voyager fleet over in the UK and the conclusion was it wasn't worth it.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,622 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I'd guess they will just replace them eventually. I'm only guessing, but I think a time line that looks something like:

    • 2030 - Enterprise replacement
    • 2035 - Mark 4 Replacement
    • 2040 - Start replacing the older ICR's

    By 2040 you are looking at 33 years. Give our take a few years on all of the above.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,366 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Hitachi in the UK has a factory with an empty order book. The UK IET meets the spec broadly and they have successfully tested a battery/diesel/25kV variant and have some orders for it. Its UK spec so fits well with NIR's requirements, so reduces the risk. Just needs 1500V

    CAF Civity might be an option, but Irish Rail and the Mk4 fleet experience clouds that

    Stadler will build anything to spec really, the power pack mid carriage isn't an option for Belfast due platform lengths. Reliability of the bi mode 777 in Liverpool has been dire

    The customer facing spec is heavily based on the OBB RailJet 1 experience

    If I was bidding I'd be bidding on the basis that the train is for Dublin Cork not Dublin Belfast so I'd size battery against Cork, as its the obvious replacement for the Dublin Cork Mk4's in the early 2030 as a run on order



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,409 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Good points. I was thinking about this afterwards, and you’re right that it’s probably not worth changing the power source, but I don’t think this is going to be a big problem. It would be far cheaper to convert them to bio fuel (bio-gas or, easier, bio-diesel) and you can say they’re providing a “decarbonised” service. The electrification programme will cover over 90% of all passenger kilometres travelled on the country’s rail network, so the impact of still running combustion trains on the remainder would not be that big.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,622 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Hitachi in the UK has a factory with an empty order book. The UK IET meets the spec broadly and they have successfully tested a battery/diesel/25kV variant and have some orders for it. Its UK spec so fits well with NIR's requirements, so reduces the risk. Just needs 1500V

    You know what is weird, I was watching a video review of the Class 800 a few days ago and their interior looks so much like the Mark 4! I know the Mark 4 are CAF, while the 800's are Hitachi.

    I'm not a fan of the Mark 4 or Class 800 interior, lights far too bright and overall sterile looking. But the Class 800 also seems to have issues with it being very bouncy, just like the Mark 4!

    Perhaps if IR do go with it, they can choose a different interior and lighting.

    If I was bidding I'd be bidding on the basis that the train is for Dublin Cork not Dublin Belfast so I'd size battery against Cork, as its the obvious replacement for the Dublin Cork Mk4's in the early 2030 as a run on order

    I've been assuming that if they have a battery, it will only be a small one, used to avoid idling while in the station, maybe in the approaches to and from the station and regenerative braking. I don't think you could currently do enough battery to do Dublin to Cork.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Apologies this could be a very stupid question, but is there any scope to bring some of this rolling stock work into Ireland? I appreciate that this is very skilled work but the costs are reasonably high, and it seems like the duration of work is reasonably long. I'm not for a minute suggesting that the companies would relocate completely to Ireland but can any of the work be brought here at all?

    It just strikes me that we're a country with a shortage of rail infrastructure and a reasonable political consensus that we'll acquire more, so could some portion of the money stay within the country, using a guaranteed ongoing stream of projects or long-term (10 year?) contract?

    That might simply not be possible, but why wouldn't train building be like other automotive/aeronautical industries, with multiple suppliers in multiple countries, providing one end-product?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,366 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    No chance of any manufacturing in Ireland, the orders sizes are no way near what would justify a factory. There is a glut of capacity available in Europe currently. UK has Derby, Goole, Newton Aycliffe, Newport and are not sustainable even in the much bigger market.

    The CIE unions killed a deal with LHB in the late 1970's which would have setup a manufacturing base in Inchicore which would have forced rail investment to continue to keep it open



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,532 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    That's a shame. And it's not like - for instance - car manufacturing where some pieces of production are outsourced?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,366 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Its a question of how much battery you need/want to meet specification. If you remove the diesel engine entirely there a lot of space and weight available for a battery. Also a simpler train. Charging though becomes a challenge as you would need a serious amount of power on hand to charge

    You need about 2kW juice per coach per km ave. Start/stop services do better on battery than services which cruise along at line speed for hours



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,492 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    that timeline does sound quite possible to be honest.

    the 22000s will have been worked very hard on the heuston suburban with the stop start nature so they will probably have a shorter life span i feel so 2040 with them being at 33 years while it is generally on the low side could be a possibility.

    like always though time will tell.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,622 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I'd love that!

    I just assumed that you wouldn't have enough batteries for intercity type speeds and distances. I see however that Hitachi have trialled an all battery Class 800 Intercity train, very cool, though I note it only went 70km with 5 carriages and speed topped out at 120km/h. Cork to Dublin would need much larger battery capacity then that, specially if they are aiming for 200km/h.

    As you say, the big challenge would be charging at both ends.

    While I think the branch lines could definitely go battery, I kind have assumed the core Cork to Belfast route would need to be OHL, which would help charge the branch line trains and help reduce how much batteries they need (plus their lower speeds).

    But if they can do Intercity at 200km/h then brilliant! I'd love to be wrong on this.

    As an aside, even though I'm a big fan of battery tech myself, I keep getting surprised how fast it is coming along. The double decker BEV buses have arrived 2 years earlier then I predicted. BEV articulated trucks are already operating across Germany. DART+ BEMU's. All seem to be happening a few years ahead of where I would have thought, so perhaps this could be another pleasant surprise.



Advertisement