Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

M11/N11 - M50 (J4) to Coyne's Cross (J14) [options published]

1363738394042»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,099 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Contentious to who though, would only effect 8 to 10 houses, albeit probably wealthy connected people. But it would be far better for the greater good.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,099 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Now that we are officially in election mode, will be interesting see what promises are made on this project. At a minimum canvassers need to be asked about extra buses. The 6.30am 133 left passengers behind in Kilpedder last week as it was full. And the n11 itself is now backed up to before jn12 at the same time some mornings.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,099 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Test Test

    Also, for some reason I can't see the last page or the most recent posts? Probably won't see this one either.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,657 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I think if FFG are back in government without greens we might see this turbo charged



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,657 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Has anybody heard any chat about this road scheme since change of government? I know it is early days, but I had hoped that perhaps it would have been quite a high priority for incoming govt to at least announce something on it.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,648 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Two things will provide some signalling on this:

    1. The publication of TII allocations for 2025 which in the pre Ryan jockeying days happened in mid/late December, which are still overdue but should be published before the end of the month.

    2. The review of the National Development Plan in the summer which should see TII input on which schemes need to be prioritised unlike the last set of TII proposals which was dismissed.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,657 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Thanks, wasn't aware of imminent TII allocations, will be interesting to see if any mention in that.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,657 ✭✭✭hometruths


    TII allocations have been announced and as far as I can see nothing for this scheme.

    https://www.tii.ie/media/orbdngms/tii_local-authorities_2025-road-grant-allocations.pdf



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 434 ✭✭Ireland trains


    https://n11m11bpis.ie/publications/

    Major upgrade of junction 7 Bray South (Souther Cross) proposed as part of latest design.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,604 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    Am I misremembering or was the bus lane scheme once described as "quick-build".

    Each new iteration of it has added more and more infrastructure - this thread started in 2016! Not a single thing has been done in the intervening period other than the production of multiple reports and consultations. But 1000s of houses have been built and moved into all along the N11.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,324 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    I believe it was, but like certain “quick build” cycling projects in Dublin this scheme is anything but quick. It’s a nonsense term in Ireland, our system is incapable of delivering infrastructure quickly due to its incredibly consultative and bureaucratic methods, combined with an increasingly litigious society.
    I believe the scheme started off all singing all dancing, including bus lanes, widening to 6 lanes and extending all the way from Bray to Newtown mount Kennedy. Then it was the bus lanes only. Now according to that video they are going with the bus lanes and some parallel service roads, and junction redesigns. This is great to see as I really don’t think bus lanes can be delivered in isolation here due to the amount of access issues and unsafe junctions that the road currently has.

    If we could get this phase over the line, we can look at the changes needed further to the south at Delgany afterwards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,111 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    This is all totally inadequate and a waste of money. This needs 3 lanes running traffic each way. If they do what they now say they'll be ripping it all up again soon after.

    It makes zero sense.

    There was a comprehensive proposed solution here that is inevitable but has also been sidelined for this.

    This proposed mess even has the word "interim" on it. They are telling us they going to blow our money essentially on a couple of bus lanes.

    The Greens are gone. It's time to just do this properly in the first instance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,139 ✭✭✭BraveDonut


    Rubberneckers slowing to have a gawk at the Herbert road protesters causing chaos on the M11/M50.
    The protesters are oblivious to the fact that they are causing a problem



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,662 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    More lanes is the temp solution! This actual stretch has had enough redesigns and aux lanes to prove that the traffic just expands to fill it (as someone who has been commuting it (by car) for over 20 years!).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 434 ✭✭Ireland trains


    wasn’t Fassaroe’s P&R supposed to done by now as well?
    Surely they could convert the hard shoulder from Loughlinstown to Fassaroe now, while the junction alterations go through planning.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,604 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    having looked at the plans, I actually think the main reason they have to close the Herbert Road junction is because of the active travel requirement. They could easily leave it open for exit-only from the N11, there's never a queue there and very few cars use it to go south on the N11.

    But they have to get cyclists (and to a lesser extent pedestrians) off the hard-shoulder to accommodate the bus-lane and that means building an off-line cycle path between J6 and J7 which goes across the Herbert Rd. junction. This would be completely unsafe with the junction still open.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,657 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Perhaps the bus lane is the Trojan horse to ensure they can go ahead with the initial solution of motorway through the glen to coynes cross.

    Greens or no greens there was no way they were going to get that road as proposed through the glen of the downs because of the Habitats Directive.

    If in a year or two the proposal is extending a bus lane through the glen, then that stands a far higher chance given there is no alternative route to extend an existing route.

    Once they have permission to put the bus lane through, they have the road width they need and can pursue the original plan.



Advertisement