Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

A global recession is on the horizon - please read OP for mod warning

1345346348350351353

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,107 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Why is it a terrible idea?

    We signed up to a global tax deal on the basis the US did. We had a big negotiation over it.

    They have reneged on that deal.

    So why wouldn't we leave the deal and lower corporation tax to boost our competitiveness when they are putting up tariffs on us?

    It would help offset the cost of the US tariffs on companies based here, protect jobs and make us more competitive for new jobs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,970 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe




  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,523 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Yeah, well leaving the OECD minimum tax regime is also a terrible idea so it doesn't matter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,107 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Why? We held out joining it until the US did. They have now reneged. So it means nothing.

    Leave it and reduce CT to 8%. That will more than cover the costs of Trump's tariffs for companies here and give a big competitive boost.

    When the US chooses to rejoin it as is then we go back.

    We have to do something. This country is facing an economic catastrophe. This is the biggest tool we have. And guess what? We don't need EU permission (I know that upsets you).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,877 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    We negotiated terms that we could agree to and signed up. Guaranteed 15% maximum etc.

    Similar To Brexit you think the best course of action is to burn bridges with our allies.

    It's foolish. It was foolish during Brexit and you were proven categorically wrong time and time again.

    Your obsession with the EU being the bad guy is bizzare. Brexiteers and now Maga are the fools, we should not hitch our wagon to them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,643 ✭✭✭yagan


    I remember during the brexit negotiation years Kermit was a resident contrarian on all brexit threads.

    Logic and reason are absent.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,523 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    We held out joining it until the US did.

    This is not my memory of it. Why would it matter to us that a high tax rate country commits to a minimum rate. Our issues were to do with the rate and making sure it wasn't increased in the future. We agreed to it together with 140 other countries at the same time.

    Where have they reneged on it? Their CT rate is still 21%, well above the minimum.

    Leaving it and making ourselves even more of an international tax pariah would be incredibly self-defeating. And also deeply unnecessary.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,955 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    corporate tax global needs to rise, but this needs to be done very carefully, and very slowly, by maintaining a relatively low rate, we re playing a serious game of you re it! the only way to try resolve our most critical of issues such as housing, health care, infrastructure etc etc, taxes are gonna have to rise, but slowly. this state of relatively low taxes has proved itself over time to be flawed and wrong, leading to rapidly growing wealth inequality, serious social dysfunctions, rapidly escalating environmental problems etc etc, by maintaining this approach, your kids and grand kids futures are doomed, and this is where corporate taxes come in, by maintaining this relatively low rate, you re taxes are gonna have to rise to try resolve these critical issues, i.e. you re it, so its either corporations or you!

    the idea of maintaining low corporate taxes is based on increasing consumption, keep playing this game, and your kids are fcuked! we need to invest, and invest quickly, and this is where taxes comes in, so chose your kids future, you either want them to have some sort of future, or you dont!

    …but dont worry, its very unlikely much of the above is gonna happen, i.e. its very unlikely corporate taxes are increasing by much anytime soon, so…..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,779 ✭✭✭oceanman


    The EU have been pissed off with our little tax arrangement for a long time now, if this gets messy dont be surprised if

    the EU throws us under the bus.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,533 ✭✭✭Deub


    If I got 10€ every time I read the EU was going to throw us under the bus, I would be a millionaire. However, it never happened so what makes you think, this time is different?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,877 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,360 ✭✭✭SaoPaulo41


    Trump tariffs to be 10pc, 15pc or 20pc depending on country and industry - Sky News
    A source close to the White House has told Sky News there will three separate bands of tariffs - 10pc, 15pc, and 20pc.
    The bands will differ both by country and by industry, Sky news reported.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,643 ✭✭✭yagan


    If we're at fault then how these OECD countries have agreed to come down towards our 12.5% CTR for multinationals?

    Maybe your Daily Mail or Daily Express will have an answer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 512 ✭✭✭Murt2024


    Got approval in principle and holding off now for six months to see how all this plays out. My guess is a massive recession in hospitality trade, pharmaceuticals and IT. Where I work a team 15 programmers were let go out of a team of 20 as chat gpt and other AI software can basically do the job for you, same for accountants.

    Id recommend anyone now to skip college and do a trade if your able for it.

    Even stuff like Azure, AWS, Cisco you have an AI bot basically who will design things for you and ensure it’s secure from a security perspective.

    It doesn’t mean these type of roles or retiring, just need less and less people to do the roles. You still need the knowledge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,643 ✭✭✭yagan


    I agree with you on the trades but I reckon there's a limit of how much of the human you can take out of the equation before customers simply give up. I know chat bots are an instant no no for me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 512 ✭✭✭Murt2024


    it depends how much companies are willing to spend in all honesty. There’s some that cost **** all, there’s some are excellent ones but 50 times the price. The likes of sky is the cheapest of the cheep you can get.


    I can put into an AI chat design me a data center infrastructure that will service 10,000 employees and give it the list of applications that i need and budget. Design this with the upmost security and all firewall and equipment i will need



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 661 ✭✭✭engineerws


    Anyone know anything about the 39% tariff we are charging on US goods?

    https://www.newsweek.com/trump-reciprocal-tariff-chart-2054514



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,877 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    Sounds like there's a higher probability of losing your job within 6 months than property prices crashing in the same period.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    I use various AI tools for the 5-10% of my job that involves coding

    At best they are a better autocomplete

    At worst I seen it generate dangerous buggy rubbish that hilariously enough wouldn’t even compile due to hallucinations, eg asked Amazon ai tool to create Amazon infrastructure code (Cloudformation) what it generated looked ok but had **** that was simply invented and wouldn’t deploy

    Maybe on future it lead to some productivity gain, but even at basic tasks that I usually relegate to interns like writing test code, the current state of art just generates rubbish



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,127 ✭✭✭sock.rocker*


    The "tariff" rate is just (surplus / total exports to the US) * 0.5. This math works for basically everywhere.

    It is a nightmare for poorer countries who can't afford to buy much stuff from the US while American consumers and companies buy stuff from them.

    Lesotho got whacked with 50% and only sells ~$250m to the US.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 661 ✭✭✭engineerws


    Yep, I was looking at Lesotho and going, what?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,643 ✭✭✭yagan


    So it looks like the failed casino owner and convicted sex offender thinks that simply applying tariff rates based on individual trade deficits the US has with each country will somehow magically make their deficit disappear.

    If you're a textiles/garment factory owner in Cambodia you're probably going to see fewer sales to the US because US importers will now have to pay Trump's 49% tariff. You've still got inventory to sell so you take a hit, offer a discount to entice new customers and now you've reduced your exposure to volatile US trade.

    Replicate this in every country Trump applied his deficit adjustment tariff to and the world moves on, except for the US which will be experiencing a self induced recession and will now have a tariff ditch around its economy that will put investors off.

    His deficit adjustment tariff will only bring home production to cater for the US domestic market because Trump will have killed the export trade because countries like Cambodia will apply on US imports the rate Trump slapped on them.

    The nearest policy I can think of is the Argentine post WWII protectionist substitution policies that saw it ban imports on anything they felt should be produced domestically which killed its manufacturing export industry because of counter tariffs.

    Edit to add, the global economy moved while Argentina stagnated, and the global economy will move on while Trumpistan stagnates.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,113 ✭✭✭Thespoofer


    Its so obvious now its not even funny anymore.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 661 ✭✭✭engineerws


    What happens to your motherland in the tariff regime is of no real interest to me. You're under plenty of sanctions already so probably doesn't make much difference. Anyway, I guess it's something for you to crow about…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    The drop in first couple of hours of US market open today just there

    Is larger than Lehman Brothers event on Sep 15th 2008

    Buckle up and don’t forget to say thanks!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,955 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    whats sites would you recommend to watch market trends in real time?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,121 ✭✭✭greenfield21


    So how do all these countries find alternatives markets, hmm, if these tariffs stick( only the ones on China will probably be there in a few months), surely a huge wave of deflation is coming for Europe. People forget how different the US is to the rest of the world.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,928 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    I have watch lists and notifications in Trading 212, I think they get data from interactive brokers

    But Google finance, yahoo, Bloomberg, Reddit all have fairly up to date news and tickers

    Bloomberg have free podcasts on Spotify; Trumponomics, Odd Lots, Bloomberg Technology keep with wider trends



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,533 ✭✭✭Deub




Advertisement